Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

    Yeah P4, I was afraid that would happen to the Lobos. We're as good as anyone with Cam, Alex and Kendell, but have no other scorers. Close til the last five minutes then KU jumped into another gear. Cam Bairstow did show he belonged on the court though, think he might turn out to be a prospect and I never expected that before this summer.

    Comment


    • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

      Originally posted by jdw View Post
      Yeah P4, I was afraid that would happen to the Lobos. We're as good as anyone with Cam, Alex and Kendell, but have no other scorers. Close til the last five minutes then KU jumped into another gear. Cam Bairstow did show he belonged on the court though, think he might turn out to be a prospect and I never expected that before this summer.
      Kirk got man handled I didn't expect that at all. Cam vs Ellis was as expected great matchup. I just couldn't believe Kirk played so bad. Embiid took him out of the game. Was in foul trouble all game.

      Comment


      • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

        on that note, any takers for smart being the #1 overall pick in the draft?
        Why so SERIOUS

        Comment


        • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

          Originally posted by Really? View Post
          on that note, any takers for smart being the #1 overall pick in the draft?
          Not me I still like Exum more than Smart. It wouldn't be a bad pick though. Plus Smart is most likely going to be an impact player right away. I could change my mind between now and the draft though. The Magic reported wanted Smart at #2 and him him rated #1 by a wide marginlast year. I believe Ford says if they get the #1 pick they would probably take Smart. That FO loves him.

          Here is an article talking about Smart's chances of going #1. http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/nba-draft/post?id=490


          Marcus Smart was an afterthought for the 2014 NBA draft's No. 1 pick. When Oklahoma State's point guard-in-training opted to remain in Stillwater this past offseason, there was a gasp among the college basketball community and also the NBA fraternity.

          "Is he crazy?" one NBA general manager texted me moments after hearing the decision.

          "He just cost himself a ton of money," another one told me at the time.

          Smart would have earned in excess of $2.9 million this season if he had been selected in the top five picks this past June, but he has always bet on himself -- and it usually has worked in his favor.

          Smart sat and watched, waited his turn as the freshmen -- Andrew Wiggins, Jabari Parker and Julius Randle -- received all the hype early in the season. The Champions Classic featured all three, and none disappointed. The 2013-14 college hoops campaign would be all about The Frosh.

          [+] Enlarge
          AP Photo/Gerry Broome
          Duke's Jabari Parker and other heralded freshmen initially overshadowed the production of Marcus Smart.
          But exactly one week after the trio (along with Arizona's Aaron Gordon) had created a national firestorm and quickly become the face of college basketball, Smart made a statement.

          "Don’t forget about me."

          The 6-foot-4, 220-pound point guard scored a career-high 39 points against a ranked Memphis team that was supposed to boast the best backcourt in the nation. However, it was how he did it that had everyone in the NBA community talking about whether he had legitimately entered the equation for the No. 1 overall selection.

          "Why not?" asked one high-ranking NBA executive. "If someone needs a point guard, why wouldn’t you take him first?"

          Smart has been widely regarded as a non-shooter throughout his career. When I watched him in the summer, he'd attack the basket and get whatever he wanted in the lane, almost thriving by finishing through contact. He rarely shot the ball from deep, because he rarely needed to do so.

          Last season, though, Smart took plenty of deep jumpers (131 in total) -- and made only 29 percent of his attempts from beyond the arc.

          "If he could just shoot," one NBA GM told me prior to Smart's announcement that he would return for his sophomore year. "I just don’t know how good he’ll be in the league because he's not a great athlete, and he can't shoot it.”

          However, Smart is a worker -- and he's also cognizant of what people say about him. He took the constructive criticism, worked all summer on his perimeter shot and his floor game and has come back with confidence that he can make shots from deep.

          "My shot has definitely gotten better," Smart told me after an October practice in Stillwater. "That’s one of the main reasons I came back, along with working on becoming a better point guard."

          And leaving college on a higher note than an early NCAA tournament exit.

          Smart is a winner. The NBA guys love his intangibles. Billy Donovan and Shaka Smart -- who have coached him in international competition the past couple of summers -- rave about Smart. Heck, everyone does. He's a rare breed in this day and age, someone who leads with both his words and his actions. He goes hard all the time, whether it's diving on the floor in practice or playing both ends of the court each and every game.

          "He's the only guy in this draft that can dominate the game on both ends of the floor," said one NBA scout who was in attendance for Smart's elite performance against Memphis.

          Smart made 5 of 10 shots from beyond the arc against Josh Pastner's Tigers. He didn’t just make them, but it was how he took them that was different from in the past. There was no hesitation. The same confidence he displays with the rest of his game was apparent when he pulled up from long distance.

          However, NBA types want to see more. Could the performance against Memphis be a fluke? Will he be a subpar shooter for the remainder of the season?

          Smart played South Florida on Monday night and made just 1-of-5 shots from long range. He's shooting 36 percent from deep this season, but is just 6-of-21 in the four games besides the win over Memphis.

          "If he shoots the ball like that and is making 3s, he becomes a guy that has to be in the equation for the No. 1 pick," Pastner told me.

          "He firmly established himself in the equation," an NBA scout added.

          Ironically, Smart has an outside shot to go No. 1.

          Without a consistent perimeter shot, Smart is likely an average NBA point guard. He's powerful and can finish at and around the rim, but he's not ultra-explosive and doesn't possess terrific speed such as a Russell Westbrook or a healthy Derrick Rose.

          The best guess here is that Smart makes a significant improvement in his perimeter shot because of his work ethic. His shot isn't broken. He's not Rajon Rondo from deep. He just needs reps and confidence.

          "He’s special," said South Florida assistant Mike Wells, who spent nearly two decades working in the NBA. "Loved his poise and the way he talks to his teammates. I think he’s kind of like Dwyane Wade. He needs to work on his explosiveness off the bounce, get more separation from the defense, and also work on running pick-and-rolls on the sideline. He's strong in the air with the ball like all good pros that can score. He has great strength and his shot looks good.”

          "He’s special," Bulls head coach Stan Heath added. "He’s a great leader, is relentless and is a winner."

          Right now, Smart isn't just the best player in college basketball. He's also showing NBA folks exactly why he returned to college for another season.

          "I wanted to get better," he told me a few months back. "I don’t think I was ready for the NBA last summer."
          I don't really agree that his shot is that better. He is really just taking better shots this year. His outside shot selection was awful last year. It is better just not as drastic as this article makes it out to be. I liked his mechanics last year.

          I can't believe I sat through that whole game. That was so ugly Pitt vs Cincy. I really like Justin Jackson I watched him practice a few weeks back and he is crazy intense all the time. He played fantastic tonight. Love that motor.
          Last edited by pacer4ever; 12-17-2013, 10:24 PM.

          Comment


          • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

            Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
            Not me I still like Exum more than Smart. It wouldn't be a bad pick though. Plus Smart is most likely going to be an impact player right away. I could change my mind between now and the draft though. The Magic reported wanted Smart at #2 and him him rated #1 by a wide marginlast year. I believe Ford says if they get the #1 pick they would probably take Smart. That FO loves him.

            Here is an article talking about Smart's chances of going #1. http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/nba-draft/post?id=490




            I don't really agree that his shot is that better. He is really just taking better shots this year. His outside shot selection was awful last year. It is better just not as drastic as this article makes it out to be. I liked his mechanics last year.

            I can't believe I sat through that whole game. That was so ugly Pitt vs Cincy. I really like Justin Jackson I watched him practice a few weeks back and he is crazy intense all the time. He played fantastic tonight. Love that motor.
            Yeah, I thought that was the one thing missing for me last year, I think if he can consistently hit open 3's not even contested one e has a good shot at going #1, on the offensive end he kind of reminds me of the middle between Tyreke Evans and Deron Williams, but I love his defense and tenacity as well. It will be interesting to see how the rest of his season goes. I really have not saw much of Exum, but have heard good things about him. But going back to Smart I think seeing how he has developed during one offseason in college is really inspiring, makes me wonder where he can still go, granted he may be limited in some situations due to physical gifts, but he also has certain physical gifts that not all NB PGs have.

            I think this years class can be special, atleast those with 1st round potential.
            Why so SERIOUS

            Comment


            • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

              Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
              Going back through tape of this weekend right now. **** Joel Embiid made my prediction of Nex Mexico winning look silly. He man handled the front line of New Mexico. The foot work he displayed on Saturday is better than any big in the NBA(of his size) it was David West esq. He even did a Dream Shake that left me rewinding the game at least five times. So Crazy that guy has only been playing for 3 years.


              Also I may have short changed my projection for Marcus Smart last year. I projected he would be a a all star a time or two. The way he has vastly improved in just one year is really good. Add in his intangibles the kid is going to be a great one for a long time at the next level.
              Embiid is one of my favorite players to watch. I came for Andrew Wiggins, but I stayed for Embiid.

              Comment


              • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

                Crazy hoe much better Kyle Anderson is this year. He is so much better skill wise. His lack of athleticism is still worrisome, but I now believe he is at least a nba player. I didn't see it last year. Levine is just so smooth reminds me a lot of Terrence Ross in college.

                Comment


                • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

                  What a 1st half so far fast paced game. So much talebt on both sides. I love Hood for the NBA dont know how high he gets drafted, but he should be a good starter at the next level. Duke has a special combo in Hood and Parker.


                  Duke needs to attack the zone. They are to good to take all those 3s. Great job by Alford changing to zone.

                  Comment


                  • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

                    TJ Warren was one of my favorite freshmen last year. He now has very little help, but produces I love his game, so smart and savvy. He reminds me so much of Tobias Harris not a great athlete but a good player. I love guys who are super versatile. He can score from anywhere on the floor.

                    Comment


                    • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

                      Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
                      Crazy hoe much better Kyle Anderson is this year. He is so much better skill wise. His lack of athleticism is still worrisome, but I now believe he is at least a nba player. I didn't see it last year. Levine is just so smooth reminds me a lot of Terrence Ross in college.
                      Yeah, I wanted to see that game, the times I saw Kyle Anderson in HS I thought he had NBA potential, his game is slow, but it seems to work for him. How much PT did he get at the point during that game, I really like him there over any other position.
                      Why so SERIOUS

                      Comment


                      • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

                        Originally posted by Really? View Post
                        Yeah, I wanted to see that game, the times I saw Kyle Anderson in HS I thought he had NBA potential, his game is slow, but it seems to work for him. How much PT did he get at the point during that game, I really like him there over any other position.
                        I have watched UCLA at least 5 times this year and he plays like that every game now. I hated him last year really is crazy how much different he looks. He loves going weak hand and now can finish, and shoot. His size at the position is scary. I am so happy he listen to the right people and came back to school.


                        Side note I watched Okafor and Turner play in the past week. Okafor is my favorite High School C prospect I have ever watched. He is the most skilled C I have ever seen in HS. With that said Turner is a better NBA prospect right now. How he can move and his skill level is pretty crazy. In the game I watched he had 15 blocks. He is one of the quickest leapers I have watched. He is the new breed of C. The only thing is his body needs work. I am not concerned his frame is great and looks like he can put on the weight needed. He isnt the man child that Drummond was in HS, but he moves better than Drummond and is much more skilled.


                        I went to the Tech game last night. JaQuan Lyle is so lazy I swear so skilled and love his frame, but he scares me. I came away really impressed with 2015 prospect Montaque Gill-Caesar. Love his mechanics on his jumper. He is #24 on yahoo. I didn't know him going into the game, but doing research all the top midwest schools are after him. He would be a top target for me. I love his shot.


                        Going to watch Tech vs Marion Monday should be a great game. Blackmon Jr. is a man on a mission this year.

                        Comment


                        • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

                          Originally posted by PacersHomer View Post
                          Embiid is one of my favorite players to watch. I came for Andrew Wiggins, but I stayed for Embiid.
                          Wiggins is becoming underrated. He is the best defender I have watched(prospect wise that is saying a lot I love Gordon's defense at Zona)His skill level is just average, but he does some things that are insanley hard to do.


                          I was listening to a broadcast of a Kansas game, and the broadcaster said he reminded him of Paul George at Fresno. I agree with that in a big way. Wiggins situation is different he plays with a ton of talent. But in terms of flashing tremendous skill, but only currently playing with average skill I agree. He would be a top 5 defender in the NBA right now I believe I love how he plays defense. (He may not be that high simply due to his size he need to add strength)

                          He showed me a lot in the past few games(the Colorado game he impressed me). He keeps getting better which is expected, but he is playing with more heart and more intensity on offense lately.

                          Comment


                          • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

                            Umass got screwed today. One of the worst calls I have ever seen in college basketball I would protest the game if I was Umass.

                            Jordan Clarkson is a pretty interesting prospect at Mizz he is owning the Illini early.

                            Comment


                            • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

                              Marcus Smart is one of the lowest Bball IQ high IQ basketball players I have watched.

                              He plays so well most of the time, but the shot selection and silly fouls need to become a thing of the past and fast. Commits so many bad fouls.

                              Comment


                              • Re: 2013-2014 NBA Draft Prospects thread

                                Markell Brown has long been one of my favorite wings. I am glad he is undersized he may slip all the way to us in the 2nd rd. I think he will be a really good combo guard in the NBA he scores in so many ways I love his old school game(he is a great athlete as well terrific first step)



                                also I still don't like Lebryan Nash, but at least he is learning he needs to play like a PF. Slowly understand what he needs to be.



                                So many great big pgs this year in college ball. Pretty crazy how many talented pgs there are over 6'3.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X