Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

    What I hate the most is that the team completely ignores Hibbert in the 4th. Even though he's the guy who you can rely on to score easy buckets, not fadeaway jumpers. Ugh.
    Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

      I thought we picked up right where we left off last season at the beginning of training camp? So far, this is the worst we've looked to start a season in years.

      I'm concerned about the offense. It's been bad for a long time. We were very predictable last season too.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

        Man, it's great to hear someone else disgusted with our Charmin style picks. Am I wrong for wanting to see one of our so-called smashmouth players parking a defender on his can with a pick just once? It's not like we don't have guys capable of setting some effective picks. I just don't get it.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

          The offense is problematical at this point, for sure.

          But, a couple of bright spots: We lead the East in Opp FG% and in Total and Off. Rebound %. I hope that indicates fundamental defensive strength that will stick with us and shore us up as we address the offense and wait for Danny's return.


          [~]) ... Cheers! Go Pacers!

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

            I'm still high on this team, and all the players involved. We're three games into the season, and missing our lead scorer. Gerald Green will benefit from being the first scoring option off the bench, instead of 5th scorer with the starters (as Paul experienced last year). Yeh, we shouldn't have had that much trouble beating the Kings last night, after having such a good lead at the half. But we're only going to get better.

            As always, Peck, your Odd Thoughts on this game are awesome.

            Ok Paul George had a very good statistical game & yes he played superb defense to close out the game. But am I the only person who wonders if maybe he would play just a little better every now and then if he got angry? I mean in all of the games he’s played I’ve never seen him get upset about anything and I think it would do him a world of good to every now and then get offended by a hard foul or something. I mean Danny enters a game ready to fight, David West looks like someone spit on him every single min. he is on the floor even Roy on occasion gets fed up & gets emotional in a game. There just never appears to be any real fire there, maybe it’s just me. I mean I love the fact that he is rebounding at a very high level but I guess I just thought with Danny out he would somehow get his points up to the mid 20’s, maybe that’s just not his game and it may never be.


            This is all true. I've said it before, when Paul plays with a bit more confidence, swagger, and emotion, he really gets in the zone. But I wonder if he fears getting too emotional, at the risk of making bad plays, turnovers, etc. It would be nice if Paul could get someone to yell at before the game, a la David Benner. Maybe that can be Gentle Ben's bench role.
            witters: @imbtyler, @postgameonline

            Originally posted by Day-V
            In conclusion, Paul George is awesome.
            Originally posted by Slick Pinkham
            Our arena, their arena, Rucker park, it just doesn't matter. We're bigger, longer, younger, faster, and hungrier.


            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

              Offensively the Pacers are lost. They are averaging 90 points in regulation games. Then only 15 extra points with 10 min of OT. This pathetic offense produced an anemiic 16 ASTS in 58 game minutes. Terrible, absolutely horrible.

              Granger is out, but he's not the reason this team is so bad on offense. The reason is poor shot selection, relying on 3 pt shooting too much, and too little scoring in the paint. Better offensive plays from Vogel would be a definate improvement along with better execution by the players. Both Vogel and the players had training camp to work on the offense going into this season, so that can't be used as an excuse this season.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

                Our offense is just a mess right now. I like Vogel and all, but he is once again confusing me with his tactics... Last year I felt like we would try to feed the ball into Hibbert, this year it feels like we are barely doing that. In fact I feel like Hibbert barely ever gets the ball. Our substitution methods are still weird as ever too. Vogel always seems to take guys out when they are doing good, why he does it beats me... He did it with Gerald and also with Lance if I remember correctly. Which brings me to another point. I mentioned it in the game thread... Lance should be starting. I am willing to give Gerald a little more of a chance with the starters, but I think he would benefit coming off the bench. Lance looked good with the starters and has looked pretty good so far all around.

                As for Paul, I really do wish he would show more emotion. I think he is the type of person who doesn't want to get in anyone's way. He doesn't want to offend anyone on the team by trying to take over a game or whatever. I would love to see for him to just call for the ball and shoot it without hesitation. I get so flustered when he is wide open and does a little shot fake and passes it or drives and misses a contested layup or short-range jumper. If he is open, he should shoot it, simple as that. I have seen him take offense to a hard foul before, but he doesn't really do anything about it. I don't know if Paul will ever develop this into his game.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

                  Originally posted by beast23 View Post
                  I totally agree with your point about picks.

                  However, a fake pick is an excellent play and usually successful, if used correctly. And that would be after setting 3-4 good, hard picks first. If used as one out of every 4-5 picks set, a false pick is very useful and takes the opponent by surprise.

                  But using a false pick on nearly every pick set is just plain lazy and bad basketball.
                  Yep. And I don't think the coaching staff wants them to set those fake picks that often. They did drills in camp where the players were getting smacked with big pads to let them get a sense of what a good pick feels like. Vogel talked about wanting the bigs to set good, hard screens. Tyler did in the first two games, and then...

                  It puzzles me with Tyler in particular. I know he's anxious to get into potential shooting position. But this guy loves contact, I'd expect him to really take to setting hard screens. It was disappointing to see him go back to the fake screen last night.
                  "Freedom is nothing else but a chance to be better." - Albert Camus

                  "Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well." - Voltaire

                  "Everyone's values are defined by what they will tolerate when it is done to others." - William Greider

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

                    Regarding Lance's PT:

                    I think Frank is rewarding a guy that the organization has worked with for several years. Lance's jumper/decision making is greatly improved, and Frank is rewarding him with PT. The chemistry with Lance/PG/Hill/Hibs/West is so much better than with Green.

                    It's clear to me this team is still finding it's way, the offense is non-existent. It's crazy that Roy can dominate like he did and rarely get a play run for him.

                    For all the complaints about GH3, he really asserted himself in the OT's. When everyone is shying away from the ball, he makes things happen. When he gets to 100% the offense will really improve, IMO.


                    EDIT: Big shoutout to Tyler, by the way. For a guy that was absolutely terrible last season, he's actually looked to make some passes/go inside. He isn't as reliant on the jumper, his defense has improved, and he's rebounding.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

                      My guess as to why Green played as little as he did even though his stats were pretty good is this. I watched him very closely last night and he makes more mistakes consistently than any Pacers player that I can remember. I hate to make a knee- jerk judgement, but his bb IQ and overall feel for the game is really poor. He doesn't know how play.

                      He is a great athlete, and a pretty good shooter, but his passing is horrible, his team defense is really bad.

                      Lance makes a lot of mistakes, and his ball IQ isn't so good either, but his feel for the game is much, much better than Green's



                      and let me also say that Hayes is a great defender. He defended West as well one on one that I have seen. JVG always said that Hayes was one of the best defenders in the NBA and now I agree
                      Last edited by Unclebuck; 11-04-2012, 07:18 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

                        Really doesn't matter but impresses me nonetheless.

                        Paul is currently averaging 14pts, 13 rebs, and 5 assists/game!

                        If he gets to the FT line just 2 more times a half, he's not too far from some crazy season averages such as 16pts, 8 rebs, 5 assists. Those are some GOOD numbers. And the fact that we think he's just playing okay, kinda tells you that he could easily meet those numbers at some point--THIS YEAR.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

                          Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
                          Really doesn't matter but impresses me nonetheless.

                          Paul is currently averaging 14pts, 13 rebs, and 5 assists/game!

                          If he gets to the FT line just 2 more times a half, he's not too far from some crazy season averages such as 16pts, 8 rebs, 5 assists. Those are some GOOD numbers. And the fact that we think he's just playing okay, kinda tells you that he could easily meet those numbers at some point--THIS YEAR.
                          Forgot to mention his 1blk, and 2 steals that he brings as well!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

                            Originally posted by Peck View Post
                            Also I know they are new and all but are Sam Young & Gerald Green the two single dumbest passers you’ve ever seen?
                            No. Solomon Jones was the worst, and it's possible that Lou was worse than Sam and Gerald, but they're the worst wing passers so far.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

                              The bright side, once the light switches on for the team and they start clicking on offense while keeping that defensive mentality, I think only the Heat can beat them.

                              We can only hope that they get there.
                              First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Odd Thoughts: Home opener vs. the Kings

                                Hmm, I must be some kind of glass overflowing type of guy because I think the team looks great. I honestly do.

                                First off, so far we've seen teams AGGRESSIVELY TRIPLE TEAM Hibbert, and even West. I mean as in full on jailbreak caution to the wind attacking. It's partially worked on pure audacity, just the balls to even try it catching the Pacers off-guard from what they normally might encounter.

                                They also have faced 2 teams with noteworthy physical and capable bigs. Cousins might very well be a top 3 center in the NBA and this was discussed with a fair amount of agreement at the last PD party. Charlotte just stuffed the lane with a zone about 60% of the game which is nuts for most NBA teams.

                                So you have a team built on feeding David and Roy and then working off that, and teams are flat out saying "no, we refuse to lose that way even if it means shooters will be wide open". Some of this might be the lack of Granger giving these teams the confidence to bail on the perimeter, some of it might just be the pure fear Roy and West put into them on offense. Either way it's clear the Pacers will have to make the open outside shots they are getting.

                                And the other thing they must do, something we saw with the Bobcats at times, is to regroup on the playbook and counter-attack the low block aggressiveness these teams have shown. If 2 guys are going to leave to go after Roy, then those other 2 players need to set up the rotation with their own back picks. This will get Roy his outlet pass and get the ball rotation to the weakside going again. We saw a couple of dunks on the weakside baseline doing just this.

                                The problem appears to be that they just have playbook set to deal with standard doubles to the post, and with the style of defense they've seen in each game they haven't been able to fully grasp how to overcome it.


                                Also it's obvious that these 3 opponents were playing overly physical and somewhat out of control, which has played perfectly into the hands of Tyler and Lance. This is what you want, balance and variety that allow you to compete every night no matter what. Ian has suffered the most due to his bizarre inability to draw any fouls no matter the extreme level of contact/"defense" played on him.



                                The reason I love where the team is at is because they've shown that their length, physicality and athleticism on defense can really blow up what the opponent is trying to do. The total lack of scoring by the Kings late was specifically due to this, to the level of hard play the entire game that wore them down (and the Pacers a bit too). This team is defending the paint and rim at a much higher level than last year and it doesn't appear to be just luck or low competition.



                                Green is fine, Young is fine. They have both made more positive plays than negative and have shown terrific effort from end to end. I don't see anyone drifting, getting lazy, etc. What I see is just offensive confusion due to some unexpected defensive looks that caught them off guard. As they learn how to work together to deal with these looks, as they develop that offensive chemistry a bit more, these things will disappear and you'll see the full power of the outstanding mix of talent IMO.

                                It's clear that both Roy and West can score in the post, that Paul has a greatly improved offensive game and that Green and Hill can physically attack off the dribble and hit enough shots to keep teams honest. All they do is adjust the plays to more effectively punish the "no low block at all costs" defenses and it's going to be game over for most teams.

                                Scoring on this group of Pacers is going to require some outstanding long jumper shooting and a lot of long rebounds.


                                Ian will start getting calls, Green already started looking more settled into the offense last night, Lance has his confidence up as does Tyler and both seem to have a better sense of how they can positively contribute.




                                But then again where would we be without a "first 5 games freakout", and no offense Peck but I'd definitely expect you to be dead center in the middle of one of those.

                                Personally I'm blown away by the total improved physicality and athleticism of this team. I've yet to feel like "oh boy, that guy does not belong out there", even when guys have "struggled". All I've seen is some things not quite clicking and a bit of confusion, two things that can be fixed during the season and typically improve with playing time.
                                Last edited by Naptown_Seth; 11-04-2012, 08:50 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X