Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

(TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

    http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/pos...tingy-starters

    How it works offensively
    Pacers coach Frank Vogel is a man who appreciates uniformity. Last season, his team’s primary lineup logged 1,000 minutes. No other unit in the NBA topped 750 minutes. This season, the Pacers’ starters once again lead all five-man units in minutes played -- only this time it’s George Hill and Lance Stephenson in place of Darren Collison (traded during the offseason) and Danny Granger (made his debut Saturday after missing the first 55 games of the season because of patellar tendinosis).

    When newly assembled units struggle to find themselves offensively, coaches often will preach patience and time. In the case of the Pacers this season, that largely has worked. With each passing month in Granger’s absence, Indiana’s starting five have grown more comfortable as an offense, and they’ve been impressively efficient in the past 20 games or so.

    For one, they get into their stuff more quickly. That swing sequence at the top of the floor that opens many of their half-court possessions -- wing-to-big-to-wing -- happens promptly and crisply. From here, the Pacers generally go one of a few different ways.

    First, there’s George, who’s the unit’s most effective (and only true) creator off the bounce. The Pacers might isolate him inside the arc on the left side and let him work over a smaller defender. They’ll also use Hibbert to pin down for George to pop out to the perimeter. With enough separation, George will take the shot, but if his defender is close, he’ll put the ball on the floor.

    Comparatively few of George’s possessions originate from high pick-and-rolls. Every once in a while in early offense, West will set a little step-up screen, but George clearly prefers to rub his guy off West or Hibbert at the foul-line extended area about 15 feet from the basket. Overall, George is a player who likes a layer of space around him while he’s working on offense (it’s not unusual to see George politely wave off a pick). Given that tendency, it’s an interesting exercise to imagine him playing alongside some guys who can actually shoot the ball from distance.

    With West and Hibbert on the floor, the Pacers look inside a fair amount. There’s a certain obligation to feed Hibbert if his defender ends up on the high side. He’ll also see the ball if the matchup advantage is wildly in his favor. Despite Hibbert’s struggles to find his hook shot, there’s been no detectable fall-off in his touches.

    West at the elbow is a higher-grade option. Big men with the ability to control a possession from the high post are becoming a less common breed. From that spot, West can turn around and fire a jumper, but more often than not he surveys the scene. As West watches the defense, he’s patient, scanning the perimeter. Who’s cheating? Who’s inclined to cheat if I get into my move? If West finds something, he’ll kick the ball out. If not, he might unleash a ball fake or just return it to the top of the floor.

    The Pacers do a nice job of using West on the weakside elbow as a sensible release option. When teams load up on George on one side of the floor, the Pacers have increasingly looked West’s way as the logical counter. George is getting better and better at reading the court for his next best option, in large part because he’s learned that looking to West at that spot is generally the answer.

    The ball doesn’t spend a great amount of time in the hands of Hill, who’s far more of a cutter than an initiator in the half court. Defenses have universally run under any ball screen set for Hill, and he’s become considerably more willing to shoot the 3-ball if given sufficient space. A couple of times a game, Hill will dribble left of one of those picks, then launch a shot from distance. Overall, he’s 36.9 percent from beyond the arc.

    The unit generally plays together in six-, eight-, sometimes even 10-minute stints, and at some point, Stephenson will get a chance to initiate in the half court. Stephenson probably will never be a guy with whom you can create beautiful basketball, but playing with this unit has refined him as a player. It’s not just the shooting percentages, which are way up. Stephenson is a better decision-maker, a better mover and still a beast on the break. Sometimes when a player goes from a bench mob to the junior member of a five-man unit, all of the manual labor and errand-running that come with that job make him value his time with the ball more.

    How it works defensively
    Exceptionally well, which is an affirmation of some traditional truths about basketball. Even as the NBA undergoes a radical sea change with respect to size and position, being big is still an asset. Virtually every single night they take the floor, the Pacers’ starters have an enormous advantage -- literally. With the 6-foot-2 Hill replacing the 6-0 Collison in the first unit, the Pacers have legitimate length at all five positions and tower over opponents. Logically enough, this group works its strength.

    It’s tough to move downhill against the Pacers in the half court because everywhere an offensive player turns, there are limbs blocking his path. For similar reasons, it’s also difficult to shoot over the top, move off the ball and more generally, find open parking spots anywhere on the floor. As a result, defenses have to work hard to get clean looks against the Pacers’ first unit.

    Strong defenses tend to rotate well, but the elite ones don’t have to rotate at all. We can confidently place the Pacers’ starters in that group. Individually, each perimeter player contains his man at the point of attack, while West and Hibbert can handle just about any one-on-one matchup they’re assigned. Hill, Stephenson and George don’t have to worry about finding shooters because they’re already on top of them anytime they’re within a couple of feet. Opponents get fewer than 15 3-point attempts per 48 minutes against this unit (among the most frequently used lineups, only Chicago’s top two units do better), and converting only 31.3 percent of them.

    George is a useful case study in why opponents can’t access normally reliable second and third options after the Pacers stop the ball on the first. It’s fun to watch George defend on the weakside. When he’s off the ball covering a stationary player on the perimeter, George will confidently run through a sequence of motions -- move toward the action on the ball side, dance back a couple of steps when a passing lane to his man opens up, cheat again once that window closes but not without a quick look back to make sure his guy hasn’t moved to a different spot where he could hurt the Pacers.

    There’s no science to measure off-ball defense, but when you observe a player make every step toward and away from the action with so much purpose, when bad gambles and iffy decision occur so rarely, it becomes easy to understand how a unit is surrendering only 93.6 points per 100 possessions.

    Now, is this a case of a wing player like George having the luxury of playing alongside two big men who can handle the pick-and-roll? Or do the big guys excel because they play with a point guard like Hill who can corral opposing point guards and fight over screens when necessary, and wings like George (6-8) and Stephenson (6-5) who can hold their own against attackers who might post up or drive against lesser defenders?

    In the case of Indiana’s featured lineup, the answer is both. There’s a mutual benefit between big and small that carries over from the perimeter to the basket area. Guys remain in their area, but Hibbert has a lot to do with that. He rarely leaves the paint, and why should he, because at 7-2 he’s far more effective playing goalie than he would be commuting from the top of the floor off a hard show or jamming a screener.

    If a guard is able to beat Hill or Stephenson, Hibbert lies in wait and can contain him with his outstretched arms, all the while shading his man, which allows West or a weakside defender to stay at home. With few open targets surrounding him, the guard now has to find a way to magically deliver the ball to the hoop against a deceptively quick-footed, lurching giant -- and if he gets close enough, probably a second long-armed defender.

    West might be even be a worse candidate for exploitation in the pick-and-roll for an offense. West meets the ball handler way up at the top of the floor, then chases down his original matchup (or other big man if Hibbert picks up West’s guy, sometimes the case when it’s a power forward with some skills). This is an exhausting anaerobic workout for a big guy, but the 6-9 West never stops moving for a second. His gift is knowing how to time his departures and arrivals. West can launch an all-out blitz on a point guard if Jason Maxiell is his man. But if he’s guarding someone who could potentially cause some trouble, especially as a popper, West will temper his attack.

    There sometimes come a point when a frustrated offense will all but abandon a pick-and-roll attack against the Pacers, which is why you see teams stagnate against them. If you can’t get anything against the pick-and-roll, can’t capably penetrate by isolating your perimeter guys, and if Hibbert is going to confront anyone who gets within 8 feet of the basket, then what do you have?

    Finally, with Granger active again, does Vogel take minutes away from this unit to accommodate Granger's return? The more difficult question to answer for Vogel is whether he can afford to.
    There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

  • #2
    Re: (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

    I am curious as to how the defense last year with GH/PG/Granger/West/Hibbert compares ( on a statistical POV ) to this years lineup of GH/Lance/PG/West/Hibbert.
    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

      Great read!

      Exactly my #1 concern with Danny coming back and replacing Lance. This unit is symbiotic defensively. Lance doesn't have to save himself defensively. I've never considered Danny a great team defensive player. He'll get the weak side block and in isolation against bigger small forwards, he's very good. When it comes to all out instinctive team defense, I've never thought he was above average. I feel like the current group is the best in the league. Maybe Shaw/Vogel can integrate him without concern, but its really a big deal to me. The theory that Lance has to appreciate his touches and fit in with the first team makes sense to me too. I'd be an advocate of Danny with the 2nd group for the entire year, but I doubt they'll do that. We'll see hopefully my concerns are invalid.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

        You guys all need to remember that Hill, PG, Danny, West, Hibbert was a great lineup last year too.

        Lance's improvement is great because it gives us more awesome lineup combos. And hopefully DJ and Ian continuing to improve as they have can give us even more flexibility.


        Comment


        • #5
          Re: (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

          If you could move Truehoop over to Grantland, you could pretty much knock out the NBA section of ESPN.com. And everyone would be better for it.
          You Got The Tony!!!!!!

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

            Also, check out this other ESPN piece from today:

            http://www.pacersdigest.com/showthre...=1#post1595190
            "Freedom is nothing else but a chance to be better." - Albert Camus

            "Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well." - Voltaire

            "Everyone's values are defined by what they will tolerate when it is done to others." - William Greider

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

              This article makes a strong point for the way Frank plays "two units" it is obvious to me that Frank likes to play his starters as a unit as much as possible. Most coach or at least a lot of coaches don't do this, they often will keep a bench player in the game with the starters (Carlisle did this a lot). I see strong evidence that Frank's approach works extremely well.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

                Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                This article makes a strong point for the way Frank plays "two units" it is obvious to me that Frank likes to play his starters as a unit as much as possible. Most coach or at least a lot of coaches don't do this, they often will keep a bench player in the game with the starters (Carlisle did this a lot). I see strong evidence that Frank's approach works extremely well.
                That's why Frank is coach of the year. He emphasizes defense and toughness with both units. Most coaches only preach offense to their starters. This Pacers defines the phrase defense wins championships.
                Smothered Chicken!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

                  Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                  You guys all need to remember that Hill, PG, Danny, West, Hibbert was a great lineup last year too.

                  Lance's improvement is great because it gives us more awesome lineup combos. And hopefully DJ and Ian continuing to improve as they have can give us even more flexibility.
                  I think that having Granger in with Lance ( or vice versa ) creates different matchup problems for the other Team on both the offensive and defensive end.

                  It's like the difference between driving with a car that race car that can handle a tight turn but can't accelerate as fast....as opposed to a race car that can accelerate fast but can't handle tight turns as well.

                  This doesn't mean that Granger is better than Lance in the lineup....I'm just saying that both bring a different skillset to the floor when combined with GH/PG/West/Hibbert and the lineup that we use should be dependant on the matchups.
                  Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

                    Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                    This article makes a strong point for the way Frank plays "two units" it is obvious to me that Frank likes to play his starters as a unit as much as possible. Most coach or at least a lot of coaches don't do this, they often will keep a bench player in the game with the starters (Carlisle did this a lot). I see strong evidence that Frank's approach works extremely well.
                    You can still give heavy minutes to your starting five together without platooning with two different units.

                    Vogel does this. Heavy minutes to his starting five, while keeping PG or West with the second unit..
                    Last edited by mattie; 02-25-2013, 06:25 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

                      Originally posted by Coopdog23 View Post
                      That's why Frank is coach of the year. He emphasizes defense and toughness with both units. Most coaches only preach offense to their starters. This Pacers defines the phrase defense wins championships.
                      They won't be an example of that phrase until they are holding up the hardware at center court.

                      But we definitely hope this Pacers team will come to define the phrase "defense wins championships!"

                      For now we're at "defense wins games."
                      "Freedom is nothing else but a chance to be better." - Albert Camus

                      "Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well." - Voltaire

                      "Everyone's values are defined by what they will tolerate when it is done to others." - William Greider

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

                        Originally posted by Speed View Post
                        Great read!

                        Exactly my #1 concern with Danny coming back and replacing Lance. This unit is symbiotic defensively. Lance doesn't have to save himself defensively. I've never considered Danny a great team defensive player. He'll get the weak side block and in isolation against bigger small forwards, he's very good. When it comes to all out instinctive team defense, I've never thought he was above average. I feel like the current group is the best in the league. Maybe Shaw/Vogel can integrate him without concern, but its really a big deal to me. The theory that Lance has to appreciate his touches and fit in with the first team makes sense to me too. I'd be an advocate of Danny with the 2nd group for the entire year, but I doubt they'll do that. We'll see hopefully my concerns are invalid.
                        The #1 legit concern about Granger's eventual return to strating five - defensive impact. Stephenson has become an absolute terror on D. Granger is not a bad defender (assuming good health), but LS has taken it to a whole different level, IMO. Way more than I would have expected. And it obviously works with the other four starters.

                        I think the issue of Granger being reinserted with the starters is not a given. I think it should be handled based on the combination of DG's performance and conditioning. But the performance piece must include how his performance fits with the starters compared to what's developed in his absence. I would think at minimum, even if DG does go back to starting, it will be a good three weeks before there's enough data to justify it.
                        I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                        -Emiliano Zapata

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

                          Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                          I am curious as to how the defense last year with GH/PG/Granger/West/Hibbert compares ( on a statistical POV ) to this years lineup of GH/Lance/PG/West/Hibbert.
                          According to 82games, last year

                          DC/PG/DG/West/Hib played 1000.1 minutes with an ORtg of 109, DRtg of 100, for a net +9 pts per possession
                          GH/PG/DG/West/Hib played 229.3 minutes with an ORtg of 112, DRtg of 97, for a net +15 pts per possession

                          This year

                          GH/LS/PG/West/Hib has played 877.7 minutes with an ORtg of 110, DRtg of 96, for a net +14 pts per possession

                          (TrueHoop's numbers are slightly different: ORtg 108, DRtg 94, not sure why. But the net points is the same. Maybe they took them from a different point in time?)

                          So to answer your question, the defense is slightly better, but still very comparable to last year's lineup.

                          The big difference this year is that we have effective defensive bench units, and I think a big part of the credit should go to Ian Mahinmi here. I'll admit I wasn't too happy with the contract he received at the time, but dang has he done a great job. It also helps that Vogel has been mixing Paul G in with the backup units a lot.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

                            This was a great article. Another factor to the Pacers defense is that they don't gamble for steals which leaves them in great position to contest shots and rebound them when they miss the mark. One thing that I didn't see him mention, is how well the Pacers rebound the ball. They average 13 offensive rebounds per game and are #1 in the league in total Rebounds per game.

                            Like Pat Riley famously said, "No Rebounds, No Rings!". If you were wondering, the Miami Heat are dead last in the league in rebounds per game.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: (TrueHoop) Killer Lineup: The Pacers' stingy starters (Excellent article)

                              Originally posted by naptownmenace View Post
                              This was a great article. Another factor to the Pacers defense is that they don't gamble for steals which leaves them in great position to contest shots and rebound them when they miss the mark. One thing that I didn't see him mention, is how well the Pacers rebound the ball. They average 13 offensive rebounds per game and are #1 in the league in total Rebounds per game.

                              Like Pat Riley famously said, "No Rebounds, No Rings!". If you were wondering, the Miami Heat are dead last in the league in rebounds per game.
                              This article completely and in-depth shows why our unit is so effective
                              Smothered Chicken!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X