Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

    Originally posted by Really? View Post
    Oh yeah and RGIII is not a running QB, he is a passer with very good running ability.
    Great observation and he only ran once on Sunday and he was only sacked twice. Luck ran four times and was sacked four times and he was hit much harder than RGIII was. RGIII is not invincible but neither is one Andrew Luck. We will see the same thing happen to him, it just a matter of when, not if....... ...

    Comment


    • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

      Originally posted by Coopdog23 View Post
      OlBlu I think you have a serious concussion. Your prediction for yesterday was just a little..... well big time off.
      Yes, it was and I could not be more delighted that it was. It sure looked on the mark in the first half though didn't it? ...

      Comment


      • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

        Originally posted by OlBlu View Post
        Great observation and he only ran once on Sunday and he was only sacked twice. Luck ran four times and was sacked four times and he was hit much harder than RGIII was. RGIII is not invincible but neither is one Andrew Luck. We will see the same thing happen to him, it just a matter of when, not if....... ...
        Luck actually slides, RG3 doesn't end of story
        Smothered Chicken!

        Comment


        • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

          Originally posted by Pacergeek View Post
          what happened today was only a matter of time. the NFL is no place for a running QB. Its a shame because RGIII is a darn good passer. I blame the Shannahans for their stubbornness thinking that they can re-create the Baylor offense in the NFL.
          Seriously, just let him throw.


          Comment


          • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

            Originally posted by Coopdog23 View Post
            Luck actually slides, RG3 doesn't end of story
            See this isn't 100% true though either, Luck dove forward on the 3rd down play and the TD run against GB. Now under those circumstances we probably would all do the same, but I'm just saying it could happen. RGIII yesterday though proabbly should have just gone out of bounds.


            Comment


            • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

              Originally posted by OlBlu View Post
              Great observation and he only ran once on Sunday and he was only sacked twice. Luck ran four times and was sacked four times and he was hit much harder than RGIII was. RGIII is not invincible but neither is one Andrew Luck. We will see the same thing happen to him, it just a matter of when, not if....... ...
              Today was the first time that Luck was sacked more times than Griffin. And Griffin only played half of the game. I definitely think that Griffin has gotten hit more than Luck has so far this season. I think RGIII needs to bulk up 10-15 more pounds in order to stay away from the lil injuries that a guy like Mike Vick has endured throughout a lot of his career.

              Obviously no matter how big you are, the more hits you take, the more likely you are to have nagging injuries (see Rothlisberger, Ben) but I'd think that a few extra pounds of muscle should help some.

              Honestly, both rookie QB's are taking a bit of a pounding so far this season. But to be honest, with defenses keying on hitting the QB nowadays, the days of "keeping the QB clean" are over. Guys like Brady, Manning, and Rodgers took some vicious hits in the pocket yesterday. It's just something thats a part of the game now.

              Comment


              • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

                Is anyone in the media or NFL hierarchy questioning Luck's arm at this point? With 4 games worth of evidence you'd think if there were question marks it would be mentioned by commentators, competitors, etc....
                Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                ------

                "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                -John Wooden

                Comment


                • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

                  Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
                  Today was the first time that Luck was sacked more times than Griffin. And Griffin only played half of the game. I definitely think that Griffin has gotten hit more than Luck has so far this season. I think RGIII needs to bulk up 10-15 more pounds in order to stay away from the lil injuries that a guy like Mike Vick has endured throughout a lot of his career.

                  Obviously no matter how big you are, the more hits you take, the more likely you are to have nagging injuries (see Rothlisberger, Ben) but I'd think that a few extra pounds of muscle should help some.

                  Honestly, both rookie QB's are taking a bit of a pounding so far this season. But to be honest, with defenses keying on hitting the QB nowadays, the days of "keeping the QB clean" are over. Guys like Brady, Manning, and Rodgers took some vicious hits in the pocket yesterday. It's just something thats a part of the game now.
                  Exactly, we are talking about the NFL, running or not running a QB can get hit and be out of the game at anytime, that hit Luck took yesterday would have probably take him out the game and maybe the whole week he was just lucky enough that he didn't get hurt.

                  I don't get the RG3 hate around here, some of you are proving what I've been saying forever that Irsay was smart enough to bring Luck here because Indiana is still not ready for a QB like RG3, I like both guys and I'm rooting for both of them and I don't see a reason for people not to do the same.
                  @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                  Comment


                  • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

                    Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                    Exactly, we are talking about the NFL, running or not running a QB can get hit and be out of the game at anytime, that hit Luck took yesterday would have probably take him out the game and maybe the whole week he was just lucky enough that he didn't get hurt.

                    I don't get the RG3 hate around here, some of you are proving what I've been saying forever that Irsay was smart enough to bring Luck here because Indiana is still not ready for a QB like RG3, I like both guys and I'm rooting for both of them and I don't see a reason for people not to do the same.
                    I don't think anyone here hates RG3. It may just seem that way because olblu has been harping all offseason about how great RG3 is and how Luck will get hit more and not make it through the season.

                    So there's quite a bit of "I told you so" when it continues to be proven that olblu is dead wrong and is shown to be an unrealistic troll that has no clue.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

                      Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
                      Today was the first time that Luck was sacked more times than Griffin. And Griffin only played half of the game. I definitely think that Griffin has gotten hit more than Luck has so far this season. I think RGIII needs to bulk up 10-15 more pounds in order to stay away from the lil injuries that a guy like Mike Vick has endured throughout a lot of his career.

                      Obviously no matter how big you are, the more hits you take, the more likely you are to have nagging injuries (see Rothlisberger, Ben) but I'd think that a few extra pounds of muscle should help some.

                      Honestly, both rookie QB's are taking a bit of a pounding so far this season. But to be honest, with defenses keying on hitting the QB nowadays, the days of "keeping the QB clean" are over. Guys like Brady, Manning, and Rodgers took some vicious hits in the pocket yesterday. It's just something thats a part of the game now.
                      I think you guys are missing the point. ITs the type of hits a QB takes that matters and not all hits are the same.

                      Of course we know that but the NFL protects pocket passers much more than a QB who takes off and runs. RG3 got hurt because he was trying to do too much too early on in a game. This shows his inexperience and he got burned for it.

                      Contrast that to Andrew Luck and most of his runs were in the second half when he was trying to win the game. When Luck split the LB's for a first down he did so with correct angle that didn't put his head out there to get hurt. He got sandwiched but the LBS were on their heels and didn't have the ability to generate a significant impact.

                      The one unnecessary roughness hit was a hit to the arm then to the head. Maybe it shouldn't have been called but the impact was mostly to Lucks sternum.

                      The big difference is knowing when to run and when not to and RG3 is behind on the curve here. He even says he won't change his style and it appears that the Redskins don't plan to change it either which is the problem.

                      Adding weight won't protect your noodle see Aaron Rodgers in 2010 agaisnt the Lions. You simply have to slide more or throw the ball away.

                      Edit: Lucks run in the 4th.. He uses the Ref to gain the angle to split the defenders at the 1:36 mark.

                      http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201210...enu=highlights
                      Last edited by Gamble1; 10-08-2012, 11:11 AM.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

                        Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                        Exactly, we are talking about the NFL, running or not running a QB can get hit and be out of the game at anytime, that hit Luck took yesterday would have probably take him out the game and maybe the whole week he was just lucky enough that he didn't get hurt.

                        I don't get the RG3 hate around here, some of you are proving what I've been saying forever that Irsay was smart enough to bring Luck here because Indiana is still not ready for a QB like RG3, I like both guys and I'm rooting for both of them and I don't see a reason for people not to do the same.
                        Luck was the consensus 1st pick. He'd been the 1st pick a year earlier even. RG3 came late to the table but no matter who was choosing first, Luck would've likely been the 1st pick. If RG3 would've been Indy's pick the fans would've been just as much behind him as they are Luck. And they probably would be complaining if RG3 was running and getting hit rather than hardly running at all, sliding, and playing it safe and going out of bounds rather than getting the last yard. History has shown that stuff gets your QB banged up and on the bench.

                        Add to that Luck and RG3 were picks 1 and 2 in the same draft.

                        Add to that Ol Blu's constant cheerleading for RG3 vs Luck and you have Indy fans paying more attention to the Redskins than they normally would. I don't think it's to knock RG3 though and I don't think it's fair to say Indy isn't ready for a QB like RG3.
                        Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                        ------

                        "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                        -John Wooden

                        Comment


                        • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

                          Originally posted by OlBlu View Post
                          Yes, it was and I could not be more delighted that it was. It sure looked on the mark in the first half though didn't it? ...
                          never really did
                          Smothered Chicken!

                          Comment


                          • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

                            Originally posted by Bball View Post
                            Is anyone in the media or NFL hierarchy questioning Luck's arm at this point? With 4 games worth of evidence you'd think if there were question marks it would be mentioned by commentators, competitors, etc....
                            Well, the Colts have been off for two weeks, so there was bound to be less talk, and also it is pretty hard to comment negatively on a rookie that just won a big game against arguably one of the best teams in the NFL.

                            My take is he has enough are strength but his judgement on deep passes has to improve, specifically on how much air to put under the ball and how far he should throw it, it is all about timing, and it will improve as he builds relationships with the receivers. A prime example of this is the deep pass that he threw to Avery this week, in previous games he has under thrown him, this game he made a good adjustment, but should have put a little bit more air under the ball, since he didn't he barely over threw an out stretched Avery.

                            It will be so interesting seeing where he is by the end of the season.
                            Why so SERIOUS

                            Comment


                            • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

                              Like I've been saying though, deep balls are a ****** indication of arm strength. Luck's arm is unbelievable in the spots where arm strength actually matters, on the run, against pressure, throwing out routes, he does all these brilliantly and with very little time to set his feet.

                              RGIII has a "bigger" arm, slightly (I've said this all along), but right now he does not have the in pocket moxy to back it up. RGIII may be faster, but right now he doesn't pick his spots the way Luck does. Games are not won in the first and second and third quarters, but with the way RGIII plays you would think they are. He may be a walking highlight reel, but unless RGIII changes the way he plays the game, he's going to be remembered more for his highlights than his wins. RGIII has grabbed all the headlines, but Luck has the better record and is making his team more competitive. ESPN was talking about how RGIII needs to learn how to win. Luck doesn't need to do that, he knows how. You just need to get some of the other youth on the Colts to make that transition and Sunday looked like a step in that direction.

                              RGIII and Luck will both be great QBs, much better than Cam Newton, but Sunday proved, beyond a shadow of a doubt that Luck is much further down that path.


                              Comment


                              • Re: Luck vs Griffin - let it begin.

                                Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                                Like I've been saying though, deep balls are a ****** indication of arm strength. Luck's arm is unbelievable in the spots where arm strength actually matters, on the run, against pressure, throwing out routes, he does all these brilliantly and with very little time to set his feet.

                                RGIII has a "bigger" arm, slightly (I've said this all along), but right now he does not have the in pocket moxy to back it up. RGIII may be faster, but right now he doesn't pick his spots the way Luck does. Games are not won in the first and second and third quarters, but with the way RGIII plays you would think they are. He may be a walking highlight reel, but unless RGIII changes the way he plays the game, he's going to be remembered more for his highlights than his wins. RGIII has grabbed all the headlines, but Luck has the better record and is making his team more competitive. ESPN was talking about how RGIII needs to learn how to win. Luck doesn't need to do that, he knows how. You just need to get some of the other youth on the Colts to make that transition and Sunday looked like a step in that direction.

                                RGIII and Luck will both be great QBs, much better than Cam Newton, but Sunday proved, beyond a shadow of a doubt that Luck is much further down that path.
                                With Lucks passing, he has also had trouble on out routes at times as far as arm strength is concerned, but he has gotten better at that as well. One of the things I notice is that when he sees a guy that is wide open, he tends less than enough velocity behind the ball, it is like he wants to make sure that he makes it an easy catch. This is good in some situations because it increases the likelihood that a player will catch the ball, but on the other hand, the player typically does not have as much time to run after the catch, especially with the speed of the defenses.

                                I also would not say that Griffin does not know how to win, he has seemed to fair pretty well in pressure, and has lost a lot of close games so far this year, but you also have to remember that his teams pass defense is 31st in the league in regards to yards, that is definitely a hindrance in close games.

                                In regards to his record vs Luck, he only has one more loss, but he has also played one more game, so I would not really read much into that. Also when he got hurt the score was 7-7 and he was putting together a drive in the redzone to give them the lead, who knows what happens in a close game if he is still in.

                                I also agree that both QB's will be very good, not giving both the great part yet, but I would not rule out Cam Newton, he is in critical period of his career right now, and will need to learn how to overcome his weaknesses and adversity to pull through and win games, still only his second year in the league.
                                Why so SERIOUS

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X