Danny has not been an star in a least two years, yes his numbers have been up there but "true stars" do other things on the court other than score.
Stars to me are players that bring other things other than scoring to the table, I can tell you that if Danny in his prime was as good as Paul George right now nobody would have been complaining about him.You don't have to define star but just give me some examples of who fits the star category for you. Also let me make sure to be clear here, I'm talking about the healthy Danny Granger. Obviously he is not a star caliber player at the moment.
But go back a year or two, was he a star then? But really I'm more interested in seeing who you have as a star player.
It is hard for me to put Danny on the star category when he obviously only cared about scoring and took defensive plays off for many years, I mean one thing is try and not been able to do it but another thing is just not trying just because you don't want to.