Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

2004-02-17

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2004-02-17

    Are Hawks suffering from buyer's remorse?
    By Chad Ford
    NBA Insider
    Send an Email to Chad Ford Tuesday, February 17
    Updated: February 17
    10:30 AM ET

    Less than a week after the Hawks traded Shareef Abdur-Rahim and Theo Ratliff to
    Portland for Rasheed Wallace, the verdict from NBA GMs on the trade is
    overwhelmingly in. . . the Hawks didn't get enough.

    Will they, in the course of the next three days, reverse course and try to get
    more for 'Sheed?

    "Cap room is great as long as you have a concrete plan how to use it," one GM
    told Insider in L.A. "They aren't getting Kobe. No way. And when you look at the
    rest of the board? There isn't another player available as good as Rahim.
    Atlanta could, like Utah last year, strike out this summer. That's not good."

    Everyone understands the Hawks' desire to blow things up. The team was going
    nowhere and new management wanted a fresh slate. But as the team positions
    itself to have nearly $20 million in cap space this summer, you have to wonder .
    . . are any free agents really willing to come to Atlanta?

    Several GMs were shocked that the Hawks didn't get at least some talent back in
    return -- perhaps a first-round pick or a young prospect. After trading Nazr
    Mohammed to the Knicks on Sunday, the team's core is now Jason Terry, Boris Diaw
    and second-round pick Travis Hansen.

    Considering that management would prefer to unload Terry this summer when his
    base-year compensation status expires, the Hawks sure don't look like a very
    desirable free-agent destination for either a marquee free agent or a top-flight
    coach.

    Young players like Kenyon Martin, Jamal Crawford, Quentin Richardson and
    Stromile Swift could probably be had for the right price on this summer's
    free-agent market. But given the Hawks' no-existant nucleus, will any of them
    make a real difference?

    That's led to growing speculation that the Hawks will now try to see, over the
    next few days, if they can get cap space and a prospect or two from another team
    interested in Rasheed.

    The problem with the speculation is that there are actually very few teams with
    that type of cap room or expiring contracts to make a deal. The Nuggets,
    Pistons, Kings, Spurs and Jazz are the only teams in a position to offer the
    Hawks similar cap room, plus picks or prospects in return. Complicating matters
    even further, with 'Sheed telling everyone who will listen that he's playing in
    New York next season -- barring some huge financial windfall elsewhere -- why
    would a team give up anything in order to get him?

    The Pistons and Spurs are the only teams with any motivations. With the Knicks,
    Nets and Pacers all looking strong in the East, you've got to believe that Larry
    Brown is pushing hard for an inside scoring presence in Detroit. The Pistons
    have the expiring contracts (Bob Sura, Zeljko Rebraca, Lindsey Hunter), an extra
    first-round pick (from Milwaukee) and young prospects to make a deal happen.

    And, they probably have a good enough team to convince 'Sheed to re-sign. The
    problem is that they don't have the resources to re-sign 'Sheed this summer.

    Dumars is intent on making Mehmet Okur part of the long-term future in Detroit.
    They need all of the cap room created from those expiring contracts to get far
    enough under the cap to re-sign Okur, who is a restricted free agent. While the
    Pistons could rent 'Sheed for the rest of the year and then say good bye . . .
    it seems like their first-rounder could get more value somewhere else.

    The Spurs are in a similar boat. They could package Ron Mercer, Robert Horry,
    Hedo Turkoglu and one contract with one more year left (like Bruce Bowen's) to
    make a deal make sense for the Hawks. But it would cost them Emanuel Ginobili in
    the end.

    Like the Pistons, the Spurs need the cap room from their expiring deals to
    re-sign Ginobili this summer. Even if they didn't, the Hawks would certainly
    insist on Ginobili being part of the package for Horry. While 'Sheed would be a
    great fit in San Antonio, the cost is too high for the Spurs.

    The other teams that are really interested in Sheed -- Dallas, New York and
    Houston -- just don't have the goods to get a deal done with the Hawks.

    The bottom line -- the Hawks took a big risk last week with little chance of
    reaping rewards in the open market. The best hope may be to use their space to
    broker a trade with a team desperate to get under the cap in July. Several teams
    like the Grizzlies and Suns will be in hot pursuit of Kobe Bryant this summer
    and may be willing to trade away significant assets if they get an agreement
    from Kobe's people that he's willing to play there.

    The Hawks would be in a position to reap the benefit in such a situation. But
    short of that? Iraq may be rebuilt before the Hawks are.

    Around the League

    With Vin Baker now kicked to the curb, Celtics GM Danny Ainge has turned his
    attention to the Celtics' glaring hole at the four. Using Chris Mills and Chris
    Mihm as bait, sources told Insider on Monday that Ainge has made numerous offers
    to teams and is waiting for someone to come back and say yes.

    At the top of the Celtics list? The Magic's Juwan Howard. Howard's reasonable
    (albeit long) salary, selflessness and hunger to play on a good team all appeal
    to Ainge. Howard got great reviews in Denver last season and the Celtics believe
    he can help. To make the deal work, the team would likely also have to swallow
    the salary of Pat Garrity, who's out the rest of the year with an injury and
    either Steven Hunter or Gordan Giricek (who the Magic seem to want to keep) in
    return.

    That's not the only team the Celtics are talking to. The Pistons (Corliss
    Williamson) and the Blazers (Dale Davis) are also potential partners. Ainge's
    willingness to take on guaranteed salaries make him an unusual player at the
    trade deadline. The Celtics are confident they'll win in arbitration on the
    Baker situation, putting their cap number at a more reasonable number. It won't
    be enough to make a huge splash in free agency, which is why Ainge is determined
    to move Mills and Mihm now before they slip away for nothing.

    What does the wholesale dumping of talent get the Magic? Wiggle room. The team
    would have only $37 million in guaranteed salaries next season, but with a high
    lottery pick and several cap holds, there won't be much cap room left to work
    with unless it also finds a way to move Andrew DeClercq and Reece Gaines off the
    roster by July 15th.

    This really speaks to the problem the Magic are facing. Even with just three
    guaranteed contracts -- Tracy McGrady, Grant Hill and Drew Gooden -- the high
    lottery pick and the cap holds the Magic are still nearly capped out.

    Several other teams, including Detroit, Philly, Chicago and the Warriors, have
    been trying to work out their own deals with Orlando, but according to sources,
    the Magic really don't know what to do. Do they try to add a veteran or two in
    an area of need (like Eric Snow or Erick Dampier) or do they strip the team down
    to nothing?

    The chances of adding a veteran who can really turn things around in Orlando are
    slim. But stripping down will surely push McGrady to opt out of his contract
    after the end of next season. Either way it looks like the Magic are hurting
    unless, that is, Hill retires (still, his contract wouldn't be of the books
    until January 2005) or the team's able to trade McGrady for another superstar
    with more years. Right now both event look unlikely.

    Add yet another Knick to the trading block. Several sources told Insider on
    Monday that Isiah Thomas has brought up Dikembe Mutombo's name in several phone
    conversations.

    With Nazr Mohammed and Kurt Thomas on board, Thomas feels like Mutombo is
    expendable . . . especially if he can get another younger, more athletic player
    in return. Who'd be crazy enough to pick up the last year and half of Mutombo's
    deal? Thomas is targeting the Mavs, Spurs and Grizzlies -- all of whom need a
    big man for a playoff run.

    According to reports, the Bulls won't pay Jamal Crawford more than the mid-level
    exception next year, which makes you wonder . . . why aren't they moving him
    now? Crawford will get more on the market with so many teams now under the cap.
    Is John Paxson really willing to lose Crawford for nothing in return?
    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you


  • #2
    Re: 2004-02-17

    Thanks Jay

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: 2004-02-17

      No sweat.

      Before PD, that was the first site I'd visit each day. Now its the second, so unless I'm in a meeting, traveling, or the boss is riding my @$$ about a deadline, I can usually get it posted before noon (CDT).
      Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
      Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
      Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
      Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
      And life itself, rushing over me
      Life itself, the wind in black elms,
      Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

      Comment

      Working...
      X