Jo Ann Gora, President of Ball State University (BSU) in Indiana, has weighed in on the subject of intelligent design
, declaring that science faculty can't say that intelligent design is science in science classes. Incredibly, Gora insists that her university's "commitment to academic freedom is unflinching," even while she imposes a gag order on science faculty who think there is evidence of intelligent design in nature.
Memo to President Gora: Academic freedom was designed to protect dissenting and unpopular views among faculty. That's the whole point. Redefining it as the "freedom" to teach only the majority view isn't academic freedom; it's a power play right out of the pages of George Orwell's 1984
. Gora's statement makes a mockery of true academic freedom. It also exposes Gora as a complete hypocrite on the subject. Nearly a decade ago, she and her university went to the mat defending the academic freedom of a left-wing peace studies professor with controversial views
. Now it turns out that their commitment to academic freedom is a sham: Academic freedom at Ball State apparently only means the right to teach views the university administration agrees with.
Of course, the context for Gora's remarks is the continuing controversy over BSU physicist Eric Hedin
, under attack by the extremist Freedom from Religion Foundation because he may have covered the issue of intelligent design as part of his "Boundaries of Science" seminar. Although Gora doesn't mention Hedin, the university issued a companion statement that said:
Provost Terry King and Professor Hedin have both reviewed the panel's findings and are working together to ensure that course content is aligned with the curriculum and best standards of the discipline. The university is particularly appreciative for Dr. Hedin's active participation and cooperation during this process. His academic credentials are an asset to the university. He remains an important and valued member of our physics and astronomy department.
The statement about Hedin is notable for how little it actually says. And President Gora's statement, far from clarifying matters, adds more confusion:
1. Hedin's honors seminar is supposed to be interdisciplinary. The course description for the seminar published by the university clearly states that it doesn't just deal with science; it also has to deal with important human questions raised by science. This course description applies to all the different faculty who teach the course. So Hedin's honors seminar isn't simply a science course. Does that mean Hedin can talk about intelligent design in the class according to Gora?
2. President Gora forbids teaching that intelligent design is a scientific theory in science courses. But teaching about the controversy over intelligent design is not the same thing as teaching ID as a scientific theory. So can professors still teach students about the majority and minority views about intelligent design in the scientific community?
3. If Gora really believes that intelligent design is religion and that it is inappropriate to present in science classes, does her gag order apply equally to scientists on her campus who are opposed to intelligent design? For example, does her new speech code forbid scientists from attacking ID in science classes? After all, in her view, that would be tantamount to attacking religion, and therefore would be unconstitutional according to her legal analysis.
If anyone thinks that Gora's statement is the end of the Hedin matter, they are mistaken. This is just the beginning. BSU is a state university, and its blatant double standard on academic freedom raises fundamental questions that will need to be answered.