Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

    Originally posted by CableKC View Post
    About that Green to Nets for Reggie Evans.....it makes ZERO sense....I'm calling total BS on that.

    It's been said that the Nets are way over the LT.......and that every $$$ costs them way more than it should. Green earns more than Reggie Evans....so the cost to add Gerald would be way more than it should be.

    Reggie fits exactly what the Nets need in a frontcourt Player....a guy that literally does all the dirty work that will allow Brook and KG to just focus on the offensive end instead of having to grab rebounds.
    It's not going to be straight up. If it were to happen, it would be something like Evans to Indiana and Green to Boston.

    Right now no trade checker will work on the official Celtics-Nets trade because the Nets are planning to sign and trade Bogans to the Celts for the remaining money to make the deal financially work.

    Boston probably doesn't like the idea of Bogans getting 5 mil+ a year and wanted to incorporate a third team to involve an extra player so Bogans contract could be cut in half. This Gerald Green trade makes sense financially. Whether or not Boston would even want Green is another issue.
    Last edited by Pacersalltheway10; 07-03-2013, 03:45 AM.

    Comment


    • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

      http://nba.si.com/2013/07/02/tony-al...nt-four-years/

      The Grizzlies have agreed to re-sign unrestricted free agent guard Tony Allen to a multi-year contract, according to multiple reports.

      Yahoo! Sports and USA Today Sports reported that Allen has agreed to terms on a four-year, $20 million deal.
      Oldness comes with a smile
      To every love given child
      Oldness comes to rile
      The youth who dream suicide


      Comment


      • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

        We could play Copeland on offense and Evans on defense . . . if we had 50 timeouts a game.
        "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

        Comment


        • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

          I like Reggie Evans. Advocated for him a few years back. He satisfies my "a pain in the arse to play against, so he must be effective" benchmark. He can't be in at the end of a game in crunch time because he'll make a bonehead play and IIRC he is horrific from the FT line. You don't ever ever need him to be in at the end of a game in Indiana.

          Reggie Evans is one of the very few guys in the league that tries to go toe to toe with DWest in a physical battle. Dude's not afraid of anyone.

          Comment


          • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

            Chris_Broussard Chris Broussard
            Source: nets out of the running for Kyle Korver


            Chris_Broussard Chris Broussard
            Nets don't have enough $ to offer him. Big liss

            Comment


            • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

              Originally posted by sopgy View Post
              Chris_Broussard Chris Broussard
              Source: nets out of the running for Kyle Korver


              Chris_Broussard Chris Broussard
              Nets don't have enough $ to offer him. Big liss
              "In the bag" doesn't mean what it used to, huh?

              Comment


              • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

                @GeryWoelfel: Just how highly did the Bulls regard Mike Dunleavy? I was told he was their No. 1 free agent target.



                Hahahahahahaha
                @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                Comment


                • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

                  Originally posted by Speed View Post
                  I like Reggie Evans. Advocated for him a few years back. He satisfies my "a pain in the arse to play against, so he must be effective" benchmark. He can't be in at the end of a game in crunch time because he'll make a bonehead play and IIRC he is horrific from the FT line. You don't ever ever need him to be in at the end of a game in Indiana.

                  Reggie Evans is one of the very few guys in the league that tries to go toe to toe with DWest in a physical battle. Dude's not afraid of anyone.

                  Yeah, I don't think he'll be easy to get since he's signed to a very cheap contract for his production, but I love his relentless rebounding. Among players who played at least 30 games and 15MPG last season, he was by far the best rebounder. He had a DRR of 38.1%(!) and ORR of 15.4% -- 26.7% TRR. Next best was Asik at 22%. He's easily worth 3x what his current contract is paying him, IMO.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

                    So I assume Evans would be our backup PF and Copeland backup SF? Then Ian, Lance, and Watson. Pretty sweet. Evans is way better around the basket with put backs and stuff than Tyler.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

                      Originally posted by Grimp View Post
                      So I assume Evans would be our backup PF and Copeland backup SF? Then Ian, Lance, and Watson. Pretty sweet. Evans is way better around the basket with put backs and stuff than Tyler.
                      Then a third string group of Plumlee, Hill, OJ, and Flynn/Sloan/Baby Hans, whoever wins Summer League.

                      This absolutely works for me. Sign me up

                      Comment


                      • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

                        Originally posted by Grimp View Post
                        Evans is way better around the basket with put backs and stuff than Tyler.
                        http://www.basketball-reference.com/...shooting/2013/

                        http://www.basketball-reference.com/...shooting/2013/

                        Tyler Hansbrough shot 57.1% at the rim during the 12-13 season.

                        Reggie Evans shot 54.3% at the rim during the 12-13 season.

                        So, Tyler was better at it last season.

                        Want to look further back? Ok. Reggie Evans only played 56 games for the Clippers last season and he only attempted 76 shots in the 11-12 season so let's not count it due to the small sample size. He seldomly played with Toronto in 2009 through 2011 as he only appeared in 58 games throughout those 2 seasons.

                        So, his last real season was back when he was with Philly in 2007-2008 and 2008-2009.

                        Let's see what he did back then:

                        2008-2009: 42.9% at the rim -> http://www.basketball-reference.com/...shooting/2009/

                        2007-2008: 49.6% at the rim -> http://www.basketball-reference.com/...shooting/2008/

                        For a comparison, Tyler only shot once in this range. That happened during his rookie season when he shot 49.6% at the rim. He has shot above 56% from that area in every other season that he has played.

                        So, we can safely come to this conclusion. Reggie Evans is NOT a better finisher in the league than Tyler Hansbrough. Not that Tyler is great at it or anything. It's just that Reggie Evans is a really atrocious finisher. He is one of the worst in the league in this aspect. Lou Amundson is a way better finisher than him (Lou has never shot below 50% at the rim).
                        Originally posted by IrishPacer
                        Empty vessels make the most noise.

                        Comment


                        • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

                          Originally posted by Peck View Post
                          Man I wish I never would have opened this thread up tonight. Now all I'll do for the next few days is obsess over some way to trade Green for Evans. Hell Green for anyone really, but the thought of Evans as your backup 4 makes me happy. I can't see the Nets doing this though as they are extremely short in the big men department.
                          They just drafted Mason Plumlee, traded for Garnett, have Lopez and Blatche.

                          Comment


                          • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

                            Originally posted by imawhat View Post
                            KG, Lopez, Blatche, Humphries, Plumlee. They'll get by. They're supposedly looking for a 3rd PG, but I do think they'd pick someone to replace Brooks before getting a 3rd PG. Who knows, maybe they'd try Green again.
                            Didn't Humpries go in the Boston deal?

                            Comment


                            • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013

                              Originally posted by Larry Staverman View Post
                              If Bird pulls this off he is executive of the year
                              This trade would be amazing. Evans is a pain in the ***, great rebounder, and good post defender because he's so damn strong you cannot bully him around. His demeanor and the way he plays is just like David West and would really make us a pain in the *** to play against. The more Solomon Hill, David West, Reggie Evan's type of players we bring in, the better.
                              Dear P_George,
                              You have received an infraction at Pacers Digest.

                              Reason: Unacceptable Comment and/or Content

                              Comment


                              • Re: Off Season News, Rumors, and Trades, etc. 2013



                                now THAT is a guy with legit sources

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X