Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 115

Thread: PAUL GEORGE???

  1. #51
    Member Sparhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    34
    Posts
    5,338

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by CJ Jones View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    He was actually 2nd in BPG if you take away Hayward, Johnson, and Rush. All three played the majority of their minutes at SF.
    Ha, even better.
    Lance + Starting SG = Awesome

    Now really free Lance!

  2. #52
    Born ready? TheDavisBrothers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Davenport, IA
    Age
    24
    Posts
    1,478
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by joew8302 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Geeze, are you guys really that out of touch to completely dismiss my question as preposterous?

    Last year in 30 MPG Hayward averaged 11.8 pts/3.1 apg/3.5 rpg and shot .456 overall, .346 from three and .832 from the line


    Last year in 30 MPG George averaged 12.1 pts/2.4 apg/5.6 rpg and shot .44 overall, .385 from three and .802 from the line

    Seems like a reasonable question to pose. Those of you who are acting like I am comparing Paul George to Deshawn Stevenson need to touch base with reality.
    Paul George is the slightly better all around player right now and has way more upside. Heyward is a very nice player, no doubt, but given the choice, it's not even a question...

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheDavisBrothers For This Useful Post:


  4. #53
    I'm on a MAC! graphic-er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    7,444

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDavisBrothers View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Paul George is the slightly better all around player right now and has way more upside. Heyward is a very nice player, no doubt, but given the choice, it's not even a question...
    I doubt that the Jazz would take PG for Hayward straight up. but your comment implies that should be the case.
    You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

  5. #54
    Pacers Fan For Life J7F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Seymour, IN
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,060

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by graphic-er View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I doubt that the Jazz would take PG for Hayward straight up. but your comment implies that should be the case.
    No way of knowing this for sure but I would bet money they would take that trade in a heartbeat...

    PG is at least a year or two younger isn't he? With marginally better statistics...

    PG has way more potential than Gordon...
    Nothing in life worth having comes easy.

  6. #55
    I'm on a MAC! graphic-er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    7,444

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by J7F View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    No way of knowing this for sure but I would bet money they would take that trade in a heartbeat...

    PG is at least a year or two younger isn't he? With marginally better statistics...

    PG has way more potential than Gordon...
    Hayward plays in the West, tougher overall competition.

    Define potential...
    You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

  7. #56
    Member Ace E.Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    5,294

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by J7F View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    No way of knowing this for sure but I would bet money they would take that trade in a heartbeat...

    PG is at least a year or two younger isn't he? With marginally better statistics...

    PG has way more potential than Gordon...
    PG is actually 2 months older...

    I think it's a little too early to know who will be the better player for the long haul. With that said, I've already gone on record in that I think Paul is better right now, but it's definitely debatable.

    Just as the Jazz wouldn't take PG, I'm 100% sure the Pacers wouldn't think to trade PG for Gordon Hayward......

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Ace E.Anderson For This Useful Post:

    J7F

  9. #57
    Undefeated
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Carmel
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,015

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by naptownmenace View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I like Brian Shaw but Trainer Rob McClanaghan is the person he really needs to spend some time with. He's the trainer that turned Derrick Rose into a league MVP and transformed Kevin Love from a decent rebounder and all-around player into the rebounding monster and scorer he is today.

    The one thing he got both Rose and Love to buy into is creating contact instead of just reacting to it. Derrick Rose learned how to jump into people when they challenge his shot and score through contact. When guys try to box out Kevin Love, he meets force with force and because of his wide stance is able to snare the rebound. The key is keeping your balance while the other player is knocked off balance.

    Oh, yeah... Russell Westbrook and Al Horford are his other All-Star clients. Todd Rob McClanaghan makes frachise players.

    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...ose/index.html
    Who then get injured because they initiate to much contact!!
    Danger Zone

  10. #58
    Undefeated
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Carmel
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,015

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by PacersHomer View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I bet the list of players who topped out at 22 is minimal if it exists at all.
    I topped out at 16, and I sucked then...
    Danger Zone

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Rogco For This Useful Post:

    J7F

  12. #59
    Undefeated
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Carmel
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,015

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    I think the PG and GH comparison is interesting. Both played well for such young players, but both (and I didn't watch much GH, but did check his box score a lot, so I am making a deduction off of that) seemed to disappear at times. Often I think we blame it on focus, but I think it has more to do with young players being deferential still to the older players on their teams. This year should be interesting for both.
    Danger Zone

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Rogco For This Useful Post:

    J7F

  14. #60

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Hayward benefited from being able to play his natural position. Really good player, maybe slightly ahead of Paul right now offensively, but he's nowhere near as versatile of a defender.

  15. #61
    Pacers Fan For Life J7F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Seymour, IN
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,060

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by graphic-er View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Hayward plays in the West, tougher overall competition.

    Define potential...
    At a glance the West appears to have the weaker competition at SF spot and the East has weaker competition at the SG spot going forward...

    Top Eastern SF
    LeBron James
    Carmelo Anthony

    Andre Igoudala
    Danny Granger
    Gerald Wallace
    Luol Deng
    Paul Pierce

    Michael Kidd-Gilchrist


    Top Western SF
    Kevin Durant

    Nicholas Batum
    Danillo Gallinari
    Wilson Chandler
    Michael Beasley
    Gordon Hayward
    Andrei Kirilenko

    Shawn Marion
    Caron Butler
    Stephen Jackson





    Top Eastern SG
    Dwyane Wade
    Joe Johnson
    Monta Ellis

    Paul George
    Nick Young
    Lou Williams
    DeMarr DeRozan

    Bradley Beal
    Jason Terry


    Top Western SG
    Kobe Bryant
    Eric Gordon
    James Harden
    Kevin Martin
    Manu Ginobili

    Tyreke Evans
    OJ Mayo
    Brandon Roy
    Marcus Thornton

    Chauncey Billups



    And Webster's Dictionary defi... Just kidding...


    I guess what I look for in a player to know if he has all-star>superstar potential is if at a young age that person appears to already have an advantage in any particular area or areas over the majority of the players in the league at his position...

    An all-star might have one or two advantages at a young age where a superstar will show in multiple areas...

    Gordon appears to have a very high basketball IQ and already knows how to perform well in big games... That's it... I don't really see any one other discernible advantage the kid has over the majority of the players in the league at his position... He does a lot of things well and has the potential to be a good player for years... And he definately could contribute to a championship team... I just don't ever see him being the 1st or 2nd best player on a championship contending team...

    PG has several qualities greater than the majority of the players in the league at his position... At 6'10" he is the tallest SG in the NBA... He is also extremely athletic... He can run out on a fast break faster than most SGs and can jump higher than most SGs... He plays the passing lanes for steals better than maybe any player I have ever seen... He is also one of the best all-around defenders in the league... And he is an elite rebounder at SG... If he can polish up other parts of his game he has the potential to be one of the top SGs in the league... And I can see him becoming a 1st or 2nd best player on a championship contending team...
    Nothing in life worth having comes easy.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to J7F For This Useful Post:


  17. #62

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    I don't see how they are even being compared. PG is beyond a doubt both better right now and has far more upside. The Jazz would do the trade straight up without a second thought. PG is frequently talked about by other players, other fans, national media, etc. etc. He has obvious star potential (just look at his ridiculous game vs the Mavs last year).

    "Could very well end up being the best player in the draft"
    "Looking like the Pacers got a steal"
    Are the types of things that were side both before and after the draft. PG just needs experience, focus, and most of all opportunity.
    Last edited by oxxo; 08-08-2012 at 06:44 PM.

  18. #63
    I have a Member xBulletproof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    4,671

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Meh. Paul George scored more points, in less minutes while on a better team when talking about offense. He had 2 votes for All NBA Defensive 1st team, and 6 votes for All NBA Defensive 2nd team, out of the 30 head coaches who voted, and no Vogel couldn't vote for his own players.

    Yes, Paul George struggled in the playoffs, but Hayward didn't shoot over 19% (6 of 33) in the playoffs himself.

    I'm not exactly sure why Utah wouldn't trade Hayward for George if given the chance.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to xBulletproof For This Useful Post:


  20. #64
    Born ready? TheDavisBrothers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Davenport, IA
    Age
    24
    Posts
    1,478
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by graphic-er View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I doubt that the Jazz would take PG for Hayward straight up. but your comment implies that should be the case.
    If the Jazz FO wouldn't take George for Heyward, then I would feel really bad for the Jazz fans...

  21. #65
    Member pacers74's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Plainfield
    Posts
    2,289

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDavisBrothers View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If the Jazz FO wouldn't take George for Heyward, then I would feel really bad for the Jazz fans...
    I didn't want the pacers to draft Heyward in 2010. I wanted PG. I was jumping up and down happy when the jazz picked Heyward. I wouldn't trade PG for Heyward and 2 first round draft picks. Let them keep Heyward. We will find out thi s year that PG is superior in almost everyway on a basketball court than GH.
    At the least I see PG being on one of the all defensive teams and up his PPG average by 3 or 4 points.

  22. #66

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by pacers74 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I didn't want the pacers to draft Heyward in 2010. I wanted PG. I was jumping up and down happy when the jazz picked Heyward. I wouldn't trade PG for Heyward and 2 first round draft picks. Let them keep Heyward. We will find out thi s year that PG is superior in almost everyway on a basketball court than GH.
    At the least I see PG being on one of the all defensive teams and up his PPG average by 3 or 4 points.
    i like Paul George also. and think he is a better player than Hayward. But I gotta admit if the Jazz came around with Hayward plus picks, I'd hope the Pacer FO said yes.

  23. #67
    I'm on a MAC! graphic-er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    7,444

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by xBulletproof View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Meh. Paul George scored more points, in less minutes while on a better team when talking about offense. He had 2 votes for All NBA Defensive 1st team, and 6 votes for All NBA Defensive 2nd team, out of the 30 head coaches who voted, and no Vogel couldn't vote for his own players.

    Yes, Paul George struggled in the playoffs, but Hayward didn't shoot over 19% (6 of 33) in the playoffs himself.

    I'm not exactly sure why Utah wouldn't trade Hayward for George if given the chance.
    Looking at the last 2 months of the season Hayward was playing out of his mind compared to George.

    I like George, but I just like Hayward much better going forward. I'm just not sure how you all can be so sure on a guy who look nothing but spot of 3's all year long. He is Danny Granger lite right now, and Tayshaun Prince 2.0 in the future. I think Hayward's out look is much better. I think he has a legit shot at being a Genobli type player.
    You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

  24. #68
    Member Ace E.Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    5,294

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by graphic-er View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Looking at the last 2 months of the season Hayward was playing out of his mind compared to George.

    I like George, but I just like Hayward much better going forward. I'm just not sure how you all can be so sure on a guy who look nothing but spot of 3's all year long. He is Danny Granger lite right now, and Tayshaun Prince 2.0 in the future. I think Hayward's out look is much better. I think he has a legit shot at being a Genobli type player.
    Your comparisons are way off for a number of things.

    1. PG is already a better shooter and scorer than Prince has been within his career. Also, Prince wasn't athletic enough to guard quick 1's and 2's...on a CONSISTENT basis. Danny Granger and Prince play nothing alike, and neither are particularly explosive, quick, nor athletic which are all strengths of Paul...so how do they compare?

    2. Hayward doesn't have Ginobili's herky-jerky type of ball handling skill. He's not as quick, nor as good of a ball-handler as Ginobili (which is part of what makes Manu so good)

    As someone stated before, Paul averaged more points, in less minutes, on a much better team, as a lesser focal point within the offense. All this was WITH Heyward's lil "surge" at the end of the season (though 14 ppg isnt much of a surge when you should be the best wing scorer on your team). And then when you add in George's superior athleticism, rebounding, and defense...PG is better now and going forward. Lol I don't see how anyone could argue different.

    But at this point your mind is made up. So the arguing is a moot point, no matter how many facts people may spew within this thread.

    I'm not sure if it's a coincidence or not, but I've noticed that between Gordon and Heyward, you like home-grown, Indiana boys quite more than the average pacer fan. Not necessarily a bad thing, they're both good young players. But you're opinion of them is a lot higher than most.

  25. #69
    I'm on a MAC! graphic-er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    7,444

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Your comparisons are way off for a number of things.

    1. PG is already a better shooter and scorer than Prince has been within his career. Also, Prince wasn't athletic enough to guard quick 1's and 2's...on a CONSISTENT basis. Danny Granger and Prince play nothing alike, and neither are particularly explosive, quick, nor athletic which are all strengths of Paul...so how do they compare? Both Granger and Prince were pretty quick and athletic in their first couple years in the league. All of them are spot up shooters. None of the 3 have much of a handle. George can guard the smaller quicker players now because he is thin enough to do it at 215lbs. But once he gets up to 225-230 range the speed will start to elude him. George might have all the athletic ability in the world, but I don't think he will have the skills to utilize it to the level you all are predicting. Thus he will be Prince 2.0, great defender, great leaper, good shooter.

    2. Hayward doesn't have Ginobili's herky-jerky type of ball handling skill. He's not as quick, nor as good of a ball-handler as Ginobili (which is part of what makes Manu so good) Well its a given he is not as quick as Manu, 6-5 vs 6-8. Hayward has a pretty good handle from what I seen, better than George's for sure. I guess when I mean Genobli like, I refer to play making abilities, a heady game, able to use alot of deception.


    My opinions though, just what i observe, I hope both turn out to be all-stars.
    You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

  26. #70
    Member Sparhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    34
    Posts
    5,338

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    I wish nothing but success to Hayward and PG. Personally, I'm so very happy the Pacers drafted PG. PGs offense will come, but damn the dude can play some serious D and hit those boards. Gotta love that.
    Lance + Starting SG = Awesome

    Now really free Lance!

  27. #71

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    It's a good thing that Paul can defend. It's even better that he is a really really good defender. Glad he can rebound. Glad he can block shots. Glad he is athletic. All of that stuff is good. But just listing out all the things he can do makes me feel like seth or MR explaining why McRoberts should be playing. It's stuff that's nice, but it not stuff that's Paul's job.

    Paul can play in the league with the skill set he has now. A kind of young Bruce Bowen guy. Good guy to have on a team. Makes the team better. Versatile, doesn't need the ball, but basically Gerald Green on steroids. Makes the team good, but doesn't make the team great. or even very good.

    The Pacers need Paul to be very good at least. They need him to be a guy you have to pay attention to when they are defending the B&G. Paul needs to become a 'Scoring' Guard. not just a defender/3-pt shooter. Paul needs to get a couple of moves that force teams to double against him or just give up points by not doing so.

    and one more thing. to use an Isiah Thomasism, he need to stop playing just to play and start playing to win. So far, Paul has just showed up and played the game. That was great until things get serious, and suddenly Paul doesn't have a go to move. or can't feed the post when pressured. or can't post a guy that half a foot shorter than he is. He just doesn't have a purpose to what he is doing. That is the things he needs to work on. Find something that allows him to impose his will on the guy guarding him. Put a half *** defender on Danny and he'll go for 40. put the same guy on Paul and he goes for 15 or 20. Paul needs to find what he can do and start doing it until someone figures out a way to stop it.

    hope that makes sense.

  28. #72
    Member spazzxb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    fort wayne In
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,821

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by graphic-er View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Hayward plays in the West, tougher overall competition.

    Define potential...
    Thats not really all that accurate anymore, we had to play Miami 4 times last season and are in the same division as Derrick Rose. Sure the West have a couple more mediocre teams fighting for the eigth seed, however if you look at last years playoff teams records vs. seed they are pretty similiar.
    Last edited by spazzxb; 08-09-2012 at 04:55 PM.

  29. #73
    I have a Member xBulletproof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    4,671

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by graphic-er View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Looking at the last 2 months of the season Hayward was playing out of his mind compared to George.

    I like George, but I just like Hayward much better going forward. I'm just not sure how you all can be so sure on a guy who look nothing but spot of 3's all year long. He is Danny Granger lite right now, and Tayshaun Prince 2.0 in the future. I think Hayward's out look is much better. I think he has a legit shot at being a Genobli type player.
    What does Hayward's last 2 months of the season have to do with anything? He shot 19% in the playoffs after those 2 months too. You keep pointing out throughout this thread when George struggled, and when Hayward did well, like the rest of the season didn't happen.

    Also, when are you going to give up on this Tayshaun Prince thing? Have you ever looked at Tayshaun Prince's career? Paul George is already averaging what Tayshaun did in his prime. He was essentially Tayshaun Prince last season. I guess only Gordon Hayward can get better. Paul is doomed to never improve.

  30. #74
    Member Ace E.Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    5,294

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Quote Originally Posted by xBulletproof View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What does Hayward's last 2 months of the season have to do with anything? He shot 19% in the playoffs after those 2 months too. You keep pointing out throughout this thread when George struggled, and when Hayward did well, like the rest of the season didn't happen.

    Also, when are you going to give up on this Tayshaun Prince thing? Have you ever looked at Tayshaun Prince's career? Paul George is already averaging what Tayshaun did in his prime. He was essentially Tayshaun Prince last season. I guess only Gordon Hayward can get better. Paul is doomed to never improve.
    I didn't want to continue going back and forth, but I've NEVER understood the Prince comparisons. Tayshaun was slow, unathletic (vertically and foot speed) and was more of a post up/mid range scorer. PG is already a better deep shooter (took over 20 more 3's last year than Prince ever has in a season)

    Also PG is already as good of a scorer, without havin a "go to" move.

  31. #75

    Default Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Thanks for all the responses guys! I was away for awhile but enjoyed reading everyone's thoughts! I'm so excited for preseason to start... I wanna see the scrimmages, and see where everyone has improved!

Similar Threads

  1. Roy Hibbert vs Paul George vs George Hill
    By AugustinGrangerHill in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 07-18-2012, 09:45 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-17-2012, 05:26 PM
  3. Where was paul george
    By IUfan4life in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 04-24-2011, 04:32 AM
  4. why take out paul george?
    By WhatCouldHaveBeen in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-22-2011, 11:05 AM
  5. Paul George
    By dgranger17 in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 10-21-2010, 07:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •