Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

    I think the Pacer’s can beat Boston this year. Both during the regular season and the playoffs. One win for Boston, the rest for Indiana during the regular season and 4-2 if they match up during the playoffs.

    Boston has 15 guys right now, but there is a lot of deadwood.

    Paul Pierce
    Kevin Garnett
    Rajon Rondo
    Jeff Green
    Brandon Bass
    Courtney Lee
    Avery Bradley
    Chris Wilcox
    Jason Collins
    Keyon Dooling
    Jared Sullinger
    Fab Melo
    Dionte Christmas
    Jamar Smith
    Kris Joseph

    Which seems to mean their rotation should look something like this. At least the 8 guys that will be doing most of the heavy lifting. To me it looks like 3 guys and a bunch of fill in the blanks. They’re counting of Jared Sullinger and Fab Melo to be regular rotation guys. I don’t see it, but opinions vary.

    PG – Rondo
    SG – 2 of Lee/Terry/Bradley
    SF – Pierce
    PF – Green/Bass
    C – Garnett

    Defensively, Rondo will be a problem for Hill, but less of a problem than he is against most teams. Pierce will give Danny some problems. As will Kevin Garnett vs Roy. But, Garnett the Elder is a jump shooter, as is Pierce the Elder and the lack of anything resembling an inside game should work in the Pacer’s favor. Maybe Green can give BOS some scoring, but he is, IIRC, another jump shooter.

    Offensively, Roy should do well vs Garnett. Garnett is tall, but doesn’t seem big and strong enough to take Roy. Pierce is getting to the point where he’s running out of guys he can defend. Lee/Terry/Bradley are undersized, hopefully that’s a bad thing vs next year’s Paul George. Neither Green nor Bass can defend West. I just don’t see Boston being able to defend the Pacers for 48 min.

    Come playoff time, the Boston defense will make each game look like the NYK/IND games from the ‘90’s, but Indiana can score and Boston can’t, six games.
    Last edited by xIndyFan; 08-28-2012, 09:38 AM. Reason: forgot about Green :o

  • #2
    Re: IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

    Didn't they just bring back Jeff Green as well? He should give them a lift off the bench if he doesn't move past Bass in the starting lineup.
    I still agree with you though, the Pacers should be the better team this year.
    Why do teams tank? Ask a Spurs fan.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

      I guess I don't look at it in this way. I don't go into a season thinking which teams we can beat and which teams we cannot beat. There are way, way too many variables IMO to do it that way.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

        The Pacers can beat them in the regular season because Boston doesn't really give a crap about their regular season records but I don't see the Pacers beating them on the playoffs.

        Rondo >> Hill
        Terry > PG
        Pierce> Danny
        Bass = West
        KG = Roy?

        Their bench is also better.
        @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

          Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
          I guess I don't look at it in this way. I don't go into a season thinking which teams we can beat and which teams we cannot beat. There are way, way too many variables IMO to do it that way.
          I disagree with a lot of what the original post said. Especially about Garnett. He shouldn't have any trouble guarding Roy. He's one of the best post defenders in the league. Their bench and their scoring were their major weaknesses last year and they've improved it greatly by adding Courtney Lee, Jeff Green, and Jason Terry. Rondo will still give the Pacers fits and Paul Pierce, when healthy, is still a great all-around player that draws a lot of fouls.

          IMO, the Pacers match up very well against the Celtics because they aren't as good without Ray Allen. I think they could beat them in a 7-game series but the Celtics have the best player in Rondo and they have the Pacers beat in the experience department. Never underestimate the value of Championship experience.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

            Let's not forget this Bos team took the Heat to a 7 game series, and were a Lebron James classic game away from putting them away in 6. Yes they lost Ray Allen, but they added 2 players to take his place (C.Lee and J. Terry) while also getting back a very versatile cog in Jeff Green.

            I disagree that they have a bunch of guys who can "fill in the blanks". Terry, Bass, Green and Lee are 4 players that are good role players who stick to what they do well. Bradley is out for some of the beginning of the season, but he gives them a MAJOR defensive presence in spite of his undersized frame. He's also able to score on fast breaks and back cuts.

            KG gives any players he's guarding problems because 1. He's a very good defender, 2. He's earned the respect of the officials so he gets away with a lot (not a bad thing in my eyes) and 3. HE'S A VERY GOOD DEFENDER!. I don't think that's a good matchup AT ALL for Roy, though I think that if Roy can impose his size, it may wear KG out a little bit.

            You're dead on the money with Paul Pierce. He's still pretty good offesnively, but he can't guard anyone anymore. He's reallllly slow out there. However, Doc Rivers is a good coach who has very good defensive principles, so PP defensive struggles is less of a liability than it would be on other teams. Also, the pacers don't have a wing player (cept maybe Gerald Green now) who can just impose their size/athleticism against Paul.

            Rondo is going to give ANY team problems just because he's so good at getting his teammates the ball. He is the reason that KG and PP (and Ray Allen when he was in Boston) were able to maintain their efficiency offensively, because he gets them the ball in their spots.

            So You're kind of looking at something like this (obviously opinions will vary)

            Rondo > Hill
            C. Lee < Paul George
            PP = DG
            Bass < West
            KG = Roy.

            Also Doc Rivers is one of the best coaches in the league, and that can't be discounted.

            I think during the regular season the Pacers can beat Boston, and it not be much of a surprise. In the playoffs however, I definitely feel it'd be a physical 7-game series. I think we'd have to see what types of strides (if any) players like Hill, George, and Hibbert have made before we can fully decide whether or not we would be able to beat the Celtics in a playoff series.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

              Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
              The Pacers can beat them in the regular season because Boston doesn't really give a crap about their regular season records but I don't see the Pacers beating them on the playoffs.

              Rondo >> Hill
              Terry > PG
              Pierce> Danny
              Bass = West
              KG = Roy?

              Their bench is also better.
              I would more so tend to say:

              Rondo > Hill
              Terry < PG
              Pierce > Danny
              Bass < West
              KG < Roy (Height, age, Hibbert's improvement)

              Also I feel our bench is better than theirs.

              I think we have a great chance to beat them out, but that doesn't mean we will. I do think we have the better team. Come playoff time they are an animal to deal with though. Pierce KG and Rondo all step up and play like superstars.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

                Originally posted by Ownagedood View Post
                I would more so tend to say:

                Rondo > Hill
                Terry < PG
                Pierce > Danny
                Bass < West
                KG < Roy (Height, age, Hibbert's improvement)

                Also I feel our bench is better than theirs.

                I think we have a great chance to beat them out, but that doesn't mean we will. I do think we have the better team. Come playoff time they are an animal to deal with though. Pierce KG and Rondo all step up and play like superstars.
                I'm assuming you mis-typed here lol

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

                  isn't this just a parody of the ATL thread?

                  edit: nvm it's the same guy... can we at least get proper grammar in thread titles? "the pacer's?"???

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

                    I like Lee as a bench SG, but at Terry's age he and Lee are not Paul George caliber. His length will give their shooting fits.

                    Danny will be able to run with Pierce this year and definitely able to score on him as much as PP can the other way.

                    Roy/West vs KG/Green seems like a win overall for Indy because KG just can't make up the difference.

                    Rondo/Bradley will give Indy fits though, Hill will struggle with them and Bradley should be able to D-up DJ pretty well.

                    Gerald could be the difference maker from the bench, the 8 points that gives Indy a 5 pt win.



                    I have low expectations for Sully and don't get how much Boston fans can talk themselves into the next Sean May as being a steal, and that might not be fair to Sean's pre-injury production.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

                      Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                      I like Lee as a bench SG, but at Terry's age he and Lee are not Paul George caliber. His length will give their shooting fits.

                      Danny will be able to run with Pierce this year and definitely able to score on him as much as PP can the other way.

                      Roy/West vs KG/Green seems like a win overall for Indy because KG just can't make up the difference.

                      Rondo/Bradley will give Indy fits though, Hill will struggle with them and Bradley should be able to D-up DJ pretty well.

                      Gerald could be the difference maker from the bench, the 8 points that gives Indy a 5 pt win.



                      I have low expectations for Sully and don't get how much Boston fans can talk themselves into the next Sean May as being a steal, and that might not be fair to Sean's pre-injury production.
                      West trying to guard Green seems like a nightmare waiting to happen, you also forgot about Bass who is also a pretty good player.
                      @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

                        I call making the "IMO, the Pacers can beat PHI this season" thread!
                        "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

                        "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

                          Originally posted by Frostwolf View Post
                          isn't this just a parody of the ATL thread?

                          edit: nvm it's the same guy... can we at least get proper grammar in thread titles? "the pacer's?"???
                          sorry, didn't even notice. It's really sad when you get called out on your English grammar by an international.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

                            Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                            The Pacers can beat them in the regular season because Boston doesn't really give a crap about their regular season records but I don't see the Pacers beating them on the playoffs.

                            Rondo >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hill
                            Terry = PG
                            Pierce > Danny
                            Bass < West
                            KG > Roy

                            Their bench is also better.
                            fixed
                            Originally posted by Piston Prince
                            Bobcat fans telling us to cheer up = epic fail season
                            "Josh Smith Re-building the city of Detroit one brick at a time"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: IMO, the Pacer's can beat BOS this season.

                              Originally posted by Frostwolf View Post
                              isn't this just a parody of the ATL thread?

                              edit: nvm it's the same guy... can we at least get proper grammar in thread titles? "the pacer's?"???
                              Not trying to be rude, but I don't see the point in you posting this. I realize some of you old school posters are either too busy or too cool to post here anymore, but if that's the case, why waste your time making posts like this? Adding something to the conversation would be much more appreciated.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X