Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

    Originally posted by Anthem View Post
    Show your work! What games do you think will be won or lost?
    I will tell you what I told my high school algebra teacher. Eat poop and die!!!

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

      Wed 2 vs Washington - W
      Fri 4 @ Boston - L
      Sat 5 vs Milwaukee - W
      Tue 8 vs Miami - L
      Thu 10 vs New York - L
      Sat 12 vs Charlotte - W
      Sun 13 @ Brooklyn - L
      Tue 15 @ Charlotte - W
      Wed 16 @ Orlando - W
      Fri 18 vs Houston - L
      Mon 21 @ Memphis - L
      Wed 23 @ Portland - W
      Sat 26 @ Utah - L
      Mon 28 @ Denver - W
      Wed 30 vs Detroit - W

      8-7.
      This space for rent.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

        10-5

        Pacers will lose one game a week. Random loss, but make it up by winning games they shouldn't.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

          8-7
          Boston is bad and I think MIL won't look so tough in Indy despite the back to back. I think Miami kills them and gets everybody bailing on them as a "real" playoff team and that gets compounded with a loss to NY.

          Orlando I put down as a good trap loss since it's a road game on the back to back, but Houston is a prime example of a chance to come up with a quality home win. I don't think they can beat both Utah and Portland on the road, but I think they can beat one of them at least. Denver is just too hot.

          Also take note that the Detroit game is technically the beginning of the long virtual homestand.

          W Wed 2 vs Washington
          W Fri 4 @ Boston
          W Sat 5 vs Milwaukee

          L Tue 8 vs Miami
          L Thu 10 vs New York
          W Sat 12 vs Charlotte
          L Sun 13 @ Brooklyn
          W Tue 15 @ Charlotte
          L Wed 16 @ Orlando
          W Fri 18 vs Houston
          L Mon 21 @ Memphis
          L Wed 23 @ Portland
          W Sat 26 @ Utah
          L Mon 28 @ Denver
          W Wed 30 vs Detroit
          Last edited by Naptown_Seth; 01-09-2013, 12:50 AM.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

            11-4

            W- Wed 2 vs Washington (I'm perfect so far...)
            W- Fri 4 @ Boston (a whipping of these guys is in order)
            W- Sat 5 vs Milwaukee (Revenge on our mind)
            W- Tue 8 vs Miami (We usually get these guys atleast once, don't we?)
            L- Thu 10 vs New York (They usually get us atleast twice, don't they?)
            W- Sat 12 vs Charlotte (Still the Kittens)
            L- Sun 13 @ Brooklyn (DWill will score 40 and have 10 ***-ists)
            W- Tue 15 @ Charlotte (MEOW)
            W- Wed 16 @ Orlando (Who will be left after they trade Reddick and Jameer)
            L- Fri 18 vs Houston (If Greg Smith's shoes are dbl-knotted we are in trouble)
            L- Mon 21 @ Memphis (Gasol stays on floor- Revenge on their mind)
            W- Wed 23 @ Portland (We always) -- Andre --
            W- Sat 26 @ Utah (Play Well) --Miller Trip--
            W- Mon 28 @ Denver (Against the West) --Played in Portland, Denver and Utah--
            W- Wed 30 vs Detroit (DANNY RETURNS AT HOME... just in time to get traded by Feb 15th)

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

              Originally posted by Anthem View Post
              Show your work! What games do you think will be won or lost?


              Wed 2 vs Washington
              Fri 4 @ Boston
              Sat 5 vs Milwaukee

              Tue 8 vs Miami
              Thu 10 vs New York
              Sat 12 vs Charlotte

              Sun 13 @ Brooklyn
              Tue 15 @ Charlotte
              [Wed 16 @ Orlando
              Fri 18 vs Houston

              Mon 21 @ Memphis
              Wed 23 @ Portland
              Sat 26 @ Utah
              Mon 28 @ Denver
              Wed 30 vs Detroit



              11-4

              Very optimistic, but I'm feeling much better about this team and the defense.

              vs Miami is always going to be tough, going to Memphis is difficult, Houston will be a challenge, and it'll be quite difficult to beat Mil/NY/BKN in a week.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

                Wow, you guys are really optimistic. I thought my +.500 for the month was pretty optimistic.
                This space for rent.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

                  Wed 2 vs Washington W
                  Fri 4 @ Boston W
                  Sat 5 vs Milwaukee W
                  Tue 8 vs Miami L
                  Thu 10 vs New York W
                  Sat 12 vs Charlotte W
                  Sun 13 @ Brooklyn L
                  Tue 15 @ Charlotte W
                  Wed 16 @ Orlando W
                  Fri 18 vs Houston L
                  Mon 21 @ Memphis L
                  Wed 23 @ Portland W
                  Sat 26 @ Utah W
                  Mon 28 @ Denver L
                  Wed 30 vs Detroit W

                  10-5. An optimistic number it turns out, but completely doable. The schedule isn't as tough as people are saying. That doesn't mean the Pacers don't struggle, anything can happen, but the schedule isn't near as tough as people are saying.

                  There are only 5 times on the list that pass as legit really good teams the Pacers don't ever want to have to play. Miami, Memphis, New York, Denver and Houston. (I'm not afraid of Denver at all, but we'll throw them a bone)

                  I said we'd lose against Brooklyn, but really they suck. The rest of the teams on that list are average or below average. Portland, oston, Utah and Milwaukee are average teams the Pacers will handle, while the rest of the teams blow.

                  The only thing I said was the Pacers will avenge their loss against New York. Based off of odds, I figured the Pacers have a decent chance to win this game.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

                    Originally posted by mattie View Post
                    Wed 2 vs Washington W
                    Fri 4 @ Boston W
                    Sat 5 vs Milwaukee W
                    Tue 8 vs Miami L
                    Thu 10 vs New York W
                    Sat 12 vs Charlotte W
                    Sun 13 @ Brooklyn L
                    Tue 15 @ Charlotte W
                    Wed 16 @ Orlando W
                    Fri 18 vs Houston L
                    Mon 21 @ Memphis L
                    Wed 23 @ Portland W
                    Sat 26 @ Utah W
                    Mon 28 @ Denver L
                    Wed 30 vs Detroit W

                    10-5. An optimistic number it turns out, but completely doable. The schedule isn't as tough as people are saying. That doesn't mean the Pacers don't struggle, anything can happen, but the schedule isn't near as tough as people are saying.

                    There are only 5 times on the list that pass as legit really good teams the Pacers don't ever want to have to play. Miami, Memphis, New York, Denver and Houston. (I'm not afraid of Denver at all, but we'll throw them a bone)

                    I said we'd lose against Brooklyn, but really they suck. The rest of the teams on that list are average or below average. Portland, oston, Utah and Milwaukee are average teams the Pacers will handle, while the rest of the teams blow.

                    The only thing I said was the Pacers will avenge their loss against New York. Based off of odds, I figured the Pacers have a decent chance to win this game.
                    And if PG is able to slow Harden, I think HOU is very beatable as well. The good thing bout this team is when you play good defense, you're able to be competitive within every game.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

                      Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
                      And if PG is able to slow Harden, I think HOU is very beatable as well. The good thing bout this team is when you play good defense, you're able to be competitive within every game.
                      Correct, really I think the Pacers should be able to beat Houston, but that almost always seems to be a terrible matchup. That's the only reason why I listed them as such.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        10-5 with losses to Miami, NY, Memphis, Houston and Utah.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

                          W Wes 2 vs Washington (well, it already happened but you gotta post it)
                          W Fri 4 @ Boston
                          W Sat 5 vs Milwaukee
                          L Tue 8 vs Miami
                          W Thu 10 vs New York
                          W Sat 12 vs Charlotte
                          L Sun 13 @ Brooklyn
                          W Tue 15 @ Charlotte
                          ? Wed 16 @ Orlando
                          W Fri 18 vs Houston
                          L Mon 21 @ Memphis
                          W Wed 23 @ Portland
                          W Sat 26 @ Utah
                          L Mon 28 @ Denver
                          W Wed 30 vs Detroit

                          Short analysis of the predictions:

                          @ Boston: Seriously, why so many people think that we're going to lose this? It's too early for Boston to be playing good. They are 30th in rebounding. 30th! And their defense is awful when KG is on the bench. Their front court is extremely weak. They are starting Jason Collins at Center for crying out loud. Now, there's always the possibility of Paul Pierce being on fire and Rondo going ham. But even then, they don't have much help from the rest of their team. This will be Bradley's second game off of injury. Courtney Lee and Jason Terry are under-producing. And Barbosa has only logged 2 minutes in the past 5 games due to injury. They were easily beaten by our Western doppelganger last night. I expect a win.

                          vs Milwaukee: Milwaukee will be at Houston the previous game so they'll have to travel from Houston to Indy. We will have to travel from Boston to Indy. Both teams will be tired. The home crows really helps a good shooting like Milwaukee to shoot even better. So, I don't think that they're going to replicate their shooting in Indiana. Tricky defense but we should be able to win this as we have not looked bad against playoff teams at home.

                          vs Miami and vs New York: I expect us to go 1-1 in those two games. I feel that Miami is more likely to beat us than the Knicks simply because Miami is injury free and looking to embark on a new winning streak. Of course, Miami coasts during the regular season so you never know. I find it more probable that we beat the Knicks due to Felton's injury and due to the fact that teams that shoot a lot from the perimeter like the Knicks can easily go cold on an away game.

                          vs Charlotte: Well, we should beat the Bobcats.

                          @ Brooklyn: They fired their coach and now they're surging. It's also an away game so I'm fully expecting a loss.

                          @ Charlotte: Again, we should beat the Bobcats.

                          @ Orlando: This game is a question mark. It really depends on who the Magic trade in the deadline. If Redick and Jameer are still with them, I expect a loss. If not, I expect a win.

                          vs Houston: They will either kill us or we will kill them. If Harden gets his calls and puts PG in foul trouble then chances are that we're going to lose. If they hit their 3s, they could kill us as well. If they don't hit their 3s at a high clip and spend most of the game isolating Harden against PG (while not putting him on foul trouble, of course) then I can see us winning this. As it is a home game, I'll give the advantage to our guys but it's really, really close.

                          @ Memphis: They will beat us, no doubt about it. We are far too similar this season in order to get an qway win out of each other. They will hit more perimeter shots at their home, we will hit less so we will naturally lose.

                          @ Portland: Are they going to be the same team after the deadline? If yes, then we will beat them as they have a worse bench than ours. If they have upgraded our bench then it can go either way.

                          @ Utah and @ Denver: I think that we go 1-1 against those two. In general, I think that we split the West coast trip. I certainly see a loss in Memphis as I mentioned and I possibly see a win in Portland but I have no idea what is going to happen between those two. We possibly lose by the hottest one of the two and beat the other one.

                          vs Detroit: We should beat Detroit as it is going to be the first game of the homestand.

                          That's 10-4 with one wild card game. However, those predictions are fairly optimistic and I am willing to acknowledge. I can see us going anywhere from 11-4 to 8-7.

                          I definitely think that we're going to be over .500 for the month, though. We may face several stronger opponents but at least we get them at home for a change.
                          Originally posted by IrishPacer
                          Empty vessels make the most noise.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

                            Originally posted by Dece View Post
                            Real tough month, should learn a lot about this team. I got:

                            Wizards - W (I know, amazing prediction!!)
                            @Boston - L
                            Milwaukee - W
                            Miami - L
                            New York - L
                            Charlotte - W
                            @Brooklyn - L
                            @Charlotte - W
                            @Orlando - L
                            Houston - L
                            @Memphis - L
                            @Portland - L
                            @Utah - L
                            @Denver - L
                            Detroit - W

                            So we need to flip 3 of those L's to win the month... holding homecourt against Houston, beating Orlando on the road, and taking one of the road games off Denver or Utah seem like the 3-4 that could go either way to me. If we pull that off and go 8-7 or 9-6 for the month I'll be really impressed with this team.
                            I wanna keep this thread alive because I'm curious how well I do or don't know this team. Need to win tonight because it is only getting harder as the month goes on.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

                              Originally posted by Dece View Post
                              I wanna keep this thread alive because I'm curious how well I do or don't know this team.
                              Agreed. It's important to know how much we know our team.
                              Originally posted by IrishPacer
                              Empty vessels make the most noise.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: The January Win/Loss Prediction Thread

                                I'm late, and I think it's more accurate to just guess the total W/L rather than specify each game, but I'll play along:

                                Wed 2 vs Washington - W
                                Fri 4 @ Boston - L
                                Sat 5 vs Milwaukee - W


                                Tue 8 vs Miami - W
                                Thu 10 vs New York - L
                                Sat 12 vs Charlotte - W
                                Sun 13 @ Brooklyn - L
                                Tue 15 @ Charlotte - W
                                Wed 16 @ Orlando - W
                                Fri 18 vs Houston - W
                                Mon 21 @ Memphis - L
                                Wed 23 @ Portland - L
                                Sat 26 @ Utah - W
                                Mon 28 @ Denver - L
                                Wed 30 vs Detroit - W

                                7-5 from here on, 9-6 for the month. Very tempting to have us lose vs MIA, @ORL, and @UTA, but I just felt like that was a bit much.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X