Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

[IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

    Dear all owners,

    Please welcome RandyWrinkles to the fold - he will be taking over iceman1's team (the Anderson Packers).

    We currently have 16 owners signed up on sports.ws, but I know there are two more owners (diamonddave00 and BSparkman) who have submitted protected lists but have not yet signed up.

    We will be losing Scott and Mourning, two veterans of our keeper leagues, and their teams will be dissolved into the regular draft pool. Depending on the status of diamonddave and BSparkman's returns, their teams may also be dissolved into the draft pool.

    This is an awesome opportunity for the lower ranked teams to pick up some very, very good players through the draft and not have to wait for their rookies to develop. The draft will NOT be expanded nor will the draft order be altered, which means that every pick in the draft this year will be super important.

    The only definitive thing I can tell you guys right now is that your 8-man protected lists are due on September 30, this coming Sunday. Please post in this thread with your finalised lists.

    I will be back with more announcements once I finalise the status of our remaining two owners.

    Thank you everyone for your patience during this summer. Let's make the IKL an even better league going forward.

  • #2
    Re: [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

    BELFAST BANSHEE (Jose Slaughter)

    Protected

    Nikola Pekovic
    Amare Stoudemire
    Blake Griffin
    James Johnson
    Donatas Motiejunas
    Jerryd Bayless
    Jeff Teague
    Ricky Rubio

    Unprotected

    Michael Beasley Traded for Mournings 2nd round draft pick
    Alonzo Gee
    Beno Udrih
    Gary Neal
    Last edited by Jose Slaughter; 09-24-2012, 02:07 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

      FIRST ROUND

      1. China Grove
      2. Emerald City
      3. Indy
      4. Young
      5. Groningen
      6. Philadelphia
      7. Gobias
      8. DC
      9. Enfield
      10. Funk Seoul
      11. Belfast
      12. Nacogdoches
      13. Hoopstown
      14. Jeffersonville
      15. DC (from Las Vegas: Holiday + 1st for Nowitzki trade)
      16. Utrecht
      17. Indianpolis
      18. Redbull
      19. Anderson

      SECOND ROUND

      1. China Grove
      2. Emerald City
      3. Indy
      4. Belfast
      5. Groningen
      6. Philadelphia
      7. Gobias
      8. DC
      9. Enfield
      10. Funk Seoul
      11. Young
      12. Nacogdoches
      13. Hoopstown
      14. Jeffersonville
      15. Las Vegas
      16. Young
      17. Indianpolis
      18. Redbull
      19. Anderson

      THIRD ROUND

      1. China Grove
      2. Nacogdoches (from Emerald City: Wall + Booker + 3rd for Ilyasova + Joe Johnson + 4th)
      3. Indy
      4. Young
      5. Groningen
      6. Philadelphia
      7. Gobias
      8. DC
      9. Enfield
      10. Funk Seoul
      11. Belfast
      12. Nacogdoches
      13. Hoopstown
      14. Jeffersonville
      15. Las Vegas
      16. Utrecht
      17. Indianpolis
      18. Redbull
      19. Anderson
      20. Baltimore

      FOURTH ROUND

      1. China Grove
      2. Emerald City
      3. Indy
      4. Young
      5. Groningen
      6. Philadelphia
      7. Gobias
      8. DC
      9. Enfield
      10. Funk Seoul
      11. Belfast
      12. Emerald City (from Nacogdoches: Wall + Booker + 3rd for Ilyasova + Joe Johnson + 4th)
      13. Hoopstown
      14. Jeffersonville
      15. Las Vegas
      16. Utrecht
      17. Indianpolis
      18. Redbull
      19. Anderson
      20. Baltimore

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

        Protected

        Stephen Curry
        Lou Williams
        Rodney Stuckey
        Gerald Wallace
        Enes Kanter
        Tiago Splitter
        Maurice Speights
        Jordan Hill

        Unprotected

        Chandler Parsons
        Larry Sanders
        Byron Mullins
        Koutas Koufas

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

          Philadelphia Clown Babies (LG33)

          Protected

          Andrea Bargnani
          Eric Bledsoe
          Marshon Brooks
          Danny Granger
          Brandon Knight
          Greg Monroe
          Anderson Varejao
          David West

          Unprotected

          Gilbert Arenas
          Reggie Jackson
          Jason Richardson
          Mo Williams

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

            DC DREAMERS (kuq_e_zi91)

            DeAndre Jordan
            Derrick Favors
            Ed Davis
            Kawhi Leonard
            James Harden
            D.J. Augustin
            Jrue Holiday
            George Hill

            Unprotected:

            Ekpe Udoh
            Trevor Ariza
            Tyler Hansbrough
            DeMar DeRozan
            2015, 2016, 2019 IKL Fantasy Basketball Champions - DC Dreamers

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

              GOBIAS ILLUSION

              Chris Paul
              Jeremy Lin
              Jarrett Jack
              Jordan Crawford
              Kenneth Faried
              Bismack Biyombo
              Kendrick Perkins
              Kevin Seraphin

              unprotected
              Gerald Henderson
              Wesley Johnson
              Jon Leuer
              Darko Milicic
              This is the darkest timeline.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

                FUNK SEOUL BROTHERS

                G Derrick Rose
                G Manu Ginobili
                G Ty Lawson
                G Rodrigue Beaubois
                C Chris Kaman
                CF David Lee
                CF DeJuan Blair
                F Tyrus Thomas

                --
                Ian Mahinmi
                Hassan Whiteside
                Udonis Haslem
                Jared Dudley

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

                  Protected:

                  Al Jefferson
                  Andris Biedrins
                  Rajon Rondo
                  Andray Blatche
                  Thaddeus Young
                  Goran Dragic
                  Alec Burks
                  Al-Farouq Aminu

                  and while I'm looking at my own list, it just hit me, I need to improve A LOT...
                  Trying to enjoy every Pacers game as if it is the last!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

                    YOUNG TURKS (bellisimo)

                    Spencer Hawes
                    Jason Smith
                    Carlos Boozer
                    Kris Humphries
                    Matt Barnes
                    Andre Iguodala
                    CJ Watson
                    Sundiata Gaines

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

                      HOOPSTOWN HOOPSTERS (diamonddave00)

                      Zach Randolph
                      Andrew Bynum
                      Tyson Chandler
                      Chris Bosh
                      Tyreke Evans
                      Devin Harris
                      Arron Afflalo
                      Wilson Chandler

                      --

                      Dorell Wright
                      Jermaine Oneal
                      Jameer Nelson
                      Glen Davis

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

                        Reposting from a previous thread before all the craziness went down.

                        BALTIMORE BULLDOGS (bulldog)
                        Keep:
                        Tim Duncan
                        Pau Gasol
                        Paul Millsap
                        Marcin Gortat
                        Danilo Gallinari
                        Dwyane Wade
                        Steve Nash
                        Jose Calderon
                        Jonas Jerebko
                        Jan Vesely

                        Drop:
                        Leandro Barbosa
                        Joel Przybilla


                        2010 IKL Fantasy Basketball Champion Baltimore Bulldogs

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

                          Anderson Packers (Fishers Cottage Cheese)

                          Protected:

                          Russel Westbrook
                          Jason Terry
                          Al Horford
                          LeBron James
                          Joakim Noah
                          Jamal Crawford
                          Rudy Gay
                          Shawn Marion

                          Unprotected:
                          Jose Barea
                          Zaza Pachulia
                          Delonte West
                          Caron Butler

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

                            Originally posted by bulldog View Post
                            Reposting from a previous thread before all the craziness went down.

                            BALTIMORE BULLDOGS (bulldog)
                            Keep:
                            Tim Duncan
                            Pau Gasol
                            Paul Millsap
                            Marcin Gortat
                            Danilo Gallinari
                            Dwyane Wade
                            Steve Nash
                            Jose Calderon
                            Jonas Jerebko
                            Jan Vesely

                            Drop:
                            Leandro Barbosa
                            Joel Przybilla

                            Just a clarifying question. Since he's keeping 10 players and the limit is 8, does this mean that he forgoes his 1st and 2nd round picks? Thanks!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: [IKL12-13] WE ARE A GO!

                              Originally posted by Speed View Post
                              Just a clarifying question. Since he's keeping 10 players and the limit is 8, does this mean that he forgoes his 1st and 2nd round picks? Thanks!
                              yessir

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X