Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

4/21/2013 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Hawks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 4/21/2013 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Hawks


    PLUCK THE HAWKS


    -VS-



    Game Time Start: 1:00 PM ET
    Where: The Fieldhouse, Indianapolis, IN
    Officials: D. Stafford, D. Jones, R. Mott, P. Fraher

    Television:
    Radio: WFNI 1070 AM / WCNN 680 AM, 93.7 FM
    Media Notes: Indiana Notes, Atlanta Notes
    NBA Feeds:

    REMINDER: Per PD policy, please do not share a link to, describe how to search for, request a link to, or request a PM about streaming video of a NBA game that is not coming directly through the NBA. Not even in a "wink-wink, nudge-nudge, know-what-I-mean" round-about sort of way. Thank you


    0
    49-32
    Home: 30-11
    0
    44-37
    Away: 19-21
    Apr 24
    Apr 27
    Apr 29
    May 01
    7:30pm
    7:00pm
    TBD
    TBD
    HIBBERT
    WEST
    GEORGE
    STEPHENSON
    HILL
    HORFORD
    SMITH
    KORVER
    HARRIS
    TEAGUE


    PACERS
    Danny Granger - left knee surgery (out)



    HAWKS
    Zaza Pachulia - sore right Achilles (out)
    Lou Williams - torn ACL, right knee (out)




    Avi Friedman: Pacers Player Playoff Preview (Say that ten times fast)

    Here we are again. The postseason. Thus, this*Pacers Player Playoff Preview. (Say
    that ten times fast.)

    Indiana is in the playoffs for the third year in a row. The team hasn’t played that well
    of late losing five of six games after a nice, Western Conference road trip during which
    they won all four games. But looking forward to the playoffs, the Pacers can regain
    some*momentum and confidence*with a good series against the Hawks.

    By now, all of the players’ roles have been determined.

    Let’s look at what to expect from each on both sides of the floor.

    Paul George

    Offense

    Paul George has really emerged offensively this year. He’s averaging 5 more
    points than he did last year, and*the main two ways he scores are off threes and
    driving to the basket for layups/dunks off of a pick. Sometimes he’ll also stop at mid
    range for the pull up and if he’s being guarded by a significantly smaller defender he
    can shoot turnaround jump shots off post ups.

    The main surprise has been his three-point shooting. He has almost one more per
    game than last year and has made the tenth most in the league. He’s kinda struggled,
    though since the all star break, hitting only 32.2% of his 3′s as opposed to 38.6% pre-
    all star break.

    Defense
    
It’s amazing how Paul George’s improvement on defense is what people are
    raving about when you think about how he’s averaging 5 more points a game.
    Nonetheless, the hype on his defense is justified as he is one of the candidates for
    defensive player of the year. He has consistently guarded the opponents’ top
    offensive wing player and has almost always done an effective job. He is also a
    major pest at playing the passing lanes finishing with the 6th most steals in the
    NBA.

    The *part about his defense that amazes me the most is how effective he’s able to
    be even when he’s not playing great offensively. Also, he did a great job on LeBron
    this season which could be key if the two teams are to meet in the playoffs.


    David West

    Offense
    David West has been a nice surprise offensively this season along with Paul George,
    averaging 4.3 more points per game. He’s very efficient, shooting almost 50% and
    out of all the Pacers he’s the one guy that I’d feel most confident with when you just
    need one basket.

    He’s the human bulldozer...CONTINUE READING AT 8p9s

    Robby Kalland: Hawks face off with the Pacers in the first round

    The Hawks find themselves the sixth seed in the Eastern Conference which means a
    trip to Indiana to face the Pacers in the first round. We breakdown the match-ups and
    what to expect in this first-round series.


    The Hawks will travel to Indiana on Sunday to take on the Pacers at 1 PM (TNT) to begin
    their first-round series. Atlanta has played Indiana four times this season to an even 2-2
    split, with each team winning both home games. The Hawks will have to break that
    trend and get a road victory if they are to move on to the second round. The good news,
    beating the Pacers at home is not an impossible task. The Pacers were 30-11 at home
    this year, but have lost three of their last four home games. Indiana possesses about as
    much of a home-court advantage as the Hawks do (IND: 25th in attendance, ATL: 26th)
    which is why this is the 1 PM game on Sunday, and will be "featured" on NBATV on
    Wednesday night (7:30 PM). Here, we will breakdown the key match-ups that will be the
    deciding factors in this series.

    (Note: For a full breakdown of the Hawks' offense read my post on HoopChalk
    detailing the Hawks favorite offensive plays with lots of video/diagrams
    .)

    The Pacers calling card is their defense. Indiana ranked first in the NBA with a defensive
    rating of 99.8 and second in points per game allowed at 90.7. They struggle however on
    offense, ranking 20th in the NBA with an offensive rating of 104.3 and 23rd with 94.7
    points per game. The key for the Hawks will be to speed up the Pacers by creating
    turnovers to get out on the fast-break and get easy baskets. The turnover battle will be
    key (I know it's a cliche, but it's true). The Pacers are 19-19 when turning the ball over
    15 or more times and Atlanta is 27-13 when forcing 15 or more turnovers.

    As for the key match-ups...CONTINUE READING AT PEACHTREE HOOPS

    2012-2013 Playoff Previews: Indiana Pacers vs. Atlanta Hawks

    After a long regular season full of snaps and strains, travails and terrors and 715,973
    canned arena demands that “ev-ry-bo-dy clap yo hands,” the NBA’s postseason is set to
    tip off this weekend. With that in place, the minds behind Ball Don’t Lie are going to
    preview each first-round series, with Kelly Dwyer going against character for a more
    genial take, Dan Devine bringing his inimitable mixture of both order and bedlam, along
    with Eric Freeman’s legendary look inside the reputations of some of the series’ key
    fixtures.

    Kelly Dwyer’s Guide Vocal

    In a way, it’s probably best that the Atlanta Hawks as you’ve long known them (or, at
    least, long tolerated them) go out like this. In a first-round pairing with Indiana, with
    most games probably due for NBA TV airings, anonymous as all get out. We’re not going
    to pretend to know what’s going on in Danny Ferry’s head as he approaches an offseason
    that will lead to the expiration of coach Larry Drew and forward Josh Smith’s contracts,
    but based on Ferry’s fine work from last summer, it’s likely that the new’ish Atlanta GM
    is looking to clean house this July.

    And you can’t clean house if emotional attachments are left dangling. Not that the city
    of Atlanta has ever had an overwhelming attachment to this successful, if
    underwhelming team.

    The way toward this clean sweep is to duck out as silently as possible, and the Pacers
    (a positive mix of set-crushing defense and old-fashioned Midwestern anonymity) provide
    the perfect opponent. It’s true that the teams split their season series, and that Indiana is
    limping into the postseason after losing five of six games (on the heels of an impressive
    Western Conference jaunt), but rotations and whistles tend to tighten in the postseason.
    And even some of Atlanta’s more enviable quirks — like, say the forward/center screen-
    and-roll movement between Smith and adaptable big man Al Horford — could be
    swallowed up by Roy Hibbert’s long arms and David West’s ability to glare the referees
    into submission.

    Are we crediting the Pacer defense too much? Perhaps, but this is on the heels of a season
    where the Pacer defense hasn’t been credited nearly enough. The Pacers aren’t lousy with
    Hall of Fame talent on that side of the ball, but they did turn in a defensive season unseen
    since the heyday of...CONTINUE READING AT BALL DON'T LIE

    ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED: The Pacers-Hawks Playoff Preview

    From October through April, thirty teams scratched and clawed their way for this
    opportunity. Who will make it out? Who will be disappointed? Who will shock and
    surprise? Who will hit an insane buzzer beater that will make us all collectively gasp so
    loudly that we will be able hear each other from six counties away? WHO? TELL ME,
    WHO? Welcome to the Hardwood Paroxysm 2012-2013 Playoff Previews.


    Virtual Systems Analysis
    by Brian Schroeder


    What is Pacers/Hawks? On the surface, it is the most banal of the first round matchups
    in this most banal conference. As of now, it’s one of three series scheduled to have at
    least one game air on NBATV, an honor which it will certainly achieve again if it goes
    beyond four games. It’s not without interesting matchups, but those matchups are so
    much more predictable than even Nets/Bulls, that pointing out their novelty serves only
    to note how boring and nondescript the rest of the series is, like some sort of tautological
    imperative. It’s a point of interest merely because we want to find something interesting.

    That being said, this is perhaps the only series devoid of any driving narrative, which I’m
    sure contributes to public. In a way, this might speak to our dependence upon narrative
    in sport, despite our complaints. Look at Thunder/Rockets. I know I’m very excited to
    watch it, even though it will almost certainly be a short series without much drama. The
    pull of Harden versus his old teammates is simply too powerful not to enjoy. Pacers/
    Hawks has no such drama, which leaves it to stand only on the merits of its basketball.
    Given the fact that neither team is particularly aesthetically pleasing certainly doesn’t
    help. Given that I just devoted nearly this entire section to this series as a philosophical
    representation of our collective addiction to narrative and not a best of seven basketball
    series, perhaps the fault lies with me, or with us.

    At the same time, the Pacers thoroughly...CONTINUE READING AT HARDWOOD PAROXYSM

    Rob Mahoney: NBA playoff primer - Indiana Pacers vs. Atlanta Hawks

    It seemed as though the Hawks fell into this slot by design, presumably angling to avoid
    either the Nets or the Bulls in a 4-5 matchup. If that’s the case, the Hawks have made a
    strange miscalculation; there is virtually no reason for optimism in their upcoming series
    against the Pacers, with the only true variable involved being how long they last.

    Indiana is a tough matchup for plenty of opponents, and it managed to keep every one
    of Atlanta’s most important offensive players under wraps during the season series,
    which the teams split. Beyond that, two of the players most central to Atlanta’s in-season
    strategy against Indiana are now gone; scoring guard Lou Williams is out for the season
    with a knee injury, while physical big man Zaza Pachulia is still on the mend following an
    April operation on his right Achilles tendon. Really tough breaks for the Hawks, as a
    perimeter player capable of generating offense and a big man who can defend opposing
    centers would have been pretty useful against an opponent this suffocating defensively
    and this big on the interior.

    As it stands, Al Horford will be giving up some size to Roy Hibbert, while Josh Smith
    surrenders an advantage to David West — two factors that matter a great deal for a
    Pacers team that posts up so frequently. West, in particular, has fared well against the
    Hawks this season, as he scored 21.4 points per game (in just 34.3 minutes) on 53.2
    percent shooting over Horford, Smith, Ivan Johnson and any alternate big Hawks head
    coach Larry Drew could scrounge up. It also doesn’t help matters for Atlanta that
    Hibbert looks to be fully healthy again (he dropped 17 and 13 in his most recent game
    against the Hawks) and capable of exploiting his advantage on the block in spite of
    Horford’s outstanding defensive fundamentals.

    Indiana is so adept...CONTINUE READING AT THE POINT FORWARD




    Pacers
    Mike Wells @MikeWellsNBA
    Jared Wade @8pts9secs
    Tim Donahue @TimDonahue8p9s
    Tom Lewis @indycornrows


    Hawks
    Chris Vivlamore @ajchawks
    Co Co @cocoqt81
    Jason Walker @JasonWalkerSBN
    Kris Willis @Kris_Willis
    This is the darkest timeline.

  • #2
    Re: 4/21/2013 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Hawks

    .
    I know "Sleeze" is spelled incorrectly. I spell it this way because it's based on a name.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: 4/21/2013 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Hawks

      Originally posted by The Sleeze View Post
      .

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: 4/21/2013 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Hawks

        Waiting for this moment the whole season. First game (@home) in the playoffs. Damn, in 2 hours we are playing!
        Proud owner of 'Dutch Pacers'

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: 4/21/2013 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Hawks

          Can't wait for the game to start, made an account specifically so I could chat with some Pacers fans (none around me) during the games. Here's to a successful post season, past couple of years we keep steadily improving. Let's keep that going into the NBA Finals.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: 4/21/2013 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Hawks

            Yea man, I'm so excited!

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: 4/21/2013 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Hawks

              @1070Bruno: Hawks Coach Larry Drew confirms his starting lineup: Teague, Harris, Korver, Smith, Horford. Sets up small & quick vs. big & strong.


              Pacers should be able to take advantage of this lineup.
              @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: 4/21/2013 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Hawks

                The Smith vs. West matchup should be the most interesting. Otherwise, none of the other matchups really bother me pending Hill isn't too dinged up.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: 4/21/2013 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Hawks

                  C'mon Paul. You have Korver on you. You better eat this mismatch up like crazy...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by rel View Post
                    C'mon Paul. You have Korver on you. You better eat this mismatch up like crazy...
                    I am shocked they would put Korver on Paul. And lance being guarded by Harris???? There is two matchups we should be able to take advantage of.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: 4/21/2013 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Hawks

                      Maybe they're tanking to get swept?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: 4/21/2013 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Hawks

                        Originally posted by rel View Post
                        C'mon Paul. You have Korver on you. You better eat this mismatch up like crazy...
                        Hopefully he quits settling for jumpers like he has in the past two weeks.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Alright guys, the journey begins!

                          Let's go Pacers!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: 4/21/2013 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Hawks

                            This is it everybody! Us against the world!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: 4/21/2013 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Hawks

                              Horford will have a field day with midrange J's. Hopefully we can contain everybody else.

                              Hope Bankers Life is pretty full.
                              //

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X