Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Peyton in NY times article-a good read

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Peyton in NY times article-a good read

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/02/sp...agewanted=1&hp


    ENGLEWOOD, Colo. — “The perfect time to tell this story is after we win the Super Bowl this year.”
    N.F.L. Preview »


    Enlarge This Image
    Jack Dempsey/Associated Press

    Peyton Manning, with a new team and a fresh scar, said he was not as prepared as in years past. “No way it’s possible when you have new coaches, new players, a new offense,” he said.

    Instead, Peyton Manning was telling it after a training camp practice. Uncertainty visited his career for the first time last season, the faint scar on the back of his neck mapping the detour from the smooth path he had followed since high school, the one that made him the biggest, most surreal free agent in football history earlier this year. He has landed here, in the unfamiliar shadows of mountains he has no time to appreciate, in a new offense whose terminology he is still learning, making jokes about how he feels a little like a rookie but is not allowed to play like one. He does not know what to expect when the Denver Broncos open the season against the Pittsburgh Steelers next Sunday, let alone four months from now.

    So Manning wants to tell his Denver story now, the one that — if the Broncos wind up in New Orleans in February as Manning hopes — will wrap his own recovery, and the Broncos’ big bet on it, in a neat bow.

    “The first pass I threw in Denver was to Helton,” Manning said of his former college teammate, Colorado Rockies first baseman Todd Helton. Helton had invited Manning to use the Rockies’ facilities during the N.F.L. lockout last year, when Manning was without access to the kind of equipment and guidance he needed after such a serious injury.

    Manning was not just frustrated that he had been cut off from the people in Indianapolis who knew his body best. He was also craving privacy. His arm had lost strength, his grip was soft, his triceps had withered after one of his earlier neck operations. It had all left him oddly vulnerable and isolated.

    “I did not want people seeing me,” he said. “It becomes a private, sensitive deal.”

    So last summer, before the Colts could finally get a look at him — before even they fully realized his condition — Manning worked in secret with Rockies trainers, in hopes of avoiding the September operation that ultimately cost him the 2011 season. In June, he, a trainer and Helton went to the indoor batting cages at Coors Field. Millions of people have marveled over Manning’s passes. This one to Helton, though, Manning wanted hidden from view.

    “It was not good; he actually thought I was joking when I threw it to him,” Manning said. “The ball nose-dived. He was like ‘That’s funny.’ I was like ‘You don’t understand. I’m telling you.’ ”

    Manning was leaning against a fence, still wiping away the sweat from his latest practice. He can laugh about that pass to Helton now, just as he did a few months later when, after a throwing session in which he tried to convince the Colts and himself that he was healthy enough to play in the season opener last September, he was told he looked like Chad Pennington, the former Jets and Dolphins quarterback whose lack of arm strength was often dissected.

    A few days later, a magnetic resonance imaging test revealed that Manning would need spinal fusion surgery. The doctors told him then that at his age, they could not guarantee he would be able to return to playing football. That is the moment that set in motion the collapse of the Colts’ season, Manning’s wrenching departure from Indianapolis, the whirlwind free agency, the still-startling sight of him in a different jersey.

    For all the upheaval, much about Manning has not changed. His new coaches and teammates attest to his exacting nature, to his famous attention to detail, to how all players raise their games around him.

    He spent time at a recent practice working on the side with Eric Decker and Demaryius Thomas, the Broncos’ top receivers. They ran the same route over and over, with Manning directing them, so they could learn one another’s idiosyncrasies, just as he used to do with receivers in Indianapolis.

    Manning is careful, though, not to refer to the Colts or the teammates he had in Indianapolis by name, saying he has stopped using comparisons. And he bristles at the remarkable scrutiny, the charting of seven-on-seven periods, he has attracted during practices. He is still using practice to figure out the contours of what he is able to do again, before he has to do it in a game, he explains.

    But Manning is not obtuse. He knows everybody in the N.F.L. is looking for markers of his progress. Manning was looking for it, too.

    The Broncos are convinced they have seen enough. The offensive coordinator Mike McCoy said that from the day Manning arrived in Denver, other than monitoring the number of throws he makes, the Broncos have not held him back from anything. McCoy has never even asked Manning the one question all the armchair quarterbacks want answered: what percentage are you?


    Elway looks at the throws Manning makes when his feet are not set. Those are the ones that convince him Manning’s arm is back.

    “I didn’t know what 100 percent of Peyton Manning was,” Elway said. “I just know, knowing what I’ve seen, he can win a world championship.”

    Maybe so. Manning was watching film one day in Denver, and finally found what he was looking for. It was a long pass, a comebacker from Manning on the right hash mark to Decker on the left side. It was, Manning recalls, “a pretty healthy throw.”

    He took a video of the play with his cellphone and sent it off, a digital thank you note — “Hey, I just want to thank you for all your help,” he added — to the doctors in Indianapolis, to the former Colts coach Jim Caldwell and the team’s former general manager Bill Polian and a handful of others.

    There were many people who saw Manning at his lowest physical state — he threw with his wife, Ashley, at one point, and with his brother Eli last summer in New Orleans, when Eli could see that Peyton could not complete his throwing motion. The video went to David Cutcliffe, Manning’s coach at Tennessee who now runs the Duke program.

    Manning stayed at Cutcliffe’s home, and worked with him at Duke consistently after the spinal fusion surgery. It went to the trainers in Indianapolis, one of whom Manning turned into a makeshift quarterback coach.

    That was an awkward time that Manning describes as being in “no man’s world” — with the Colts coaches having to work on their game plans and Manning unable to practice. Manning could not lift weights for months, and most of his rehabilitation took place on the field, not in the training room.

    “I’m yelling at him, ‘No, you’re not doing it right, this is what a quarterback coach is supposed to do,’ ” Manning said. “He’s like, ‘I’m a physical therapist.’ ”

    Manning thinks that even his current coaches and teammates do not realize how significant it was for him to take the field against the Chicago Bears in the first preseason game. It was a small step of success in a season in which personal success may be difficult to quantify. He smiles when he mentions that Ashley was able to take their son, Marshall, now almost 18 months old, to the game to see him play for the first time. And he was touched when he received a text message after the Chicago game from Steve Spagnuolo, the Saints’ defensive coordinator who held the same role with the Giants: “Nice to see you back out on the field.”

    Manning wanted to send the video right away to the community of people who helped him because he does not know how good he or the Broncos will be against the Steelers.

    “It doesn’t mean by any means that I’m back,” Manning said. “I really defend against people saying ‘He’s back.’ I feel like I’ve got to right that wrong. I still have work to do. I’m not sure if I’ll ever be, if I’ll ever know the answer. It might be when I stop playing, I’ll say ‘You know what, this is where I got to.’ ”

    That looks to be plenty far. During a recent practice, Manning easily completed short touch passes into the left corner of the end zone and 25-yard go routes down the right sideline.
    Tom Moore, Manning’s offensive coordinator, visited him at Duke and again in Denver, observing him in the no-huddle offense and a two-minute drill, and noted that he played with his usual rhythm and speed. Polian has watched tape of him and sees none of the shortcomings in velocity or accuracy to his right side that others have divined.
    N.F.L. Preview »


    Much has been made about whether Manning has lost the top-end velocity off his throws. That may be irrelevant because his game was never about having the biggest arm. In the days before the Colts played the Saints in the 2010 Super Bowl, Manning said that he developed his well-documented thirst for film study because he knew early on that he would not be able to run away from defenders “or throw through three guys.” His goal was to know where everyone else on the field would be.

    Manning’s accuracy was particularly unerring in the third preseason game against San Francisco, when the first-team offense scored 17 points in less than one quarter. He completed 10 of 12 passes for 122 yards and took the kind of hit he will undoubtedly take during the season — a hard one to his upper chest near his right shoulder — as he put the perfect touch on a 38-yard completion down the right sideline. He drilled a 10-yard touchdown pass to Decker.

    He looked very much like the Manning of Indianapolis vintage. Asked afterward if it was ridiculous for anyone to now question his ability coming off the surgery, he replied flatly, “Yes.”

    “To me, it’s like he hasn’t missed a beat,” said Brandon Stokley, who played four seasons with Manning in Indianapolis and worked out with him at Duke before joining the Broncos. “Not his attitude or his drive or his will. That’s why he’s been able to play so well for so long. It’s always full speed ahead when it comes to football. I’ve never seen him not do that. That’s workouts, off-season, on the football field, in practice.

    “In that aspect, I knew that would always be there. I knew from throwing with him early in the off-season. It seemed like every time we threw, he got better.”

    With little doubt remaining about his physical readiness, a question that lingers is how quickly Manning and his new team can come together. The Colts operated largely out of a no-huddle with Manning directing plays at the line of scrimmage. The Broncos are likely to huddle more often. But the backbone of the Colts’ offensive success was Manning’s ability to play fast, to know that the receivers knew where to go, that the offensive line coach had told his unit the correct thing to do. That came from years of having the same coaches and players together.

    Polian expects that it will take about half the season for Manning and his receivers to be entirely in sync — a half of a season that includes six of the first eight games against playoff teams.

    Manning has compared being sidelined to punishment, like watching other children go to recess while he had to stay inside and write “I will not interrupt the teacher” 50 times on the chalkboard. He was excited just to be able to go on the field with no restrictions. But even Manning concedes that he is not as prepared for the start of the season as he was in Indianapolis.

    “Absolutely not,” he said. “No way it’s possible when you have new coaches, new players, a new offense. It’s been energizing to be back on the field, but it’s very challenging with all the changes. It’s not comfortable all the time.”

    That may not matter, given that it is coming from the game’s most obsessive preparer. After one practice this summer, Decker said he had never seen anyone else demand so much of himself or his teammates, and that has raised expectations within a team that made the playoffs at 8-8 last season.

    Manning is reminded every day that he is not where he wants to be. He continues to rehabilitate, and he does not expect that to end any time soon, especially because he is now 36. The player who, until last September, had missed just one professional snap because of injury — a broken jaw, and he was not happy about missing that one play either — is now in the business of maintaining a body that has already betrayed him once. His contract is structured so if his health deteriorates by the end of the season, he could be cut loose after only one year.

    “I’d like to be the player that everybody thinks they are used to seeing,” he said. “I want to be the player that they’re used to seeing. Is that possible? I’m going to work hard to be best player I can be. You’ve got to fight carrying that burden.”

    Still, Manning and the Broncos have already won in at least one important way. More than a year of grueling work and crushing disappointment removed from the first pass he threw in Denver, nobody would want to hide the next one he throws.

  • #2
    Re: Peyton in NY times article-a good read

    I'm not sure how he's going to do, but I really hope he'll do well. I'll be rooting for him to succeed and will watch as many Broncos games as I can get ahold of. Watching some preseason games, I thought his velocity when throwing to the right was not as good as the left, but the accuracy was there so he could still get it where it needed to be. It's going to be a fascinating adventure to watch.
    Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Peyton in NY times article-a good read

      I'll be rooting for him when he's not playing the Colts.

      I'm pretty sure his last neck surgery had anterior entry, so no back of the neck scar from that.

      Comment

      Working...
      X