Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Spurs to be punished for resting players

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

    Originally posted by aamcguy View Post
    I don't really understand any complaining about an imbalance of rest between teams or an imbalance in home/away games. Because when a team has a more compact schedule in one week, it means they will have another weak that is a very light schedule. When a team has a lot of road games bunched together, it means they have a lot of home games bunched together somewhere else.
    This is true in general but we're talking about this specific match-up here.

    That's a nationally televised game that was supposed to draw a lot of fans because it would be a derby between two contenders. However, the schedule made sure that one of the two teams wouldn't be able to compete.

    Pop had every right to protest the fact that his team was not given an equal opportunity in this game (the fact that this game was nationally televised does matter).

    Also, the game that the Spurs are playing in 2 days is much, much more important than the one they played together.
    Originally posted by IrishPacer
    Empty vessels make the most noise.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Nuntius View Post
      This is true in general but we're talking about this specific match-up here.

      That's a nationally televised game that was supposed to draw a lot of fans because it would be a derby between two contenders. However, the schedule made sure that one of the two teams wouldn't be able to compete.

      Pop had every right to protest the fact that his team was not given an equal opportunity in this game (the fact that this game was nationally televised does matter).

      Also, the game that the Spurs are playing in 2 days is much, much more important than the one they played together.
      That's ridiculous. Equal opportunity...on an nba schedule?

      Should he have protested because Miami gets to use lebron and his team doesn't? That's not fair either....

      It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

      Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
      Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
      NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

      Comment


      • #78
        Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

        Originally posted by Kstat View Post
        Should he have protested because Miami gets to use lebron and his team doesn't? That's not fair either....
        It is fair because he has Duncan

        This game was supposed to be a clash of the titans. It was supposed to be a derby. But that was just fool's gold as the result was already skewed by the schedule making.

        Imo, he has every right to protest it.

        And once again the game against Memphis in Saturday matters a lot to them. The game against the Heat? It only matters to the media.
        Originally posted by IrishPacer
        Empty vessels make the most noise.

        Comment


        • #79
          Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

          everytime when i think nba can't be a bigger joke, stern surprises me. he can resign and let tnt manage the nba. i'm sure things can't be worse.

          btw almost beating heat without the starters. you gotta respect popovich.

          Comment


          • #80
            Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

            Originally posted by Kstat View Post
            Btw, there's no slippery slope here. You're best guys have to at least be in the building and give the appearance that they're going to play, so your viewing audience doesn't turn the channel before the game even starts.
            Stern or the NBA shouldn't be in the position to dictate what the Coach or a Team plays. I understand that the NBA is a business.....but where is the line drawn where a Coach is allowed to rest ANY of his Players?

            Based off of this punishment.....it sounds like the answer is that there shouldn't be a line drawn.....if the Starting 5 are fair game....then the guy at the end of the bench should "technically" be fair game as well to be fined as well.

            I know that there are Stars in the NBA and on Teams....which are light years better than the 15th guy on the roster.....but from the Players and Owners POV.....there shouldn't be any distinction between the Starting 5 and the 15th guy on the bench when it comes to the Coaches decision to rest who he wants to rest.

            On top of that....this isn't the first time that Pop has rested the Big 3......much less the first time that any Team has rested any of their key Players. Why hasn't the Spurs ( much less any of the SuperStar Teams with an aging Starting lineup ) been fined last year for doing the same thing? What's the difference? As some have mentioned.....is it just because it's a Thursday night TNT game?

            Where is the line drawn when it comes to who MUST play and who DOESN'T NEED to play?

            Who decides this now? Stern/NBA or the Team/Coach?

            To me, it is a slippery slope.
            Last edited by CableKC; 11-30-2012, 04:20 AM.
            Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

            Comment


            • #81
              Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

              Stern issuing punishment on a team/coach/player for no other reason than not playing them is the definition of a slippery slope. When David West doesn't play the last 4 games of the year (I SAID IT!) even though he's healthy, then Vogel or the franchise should get fined. That's the clear precedent.

              I realize Stern's on his way out so he doesn't give a damn, and I do sorta kinda agree that Pop sitting his guys hurts the league (for like 12 hours), but you've got to be consistent. Where's the line drawn? November 29th? March 29th? If Stern issues fines or whatever he needs to hit ESPN and NBATV and specifically explain his reasoning. I don't like Pop sitting his guys. But I dislike Stern basically dictating playing time much more. Stern wants to put out a statement bashing Pop, a general "I disagree with their decision" statement, fine. But fining a coach for managing his roster how he sees fit is just way too much.

              Comment


              • #82
                Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                Popovich has always liked sticking his finger in the David Stern's eye but it's always been harmless stuff. Once you start messing with people's money, that's when the problems start. Can't blame Stern for being mad. The league builds the season narrative through strategically placed games throughout the year. Pop knows the deal, it's part of the reason his paycheck has so many 0's on it.

                Comment


                • #83
                  Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                  Pop should have just benched his starters rather than sending them home. I think Popovich took it to the extreme, and since the game is nationally televised, not only does it disappoint fans but it loses business too. If this game wasn't televised, I think Stern's would have been less infuriated.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                    Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
                    Stern issuing punishment on a team/coach/player for no other reason than not playing them is the definition of a slippery slope. When David West doesn't play the last 4 games of the year (I SAID IT!) even though he's healthy, then Vogel or the franchise should get fined. That's the clear precedent.

                    I realize Stern's on his way out so he doesn't give a damn, and I do sorta kinda agree that Pop sitting his guys hurts the league (for like 12 hours), but you've got to be consistent. Where's the line drawn? November 29th? March 29th? If Stern issues fines or whatever he needs to hit ESPN and NBATV and specifically explain his reasoning. I don't like Pop sitting his guys. But I dislike Stern basically dictating playing time much more. Stern wants to put out a statement bashing Pop, a general "I disagree with their decision" statement, fine. But fining a coach for managing his roster how he sees fit is just way too much.
                    Advertisers know games at the end of the season are hit and miss because of playoff prep. They expect that and I'm sure TNT negotiates the ad fees accordingly.

                    What they DONT expect is for someone to arbitrarily sit his star players 4 weeks into the season.

                    Things like injuries, suspensions, can't be helped. This could have.

                    It isn't that he didn't play them, it's that he sent them home knowing that it was THE most-watched marquee NBA game this week.

                    And yes, it absolutely matters more because it was a TNT game. The NBA is a business. They make a lot of their money through national TV revenue, and those broadcasting partners expect that when the best players can play, that they will play.
                    Last edited by Kstat; 11-30-2012, 05:49 AM.

                    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                      Originally posted by Kstat View Post
                      It isn't that he didn't play them, it's that he sent them home knowing that it was THE most-watched marquee NBA game this week.

                      And yes, it absolutely matters more because it was a TNT game. The NBA is a busines.
                      And that's exactly why Pops send them home.

                      The schedule makers knew as well that this was THE most-watched marquee NBA game this week. So, they should do their best to give both teams an equal chance at winning. They didn't. They skewed the outcome with the scheduling.

                      So, the league didn't respect that this was THE most-watched marquee NBA game. Why should Pops respect it then?
                      Originally posted by IrishPacer
                      Empty vessels make the most noise.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                        It isn't his place to take his ball and go home.

                        If Pop wanted to play his starters 5 minutes and yank them, that's fine. But are you telling me they're so tired 4 weeks into the season that they couldn't make the plane trip and give a token appearance? That's weak.

                        Everyone knew an hour before the game that the spurs sent their best guys home. I imagine a big chunk of TNT's audience never bothered to tune in because of that. That decision cost TNT ratings, and no doubt pissed off advertisers.

                        The NBA makes close to a billion dollars a year on TV revenue. This is a big deal.
                        Last edited by Kstat; 11-30-2012, 06:01 AM.

                        It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                        Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                        Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                        NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                          The Spurs have terrible TV ratings. Despite them being perpetually outstanding their playoff ratings are awful. I'd put good money on this whole thing INCREASING TNT's rating tonight. We'll never know, the numbers are too fungible, but I very much think this whole thing increased TNT's rating.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                            Originally posted by Kstat View Post
                            I'm pretty sure the NBA's corporate sponsors and biggest broadcast partner paying them hundreds of millions of dollars would disagree with you.

                            Agree with it or not, this is a business. And Thursday night is the NBA's biggest national showcase.
                            Hmmm, so with playoff positions on the line for some teams it's no big deal to limit minutes on your star players when you have your own position clinched by game 79-80, but god forbid you do the EXACT SAME THING at game 16 when it suits your team's needs far more.

                            Stern is an insane power monger who has had a rep built by piggy-backing a game and stars that were going to TCOB without him. I'm so sick of the praise he gets when all I see is every single clear choice by him seems to hurt the game and all the things that are great about the game come from the participants themselves or pioneers, ie Bird, Magic, Jabbar, Jordan, Dr J, Gervin and the ABA. Stern had nothing to do with the MSU-ISU NCAA title game having such high ratings, that was star power pure and simple.

                            I'd go down his entire list, but this is about the current issue. Stern DOES NOT FINE teams for bad trades that ruin franchises, didn't fine OKC for removing all of the Seattle fans and sponsors' ability to see NBA stars at all, let alone for one night, never fines teams for doing salary dumps that let players like Baron Davis or Sheed go to some new team on the cheap, doesn't fine Dwight Howard for pouting his way out of Orlando, and so on.

                            See, in those cases it's just the game and the franchises and if their choices make for a bad fan experience then that's just the way it goes. But suddenly the Spurs work the system and they are punished for it.

                            The Spurs have PUT THEMSELVES IN THE POSITION TO HAVE THIS OPTION. They have done so well that they can afford to sit players. That's exactly the same as being able to rest "injured" players in the final week or two of the season because you won enough games to not have to worry about it.




                            This is a business, and specifically an entertainment business. BUT...the entertainment value comes from the drama of perceived legit competition with unknown outcomes. This is not a musical or play or rock show where the artists must perform. The entertainment of sports is seeing who will WIN OR LOSE. That's the value. So the Spurs aren't obligated to play anyone that anyone wants to see, as long as they win the game. And by the way, the Miami fans got to see a very entertaining, competitive game. So where is their complaint on money?

                            Will Stern apologize to the Spurs and give them an honorary title if Duncan gets hurt in a couple of weeks? Will Stern give them that title if they go 6-14 with mental fatigue?

                            No. Stern has said to Pop "You must try to win the title". It's on Pop and the Spurs to determine the best way to do that, and if they fail to do that then no one suffers more than they do. It's their ticket sales and promotional benefits on the line, not Stern's. For Stern there will always be a title winning team even if the Spurs blow it.



                            One other thing. Much of this is a by-product of the newish tiered pricing approach. But this approach always runs the risk of not panning out. What if Kobe gets hurt and you paid more for the Lakers game? What if I actually did scalp into row 3 vs the Heat back in the Shaq era, only to have him get hurt early in the week and not play in that game. Did the scalper give me my money back? Did Stern fine the Heat for "ripping me off"?

                            Damn it, I paid a lot of money with total disregard to the possible risk that the entertainment might not pan out exactly as planned, so put Shaq on crutches and run his a** out there.




                            PS - how long before Stern fines teams for knocking elite teams out of the playoffs. You know, because it's a business and sponsors want 7 game series between Miami, NYK, LAL and OKC.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                              Imo Pop, and for every Pop in this case, should only answer to the Spurs' owner(if he has any problems with that and i seriously doubt it) and nobody else.He shouldn't give a flying **** if Stern *****es about it or TNT or ESPN etc. since he hasn't violated any rules.He is responsible for the playing side of the organization and will do as he wishes.I get Stern's position but at the end of the day it is what it is.Pop has done nothing illegal and any punishment will be ludicrous.
                              Never forget

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                                If this is the **** Stern's going to pull in his last year I feel bad for Adam Silver. Stern's done a ton for the NBA, but if he still can't check his ego it's past time for him to go.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X