Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

    Originally posted by Peck View Post
    Gerald Green: B-

    My God this guy loves the three point line. Thankfully he did actually hit a very big three off of that Roy block but up until then he had missed them all. He is what he is and I’ve just had to come to grips with it. Some nights he’s going to look good other nights not so much. I think getting Danny back will help him some because he can then play with another shooter so he won’t be given the green light to chuck up shots all of the time. Oh well I’m making it sound like he sucked tonight and he didn’t. He helped out on the boards and while I don’t think he blocked a shot I am pretty sure he altered an attempt by Copeland.
    I really don't like watching Gerald Green play, but I'll say something bold: he'll help us win at least one game in the playoffs.

    Every season there is one player who, like Green, gets red hot when buckets are tough to come by. Two seasons ago it was Jamal Crawford for Atlanta vs. Orlando and last season it was Nick Young for the Clippers vs. Memphis. Young got red hot and led the Clippers back from a huge deficit to win.

    I want nothing to do with either player, but their style of play goes out the window in the playoffs.

    Speaking of playoffs, we could go .500 the rest of the way and still finish 45-37. That's not bad after the start we had.
    Last edited by imawhat; 01-11-2013, 12:13 PM.

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

      And since the Pacers are winning and playing well, of course the thread has to turn into Steve Novak of all people. He's in the NBA for a reason and that reason is his shooting. He's very good at it but that's all he does. Every team needs shooting, that's the nature of basketball, but Novak isn't dangerous if you keep a body on him. But he does have a place in the league obviously, just like a Korver, a Kerr, etc, but it's completely foolish to compare these guys to Reggie or Ray Allen, and it's beyond foolish to try to compare his one skill to to that of a Chandler or Griffin.

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

        The problem with novak is its his only aspect. With reg, his ability to do other things made his 3 point shooting deadly.
        DG for 3

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

          Originally posted by imawhat View Post
          I really don't like watching Gerald Green play, but I'll say something bold: he'll help us win at least one game in the playoffs.

          Every season there is one player who, like Green, gets red hot when buckets are tough to come by. Two seasons ago it was Jamal Crawford for Atlanta vs. Orlando and last season it was Nick Young for the Clippers vs. Memphis. Young got red hot and led the Clippers back from a huge deficit to win.

          I want nothing to do with either player, but their style of play goes out the window in the playoffs.

          Speaking of playoffs, we could go .500 the rest of the way and still finish 45-37. That's not bad after the start we had.
          He has done that a few times this season already. Not necessarily for big point, just points when we needed them. That was what Barbosa was supposed to bring but never did in the playoffs. My hope in Green becoming consistent is falling by the way side, and if that is all he ever is I hope we find a way to trade him to another team next year shortly after he goes off for 30 points against Miami.

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

            Advanced stats also really hate Novak. Like I said it's not so much what he does. It's how much time he takes to do it. 25 MPG to score 7PPG? What else is Novak doing to warrant that much PT? Hopefully his minutes go down when Shumpert gets back because I will like him more, otherwise, he's a big fat defensive liability at the small forward or shooting guard, he doesn't rebound all that well and he has a tendency to disappear.


            Comment


            • #51
              Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

              Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
              What else is Novak doing to warrant that much PT?
              He spreads the floor, duh.

              Biggest albino turd? I thought he was like 6'8". Troy's over 6'10".

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

                that Novak thing is getting out of hand. I mean why wouldn't we hate? We are Pacers fans after all right? Wouldn't you feel a bit of hate for a player from a rival team almost always doing that belt thing after he makes a three? also that 20+mpg he gets is ridiculous and not warranted when what he can do is only shoot threes. battier can shoot and defend, ray can also drive and sometimes dunk, bowen can defend, terry is a gamechanger and a spark off the bench. I think that is where the criticisms for Novak comes from he can't do anything else most of the time. It's ridiculous IMO to even bring up an argument about dunking not being allowed that Chandler, Griffin and all those dunkers would be out of work. i don't think Novak is worthless, but I think there are far better and more flexible 3pt specialists out there.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

                  Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                  Comparing shooters is often difficult. You have some guy who can only catch and shoot guys. You have other guys who can do a lot more, like run off screens, shoot of the dribble and shoot when well defended. Reggie is in the second category, which makes him much, much, much more valuable than those who can only catch and shoot.
                  And some just catch and ****

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

                    Originally posted by billbradley View Post
                    All of that is wrong. Reggie would have slashed under the arc. Bigs can still lay it in for 2. What are you talking about?
                    A lot of "Reggie moments" don't happen if the 3 point line is not there.
                    @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

                      I honestly think Vnzla is trolling us because there is no way I can truly see someone trying to draw a parallel between Reggie Miller and Steve Novak. I mean I can't even really see someone drawing a parallel between Shane Battier and Steve Novak.


                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

                        Originally posted by D0NT SH0OT ME View Post
                        Let's not get too enamored with Pendergraph just because he made a few shots. He may have played well offensively, but he gave up at least 5 offensive rebounds to the Knicks when he was in due to his complete inability to box out. Hopefully Frank points it out to him when they go over film because it really is just inexcusable for a player of his size to not even attempt to body up his man after a shot attempt.
                        In Pendergraph's defense, he was kind of put in the same position as that of a backup QB. He clearly doesn't get as many first-team reps, and needs work in some areas. But he is enthusiastic, a hard worker, and from what I've heard and can tell, has a decent basketball IQ. I've said it in another thread---I really think he could benefit from working with Jeff Foster as he could teach him about positioning and foot-work and the little things expected of a big man.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

                          Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                          Advanced stats also really hate Novak. Like I said it's not so much what he does. It's how much time he takes to do it. 25 MPG to score 7PPG? What else is Novak doing to warrant that much PT? Hopefully his minutes go down when Shumpert gets back because I will like him more, otherwise, he's a big fat defensive liability at the small forward or shooting guard, he doesn't rebound all that well and he has a tendency to disappear.
                          He plays that many minutes because they don't have anybody else that can "stretch the floor" like he does, the other team needs to have a defender on him at all times, "stretching the floor" is his job, and yes I hated the clown and Troy Murphy because he was playing 30+ minutes per game at power forward and center over guys like Roy, Tyler and Mcbob.
                          @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

                            Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                            I honestly think Vnzla is trolling us because there is no way I can truly see someone trying to draw a parallel between Reggie Miller and Steve Novak. I mean I can't even really see someone drawing a parallel between Shane Battier and Steve Novak.
                            Typical TJ, has nothing else to say so let's call that person a troll.
                            @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

                              Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                              He plays that many minutes because they don't have anybody else that can "stretch the floor" like he does, the other team needs to have a defender on him at all times, "stretching the floor" is his job, and yes I hated the clown and Troy Murphy because he was playing 30+ minutes per game at power forward and center over guys like Roy, Tyler and Mcbob.
                              Then the Knicks are always going to be at a major disadvantage defensively for those 25MPG all season long. They need him to be playing 15MPG tops.


                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: Odd thoughts: Slaying the Knicks in honor of Reggie Miller

                                About Paul and Lance, it seems that from among these two, we will have the guy (or guys) that can be a "finisher" for us at the end of a close game. That is, we will have our guy who, at the end of the game, everyone on the opposing team knows the ball is coming to him, but they will be powerless to stop him. Last night I saw both Lance and Paul create enough plays for themselves that while I still would give the nod to Paul, I can also see Lance heading the same way. It has been a pleasure to watch both of them mature before our eyes.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X