I think that some people here when they read about Hibbert's offensive game or actually the lack of it, automatically jump on the X poster who said it, like he also disregarded his defensive qualities when it's not true. You know, when they say Hibbert doesn't deserve the max contract or he sucks offensively, they mean that and just that. I think someone would be crazy if he disregarded Roy's massive defensive qualities and service to this team.
As for the question, he offers too much on defense to be traded. I've personally ripped him apart during the games for his pathetic offensive game but also praised him for his magnificent D. Unless you offer me Mark Gasol or Dwight Howard (although he seems a bit difficult character and a moaner), I wouldn't trade him. If he consistently sucks next year and the year after, then you need to think about it more. But right now I wouldn't touch this team. They are plain and simple beasts on the defensive end and I don't care if they are not pretty wins as long as we keep playing like we are lately and getting the Ws of course. We also expect Danny to come back. Just the thought we add more size and strength when Danny comes back, makes me even happier.