Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

    FICKS THE KNICKS



    -VS-



    Game Time Start: 7:00 PM EST
    Where: The Fieldhouse, Indianapolis, IN
    Officials: K. Mauer, K. Fitzgerald, O. Poole

    Media Notes: Indiana Notes, New York Notes
    Television: FOX Sports Indiana / MSG
    Radio: WFNI 1070 AM / WEPN 98.7 FM
    NBA Feeds:

    REMINDER: Per PD policy, please do not share a link to, describe how to search for, request a link to, or request a PM about streaming video of a NBA game that is not coming directly through the NBA. Not even in a "wink-wink, nudge-nudge, know-what-I-mean" round-about sort of way. Thank you


    32-21
    Home: 21-5
    East: 20-12
    32-18
    Away: 13-10
    East: 20-10
    Feb 22
    Feb 23
    Feb 26
    Feb 28
    7:00pm
    7:30pm
    7:00pm
    7:00pm
    HIBBERT
    WEST
    GEORGE
    STEPHENSON
    HILL
    CHANDLER
    ANTHONY
    SHUMPERT
    FELTON
    KIDD


    PACERS
    Danny Granger - left knee tendinosis (soon, grasshopper, soon)



    KNICKS
    Marcus Camby - strained left plantar fascia (out)
    Rasheed Wallace - sore left foot (out)




    Mark Evans: The State of the Pacers’ Bench

    With no Danny Granger so far this season, the Indiana Pacers have been a little bit
    thinner than they originally expected. While Paul George has certainly emerged in
    Granger’s absence, the Indiana bench is undeniably weaker with Lance Stephenson
    having to fill a starting role. Despite the fact that much of the bench has been
    underwhelming for most of the season, the Pacers still have some time to figure out
    who can fit into the playoff rotation over the next couple of months.

    Perhaps the biggest disappointment has been Gerald Green, who was signed this
    offseason after providing a decent offensive spark for the Nets last season. In 31
    games last year, Green averaged 18.4 points per 36 minutes on 48% shooting.
    Combined with his 39% from beyond the arc, a PER of 15.8 and freakish athleticism,
    it looked as if the Pacers were getting a nice bargain at $3.5 million per year for a
    backup wing who can provide some punch off the bench.

    Unfortunately for the Pacers, Gerald Green has regressed to resemble the player
    who played his way out of the league following a short stint with Dallas in 2008-09.
    In 43 games this season, his offensive rating is a horrendous 90, and his PER, at
    7.6, is barely half of what you would expect out of an average player. He’s
    converting on less than 35% of his shots from the field, and a laughable 28% from
    three. Defensively, Green is grading slightly better than he normally does, but is
    still probably one of the weaker links on a strong defensive team. By no means did
    anyone expect Gerald Green to look like James Harden or Manu Ginobili off the
    bench, but hardly anyone thought he would struggle this much. It has been painful.

    After dealing Darren Collison, D.J. Augustin was brought into town to provide
    support to George Hill at point guard. While he hasn’t been as disappointing as
    Gerald Green, Augustin has been nothing special. Strangely enough, he is shooting
    almost the exact same percentage from three as he is from the field overall, at
    slightly over 33%. While 33% from the field is not good by any stretch, his
    offensive rating (106) slightly outweighs his defensive rating (104) in the limited
    16 minutes per game he’s playing. His 10.5 points and 5.2 assists per 36 minutes
    don’t jump off the page, but he has been passable in the few minutes he gets.
    Plus, considering how wretched he played at the beginning of the season, the
    transition to mediocre has been a nice turn of events for Indiana. His size issues
    may always present a challenge—as we saw when

    Paul George fouled out against the Nets and George Hill was left helpless having
    to defend the bigger Joe Johnson—but the Pacers can probably get away with
    Augustin in the backup role when the playoffs come around. Although, if
    something happens to George Hill, it will be time to panic.

    On a more positive note, the Pacers have gotten decent work out of their two
    primary backup big men, Tyler Hansbrough and Ian Mahinmi. Both have embodied
    their starter equivalents in small ways; Hansbrough fills the rebounding void that
    occurs when David West leaves the floor, and Mahinmi provides rim protection
    when Roy Hibbert is on the bench. Both continue to be fairly limited offensively,
    with Hansbrough’s offensive rebounding and uncanny knack for getting to the line
    being the main offensive assets between the two of them. For his part, Mahinimi
    doesn’t do anything particularly well, but he can do a little bit of everything: finish
    at the rim, hit an open jumper and cut to the hoop. His bad hands continue to be
    his largest drawback.

    Basically, neither have been studs, but for a combined price of slightly over $7
    million, Indiana has bigger concerns than two backup big men who have been
    fairly productive...CONTINUE READING AT 8p9s

    Jim Cavan: Why We Watch - Jason Kidd's Furrows

    Jason Kidd plays basketball with a generosity and grace that seems to
    elude him off the court.




    For all the legitimately “heady” moments strewn across 17 superlative seasons
    – the hundreds of big shots, a Nerds box of triple-doubles, innumerable passes
    threaded through vanishingly narrow angles—Jason Kidd’s game winning three-
    point-and-one against the Brooklyn Nets last month certainly didn’t seem to
    rate terribly highly.

    Lucky—that’s what it was. And pretty ******* stupid, too, considering that
    Kidd actually got away with not one, but twoleg-extending kicks on the shot—
    a mid-air split so graceless and ridiculous it was a wonder that his body
    managed to calibrate itself long enough to get off the shot—either of which
    could’ve easily been called the other way. Neither was, and Kidd’s illusionist
    gambit instead capped an 18-point, six-rebound, six-assist throwback
    performance that helped the Knicks remain atop the Atlantic fold and kept his
    onetime charges a byline below. The Nets haven't been quite the same since.

    So it was lucky, and stupid, but also: it was heady, and it was savvy. Jason
    Kidd has been at it hard enough, and has been paying his wary, laser-sighted
    attention long enough, to identify the rare moments when rules take a back
    seat to context. He understands because he’s been running these lacquer-
    sheen stages since a good grip of his opponents were rocking diapers and
    running head first into table corners. He also understands this because Jason
    Kidd is blessed with a real-time genius that’s both wild and weirdly structured.
    On the court, he thrives in the moment. Off it, those split seconds have
    betrayed him. Or maybe it’s the other way around.

    If the mercurial Melo is the Knicks’ undisputed MVP, then Jason Kidd has
    become arguably their most indispensable player. Game after game, the
    Bockers’ brow-furrowed maestro unfurls found money from his medic’s bag
    of tricks—pinpointperimeter swings, sneaky baseline boards, pump fake
    foul-draws seemingly owed to a magi’s spell. In and by so doing, he has
    resurrected a career that last year had become something of a gilt
    basketball hangover.

    It took him more than a decade to figure out how to shoot, which at first
    looked like a failure but wound up being perfectly timed to earn him five more
    years of NBA paychecks and springtime runs. His most oft-utilized sleight—a
    thespianic behind-the-arc pump fake—resulted in a scar and a fist-sized flesh
    knot in the span of a week earlier this year. He responded to the latter by
    lifting a helmet from the Rangers’ locker room and wearing it during halftime
    shoot-around—a kid’s reaction to the pitfalls of a kid’s game, enacted by a
    player more closely removed from his first Social Security check than many
    of his peers are from their hospital basinets. Viewers and pundits crack wise
    about old man moves, but their laughter, to borrow from Vonnegut, is
    conducted purely in self-defense.

    And Kidd genuinely seems to be enjoying himself, with a level of throwback
    production to match. If the season ended today, his 17.7 player efficiency
    rating (PER) would be his best in five seasons. He’s hitting at 44% from deep,
    one the better marks in the league and the best of his career. That .187 win
    shares per-48 would be his highest mark since Bill Clinton was President, and
    second-highest of his career. The season doesn’t end today, of course, and
    Kidd will have plenty of time to regress and tire and wonder if he really wants
    to spend the next few years getting his head caved in by Andre Drummond.
    For the moment, though, he is playing alarmingly and dazzlingly Jason Kidd-
    like basketball.

    It was just a few months ago, and just a few weeks after signing with the
    Knicks, that Kidd was been taken into police custody after getting snockered
    in the Hamptons and running his white, NBA-issue Cadillac Escalade straight
    into, wait for it, a (****ing) Cablevision telephone pole. No one was hurt, and
    Kidd was eventually released on his own recognizance. Rather than a public
    apology, all we received—NBA viewers, Knick fans, anyone who unknowingly
    shared those narrow roads with a blind-drunk basketball player that night—
    was a cynical, course-par press release stating, in so many words, “My B,
    y’all.”

    Three years and $9 million for a guy already settled into a post-retirement
    cocktail haze? To mentor Jeremy Lin on what, exactly, the fine points of power
    -guzzling Manhattans? But then the Knicks brought back Raymond Felton and
    Lin was cut loose and the incredulous rhetorical questions raised an octave:
    here was a backcourt with an eating problem and a drinking problem. Could we
    camp out in a Coleman tent for season tickets, or do we just have to keep
    fingering “refresh” on our iPhones? What had seemed a savvy and relatively
    low-cost signing looked abhorrent enough for Knick fans to wonder whether a
    Phantom-masked Isiah might be pulling strings in a Quaalude haze from a
    deep Garden bunker.

    But it wasn’t just this most recent, eminently stupid offense, committed before
    the ink on one of the most lucrative assistant player-coaching gigs in NBA
    history had soaked through James Dolan’s puffin skin paper. For Kidd’s is a past
    equal parts statistically quantum and personally checkered; as generous and
    giddily improvisational as he is on the court, Kidd has mostly been kind of a
    loutish wreck off of it...CONTINUE READING AT THE CLASSICAL




    Pacers
    Mike Wells @MikeWellsNBA
    Jared Wade @8pts9secs
    Tim Donahue @TimDonahue8p9s
    Tom Lewis @indycornrows


    Knicks
    Frank Isola @FisolaNYDN
    Alan Hahn @alanhahn
    netw3rk @netw3rk
    Mike Kurylo @KnickerBlogger
    This is the darkest timeline.

  • #2
    Re: 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

    I sure am glad that ESPN decided to broadcast Hornets vs Cavaliers over this tonight
    //

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

      Originally posted by Pace Maker View Post
      I sure am glad that ESPN decided to broadcast Hornets vs Cavaliers over this tonight
      I am because that means I can watch it on league pass broadband instead of standard definition basic cable.
      "Danny Granger is one of the top players in the league. To move Danny, you better get a lot back." - Larry Bird

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

        Should be interesting to see how we defend them. Vogel's already said PG is guarding Melo, so that leaves West on who? Kidd?

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

          Originally posted by cgg View Post
          I am because that means I can watch it on league pass broadband instead of standard definition basic cable.
          I can't figure my broadband out, it buffers every 5 seconds and my connection is certainly not being maxed out. I've installed the octoshape plugin, but it did nothing for me. It looked more like a virus than anything. Luckily the DirecTV guy just came out and hooked up the dish at my new place.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

            Loss.




            PS: That's the spirit I know....
            Never forget

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

              Originally posted by HickeyS2000 View Post
              I can't figure my broadband out, it buffers every 5 seconds and my connection is certainly not being maxed out. I've installed the octoshape plugin, but it did nothing for me. It looked more like a virus than anything. Luckily the DirecTV guy just came out and hooked up the dish at my new place.
              Are you sure octoshape isn't disabled or anything? Have you tried another browser? Mine works great with octoshape.
              "Danny Granger is one of the top players in the league. To move Danny, you better get a lot back." - Larry Bird

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

                Originally posted by HickeyS2000 View Post
                I can't figure my broadband out, it buffers every 5 seconds and my connection is certainly not being maxed out. I've installed the octoshape plugin, but it did nothing for me. It looked more like a virus than anything. Luckily the DirecTV guy just came out and hooked up the dish at my new place.
                Octoshape is pretty sketchy software... it basically enables peer to peer upload/download to provide additional bandwidth. So basically you are paying for league pass, their servers should be providing nice smooth video, but instead you are getting some of your video from Kemo and they are eating your upload. I personally refuse to install it, and won't be paying for league pass in the future.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

                  Roy
                  Originally posted by IrishPacer
                  Empty vessels make the most noise.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

                    Lance
                    Originally posted by IrishPacer
                    Empty vessels make the most noise.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

                      Nice pass, Roy. Nice dunk, Pauly
                      Originally posted by IrishPacer
                      Empty vessels make the most noise.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

                        Did Chandler just shot outside of the paint?
                        Originally posted by IrishPacer
                        Empty vessels make the most noise.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

                          I don't think Kidd can guard Lance.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

                            Wow Lance is just a 64% Ft shooter??
                            //

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: 2/20/2013 Game Thread #54: Pacers Vs. Knicks

                              Man the older Kidd gets the more he looks like John MCain, amirite???

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X