Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

What movie did you last watch?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: What movie did you last watch?

    Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
    Watch it again, and keep watching it until you agree it is a great movie.
    And go see No Country For Old Men while you're at it.

    I really like Fargo, but No Country is the best Coen Brothers film not named Lebowski. (Haven't seen Miller's Crossing.)
    Read my Pacers blog:
    8points9seconds.com

    Follow my twitter:

    @8pts9secs

    Comment


    • Re: What movie did you last watch?

      Originally posted by JayRedd View Post
      And go see No Country For Old Men while you're at it.

      I really like Fargo, but No Country is the best Coen Brothers film not named Lebowski. (Haven't seen Miller's Crossing.)
      I want to see No COuntry for Old Men but I will wait for the DVD of it.

      Superbad

      Have seen it a few times now. I was waiting for people to come over and just needed something that I didnt have to pay attention to so this movie won out. I think everyone knows what goes on in this movie by now so no more explanation is needed.

      Live Free of Die Hard

      It was okay. Not as good as the first few of them and not John McLaine is a super hero who can survive ridiculous falls, jump onto Jets, drive anything with wheels and without, and kill people without mercy. I think he would have been suspended from detective work after this movie or at least had a lot of explaining to do seeing as how he single handedly destroyed a city pretty much.

      Comment


      • Re: What movie did you last watch?

        Galaxy Quest

        Always a fun movie to watch and it never gets old. This and Hot Fuzz should be the standard for parodies...

        Saw

        Was always intrigued by it, and after finally seeing it I have no real intention of watching it again or any seeing any of the sequels.
        Originally posted by Natston;n3510291
        I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of the 3 T.J.s working for them, and that ain't bad...

        Comment


        • Re: What movie did you last watch?

          Originally posted by dcpacersfan View Post
          A History of Violence (2005)
          I think that was one of the most overrated movies I have ever seen...

          Also... you should enjoy this...
          http://www.the-editing-room.com/historyofviolence.html
          Originally posted by Natston;n3510291
          I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of the 3 T.J.s working for them, and that ain't bad...

          Comment


          • Re: What movie did you last watch?

            Just saw I Am Legend. What a horrible, horrible movie. Plot holes all over the place and just generally a horrible movie. How they managed to get plot holes in the first place is an accomplishment considering there was no plot.

            Here are my gripes...

            Spoiler Spoiler:


            I could go on, but I won't. I tried to like the movie at several parts, but I couldn't.


            Comment


            • Re: What movie did you last watch?

              Originally posted by Indy View Post
              Just saw I Am Legend. What a horrible, horrible movie. Plot holes all over the place and just generally a horrible movie. How they managed to get plot holes in the first place is an accomplishment considering there was no plot.

              Here are my gripes...

              Spoiler Spoiler:


              I could go on, but I won't. I tried to like the movie at several parts, but I couldn't.
              Um. I went and saw this movie. I don't agree with more than half the things you said and could go into detail explaining them, but I'm not going to.

              I expected more from this movie than I received. I think it was overhyped and only ended up being an average movie.

              3 out of 5 for me.

              Comment


              • Re: What movie did you last watch?

                Originally posted by Indy View Post
                Just saw I Am Legend. What a horrible, horrible movie. Plot holes all over the place and just generally a horrible movie. How they managed to get plot holes in the first place is an accomplishment considering there was no plot.

                Here are my gripes...

                Spoiler Spoiler:


                I could go on, but I won't. I tried to like the movie at several parts, but I couldn't.
                Spoiler Spoiler:


                Sorry to be such an a$$ about it, but it is disheartening to see a movie of such quality get reamed because someone couldn't comprehend the complexity of the story and piece together anything that wasn't directly laid out in visuals.

                It isn't the movie of the year, or Oscar caliber, but the only real reason for it is that Oscar never praises movies of this genre, nor do they win many other awards, aside from special effects. In my opinion, movies of this genre, as well done as this one was, are just as worthy as more literary titles that often win the most prizes. Besides, prizes don't make the movie good. They only confirm someone's opinion that it was good.

                This story is a timeless classic, as it was a popular and acclaimed piece of literature, and had already been translated to the big screen twice before this version. I will check out the other movies (The Last Man on Earth, and The Omega Man) because it is a very interesting story. My guess is that they will pale in comparison simply because the quality of movie making as a whole has drastically improved in all facets of production. That's not to say there aren't turds still being made, but the good stories of the past are often told much better (and in a much more visually stunning way) now than ever before. I know it is sacrilege to suggest it, but I would welcome the original Star Wars trilogy being remade with current technology. I guarantee that they would KILL.

                Oh, and if are giving it a rating, I will go with a 1-10 scale, 10 being the best. I would give this movie an 8, maybe 9. I will own it on DVD the day it comes out. I may go see it at the theater again.

                Oh, and the trailer for The Dark Knight kicked *** too. Can't wait to see it. Once again, seems to prove my point about remaking good, old stories with new technology and movie-making mentality. So much more is expected of movies now. Not just visually, but intelligent writing too......
                Last edited by heywoode; 12-18-2007, 01:12 AM. Reason: stupid typos because it's late and I should be in bed...



                RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                Comment


                • Re: What movie did you last watch?

                  I am Legend looks like crap but then again so do all the movies of that genre.

                  Comment


                  • Re: What movie did you last watch?

                    Originally posted by heywoode View Post
                    Spoiler Spoiler:


                    Sorry to be such an a$$ about it, but it is disheartening to see a movie of such quality get reamed because someone couldn't comprehend the complexity of the story and piece together anything that wasn't directly laid out in visuals.

                    It isn't the movie of the year, or Oscar caliber, but the only real reason for it is that Oscar never praises movies of this genre, nor do they win many other awards, aside from special effects. In my opinion, movies of this genre, as well done as this one was, are just as worthy as more literary titles that often win the most prizes. Besides, prizes don't make the movie good. They only confirm someone's opinion that it was good.

                    This story is a timeless classic, as it was a popular and acclaimed piece of literature, and had already been translated to the big screen twice before this version. I will check out the other movies (The Last Man on Earth, and The Omega Man) because it is a very interesting story. My guess is that they will pale in comparison simply because the quality of movie making as a whole has drastically improved in all facets of production. That's not to say there aren't turds still being made, but the good stories of the past are often told much better (and in a much more visually stunning way) now than ever before. I know it is sacrilege to suggest it, but I would welcome the original Star Wars trilogy being remade with current technology. I guarantee that they would KILL.

                    Oh, and if are giving it a rating, I will go with a 1-10 scale, 10 being the best. I would give this movie an 8, maybe 9. I will own it on DVD the day it comes out. I may go see it at the theater again.

                    Oh, and the trailer for The Dark Knight kicked *** too. Can't wait to see it. Once again, seems to prove my point about remaking good, old stories with new technology and movie-making mentality. So much more is expected of movies now. Not just visually, but intelligent writing too......
                    Spoiler Spoiler:


                    Look I'm glad you liked the movie. Really I am, but I went with two other guys and they both hated it. As did the ten or so other people I heard walking out with the same complaints we have.

                    Hey, but feel free to question my intelligence and talk down to me because I didn't like a movie that you did. No reason for you to be reasonable about it at all cause I'm just an idiot with bad movie taste.

                    And please don't apologize for being "an a$$" especially when its clear to everyone that you aren't sincere about it.
                    You want to question my taste in movies go right ahead especially because movies are 100% opinion oriented and everyone should be entitled to their thoughts on the subject, but DO NOT and I mean DO NOT go questioning my intelligence. It is out of line and extremely disrepectful. Asking me whether or not I knew the movie was fiction? Come on. Does that really help you prove your point? And don't even get me started on this line "There are these things called DEALERSHIPS" Oh no really? Gee whiz thanks for filling me in on this. I've been living in a box for the past 19 years. After reading your post and dissection of my intelligence I'm shocked I ever graduated from Brebeuf Jesuit or got accepted into IU and the Kelley School of Business. I must be one lucky S.O.B. If it seems like I'm a little ticked about your tone it would be because I am. In my original post, NO WHERE do I question the level of intelligence of someone who might like the film. However almost immediately in your reply you question mine. I don't even know where that came from. Believe it or not, you might find this a quality film and so will others, but there will be lots of people like me who don't think its a quality film and who didn't like it. That does not make us stupid.
                    Last edited by Trader Joe; 12-18-2007, 02:18 AM.


                    Comment


                    • Re: What movie did you last watch?

                      There were quite a few plotholes in "I Am Legend" whether it was for the intent of debate or just shoddy writing is purely speculation. The movie other than the basic framework is nothing like the book which is often the case, so don't go looking to the book for answers to fill in things that were questionable in the movie, you won't find them. That's not saying the book is a bad read either, the movie just goes in a completely opposite direction of the book, characters are missing, storyline gets twisted around, bits and pieces of the book are borrowed but not as emphasized in the movie, ending is different...etc.

                      That being said if you go to this movie with the mindset for pure entertainment I think you'll be pretty content with the movie. If you go to this movie with the mindset of "oh whatever we're supposed to believe..." or "no way that could ever happen" you'll probably be disappointed.

                      I think part of the problem is for whatever reason this particular genre of movies makes it harder for people to suspend disbelief in some instances to enjoy the quality of the show. If you go and watch action movies, lets say Die Hard movies for example and see how John Mcclain lives through the most insane events you usually see people cheer instead of people saying "whatever he should have been dead 80 times over by this point".

                      Overall on a 1-10 scale i'd give this movie a 7. Not the best movie i've ever seen, It had its moments and kept me in suspense for a good portion of the movie, Will Smith did a great job with his acting.
                      Spoiler Spoiler:

                      Comment


                      • Re: What movie did you last watch?

                        I liked I Am Legend and I agree with Heywoode fully on what he stated and disagree with most of what Indy said. I would go into details but I am tired and about to sleep. That and I think Heywoode already went through point by point what Indy said was pretty much wrong.

                        Comment


                        • Re: What movie did you last watch?

                          Originally posted by Indy View Post
                          Spoiler Spoiler:


                          Look I'm glad you liked the movie. Really I am, but I went with two other guys and they both hated it. As did the ten or so other people I heard walking out with the same complaints we have.

                          Hey, but feel free to question my intelligence and talk down to me because I didn't like a movie that you did. No reason for you to be reasonable about it at all cause I'm just an idiot with bad movie taste.

                          And please don't apologize for being "an a$$" especially when its clear to everyone that you aren't sincere about it.
                          You want to question my taste in movies go right ahead especially because movies are 100% opinion oriented and everyone should be entitled to their thoughts on the subject, but DO NOT and I mean DO NOT go questioning my intelligence. It is out of line and extremely disrepectful. Asking me whether or not I knew the movie was fiction? Come on. Does that really help you prove your point? And don't even get me started on this line "There are these things called DEALERSHIPS" Oh no really? Gee whiz thanks for filling me in on this. I've been living in a box for the past 19 years. After reading your post and dissection of my intelligence I'm shocked I ever graduated from Brebeuf Jesuit or got accepted into IU and the Kelley School of Business. I must be one lucky S.O.B. If it seems like I'm a little ticked about your tone it would be because I am. In my original post, NO WHERE do I question the level of intelligence of someone who might like the film. However almost immediately in your reply you question mine. I don't even know where that came from. Believe it or not, you might find this a quality film and so will others, but there will be lots of people like me who don't think its a quality film and who didn't like it. That does not make us stupid.
                          Now it has devolved into trying to convince YOU that the movie was good. My first post was just responding to your obvious mistakes with critiquing the movie plot and reasoning. I can live with the fact that you didn't like it, but to say it sucked for the reasons you give...that is what bothered me. Frankly, given the level of reasoning I saw in your description/gripe about the movie, I don't know what to believe about your intelligence level. I'm not saying you're stupid, I'm just saying I don't know.

                          Fine. You got into IU and Kelly. So have hundreds of thousands of other people. I really hope it works out for you. Both are fine schools and you should go far if you do well there. More power to you. Good luck and stay focused with what matters. It is easy to lose sight of that in Bloomington, especially during Little 5 weekend or when the Hoosiers are doing well in the polls.

                          I'm not going to bother with counterpointing your counterpoints, because it has gotten ridiculous, and if you have to be spoonfed the idea of the movie, then you obviously aren't going to get it when I spell it out either.

                          I'm sorry for insulting your intelligence. I honestly do mean it. It is, after all, just a matter of opinion about the quality of a movie. I honestly didn't mean to make it so personal. Again, I apologize for doing so. I can agree that we agree to disagree and move on. I'm not trying to end the conversation; if you have more to say, I'm here to listen. I was just giving you the opportunity to end it.



                          RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                          Comment


                          • Re: What movie did you last watch?

                            Originally posted by TheDon View Post
                            There were quite a few plotholes in "I Am Legend" whether it was for the intent of debate or just shoddy writing is purely speculation. The movie other than the basic framework is nothing like the book which is often the case, so don't go looking to the book for answers to fill in things that were questionable in the movie, you won't find them. That's not saying the book is a bad read either, the movie just goes in a completely opposite direction of the book, characters are missing, storyline gets twisted around, bits and pieces of the book are borrowed but not as emphasized in the movie, ending is different...etc.

                            That being said if you go to this movie with the mindset for pure entertainment I think you'll be pretty content with the movie. If you go to this movie with the mindset of "oh whatever we're supposed to believe..." or "no way that could ever happen" you'll probably be disappointed.

                            I think part of the problem is for whatever reason this particular genre of movies makes it harder for people to suspend disbelief in some instances to enjoy the quality of the show. If you go and watch action movies, lets say Die Hard movies for example and see how John Mcclain lives through the most insane events you usually see people cheer instead of people saying "whatever he should have been dead 80 times over by this point".

                            Overall on a 1-10 scale i'd give this movie a 7. Not the best movie i've ever seen, It had its moments and kept me in suspense for a good portion of the movie, Will Smith did a great job with his acting.
                            Spoiler Spoiler:
                            I can live with this assessment.

                            I heard that the book takes place in a third world country, so I was expecting a lot of differences. I like the premise behind the movie. I've always been fascinated with the idea of the apocalypse. Not sure if it is a morbid curiosity or my own way of dealing with the obviousness of dying someday, but the subject interests me.

                            Without revealing your spoiler, that is good to know about the book and I'm glad the director chose not to portray Neville that way also....



                            RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                            Comment


                            • Re: What movie did you last watch?

                              I really don't think my complaints are that far off base. I felt at times like the directors weren't sure what genre of movie they wanted it to be. At times it felt too much like a lets make the screen really dark or play some music and then something will jump out at you horror style of movie. I really don't enjoy those.
                              In closing, I'll just finish by saying that it wasn't what I was expecting and that threw me of a little bit. I was expecting it to be more focused on character development and it seemed more focused on shock value. A lot of my complaints could have been gotten rid of in 10-20 minutes of extra film time that tied up some loose ends. The movie was only an hour and forty minutes or so and 10-20 minutes of extra story wouldn't have hurt anyone.

                              Spoiler Spoiler:
                              Last edited by Trader Joe; 12-18-2007, 02:02 PM.


                              Comment


                              • Re: What movie did you last watch?

                                Originally posted by Indy View Post
                                I really don't think my complaints are that far off base. I felt at times like the directors weren't sure what genre of movie they wanted it to be. At times it felt too much like a lets make the screen really dark or play some music and then something will jump out at you horror style of movie. I really don't enjoy those.
                                In closing, I'll just finish by saying that it wasn't what I was expecting and that threw me of a little bit. I was expecting it to be more focused on character development and it seemed more focused on shock value. A lot of my complaints could have been gotten rid of in 10-20 minutes of extra film time that tied up some loose ends. The movie was only an hour and forty minutes or so and 10-20 minutes of extra story wouldn't have hurt anyone.

                                Spoiler Spoiler:
                                I would've liked the movie to be longer, just so there could be more of it....The movie made me think about how some things happened and left some things to the imagination. That is what made it so powerful for me. I like movies like Die Hard and the same, but movies that make me think have a much greater impact on me.

                                Spoiler Spoiler:



                                RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X