Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 29

Thread: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

  1. #1
    Chairman of the Boards 90'sNBARocked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Chicago, but Brooklyn/Naptown Raised!!
    Posts
    7,607

    Default NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    [url]http://www.hoopsworld.com/nba-am-the-nba-rookies-to-watch/[/The Rookies To Watch:

    There is no doubting that Olympian gold medalist and top overall pick Anthony Davis is the favorite in the clubhouse to win the Rookie of The Year award in 2012-2013. Second overall selection Michael Kidd-Gilchrist looked great in summer league and could have a solid season for the Bobcats. Washington’s Bradley Beal is in the perfect situation in Washington to flourish; even Sacramento’s Thomas Robinson could shine with the Kings. However there are a few rookies who were drafted outside the top five that either put on a show in Summer League or are now poised to have big roles in the 2012-2013 season that are worth paying attention to, here are a few of them:

    Damian Lillard, Portland: Lillard was the co-MVP of the Las Vegas Summer League and truly looked like a man among boys at times running the show for the Trail Blazers’ summer crew. Lillard looks like he is the favorite to start for the Blazers and given his knack for scoring the ball and his polish, he does become a Rookie of The Year prospect, mainly because he’ll get the playing time and opportunity to showcase his skills. LaMarcus Aldridge is the lead dog in Portland, so Lillard won’t be the leading scorer, but if he can put up solid double-figure scoring and hand out the six-to-eight assists per game he says he’s capable of, Lillard could be one of the brighter rookies in the class.

    Maurice Harkless, Orlando: Mo Harkless was projected to be a bench guy in Philadelphia, but after the Dwight Howard trade landed him in Orlando, things are looking up for Harkless. It’s unlikely that Harkless starts the season as a starter, but there is little doubt that Harkless will get every opportunity to speed along his development. A rangy small forward type, Harkless has shown glimpses of having Rudy Gay/Kevin Durant type scoring ability, which will make him a fan favorite for sure. Harkless was a streaky shooter at St. John’s, however, he’s spent the entire summer re-working his shooting mechanics. If he can drain the three-ball effectively, he will supplant anyone they put in front of him in Orlando. Mo may not start the season as a starter, but the smart money is on him ending the season as one.

    Harrison Barnes, Golden State: There really couldn’t be a better situation for Harrison Barnes than the Warriors. There is almost no pressure on him and all he’ll be asked to do is play his game, not carry a franchise. Barnes was one of the brighter spots in summer league and he is expected to play a big role for the Warriors. The problem for Barnes is he’s not going to get nearly the amount of looks it will take to be a real Rookie of The Year candidate, but there is no doubting that the skills are there. The Warriors are so deep with young talent that Barnes day-to-day numbers may be underwhelming, but if you are looking for the guy that could give you 25 on any given night he might be that guy.

    Terrence Ross, Toronto: The training camp battle between Terrence Ross and Raptors guard DeMar DeRozan will be one to watch. DeRozan has the bigger, more mature NBA body and he is certainly more explosive as a scorer. However, Terrence Ross is a far better shooter. There has been talk that the Raptors would try and find ways to get both guys on the floor together, but if Ross wins the starter’s job in camp or if injury strikes Ross has the ability to be an impact scorer. Like Barnes it’s unlikely that Ross gets the minutes and touches to be a real Rookie of The Year candidate, but when you start looking at the Rookies to watch he could be one of the best of the bunch.

    Jared Sullinger, Boston: Sullinger proved in the Orlando Summer League that he’s not nearly as damaged as the draft process made him out to be and unlike most of the young bigs in summer league, he proved that he was ready to play. The Celtics have a lot of mature veterans in front of Sully, so it’s unlikely that he plays a big role as a rookie, but if he does get his shot he has the bulk and the knack for scoring that could make things interesting. He is not a Rookie of The Year candidate, but he should be fun to watch especially after the Celtic vets like Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce get a hold of him and teach him a little nastiness.

    Perry Jones III, Thunder Jones won’t be starting games, but if he sticks to the plan with the Thunder and his knee holds up he’ll have a chance for a regular role. When the Thunder started the draft process they were actually open to trading the pick. When PJIII landed to them late in the first they really couldn’t have been happier. Jones is going to have to learn to run the Thunder system and that was a knock on him in the draft process. Everyone knew Jones could play, but the question was could he run a complex system? That’s something he’ll have to prove in camp. PJIII is not a Rookie of The Year prospect, but he could be a fun rookie to watch. The Western Conference got appreciably better this summer, but adding Jones to the OKC bench crew that will likely feature Eric Maynor, Reggie Jackson and Olympian James Harden makes them better as well. The second unit in OKC added another high volume scorer, as if they were not deep enough already.

    Orlando Johnson, Pacers If there is one guy in the second round who could make a name for himself its likely Indiana’s Orlando Johnson. With a great mix of perimeter shooting, an attack-the-basket game, and a high basketball IQ Johnson could be a nice addition to a very young Pacers squad. Paul George is the starter at the two spot, but if Johnson gets some extended time he could provide a scoring boost like he did in summer league. There is no scenario short of a major injury in which Johnson will be in the Rookie of the Year discussion, but if you are looking for a dark horse rookie to watch, he might be the guy
    .
    Last edited by 90'sNBARocked; 08-21-2012 at 07:53 PM.
    Sittin on top of the world!

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 90'sNBARocked For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    #RiseOfTheKing imbtyler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Nashville, IN
    Posts
    1,631
    Mood

    Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    I have to say, what scoring boost did OJ provide during Summer League? I agree with the statements, though. Summer League is just a farce when it comes to true projections, but it'd be awesome if he became a watchable rookie this year.
    witters: @imbtyler, @postgameonline

    Quote Originally Posted by Day-V View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    In conclusion, Paul George is awesome.
    Quote Originally Posted by Slick Pinkham View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Our arena, their arena, Rucker park, it just doesn't matter. We're bigger, longer, younger, faster, and hungrier.



  4. The Following User Says Thank You to imbtyler For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    can't wait to see this v Heisenberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    12,342

    Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    Quote Originally Posted by imbtyler View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I have to say, what scoring boost did OJ provide during Summer League? I agree with the statements, though. Summer League is just a farce when it comes to true projections, but it'd be awesome if he became a watchable rookie this year.
    He did put up 12.4 a game, 3rd on the team. Sure, wasn't exactly efficient at 26%, but it's still a scoring boost. I guess.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Heisenberg For This Useful Post:


  7. #4

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    There are quite a few 2nd rounders I'd put ahead of Orlando, like Will Barton.

  8. #5
    Member Sparhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    34
    Posts
    5,301

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    Apparently OJ couldn't miss against air defenders. Summer League he couldn't hit a shot.

    Something tells me this guy could be like another streaky, and horribly inefficient scorer...AJ Price.
    Lance + Starting SG = Awesome

    Now really free Lance!

  9. #6
    Star Platinum Hypnotiq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,960

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    OJ is Barbosa 2.0 streaky shooter and has blackhole traits

  10. #7
    Member Ace E.Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    5,211

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    If Lance and other players have shown us ANYTHING it's that killing it in the summer league doesn't really mean much. Yes I'm a bit worried about OJ's shooting percentage and lack of passing, but for all we know; the coaching staff could've told him to put it up as much as he could.

    Though he wasn't converting these opportunities, OJ was able to create space and get good looks at the basket, which was somewhat of a question mark coming in.

    He's a rookie 2nd round pick on a deep playoff team. If he gives us anything resembling a contribution offensively then it's a positive.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Ace E.Anderson For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    can't wait to see this v Heisenberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    12,342

    Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    If OJ gets burn in more than 20 or so games then that's a successful rookie year as far as I'm concerned.

  13. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Heisenberg For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    PROUD 2 B A PACERS FAN! xtacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    TURKEY
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,747

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    Quote Originally Posted by Heisenberg View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    He did put up 12.4 a game, 3rd on the team. Sure, wasn't exactly efficient at 26%, but it's still a scoring boost. I guess.
    %26! wow.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to xtacy For This Useful Post:


  16. #10

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    Quote Originally Posted by Hypnotiq View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    OJ is Barbosa 2.0 streaky shooter and has blackhole traits
    boy, i do hope that OJ is Leandrhino 2.0. Barbossa can play.

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to xIndyFan For This Useful Post:


  18. #11
    #RiseOfTheKing imbtyler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Nashville, IN
    Posts
    1,631
    Mood

    Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    If OJ can fill the position of Barbosa, I won't be disappointed. Leandro disappointed overall, into the playoffs and such; but if OJ can provide some quick scoring, when it's most needed, then that'll be a success in my eyes.

    I'm not really surprised that Plumlee isn't on the list of rookies to watch (as are several other interesting rookies), but I think that he'll be the rookie that we're keeping our eyes on to produce well. Since a few of us are looking at him to replace Hansbrough to some degree, I think Plumlee is going to be under the microscope all season.
    witters: @imbtyler, @postgameonline

    Quote Originally Posted by Day-V View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    In conclusion, Paul George is awesome.
    Quote Originally Posted by Slick Pinkham View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Our arena, their arena, Rucker park, it just doesn't matter. We're bigger, longer, younger, faster, and hungrier.



  19. #12
    I have a Member xBulletproof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    4,671

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    What? No Plumlee? Sheesh.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to xBulletproof For This Useful Post:


  21. #13
    .
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    Quote Originally Posted by Sparhawk View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Apparently OJ couldn't miss against air defenders. Summer League he couldn't hit a shot.

    Something tells me this guy could be like another streaky, and horribly inefficient scorer...AJ Price.
    Well, even if that's the case, at least this time he's actually playing shooting guard, not point guard.

    But his %'s in college look good to me, and highlights show him hitting contested shots. I'm sure he's as streaky as any shooter/scorer is, but I'm encouraged that he can put up good %'s and hit contested shots.

    http://insider.espn.go.com/nbadraft/...rlando-johnson

    His freshman %'s aren't good, but his final 3 years (the ones where he was at UCSB), his FG% was .481, .475, .451 and his 3G% was .397, .405, .427

    Considering that he was apparently their only true weapon on offense (meaning he was the defense's focal point essentially all of the time), I think those are pretty good %'s.

  22. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hicks For This Useful Post:


  23. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Age
    33
    Posts
    28,142

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    I'm still waiting for the "OJ is going to revolutionize the Pacers" thread.

  24. #15
    Pacers Fan For Life J7F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Seymour, IN
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,059

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    Quote Originally Posted by vnzla81 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'm still waiting for the "OJ is going to revolutionize the Pacers" thread.
    So start it... After all you do trust the Pacers when it comes to drafting well...
    Nothing in life worth having comes easy.

  25. #16
    Member Sparhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    34
    Posts
    5,301

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    Quote Originally Posted by Hicks View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Well, even if that's the case, at least this time he's actually playing shooting guard, not point guard.

    But his %'s in college look good to me, and highlights show him hitting contested shots. I'm sure he's as streaky as any shooter/scorer is, but I'm encouraged that he can put up good %'s and hit contested shots.

    http://insider.espn.go.com/nbadraft/...rlando-johnson

    His freshman %'s aren't good, but his final 3 years (the ones where he was at UCSB), his FG% was .481, .475, .451 and his 3G% was .397, .405, .427

    Considering that he was apparently their only true weapon on offense (meaning he was the defense's focal point essentially all of the time), I think those are pretty good %'s.
    He certainly shot the ball well in college. But that doesn't always translate. Just ask Adam Morrison. I think OJ's problem is that he isn't very fast, but he could turn out something like a MarShon Brooks lite. That's not a bad thing. I'd rather not see too much of OJ next season though...mainly cause I really want Lance to succeed and get all those backup sg minutes and even some at the point.

    Not surprised Plumlee didn't make the list. hahaha I will say, even though the Pacers past up on better prospects, I do think Plumlee will have a longer and better career than Hans.
    Lance + Starting SG = Awesome

    Now really free Lance!

  26. #17
    .
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    So why didn't it translate for Adam Morrison?

  27. #18
    I'm on a MAC! graphic-er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    7,412

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    Plumlee is gonna get some minutes, he'll be a joy to watch.
    You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

  28. #19
    Member Sparhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    34
    Posts
    5,301

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    Quote Originally Posted by Hicks View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So why didn't it translate for Adam Morrison?
    I feel like it's pretty obvious.

    In college he shot 50%. In the NBA he never shot better than 38% (and probably against backups too).

    Just cause you are an efficient scorer in college doesn't always mean you will in the NBA.

    I'm not trying to dog OJ. I think he could be one of the few 2nd rounders to have a decent career. I certainly felt he was a better pick than Plumlee.
    Lance + Starting SG = Awesome

    Now really free Lance!

  29. #20
    .
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    Quote Originally Posted by Sparhawk View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I feel like it's pretty obvious.

    In college he shot 50%. In the NBA he never shot better than 38% (and probably against backups too).

    Just cause you are an efficient scorer in college doesn't always mean you will in the NBA.

    I'm not trying to dog OJ. I think he could be one of the few 2nd rounders to have a decent career. I certainly felt he was a better pick than Plumlee.
    Maybe it is obvious, but I'm trying to pin down exactly what the problem was. Was he getting open more in college than he was in the pros? He struggles to hit contested jumpers? He got to the rim in college and couldn't in the pros? I don't remember much about the guy, so I don't claim to know.

  30. #21
    I'm on a MAC! graphic-er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    7,412

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    Quote Originally Posted by Hicks View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Maybe it is obvious, but I'm trying to pin down exactly what the problem was. Was he getting open more in college than he was in the pros? He struggles to hit contested jumpers? He got to the rim in college and couldn't in the pros? I don't remember much about the guy, so I don't claim to know.
    Wasn't quick enough, and wasn't strong enough to play the SF position that about sums it up. If you aren't quick or strong, then you won't last in the league.
    You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

  31. The Following User Says Thank You to graphic-er For This Useful Post:


  32. #22

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    OJ is a guy I would play the last few minutes of the first quarter, give him a few shots. If he hits them, keep using him. If he misses them, hes riding the pine till the end of the game unless its a blowout one way or the other. Maybe not the best way to develop him. But the Pacers can't exactly afford to lose games to develop second rounders.

  33. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mad-Mad-Mario For This Useful Post:


  34. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imbtyler View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If OJ can fill the position of Barbosa, I won't be disappointed. Leandro disappointed overall, into the playoffs and such; but if OJ can provide some quick scoring, when it's most needed, then that'll be a success in my eyes.

    I'm not really surprised that Plumlee isn't on the list of rookies to watch (as are several other interesting rookies), but I think that he'll be the rookie that we're keeping our eyes on to produce well. Since a few of us are looking at him to replace Hansbrough to some degree, I think Plumlee is going to be under the microscope all season.
    I was as disappointed as anyone with Barbosa in the playoffs, but I think people forget the boost he provided in the weeks following his acquisition.

  35. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Eddie Gill For This Useful Post:


  36. #24
    #RiseOfTheKing imbtyler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Nashville, IN
    Posts
    1,631
    Mood

    Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie Gill View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I was as disappointed as anyone with Barbosa in the playoffs, but I think people forget the boost he provided in the weeks following his acquisition.
    Don't get me wrong, he definitely added a good boost to the team. And I don't forget that he was the primary difference to give us our single regular season win against the Miami Heat. I liked what he did, but I would rather build a rookie into that kind of player based on our needs. I know Gerald Green can get to the rim and hit 3's; despite Barbosa's lightning-quickness, is there a difference between what El Rapido and Green bring to the table?

    I would like to see OJ get some playing time, and develop into the next surprisingly good/decent/great player to be stolen in the second round (since '04: Trevor Ariza, Monta Ellis, Lou Williams, Paul Millsap, Glen Davis, DeAndre Jordan, Goran Dragic, Marcus Thornton, Chase Budinger, Sam Young, Landry Fields, Josh Selby, Isaiah Thomas). However, looking at this year's crop of players, I'd have to say that the players more likely to be "those guys" (besides OJ) out of the 2012 draft are Quincy Miller, Tyshawn Taylor, Doron Lamb, and maybe Will Barton.

    Who knows?; maybe this year's Jeremy Lin will be Kostas Papanikolaou (picked 48th overall in 2012).



    What a dunk, Papa Niko.
    witters: @imbtyler, @postgameonline

    Quote Originally Posted by Day-V View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    In conclusion, Paul George is awesome.
    Quote Originally Posted by Slick Pinkham View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Our arena, their arena, Rucker park, it just doesn't matter. We're bigger, longer, younger, faster, and hungrier.



  37. #25
    Member Sparhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    34
    Posts
    5,301

    Default Re: NBA AM: The NBA Rookies To Watch

    Quote Originally Posted by Hicks View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Maybe it is obvious, but I'm trying to pin down exactly what the problem was. Was he getting open more in college than he was in the pros? He struggles to hit contested jumpers? He got to the rim in college and couldn't in the pros? I don't remember much about the guy, so I don't claim to know.
    I'd say his lack of athleticism and speed were the main problems, but he couldn't even hit the outside J that he would just drain in college. I think OJ is gonna have the same problems, but at least his handles are better, so who really knows.

    OJ and Lance could be a even be a nice tandem down the road. Lance at point and OJ at sg. Defense might be pretty ugly though. haha
    Lance + Starting SG = Awesome

    Now really free Lance!

Similar Threads

  1. Rookies rating rookies
    By Speed in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-22-2010, 09:10 PM
  2. TOP 10 ROOKIES(nba.com) !
    By pacer4ever in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-16-2010, 10:33 AM
  3. Next year and the Rookies
    By Speed in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 03-21-2009, 07:22 PM
  4. Top 20 Rookies for 2008-09
    By Will Galen in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-09-2008, 01:04 AM
  5. Top 10 Rookies by NBAdraft.com
    By Doncikaz in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-16-2005, 07:39 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •