So... if I didn't see something happen, then it did not exist. Plus vast areas of scientific inquiry, such as paleontology, archaeology, geochemistry, geophysics, etc. all either do not exist, or better yet, there is some vast conspiracy among all scientists to collaborate and get to get their data to fit together nicely to fit with their strong anti-new-Earth agenda. Really? It's hard to get 3 ultra-competitive leading scientists working in the same field to agree on a place to go for dinner and to cordially last the night.No scientist was there to see the dinosaurs live through this supposed dinosaur age. In fact, there is no proof whatsoever that the world and its fossil layers are millions of years old. No scientist observed dinosaurs die. Scientists only find the bones in the here and now, and because many of them are evolutionists, they try to fit the story of the dinosaurs into their view.
There are many modern methods of dating animal, plant, and geological artifacts that have been refined over the decades or discovered anew in recent years. Sure, one method might suggest a fossil is 65.2 million years old and other may say it's 66.8 million years old. That difference of 1.6 million years seems enormous and invalidating to someone who insists (no matter what) that NOTHING is over 0.006 million years old, but the best methods seem to be converging over time.
We can date things thousands of years old, tens of thousands of years old, hundreds of thousands of years old, millions of years old, tens of millions of years old, hundreds of millions of years old, and billions of years old. Dates for the moon rocks, for example, led scientists to the unexpected conclusion that the moon was likely shed off the pre-formed Earth by an impact, early in its history, since some surface rocks on both the Earth and the moon are amazingly similar in age and composition.
Every sentence in that linked article that mentions, even indirectly, any principle of science is riddled with egregious logical and factual errors.
Of course the author is entitled to believe every word of it, as are you. But the author is claiming scientific support when his arguments do not have any. They fail kindergarten science, actually.