Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 4
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 template Next
  • #1

    Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

    Nice article

    http://www.indystar.com/article/20121217/SPORTS04/212180303/Once-questioned-Pacers-forward-David-West-surpassing-outlasting-his-peers



    Indiana Pacers power forward David West has the names memorized as if there will be a final exam: Kenyon Martin, Stromile Swift, Amare Stoudemire, Marcus Fizer, Drew Gooden.

    West watched the NBA drafts in the years before he would be eligible and knew his playing style was different from his immediate predecessors at the position. He didn't play above the rim and he wasn't the quickest player on the court.

    West didn't have to figure out his "flaws." NBA teams told him prior to the 2003 draft that he'd a marginal player in the league because he didn't fit the prototype of a modern NBA power forward.

    "I never let any of that get to me, it just motivated me," said West, who has been surpassed at the position only by Stoudemire. "If you look around, most of those guys who could just fly out the roof dunking the ball are no longer in the league."

    And West?

    He's averaged double figures each of the past eight seasons, made two All-Star appearances, with possibility of being selected for a third this season.
    West could easily stick his nose in the air and ask all his doubters, "How do you like me now?" But that's not his style.

    "That's just never a part of me," West said as he shrugged his shoulders. "That's never appealed to me. I always felt like you just go out and play the game."

    Center Roy Hibbert is the Pacers' highest paid player. Danny Granger is the longest tenured. George Hill is the hometown favorite. Paul George has the most potential. West, simply put, is the backbone of the team. He's been the Pacers' most consistent player this season, averaging 17.6 points and 8.3 rebounds a game.

    "He just knows how to play the game," Pacers coach Frank Vogel said.

    Often overlooked

    West would go to local parks to play pickup games while growing up in Teaneck, N.J., just a rock's throw across the Hudson River from New York City.

    He had the skills to compete with older players, but was often one of the last players chosen because he didn't have the tools associated with being a street ball player. He wasn't breaking ankles with swift ball skills. He wasn't causing people to rush the court in excitement after a rim-shaking dunk.

    West, who didn't dunk for the first time until his junior year in high school, wasn't worried about doing those things. He focused on the fundamentals of the game, such as proper footwork in the post, a solid midrange game and being a team player

    "I never really depended on my ability to out-jump, out-quick guys," West said. "My athleticism isn't the best part of my game. It's always been my smarts. That's really been the foundation for me and I worked everything else around that."

    West had all the skills to be successful, but the college recruiters didn't see it that way.

    Old Dominion, East Carolina and Marshall were the only schools to recruit him while he was a lanky 6-4 kid at Garner Magnet High School in North Carolina. The major Division I schools -- just like NBA personnel would -- didn't think he had the tools to be successful. It wasn't until West attended Hargrave Military Academy in Virginia that Xavier got into the mix.

    "He had high-major skills, but his athleticism wasn't what most of the big programs were looking for," said Philadelphia 76ers assistant coach Jeff Capel, who was the head coach at Old Dominion when the school recruited West. "We thought we had a chance to get him until he went to prep school. That's when everything changed for him."

    West didn't let the criticism eat at him. He had two motivating factors: future Hall of Famer Tim Duncan and the late Skip Prosser.

    Duncan, a perennial all-star with the San Antonio Spurs, has earned the nickname Mr. Fundamental because of his ability to use his skill set to make up for his lack of athleticism. West watched and idolized Duncan while he starred at Wake Forest University.

    "That was validation that it was okay not to be flashy," West said.

    Prosser, the former coach at Xavier, gave West the confidence that he could have a future in the NBA.

    "Sometimes you get down on yourself because (you) don't look like those (prototype) guys," West said. "Coach told me not to worry about that stuff. He used to say, "Trust yourself and trust what you can do and more than anything, trust your work.' "

    West took Prosser's advice and ran with it. He was a three-time Atlantic-10 Player of the Year and an All-American at Xavier before being the No. 18 pick in the 2003 draft.

    Old-school game

    West's career became uncertain when he crumbled to the ground in pain in March 2011 against the Utah Jazz with a torn anterior cruciate ligament. The loss of athleticism -- speed and leaping ability -- is the hardest part to get back following the surgery.

    But West didn't have to worry about that problem because he didn't rely on those skills to be successful. His biggest issue was regaining confidence in his left knee. West often worried about how he landed on his knee after going up for a shot. He did his best to avoid having any contact on it.

    Despites those concerns, West averaged 12.8 points and 6.6 rebounds last season.

    The trust is back in his knee and so is the old West. Medical experts say players coming off ACL surgery usually don't return to form until the second year.

    West is bullying his way in the post, getting enough space to get his shot off and schooling the younger players who think they have an athletic advantage on him. He's arguably the best pick-and-pop power forward -- setting a screen then flaring to the perimeter for a jumpshot -- in the NBA.

    "One thing about D West is that he's one of the smartest players I've ever had," said Cleveland coach Byron Scott, who coached West in New Orleans. "His basketball IQ is off the charts. He knows how to get where he wants. His basketball skills are some of the best in the league for a big man.

    "It's just that nothing he does is real flashy. That's why he doesn't get all the attention that he probably deserves. That's just David, he's got an old-school type game, it's just very effective."

    Call Star reporter Mike Wells at (317) 444-6053
    Last edited by Unclebuck; 12-18-2012, 09:04 AM.
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

    This is the reason why West at his age right now is still worth keeping. Smart players outlast the athleticism-dependent ones as age affects their game. You see guys like Duncan, Kidd, Nash, KG, Pierce, Allen, Kobe and others still effective even at the late 30s.

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

      Originally posted by 15th parallel View Post
      This is the reason why West at his age right now is still worth keeping. Smart players outlast the athleticism-dependent ones as age affects their game. You see guys like Duncan, Kidd, Nash, KG, Pierce, Allen, Kobe and others still effective even at the late 30s.
      Totally agree.

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

        Originally posted by 15th parallel View Post
        This is the reason why West at his age right now is still worth keeping. Smart players outlast the athleticism-dependent ones as age affects their game. You see guys like Duncan, Kidd, Nash, KG, Pierce, Allen, Kobe and others still effective even at the late 30s.
        I realize you are only listing current players, but you could add Reggie Miller to the list of smart players who played late into their 30's. And Reggie could have played another year or two if he wanted.

        We need West next season. Tyler isn't good enough to start, so if West leaves, then we will have to acquire a starting power forward, which isn't that easy. Just hope West wants to come back next season

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

          DW is still a beast and I hope we can re-sign him for another two year stint. He might not be the face of the franchise but he is the leader of the team right now.

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

            And I also think he just wants to win (not to suggest he doesn't like to score, everyone, or almost everyone likes to score) but he'll sacrifice his scoring for the good of the team if he is convinced it will help the team win. Plus he is one of our best passers. If you let West leave at the end of the year, and bring someone else in to play the position, who knows they might need to get their numbers or they will cause chemistry problems.


            My concern was whether the combination of West and Roy were good enough defensively as a tandem to get the job done. Well Roy keeps getting better and better, so I think they are.

            Comment

            • #7
              Re: Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

              He's smart, level-headed, strong, determined, and skilled. That's a recipe for success.
              There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

              Comment

              • #8
                Re: Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

                Originally posted by 15th parallel View Post
                This is the reason why West at his age right now is still worth keeping. Smart players outlast the athleticism-dependent ones as age affects their game. You see guys like Duncan, Kidd, Nash, KG, Pierce, Allen, Kobe and others still effective even at the late 30s.
                I completely agree. This is why I would have no problem giving him a 3 or 4 year deal for 8 Mil per

                Comment

                • #9
                  Re: Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

                  This guy continues to move up rapidly in my list of all-time favorite Pacers players. What's not to love?
                  Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                  Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                  Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                  Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                  And life itself, rushing over me
                  Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                  Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Re: Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

                    Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                    I realize you are only listing current players, but you could add Reggie Miller to the list of smart players who played late into their 30's. And Reggie could have played another year or two if he wanted.

                    We need West next season. Tyler isn't good enough to start, so if West leaves, then we will have to acquire a starting power forward, which isn't that easy. Just hope West wants to come back next season
                    Keeping him will be about affording a new contract, I really think he would want to stay and same with Pacers. Just gotta get the right numbers to make it work for everyone.
                    Garbage players get 1st round picks, (WTF)! All of the NBA must hate the Pacers! LOL

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Re: Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

                      And let me add something that I think is common in all of the "ageless" players: they have a dependable mid-range to long-range game. They don't need to always blow away their guards through speed to score. They don't need to always use brute force to get inside for a closer to the basket shot. All they need is enough space, enough separation. Or a good screen for an open shot from downtown. Or a nice setup from 15-18ft. Not only it becomes reliable as their athleticism leaves them gradually, it also becomes a "recovery tool" especially coming from an injury, regardless of what type they may be, and can also reduce the risks of injury as it requires less contact and less force.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Re: Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

                        Originally posted by 15th parallel View Post
                        This is the reason why West at his age right now is still worth keeping. Smart players outlast the athleticism-dependent ones as age affects their game. You see guys like Duncan, Kidd, Nash, KG, Pierce, Allen, Kobe and others still effective even at the late 30s.
                        I think this is a really nice point, and there clearly is some data to back it. However, the tactics question is: do you stick with West for a couple of years, or do you invest in a player that matches up age wise with the sweet spot of the rest of the team?

                        IE, do you put effort into going after a longer term deal for a Millsap-type, or do you stick with West, knowing that you're just delaying a generational move that has to be made? Hansbrough's (lack of) performance is what has put us into this position, unfortunately.

                        Thank god I don't have to make these calls.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Re: Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

                          I could watch Mr. West play basketball all day long, really hope he is in the future plans of this team
                          GO PACERS!!!

                          Twitter: @Circlecity3318

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Re: Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

                            Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
                            This guy continues to move up rapidly in my list of all-time favorite Pacers players. What's not to love?
                            Agreed. He's exceeded my expectations since Bird signed him last December.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Re: Indystar: David West is surpassing and outlasting his peers

                              Originally posted by docpaul View Post
                              I think this is a really nice point, and there clearly is some data to back it. However, the tactics question is: do you stick with West for a couple of years, or do you invest in a player that matches up age wise with the sweet spot of the rest of the team?

                              IE, do you put effort into going after a longer term deal for a Millsap-type, or do you stick with West, knowing that you're just delaying a generational move that has to be made? Hansbrough's (lack of) performance is what has put us into this position, unfortunately.

                              Thank god I don't have to make these calls.
                              I think we don't need to always go younger at every position. What I mean is you still have PG, Hill and Hibbert as your primary youth squad. And Lance can also be a part of it. and you see other teams surround their youth with winning veterans. West being old is not exactly a detriment, as you bank on your other young guys for the future of the team. Having a solid veteran presence that can contribute at a high level can be a winning presence once our young guys start to mature (something similar to the 90's Pacers).

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 3 4 template Next
                              Working...
                              X