Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

    So I have been following all of the Mad Ant games where Plumlee or Johnson have made appearances, and have been very pleased with both during their time there and am very happy Indiana is finally utilizing this tool. I have really liked what I have seen from Miles Plumlee in these games for the most part with the exception of his shot blocking skills. He seems to have terrible timing on his blocks and is often thrown out of position quite often on any head fakes and is frequently jumping too late or too early when trying to protect the rim, which is unfortunate because with this size and leaping ability I was really hoping this would be a strength in his game.

    So my question is do you guys think that his timing and shot block instincts can be developed from good coaching and playing behind two very good defensive bigs in Hibbert and Mahimi, or do you think that shot block timing is one of those natural talents where you either have it or you don't? It seems for the most part that shot blocking and it's timing is more of a natural instinct you don't necessarily see that many shot blockers blossom as their careers progress, but I am curious what others think. And if you can develop good shot blocking skills it seems like Indiana is a good spot to do it when you are playing behing Hibbert and Mahimi especially with the raw ability Plumlee possesses in his size and vertical to be good at this skill. So curious on your guys thoughts, thanks.

  • #2
    Re: Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

    In my mind shot blocking is way more about length, timing and instincts. Three things that IMO Plumlee lacks. He only has an 8'8" reach which is extremely low for a 6'11" guy.

    I'm still hopeful that he can use his size and other athletic gifts to become a bench contributer in the same way Jeff Foster was for many years. Just not sure if he has the same amount of grit and determination which in conjunction with his vert and ability to run the floor is what really made Foster a legit NBA player.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

      I've always thought that shot blocking is something you're either naturally good at or not... You have to be born with the ability to effectively read someone's body language and know where they're going before they get there... then you have to be able to know your own ability and how to time your jump and where to hold your reach... all in a split second...

      I've always felt that it is something you're born with because I believe I was...

      Growing up... In every sport I attempted I was always good to great on defense and putrid to so so on offense... I ended up getting into soccer and basketball... I shut people down because I could read their body language like a child's book allowing me to stick to them like glue... In the last rec league I played in a couple of years ago I held the local high school's leading scorer to his lowest scoring performance of the rec league season by denying him opportunities to get the ball, and challenging his shots... I had a hard time blocking his shots as he was 4" taller and a decade younger... But I still challenged them

      Timing is a big component to blocking shots... But in my opinion the ability to read someone's body language is the more important first step in blocking or challenging a shot... Because if your timing is off you may not block the shot but you can still contest it... Whereas if you don't know where to be you are either growing to foul or do nothing to contest the shot...
      Nothing in life worth having comes easy.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

        There's certainly an instinct to it, but there's also a skill of not falling for head fakes. I don't think anyone expects Plum to one day become Roy Hibbert (although, to be honest, nobody expected Roy Hibbert to be Roy Hibbert either), but I do think he (Plum) can be a serviceable defensive big man.
        This space for rent.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

          Honestly because Plumlee isn't long, but is fairly agile I think he is actually better suited for PF than C.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

            To me being a good shot blocker is a combination of being athletic, instinct, and knowing how to block shots which can be learned. We've all seen players who could jump out of the gym, but were never good shotblockers.

            I watched Plumjam's younger brother, who plays at Duke, the other day. IMO, Plumjam doesn't look to be the best of the Plumlee brothers. OTOH, in my "limited" viewing of Cody Zeller, he looks the better of the 3 Zeller brothers. JMOAA

            I'll say it again, Bird should have traded last years pick. He should have either traded out of the draft or traded up in the draft. Picking Plumjam at #26 was a mistake. He's never going to be much... wasted pick. While I'm at it, why was Bird EVER ALLOWED to make the draft pick? Just SMH.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

              Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
              I'll say it again, Bird should have traded last years pick. He should have either traded out of the draft or traded up in the draft. Picking Plumjam at #26 was a mistake. He's never going to be much... wasted pick. While I'm at it, why was Bird EVER ALLOWED to make the draft pick? Just SMH.
              Yeah, I can't believe we ever let Bird draft anybody. Green text.

              Seriously, late first-round picks are hard to trade. What do you think he'd have gotten for it?
              This space for rent.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

                Originally posted by Anthem View Post
                Yeah, I can't believe we ever let Bird draft anybody. Green text.

                Seriously, late first-round picks are hard to trade. What do you think he'd have gotten for it?


                Did you miss the part why was Bird even allowed to make the draft pick? He chose to leave, so why would he be the one making the pick with a new PBO already hired? Bird isn't some draft guru. Then maybe you think he is. We can re-hash all of Bird's picks, but we both know them by heart. Some were good picks and some failures.

                At #26 what super player was Bird going to get. Oh yeah, Plumlee. (in green) If the Pacers were going to trade out of a draft, this was the draft to do so. The pick could have been part of a bigger trade/deal of either trading up or out of the draft as I previously stated. This is why every year many teams in the bottom 80% of the draft try to deal or sell their picks. The chances of finding a gem in the latter part of the draft isn't a high %. IMO, the Pacers could be in the same situation the 013 draft depending on who is in the draft.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

                  Originally posted by Anthem View Post
                  Yeah, I can't believe we ever let Bird draft anybody. Green text.

                  Seriously, late first-round picks are hard to trade. What do you think he'd have gotten for it?
                  Teague would have been nice.
                  @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

                    Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
                    Did you miss the part why was Bird even allowed to make the draft pick? He chose to leave, so why would he be the one making the pick with a new PBO already hired? Bird isn't some draft guru. Then maybe you think he is. We can re-hash all of Bird's picks, but we both know them by heart. Some were good picks and some failures.
                    Because he was still employed by the Pacers? Because his scouting team had been scouting all year? Because he's shown himself to be a reasonably decent judge of talent? This is not something to get worked up over.

                    If the Pacers were going to trade out of a draft, this was the draft to do so. The pick could have been part of a bigger trade/deal of either trading up or out of the draft as I previously stated. This is why every year many teams in the bottom 80% of the draft try to deal or sell their picks. The chances of finding a gem in the latter part of the draft isn't a high %. IMO, the Pacers could be in the same situation the 013 draft depending on who is in the draft.
                    So... I'm confused. You're agreeing that lots of teams at the bottom of the first round try to trade out. That means the asking price is low. That means that it's hard to get any kind of value for a late first-round pick. Teams that trade out are generally GIVING away their picks. You're upset because Bird didn't give away a first-round draft pick?

                    I'm not enthralled with Plumlee, but he's far better than I expected. If you draft a guy after #25 and he's capable even making the team, you've done well. I can envision Miles becoming a rotation player. That's not bad with the #26 pick. A lot of people were killing Bird for not picking PJ3 with that pick, but he's not really produced more in the D-League than Plumlee has, and Plum plays a more important position. Again, this is not something to get worked up over.
                    This space for rent.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

                      Watching Plums in SL, I was disappointed with his shot blocking abilities as well. He would contest a shot or two but he didn't seem like a giant factor on D.

                      However, I believe that some of those things can be learned. Defensive position can be learning. Jumping straight up can be learned. We've seen that Pendy has got some of the defensive tricks that Hibby uses. So, I'm fairly certain that since Pendy was able to learn a thing or two by Hibbert then so will Plums.
                      Originally posted by IrishPacer
                      Empty vessels make the most noise.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

                        Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
                        Some were good picks and some failures.
                        Isn't that true for most all GMs?

                        To be honest, Bird has done a great job. He drafted Hibbert/Paul who both have very much blossomed into 2 All-Stars. He fixed our Looong drought of useless PGs. He made arguably the best free agent signing in Pacers franchise. Then drafted a kid in the 2nd round that everyone assumed was a problem child with no head for the NBA. Wow, has that panned out. Thats just our starting 5. He brought in Mahinmi, who you have to admit has turned it a damn good backup big, with actual size and a nice contract. He signed a great wrong coach, and gave him IMO the best assistant coach in the league.

                        What more do you want from him?
                        Last edited by LetsTalkPacers84; 01-19-2013, 06:35 PM.
                        If games are won and lost on a calculator and piece of paper, then why do we bother to play them?

                        @LetsTalkPacers

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

                          Originally posted by Anthem View Post

                          So... I'm confused. You're agreeing that lots of teams at the bottom of the first round try to trade out. That means the asking price is low. That means that it's hard to get any kind of value for a late first-round pick. Teams that trade out are generally GIVING away their picks. You're upset because Bird didn't give away a first-round draft pick?

                          STOP YOUR NONSENSE!

                          IF teams trade or sell the late picks, there must be a value to those picks to teams that trade or buy them. There are times, % is low, when a good player can be gotten. George Hill is an example.

                          Trading a pick by itself isn't something I ever mentioned. I said as PART of a trade. Some sweetner to make the deal more acceptable to both parties.

                          A theoretical scenario: lets say the Pacers want player X and offer Pacer Z for that player, but players X team won't do the deal. They would do the deal if the #26 pick is part of the deal. The Pacers feel player X is worth Pacer player Z and the #26 pick. You sweeten the deal with adding the #26 pick to get the deal done and the player you want.

                          There are numerous scenarios where a late pick can be a more valuable trading tool than a player drafted at #26, or in this case Plumlee.

                          Bird was leaving the Pacers thus he had no dog in the fight of picking who was drafted. Bird had a draft team and a board put together, and this wasn't Walsh's 1st rodeo at drafting either. Just extremely odd that the out going PBO stays around to make the draft pick. I've never known a top exec who after giving their resignation and his replacement on board being allowed to make a command decision that has influence on the future of the company. Maybe the pick was so inconsequential it didn't matter to Herb or Walsh, but to Bird it was just 1 more chance to pick a possible gem.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

                            Originally posted by LetsTalkPacers84 View Post
                            I

                            He brought in Mahinmi, who you have to admit has turned it a damn good backup big,

                            WHAT? Walsh brought in Mahinmi by trading DC and Dahntay for him. Let's not get carried away singing the praises about Bird.

                            That's the same Walsh that brought in Green and Augustin too.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Miles Plumlee Shot Blocking

                              There's only one problem Happy: You're not any good.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X