Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

    WHERE IN THE HECK IS MY TOP 5 PICK?!?

    I drafted a SG with the 5th pick in the draft - was 76 overall. Just went to my roster and he is gone and sone garbage 57 overall guy I've never heard of is in his place!!!! WTH?!?!?!

    Comment


    • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

      Just went to my roster and his minutes that I had assigned to him are now "remaining"... And he is gone. WTF

      Comment


      • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

        Originally posted by Vandy View Post
        Just went to my roster and his minutes that I had assigned to him are now "remaining"... And he is gone. WTF
        That's messed up...
        Nothing in life worth having comes easy.

        Comment


        • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

          I'm interested in horford. I'd like to unload some of my surplus of players. Also looking for some cap space if anyone wants/has room for Joe Johnson.

          Comment


          • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

            Wow... I just played my game against the Pacers. Tied at 67, Kobe hits a fadeaway game winning three with 0.3 remaining and I go to instant replay to save it. Right when I push x to save, I get the message "Please wait, restoring data..." and the game and my PS3 freeze. I reboot and of course, I'm 0-0. Here we go again I guess...
            2015, 2016, 2019 IKL Fantasy Basketball Champions - DC Dreamers

            Comment


            • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

              Originally posted by Vandy View Post
              WHERE IN THE HECK IS MY TOP 5 PICK?!?

              I drafted a SG with the 5th pick in the draft - was 76 overall. Just went to my roster and he is gone and sone garbage 57 overall guy I've never heard of is in his place!!!! WTH?!?!?!
              i sent u a PM about this. Your option maybe limited since i have no admin abilities to change anything on the roster level.

              i did some checking and the guy you mentioned simply does not exist....but suspect that there is some glitch that caused the disappearance.
              Last edited by CableKC; 05-21-2013, 02:33 AM.
              Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

              Comment


              • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

                Originally posted by Vandy View Post
                WHERE IN THE HECK IS MY TOP 5 PICK?!?

                I drafted a SG with the 5th pick in the draft - was 76 overall. Just went to my roster and he is gone and sone garbage 57 overall guy I've never heard of is in his place!!!! WTH?!?!?!
                Okay...here's the situation with Vandy / Grizzlies after some initial investigation/speculation on my part:

                During the Draft, he had the 5th Pick and drafted some SG/SF named Chase Hunt with a rating of 72....which Vandy had upgrading to a rating of 76 after running him through Training Camp. Just like all rookies...he was automatically signed to a Rookie Contract.

                After the League Advanced to start the regular season...sometime on Monday evening.....as mentioned above....this Rookie SG/SF that he drafted LITERALLY disappeared from the League along with his roster spot on the Grizzlies ( there is no Chase Hunt that exists in this League ). In his place....some Player named Benjamin Columbus ( some SF/PF ) with a rating of 57 had been assigned to his roster but not signed to any contract ( you can verify this as ALL Rookie Players are automatically signed to a contract...which Columbus doesn't have one but is already assigned to his Team ). This Columbus Player appears to be a Free Agent that is assigned to his roster ( I assume to fill any missing roster spots that he had ) but isn't signed to any contract but can't be released or waived.

                What I suspect that happened is that when the Association advanced to start the 2013-2014 season on Monday evening....it automatically created the Prospect list for the 2014-2015 Draft Class. This SOMEHOW caused some "glitch" in the Association and had elimanated Vandy's Rookie ( Chase ) and IMHO replaced him with this Columbus Rookie to fill out his roster. Why did it do this? I have no clue....I just know that Vandy's roster was messed up.

                I checked on "Player Finder" and found that there is an undrafted Rookie ( with ZERO years of Experience ) named Herb Lynch that appears to be a Free Agent with a rating of 72 that happens to be a SG/PG with very similiar Player ratings. However....this is odd because he doesn't show up in the regular Free Agent List ( the highest rated Player is 71 ) and is also listed as one of the Prospects in the upcoming Draft. My total guess here is that this "glitch" removed Vandy's Rookie was removed from Vandy's roster, somehow renamed to this Herb Lynch Player ( while making him some Free Agent ) and to fill the missing roster spot....the Association assigned this Columbus Player to Vandy's missing roster spot that was vacated with the removal of Hunt. Again, pure speculation on my part.

                The question now is...what can be done to help remedy this so that we can be fair to Vandy since all of this appears to be the result of some glitch in the Association....obviously not something within his control. You may think that he's just some useless Rookie Drafted Player....but this Player with a 76 Rating ( basically a 6th Man to Starter ) disappeared and could be considered an asset that Vandy was counting to use in the 2013-2014 season.

                Initially, I thought that Vandy can just sign this Herb Lynch Player....but since Vandy is over the Cap...he can't make an offer to this Herb Lynch Player. The only other option is to figure out a way to "force" a trade involving one of Vandy's existing Player that is rated in the low 60s to another CPU Team while getting back some SG/SF that is rated in the mid-70s that Vandy would want.

                I know that this is pure speculation and that this all sounds really wierd.....but I can't come up with any other reason as to how and what happened and I want to come up with some solution to balence this out for Vandy. I don't think that it's right to just let this go since Vandy essentially lost a key rotational Player ( through no action of his own but from what appears to be some "glitch" in the Association ) that he intended to use throughout the season.

                Thoughts?
                Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                Comment


                • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

                  Breaking news: Chase Hunt found dead just a couple days after being drafted by the Memphis grizzlies, Chase was out partying all night and decided to drive home in his brand new Porsche but the roads were slick and he lost control, police speculate he was driving over the limit and driving around 100-120mph. Our prayers are with him and his family... in other news TMZ reports Paul George and Kim kardashian have made a sex tape.

                  Comment


                  • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

                    Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                    Okay...here's the situation with Vandy / Grizzlies after some initial investigation/speculation on my part:

                    During the Draft, he had the 5th Pick and drafted some SG/SF named Chase Hunt with a rating of 72....which Vandy had upgrading to a rating of 76 after running him through Training Camp. Just like all rookies...he was automatically signed to a Rookie Contract.

                    After the League Advanced to start the regular season...sometime on Monday evening.....as mentioned above....this Rookie SG/SF that he drafted LITERALLY disappeared from the League along with his roster spot on the Grizzlies ( there is no Chase Hunt that exists in this League ). In his place....some Player named Benjamin Columbus ( some SF/PF ) with a rating of 57 had been assigned to his roster but not signed to any contract ( you can verify this as ALL Rookie Players are automatically signed to a contract...which Columbus doesn't have one but is already assigned to his Team ). This Columbus Player appears to be a Free Agent that is assigned to his roster ( I assume to fill any missing roster spots that he had ) but isn't signed to any contract but can't be released or waived.

                    What I suspect that happened is that when the Association advanced to start the 2013-2014 season on Monday evening....it automatically created the Prospect list for the 2014-2015 Draft Class. This SOMEHOW caused some "glitch" in the Association and had elimanated Vandy's Rookie ( Chase ) and IMHO replaced him with this Columbus Rookie to fill out his roster. Why did it do this? I have no clue....I just know that Vandy's roster was messed up.

                    I checked on "Player Finder" and found that there is an undrafted Rookie ( with ZERO years of Experience ) named Herb Lynch that appears to be a Free Agent with a rating of 72 that happens to be a SG/PG with very similiar Player ratings. However....this is odd because he doesn't show up in the regular Free Agent List ( the highest rated Player is 71 ) and is also listed as one of the Prospects in the upcoming Draft. My total guess here is that this "glitch" removed Vandy's Rookie was removed from Vandy's roster, somehow renamed to this Herb Lynch Player ( while making him some Free Agent ) and to fill the missing roster spot....the Association assigned this Columbus Player to Vandy's missing roster spot that was vacated with the removal of Hunt. Again, pure speculation on my part.

                    The question now is...what can be done to help remedy this so that we can be fair to Vandy since all of this appears to be the result of some glitch in the Association....obviously not something within his control. You may think that he's just some useless Rookie Drafted Player....but this Player with a 76 Rating ( basically a 6th Man to Starter ) disappeared and could be considered an asset that Vandy was counting to use in the 2013-2014 season.

                    Initially, I thought that Vandy can just sign this Herb Lynch Player....but since Vandy is over the Cap...he can't make an offer to this Herb Lynch Player. The only other option is to figure out a way to "force" a trade involving one of Vandy's existing Player that is rated in the low 60s to another CPU Team while getting back some SG/SF that is rated in the mid-70s that Vandy would want.

                    I know that this is pure speculation and that this all sounds really wierd.....but I can't come up with any other reason as to how and what happened and I want to come up with some solution to balence this out for Vandy. I don't think that it's right to just let this go since Vandy essentially lost a key rotational Player ( through no action of his own but from what appears to be some "glitch" in the Association ) that he intended to use throughout the season.

                    Thoughts?
                    I don't think there is anything any of us can do short of giving him a lopsided trade... Which would hurt our team...

                    Online Association is glitchy... In the start of the second season of another league I was in... It removed westbrook's contract amount for me... He played for $0 dollars... We quit the league when that happened...
                    Nothing in life worth having comes easy.

                    Comment


                    • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

                      Originally posted by J7F View Post
                      I don't think there is anything any of us can do short of giving him a lopsided trade... Which would hurt our team...

                      Online Association is glitchy... In the start of the second season of another league I was in... It removed westbrook's contract amount for me... He played for $0 dollars... We quit the league when that happened...
                      That is exactly what I am thinking of proposing.....find some mid-70s Rated Player on another CPU Team that could fill a similar role and then force a trade with one of his lower tier Player.

                      You're suggesting that making a "lop-sided" trade would hurt our respective Teams......but I'm looking at this from Vandy's POV...his Team is already "hurt" because of this glitch. I don't see how much such a move would really hurt our respective Team's....when none of the Players that could be traded would come from our Teams...but from one of the CPU Teams.

                      I know that the Online Association is glitchy....but he did have a mid-70s Player ( even if it was just for a day )...but because it was glitchy.....he no longer has one. I'm channeling my inner-"Sam Beckett" and trying to "put things right, that once went wrong"....I don't see any real harm in doing this.
                      Last edited by CableKC; 05-23-2013, 02:11 PM.
                      Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                      Comment


                      • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

                        Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                        That is exactly what I am thinking of proposing.....find some mid-70s Rated Player on another CPU Team that could fill a similar role and then force a trade with one of his lower tier Player.

                        You're suggesting that making a "lop-sided" trade would hurt our respective Teams......but I'm looking at this from Vandy's POV...his Team is already "hurt" because of this glitch. I don't see how much such a move would really hurt our respective Team's....when none of the Players that could be traded would come from our Teams...but from one of the CPU Teams.

                        I know that the Online Association is glitchy....but he did have a mid-70s Player ( even if it was just for a day )...but because it was glitchy.....he no longer has one. I'm channeling my inner-"Sam Beckett" and trying to "put things right, that once went wrong"....I don't see any real harm in doing this.
                        No... No harm... I think you misread me...

                        I just don't think even you can force a computer trade...

                        I think the only option would be for one of us to give him a player... And that's what would hurt one of us...
                        Nothing in life worth having comes easy.

                        Comment


                        • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

                          Originally posted by J7F View Post
                          No... No harm... I think you misread me...

                          I just don't think even you can force a computer trade...

                          I think the only option would be for one of us to give him a player... And that's what would hurt one of us...
                          I know that this is out of the ordinary.....but it's doable.

                          I can create a secondary PSN account, join the League as one of the CPU owned Teams under that secondary PSN account ( not as CableKC )....propose a trade of the Player to Vandy.....he accepts it... we just let the trade go through......then I leave the League under the secondary PSN account and reverting the Team back to the CPU.

                          Hence.....force a CPU to Player trade in a round about way.

                          Keep in mind....I only suggest this with Vandy upgrading one of his lower end Players to some CPU Owned Player in the low to mid 70s...just to replace his Player that he essentially lost cuz of the glitch.

                          I know that we can look at this as a "tough bananas" approach as this is just a glitch in the game that Vandy has to live with....but if there is a way to remedy this without really hurting one of the other Player's Teams.....then I prefer to take that route.
                          Last edited by CableKC; 05-24-2013, 07:09 PM.
                          Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                          Comment


                          • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

                            I didn't realize that the League Speed is still set at SLOW ( where the League Calendar Day advances once every 8 hours in Real time ). I can't do it now....but I will change the League Speed to FAST ( where the League Calendar Day advances once every 4 hours in Real time ) later tonight or tomorrow morning.

                            If you have scheduled games for anyone that is coming up....keep in mind that you don't have as much time as you may think:

                            1 League Day = 4 hours in Real Time
                            6 League Days = 24 hours / 1 Full Day in Real Time
                            12 League Days = 48 hours / 2 Full Days in Real Time
                            30 League Days = 120 hours / 5 Full Days in Real Time

                            Please make a note of this...especially if you have upcoming games to be scheduled against other Players. All the Games are already unlocked.

                            If you have already made arrangements with someone but can't play before the League Calendar Advances.....then let us know and I can PAUSE the League....AS LONG as both Players agree to a time to play but can't play before the League Calendar advances.
                            Last edited by CableKC; 05-24-2013, 07:05 PM.
                            Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                            Comment


                            • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

                              I leave for Indy tomorrow morning until Sunday so I'll be away from my PS3. I've played all the CPU games though, so I think I'll only miss a game against CableKC's Warriors on 11/28 and maybe also against the Grizzlies but that's on 12/21. I haven't done the math so I'm not sure if I'll be back by then. If either of you guys sees this and wants to get a game in tonight, just message me on PSN or on here.
                              2015, 2016, 2019 IKL Fantasy Basketball Champions - DC Dreamers

                              Comment


                              • Re: PS3 NBA 2K13 league?

                                Originally posted by Kuq_e_Zi91 View Post
                                I leave for Indy tomorrow morning until Sunday so I'll be away from my PS3. I've played all the CPU games though, so I think I'll only miss a game against CableKC's Warriors on 11/28 and maybe also against the Grizzlies but that's on 12/21. I haven't done the math so I'm not sure if I'll be back by then. If either of you guys sees this and wants to get a game in tonight, just message me on PSN or on here.
                                Do we have any games on the schedule? I could play in a bit...
                                Nothing in life worth having comes easy.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X