Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 19
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 11 19 template Next
  • #1

    2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

    RAJAH NIGHT AT THE FIELDHOUSE


    -VS-


    Game Time Start: 7:00 PM EST
    Where: The Fieldhouse, Indianapolis, IN
    Officials: R. Garretson, D. Collins, V. Palmer

    Media Notes: Indiana Notes, Golden State Notes
    Television: FOX Sports Indiana / Comcast SportsNet Bay Area
    Radio: WFNI 1070 AM / KNBR 680 AM
    NBA Feeds:

    REMINDER: Per PD policy, please do not share a link to, describe how to search for, request a link to, or request a PM about streaming video of a NBA game that is not coming directly through the NBA. Not even in a "wink-wink, nudge-nudge, know-what-I-mean" round-about sort of way. Thank you


    35-21
    Home: 23-5
    West: 12-9
    33-23
    Away: 15-16
    East: 15-5
    Feb 28
    Mar 01
    Mar 03
    Mar 06
    7:00pm
    7:00pm
    8:00pm
    7:00pm
    HIBBERT
    WEST
    GEORGE
    STEPHENSON
    HILL
    BIEDRINS
    LEE
    BARNES
    THOMPSON
    CURRY


    PACERS
    Danny Granger - sore left knee (day-to-day)



    WARRIORS
    Andrew Bogut - back spasms (out)
    Brandon Rush - torn ACL and MCL, left knee (out)




    Tim Donahue: Pacers Think Danny Granger’s Return Will Be Seamless

    While the whole world speculates whether Danny Granger’s return will slow down the
    juggernaut that is the Indiana Pacers, at least one person has no concerns. The team’s
    leader doesn’t think there is any chance that the return of the team’s captain will disrupt
    anything — either chemistry-wise or on the court.

    “Danny’s going to help us,” said David West. “He’s been with the team dealing with his
    injury. He’s been around us. It’s not like we’ve forgotten how he plays. He been around.
    He’s been in the locker room. He’s been on the road with us.”

    Some fans and media members thought the Pacers should have added a player —
    perhaps a shooter like J.J. Redick — at the trade deadline. But the team believes that
    its biggest “acquisition” will be simply getting Granger back on the floor.

    “What Danny Granger brings to the table is everything we could possibly hope to acquire
    at the trade deadline,” said coach Frank Vogel. “Hopefully, he gets back pretty quickly
    and returns to his form. If he does, it’s really going to give us a big boost.”

    West agrees. “There’s just nothing we can add that’s going to be better than getting
    Danny Granger back,” said West. “Six-nine, 235-pound, 20-point-a-game scorer. A
    matchup problem for these teams that just aren’t going to be able to deal with our size.
    Our tempo. Our ability to guard one through five. There’s nothing that we can add that’s
    going to be better than what Danny’s going to bring.”

    West went on to explain the other factors that Granger will bring to the team. ”He’s
    going to add to what we’re doing on both ends,” said West. “His size. His basketball IQ.
    His ability. He’s going to open the floor up, because you can’t help [off of him]. He’s
    just going to make everybody better. He’s going to make our team better.”

    “I Hope It Doesn’t Change Much”

    Then again, change always comes with some uncertainty. Granger returns to a team
    with the second-best record in the Eastern Conference. In Detroit tonight, he’ll get his
    first minutes as the Pacers are coming off back-to-back 30-point victories. Somebody,
    somewhere, is saying, “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”

    Many of the gains made by this team were made possible by Danny’s absence.

    That is not to say that Granger held this team down. Far from it. Rather, Indiana’s
    success has been spurred on by forcing the organization and its players to respond to
    loss of Danny over the course of the last four months.

    And there has been no more shining gain than the emergence of Paul George, who
    recently notched his first career triple double and made his first All-Star appearance.
    Many are worried about how Granger’s return will affect him. Even Paul himself
    sounded a little worried, when Pacers.com’s Mark Montieth asked him.

    How much will George’s role change? “I hope not much,” he said. “I really hope not
    much. That’s the most I can say, I hope it doesn’t change much.”

    But, worry isn’t always generated internally. These players — especially Paul — have
    been asked ad nauseam if they thought Danny’s return might cause problems. The
    constant questioning on the subject — which I have both observed and been a willing
    participant in — led me to have this exchange with David West.

    Me: Is it to fair to say that when we — collectively in the media — ask the question,
    “Are you worried about Danny?” that we are inserting the worry?

    West (laughing & nodding): ”I think so.”

    Beyond that, there are fears about what injecting Granger’s presence into a group
    that has seemingly finally gotten comfortable with each other and with a new persona.

    “I think we’ve kind of found an identity that we can play at,” Paul George said Friday
    night. “We can wrap our hands around the style of play we’ve been playing at lately.
    Getting up and down the court, pushing the tempo and trying to find things early.”

    The defense has always been there for this team — they are still on pace to be
    statistically the best defensive squad in the franchise’s NBA history — but the offense
    has been, well, ugly. However, it has been turning around (rising 4.8 points per 100
    possessions since December 31), and tempo has been a factor.

    Danny’s return will have at least some affect on that, as much of the tempo comes not
    from the point guards in Vogel’s offense, but from the wings — specifically, the
    shooting guards. Lance Stephenson has been described by Coach Vogel as “our best
    push guy,” and all Pacer observers can close their eyes and immediately see
    Stephenson getting the ball and changing ends as quickly as he possibly can.

    However, it’s not just...CONTINUE READING AT 8p9s

    J.M. Poulard: State of the Warriors

    The Oklahoma City Thunder are the NBA’s modicum for patient, earned, and seemingly
    sustainable success. Just three years removed from a 3-29 start and in-season coaching
    change, OKC was a Finals participant last season in a closer-than-it-looked five game
    series. The trade of James Harden not withstanding, they boast a young, versatile roster
    with two bonafide superstars, a near All-Star big man that’s only getting better, and solid
    ancillary parts that play their roles to perfection. They’ve got a model lockerroom culture
    and maybe the league’s most passionate fanbase, too.

    After going through a six-game losing streak that looked as though it would never end,
    the Golden State Warriors (33-23) finally bounced back and won three games in a row.

    The Warriors still have concerns at present time given Andrew Bogut’s issues with a disk
    protrusion in his back, but the string of victories have allowed the Dubs faithful to breath
    a sigh of relief.

    Also, it’s worth noting that one of those victories came against a San Antonio Spurs team
    that owns the best record in the NBA at this point in the season, which probably served
    as a huge confidence boost for a team leaving home for about a week or so.

    Indeed, the Warriors will start a four-game eastern road trip tonight that will see them
    face some tough opposition in the Indiana Pacers (35-21), New York Knicks (33-20),
    Boston Celtics (30-27) and Philadelphia 76ers (22-32).

    The road trip will essentially be the start of the final portion of the schedule for a Golden
    State team poised to make a run at a postseason berth. What does the remainder of the
    NBA season have in store for the Dubs though?

    A quick peek:
    • Games left: 26
    • Home games left: 16
    • Road games left: 10
    • Games versus opponents with .500 record or better: 11
    • Games versus opponents with sub-.500 record: 15


    In addition, let’s look at the games on the calendar that the Golden State Warriors have
    to play against the league’s elite (at least third best record in any conference):
    • February 26th: at Indiana Pacers
    • February 27th: at New York Knicks
    • March 11th: New York Knicks
    • March 20th: at San Antonio Spurs
    • April 11th: Oklahoma City Thunder
    • April 15th: San Antonio Spurs (potential Poppovich rests starters)


    One last quick tidbit, although the Los Angeles Lakers aren’t an elite team at this
    juncture, they have owned the Warriors in the past two seasons and the Dubs still get
    them two more times before the end of the regular season.

    So what does this...CONTINUE READING AT WARRIORS WORLD




    Pacers
    Mike Wells @MikeWellsNBA
    Jared Wade @8pts9secs
    Tim Donahue @TimDonahue8p9s
    Tom Lewis @indycornrows


    Warriors
    Tim Kawakami @timkawakami
    Marcus Thompson @gswscribe
    J.M. Poulard @ShyneIV
    Golden State of Mind @unstoppablebaby
    This is the darkest timeline.
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: 2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

    Violet Palmer.
    There is no NBA player named Monte Ellis.

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: 2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

      Sonic Truth.

      If we win these next two, I won't be able to temper my expectations much longer...

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: 2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

        Minor question...but is Biedrins the confirmed Starting Center? I am guessing that it will be Festus Ezili with Biedrins as the towel boy managing the Gatorade stand.
        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: 2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

          Damn it, I'm going to struggle to watch this game and the Hoosier game tonight. I'm so excited to see Danny play since I had to miss the pistons game.

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: 2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

            Originally posted by DJVendetta View Post
            Damn it, I'm going to struggle to watch this game and the Hoosier game tonight. I'm so excited to see Danny play since I had to miss the pistons game.
            I'd just tape the Pacers game. Other than seeing the spectacle of Danny returning...I am going to guess that we will see more of what we saw on Saturday....Granger missing a lot of shots as he gets into game form.
            Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

            Comment

            • #7
              Re: 2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

              Tape the Hoosier game.

              Comment

              • #8
                Re: 2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

                Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                Minor question...but is Biedrins the confirmed Starting Center? I am guessing that it will be Festus Ezili with Biedrins as the towel boy managing the Gatorade stand.
                According to the Warriors forum at ProSportsDaily, he is the confirmed starting Center.
                Originally posted by IrishPacer
                Empty vessels make the most noise.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Re: 2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

                  Originally posted by Nuntius View Post
                  According to the Warriors forum at ProSportsDaily, he is the confirmed starting Center.
                  Yeah...you're right...Biedrins is listed as the Probable Starter on the Pacers/Warriors Game Preview on the Warriors Website.

                  I'm surprised...cuz Biedrins seriously sucks and I thought that Mark Jackson preferred to go with Festus Ezili.
                  Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Re: 2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

                    Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                    Minor question...but is Biedrins the confirmed Starting Center? I am guessing that it will be Festus Ezili with Biedrins as the towel boy managing the Gatorade stand.
                    Andris is listed as starting center on the Warriors media notes. Media notes are compiled by (unsurprisingly) media relations folks and almost always based upon the starting lineup from the previous game. It's not necessarily what Mark Jackson has decided for tonight, so obviously things can change. But for our purposes, it's what I typically base the lineups on for the threads.
                    This is the darkest timeline.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Re: 2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

                      Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                      Yeah...you're right...Biedrins is listed as the Probable Starter on the Pacers/Warriors Game Preview on the Warriors Website.

                      I'm surprised...cuz Biedrins seriously sucks and I thought that Mark Jackson preferred to go with Festus Ezili.
                      Ezeli is decent and he has started 38 games so far but he is still very raw and doesn't get too many minutes. He is getting 14.6 MPG and averaging 2.5 PPG, 3.6 RPG and 0.9 BPG. He is actually shooting worse than Roy as well (41.6%). Plus, he still average 1 turnover per game and 2.2 fouls per game despite not playing big minutes.

                      He is a good defender and he will develop into a nice role player (or emergency starter) but his per 36 numbers are not really good for a Center playing limited minutes.

                      In any case, most of this is moot. No matter who starts at C for the Warriors, they close out the game with Lee at C as they tend to go small with a Jack - Curry backcourt.
                      Originally posted by IrishPacer
                      Empty vessels make the most noise.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Re: 2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

                        Originally posted by DJVendetta View Post
                        Damn it, I'm going to struggle to watch this game and the Hoosier game tonight. I'm so excited to see Danny play since I had to miss the pistons game.
                        Watch the Pacers or you might miss Danny going off for a season high.
                        "Danny Granger is one of the top players in the league. To move Danny, you better get a lot back." - Larry Bird

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Re: 2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

                          Originally posted by cgg View Post
                          Watch the Pacers or you might miss Danny going off for a season high.
                          Yeah....Granger's season high is 2 points for this season....so, yeah....not too hard to break that
                          Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Re: 2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

                            Just by looking at the matchups, we need Paul to abuse Barnes. Stephenson vs Thompson is also an interesting matchup, but we have seen Lance struggle sticking with strong perimeter players. If Hill can get us 10-12 pts at the PG spot, we should be in good shape
                            Being unable to close out a game in which you have a comfortable lead in the 4th Q = Pulling a Frank Vogel

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Re: 2/26/2013 Game Thread #57: Pacers Vs. Warriors

                              Pumped to be going tonight. Ready to see Danny back @ hone and hopefully get a W against a really tough team. Pretty excited to see Harrison Barnes play live for the first time. Unfortunate for him hes going to leave in a bad mood tho.
                              I Bleed Blue

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 11 19 template Next
                              Working...
                              X