Wrote this myself, so no link. Have plenty sitting on my computer, just trying to hook up a blog site to post them on. But basically, my viewpoint.
Life After Granger Looks A Lot Like Life With Granger
The Indiana Pacers entered the 2012-2013 season with a legitimate shot at winning the Central division. Since Derrick Rose was out indefinitely, their main competition for that spot was a bit hobbled. They brought in a few pieces to upgrade their bench (Gerald Green, DJ Augustin and Ian Mahimni) as that was the Achilles heel in plenty of their losses. Entering preseason without star Danny Granger, hopes were that it was just his usual preseason setback and we would be good to go by seasons start. Yet, on the eve of opening night, Danny Granger was declared OUT indefinitely, with a knee injury. The panic button started flashing red, waiting for Pacer fans to act accordingly. Five games in, the panic button has been smashed through the floor, but for the very wrong reasons.
Don’t get me wrong, Danny Granger is and has been a huge part of the success Indiana had last year, and oftentimes the lone bright spot on some pretty terrible teams. But his loss isn’t the biggest problem, and if you look closely, through 5 games, the Pacers are suffering through the same exact problems that they faced last year. Grangers 18 point per game average isn’t exactly “easy” to replace. The Pacers, under Frank Vogel, normally ride the hot hand, and to be completely honest, running the offense through Granger wasn’t the most efficient option either. His guaranteed 15-20 points will be missed, but with West another year removed from his ACL tear, Roy Hibbert peaking, and Paul George looking to turn the corner, it’s realistic that a bump in all of their stats could help lessen the blow. So, not having Grangers 18 PPG still hurts a little, but I beg someone to tell me how Granger affects the following:
In the game vs the Atlanta Hawks, the Pacers started well, but got down in the 3rd quarter. Down big, they stormed back, scoring 18 straight at one point to take a nice double digit lead going into the 4th. Just when all the fans, took a huge deep sigh of relief, the Atlanta Hawks stormed back in the 4th with an 18-0 run to match Indiana’s run in the 3rd quarter, holding Indiana to 9 points in the quarter. If anyone recalls last year’s Pacers team, with Danny Granger, a 5-7minute scoring drought in every game was almost a given and that has carried over into this year. The proof is in the pudding: Spurs game- Basket scored with 1:20 left in the 1st quarter, next basket scored with 6:52 left in the 2nd. Kings game- 2nd quarter bucket was scored at 7:20, next point scored at 3:05. As far as last year, pick a game out a hat, and there’s probably a big scoring drought. I think the points clear here. Whether in a blowout or a 1 pt game, a Pacers scoring drought is bound to happen; the only thing you could hope, as a Pacer and a Pacers fan, was that it didn’t happen at a crucial moment of the game.
Defensively, the Pacers are one of the best and stingiest teams in the league, except when it comes to small, quick guards. With teams sending out smaller guards every year, it’s a huge mismatch for Indiana, even though one of their better defenders plays the SG. The problem? Paul George is now 6’10, maybe 6’11 and guarding someone that’s 6 to 7 inches shorter than you, is a huge mismatch when it comes to speed and quickness. Regardless of how good a defender, you’d have to be amazingly quick at 6‘10 to even keep up with them, which isn’t necessarily Paul George’s strength. So when you have guards like Kemba Walker (30 points), Marcus Thornton (26 points), Kyle Lowry (21 points) and Kyle Korver (13 points, but fueled the 4th quarter run), Indiana is at an automatic disadvantage. Now, I understand Lowry isn’t a 2 guard, and Korver’s not small and “quick” but they both fit the mold for the type of players Indiana has difficulty guarding. George Hill struggles guarding quicker PGs and everyone on the team struggles defending players running off screens. Outside of getting the run around by smaller guards this year, our pick and roll defense is by far the worst I’ve seen. It turned Glen Davis into a playoff star last year, and has almost been a guaranteed score against Indiana this year as well. The philosophy is common but the execution: poor. All of our big men are very slow footed, so when they have to show on pick and rolls, it takes them a split second too long to get back to their defender. I think this also has to do with our guards not being able to or not willing to fight through screens.
Lastly, is the Pacers offensive execution. The final possession against Atlanta resembles Indiana every time they come up the court. With or without Granger, Indiana doesn’t make an attacking move until 10 or 11 seconds are left on the shot clock. Often time, it’s George Hill dribbling at the top of the key until the clock counts down to 11. Then it’s another three seconds of Indiana attempting an entry pass or multiple ball fakes to the post. We’ve now got Indiana, with only one pass in the possession, with 8 seconds left on the clock and absolutely nothing setup. This happened last year WITH Granger and the same exact things are happening without. I figured Brian Shaw would have more of an impact on the Pacers’ offense, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. The stagnant offense and scoring droughts are tied directly to the Pacers inability or refusal, to start their offense earlier, which would give them better and more looks at the basket. This is also the reason why we have been, and are again, one of the worst assisting teams in the league. Assists are easy buckets, and easy buckets are what Indiana does not get. I also imagine a rise in assist numbers would minimize the scoring droughts.
So sure, Danny Grangers out, and it’s a pretty big deal for Indiana. Is it a perfect chance for Paul George to step up? Sure is. Is it an opportunity for Hibbert to become dominant. Absolutely. Is there an open door to have a more flexible, less predictable offense? Without a doubt. But none of these things happening, yet. We have to keep in mind, Indiana is only 7 or 8 days removed from learning that Granger would be out for a long time. Give them some time to adjust and hit a groove, which I believe they will. But while people are talking about panicking because Granger is gone, you must ask: will he be able to defend smaller, quicker guards? Will he stop the scoring droughts that have been the norm since Frank Vogel took over? Will he get his team in more efficient offensive sets? The answer is no. These three problems are much more of an issue than missing Granger, because when Granger comes back, every single one of these issues, will still be an issue.
Solutions? Very simple and probably unpopular. Move Paul George to the SF. It leaves for better matchups defensively, as he will be guarding wings more his size. He may be outweighed by some forwards, but that you deal with. Make a roster spot for free agent Delonte West. Sure, he’s a nutcase. But I’m of believe that every team needs at least one nutcase to keep them on edge; but that is besides the fact. Delonte West is an excellent defender, and can guard 1s, 2s and smaller threes. It would be a great addition from a basketball standpoint, allowing him, George Hill and DJ Augustin to rotate between the point and 2 guard spots. Gerald Green continues to come off the bench, where he is better suited. Lance Stephenson has been a pleasant surprise, providing a spark in games for Indiana, making great passes and attacking the basket. In my scenario, Delonte would step in as the starting 2 guard once he is acclimated enough with the defense. There’s nothing to learn on the offensive side, so he won’t be far behind there either. Delonte isn’t a player that can put a team over the top, but he improves a glaring area of weakness, immediately, and with the Central division up for grabs, I make the move.
Life After Granger Looks A Lot Like Life With Granger
The Indiana Pacers entered the 2012-2013 season with a legitimate shot at winning the Central division. Since Derrick Rose was out indefinitely, their main competition for that spot was a bit hobbled. They brought in a few pieces to upgrade their bench (Gerald Green, DJ Augustin and Ian Mahimni) as that was the Achilles heel in plenty of their losses. Entering preseason without star Danny Granger, hopes were that it was just his usual preseason setback and we would be good to go by seasons start. Yet, on the eve of opening night, Danny Granger was declared OUT indefinitely, with a knee injury. The panic button started flashing red, waiting for Pacer fans to act accordingly. Five games in, the panic button has been smashed through the floor, but for the very wrong reasons.
Don’t get me wrong, Danny Granger is and has been a huge part of the success Indiana had last year, and oftentimes the lone bright spot on some pretty terrible teams. But his loss isn’t the biggest problem, and if you look closely, through 5 games, the Pacers are suffering through the same exact problems that they faced last year. Grangers 18 point per game average isn’t exactly “easy” to replace. The Pacers, under Frank Vogel, normally ride the hot hand, and to be completely honest, running the offense through Granger wasn’t the most efficient option either. His guaranteed 15-20 points will be missed, but with West another year removed from his ACL tear, Roy Hibbert peaking, and Paul George looking to turn the corner, it’s realistic that a bump in all of their stats could help lessen the blow. So, not having Grangers 18 PPG still hurts a little, but I beg someone to tell me how Granger affects the following:
In the game vs the Atlanta Hawks, the Pacers started well, but got down in the 3rd quarter. Down big, they stormed back, scoring 18 straight at one point to take a nice double digit lead going into the 4th. Just when all the fans, took a huge deep sigh of relief, the Atlanta Hawks stormed back in the 4th with an 18-0 run to match Indiana’s run in the 3rd quarter, holding Indiana to 9 points in the quarter. If anyone recalls last year’s Pacers team, with Danny Granger, a 5-7minute scoring drought in every game was almost a given and that has carried over into this year. The proof is in the pudding: Spurs game- Basket scored with 1:20 left in the 1st quarter, next basket scored with 6:52 left in the 2nd. Kings game- 2nd quarter bucket was scored at 7:20, next point scored at 3:05. As far as last year, pick a game out a hat, and there’s probably a big scoring drought. I think the points clear here. Whether in a blowout or a 1 pt game, a Pacers scoring drought is bound to happen; the only thing you could hope, as a Pacer and a Pacers fan, was that it didn’t happen at a crucial moment of the game.
Defensively, the Pacers are one of the best and stingiest teams in the league, except when it comes to small, quick guards. With teams sending out smaller guards every year, it’s a huge mismatch for Indiana, even though one of their better defenders plays the SG. The problem? Paul George is now 6’10, maybe 6’11 and guarding someone that’s 6 to 7 inches shorter than you, is a huge mismatch when it comes to speed and quickness. Regardless of how good a defender, you’d have to be amazingly quick at 6‘10 to even keep up with them, which isn’t necessarily Paul George’s strength. So when you have guards like Kemba Walker (30 points), Marcus Thornton (26 points), Kyle Lowry (21 points) and Kyle Korver (13 points, but fueled the 4th quarter run), Indiana is at an automatic disadvantage. Now, I understand Lowry isn’t a 2 guard, and Korver’s not small and “quick” but they both fit the mold for the type of players Indiana has difficulty guarding. George Hill struggles guarding quicker PGs and everyone on the team struggles defending players running off screens. Outside of getting the run around by smaller guards this year, our pick and roll defense is by far the worst I’ve seen. It turned Glen Davis into a playoff star last year, and has almost been a guaranteed score against Indiana this year as well. The philosophy is common but the execution: poor. All of our big men are very slow footed, so when they have to show on pick and rolls, it takes them a split second too long to get back to their defender. I think this also has to do with our guards not being able to or not willing to fight through screens.
Lastly, is the Pacers offensive execution. The final possession against Atlanta resembles Indiana every time they come up the court. With or without Granger, Indiana doesn’t make an attacking move until 10 or 11 seconds are left on the shot clock. Often time, it’s George Hill dribbling at the top of the key until the clock counts down to 11. Then it’s another three seconds of Indiana attempting an entry pass or multiple ball fakes to the post. We’ve now got Indiana, with only one pass in the possession, with 8 seconds left on the clock and absolutely nothing setup. This happened last year WITH Granger and the same exact things are happening without. I figured Brian Shaw would have more of an impact on the Pacers’ offense, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. The stagnant offense and scoring droughts are tied directly to the Pacers inability or refusal, to start their offense earlier, which would give them better and more looks at the basket. This is also the reason why we have been, and are again, one of the worst assisting teams in the league. Assists are easy buckets, and easy buckets are what Indiana does not get. I also imagine a rise in assist numbers would minimize the scoring droughts.
So sure, Danny Grangers out, and it’s a pretty big deal for Indiana. Is it a perfect chance for Paul George to step up? Sure is. Is it an opportunity for Hibbert to become dominant. Absolutely. Is there an open door to have a more flexible, less predictable offense? Without a doubt. But none of these things happening, yet. We have to keep in mind, Indiana is only 7 or 8 days removed from learning that Granger would be out for a long time. Give them some time to adjust and hit a groove, which I believe they will. But while people are talking about panicking because Granger is gone, you must ask: will he be able to defend smaller, quicker guards? Will he stop the scoring droughts that have been the norm since Frank Vogel took over? Will he get his team in more efficient offensive sets? The answer is no. These three problems are much more of an issue than missing Granger, because when Granger comes back, every single one of these issues, will still be an issue.
Solutions? Very simple and probably unpopular. Move Paul George to the SF. It leaves for better matchups defensively, as he will be guarding wings more his size. He may be outweighed by some forwards, but that you deal with. Make a roster spot for free agent Delonte West. Sure, he’s a nutcase. But I’m of believe that every team needs at least one nutcase to keep them on edge; but that is besides the fact. Delonte West is an excellent defender, and can guard 1s, 2s and smaller threes. It would be a great addition from a basketball standpoint, allowing him, George Hill and DJ Augustin to rotate between the point and 2 guard spots. Gerald Green continues to come off the bench, where he is better suited. Lance Stephenson has been a pleasant surprise, providing a spark in games for Indiana, making great passes and attacking the basket. In my scenario, Delonte would step in as the starting 2 guard once he is acclimated enough with the defense. There’s nothing to learn on the offensive side, so he won’t be far behind there either. Delonte isn’t a player that can put a team over the top, but he improves a glaring area of weakness, immediately, and with the Central division up for grabs, I make the move.
Comment