Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

PAUL GEORGE???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: PAUL GEORGE???

    Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
    Hayward plays in the West, tougher overall competition.

    Define potential...
    At a glance the West appears to have the weaker competition at SF spot and the East has weaker competition at the SG spot going forward...

    Top Eastern SF
    LeBron James
    Carmelo Anthony

    Andre Igoudala
    Danny Granger
    Gerald Wallace
    Luol Deng
    Paul Pierce

    Michael Kidd-Gilchrist


    Top Western SF
    Kevin Durant

    Nicholas Batum
    Danillo Gallinari
    Wilson Chandler
    Michael Beasley
    Gordon Hayward
    Andrei Kirilenko

    Shawn Marion
    Caron Butler
    Stephen Jackson





    Top Eastern SG
    Dwyane Wade
    Joe Johnson
    Monta Ellis

    Paul George
    Nick Young
    Lou Williams
    DeMarr DeRozan

    Bradley Beal
    Jason Terry


    Top Western SG
    Kobe Bryant
    Eric Gordon
    James Harden
    Kevin Martin
    Manu Ginobili

    Tyreke Evans
    OJ Mayo
    Brandon Roy
    Marcus Thornton

    Chauncey Billups



    And Webster's Dictionary defi... Just kidding...


    I guess what I look for in a player to know if he has all-star>superstar potential is if at a young age that person appears to already have an advantage in any particular area or areas over the majority of the players in the league at his position...

    An all-star might have one or two advantages at a young age where a superstar will show in multiple areas...

    Gordon appears to have a very high basketball IQ and already knows how to perform well in big games... That's it... I don't really see any one other discernible advantage the kid has over the majority of the players in the league at his position... He does a lot of things well and has the potential to be a good player for years... And he definately could contribute to a championship team... I just don't ever see him being the 1st or 2nd best player on a championship contending team...

    PG has several qualities greater than the majority of the players in the league at his position... At 6'10" he is the tallest SG in the NBA... He is also extremely athletic... He can run out on a fast break faster than most SGs and can jump higher than most SGs... He plays the passing lanes for steals better than maybe any player I have ever seen... He is also one of the best all-around defenders in the league... And he is an elite rebounder at SG... If he can polish up other parts of his game he has the potential to be one of the top SGs in the league... And I can see him becoming a 1st or 2nd best player on a championship contending team...
    Nothing in life worth having comes easy.

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: PAUL GEORGE???

      I don't see how they are even being compared. PG is beyond a doubt both better right now and has far more upside. The Jazz would do the trade straight up without a second thought. PG is frequently talked about by other players, other fans, national media, etc. etc. He has obvious star potential (just look at his ridiculous game vs the Mavs last year).

      "Could very well end up being the best player in the draft"
      "Looking like the Pacers got a steal"
      Are the types of things that were side both before and after the draft. PG just needs experience, focus, and most of all opportunity.
      Last edited by oxxo; 08-08-2012, 06:44 PM.

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: PAUL GEORGE???

        Meh. Paul George scored more points, in less minutes while on a better team when talking about offense. He had 2 votes for All NBA Defensive 1st team, and 6 votes for All NBA Defensive 2nd team, out of the 30 head coaches who voted, and no Vogel couldn't vote for his own players.

        Yes, Paul George struggled in the playoffs, but Hayward didn't shoot over 19% (6 of 33) in the playoffs himself.

        I'm not exactly sure why Utah wouldn't trade Hayward for George if given the chance.

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: PAUL GEORGE???

          Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
          I doubt that the Jazz would take PG for Hayward straight up. but your comment implies that should be the case.
          If the Jazz FO wouldn't take George for Heyward, then I would feel really bad for the Jazz fans...
          Did you know Antonio and Dale aren’t actually brothers?

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: PAUL GEORGE???

            Originally posted by TheDavisBrothers View Post
            If the Jazz FO wouldn't take George for Heyward, then I would feel really bad for the Jazz fans...
            I didn't want the pacers to draft Heyward in 2010. I wanted PG. I was jumping up and down happy when the jazz picked Heyward. I wouldn't trade PG for Heyward and 2 first round draft picks. Let them keep Heyward. We will find out thi s year that PG is superior in almost everyway on a basketball court than GH.
            At the least I see PG being on one of the all defensive teams and up his PPG average by 3 or 4 points.

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: PAUL GEORGE???

              Originally posted by pacers74 View Post
              I didn't want the pacers to draft Heyward in 2010. I wanted PG. I was jumping up and down happy when the jazz picked Heyward. I wouldn't trade PG for Heyward and 2 first round draft picks. Let them keep Heyward. We will find out thi s year that PG is superior in almost everyway on a basketball court than GH.
              At the least I see PG being on one of the all defensive teams and up his PPG average by 3 or 4 points.
              i like Paul George also. and think he is a better player than Hayward. But I gotta admit if the Jazz came around with Hayward plus picks, I'd hope the Pacer FO said yes.

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: PAUL GEORGE???

                Originally posted by xBulletproof View Post
                Meh. Paul George scored more points, in less minutes while on a better team when talking about offense. He had 2 votes for All NBA Defensive 1st team, and 6 votes for All NBA Defensive 2nd team, out of the 30 head coaches who voted, and no Vogel couldn't vote for his own players.

                Yes, Paul George struggled in the playoffs, but Hayward didn't shoot over 19% (6 of 33) in the playoffs himself.

                I'm not exactly sure why Utah wouldn't trade Hayward for George if given the chance.
                Looking at the last 2 months of the season Hayward was playing out of his mind compared to George.

                I like George, but I just like Hayward much better going forward. I'm just not sure how you all can be so sure on a guy who look nothing but spot of 3's all year long. He is Danny Granger lite right now, and Tayshaun Prince 2.0 in the future. I think Hayward's out look is much better. I think he has a legit shot at being a Genobli type player.
                You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: PAUL GEORGE???

                  Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
                  Looking at the last 2 months of the season Hayward was playing out of his mind compared to George.

                  I like George, but I just like Hayward much better going forward. I'm just not sure how you all can be so sure on a guy who look nothing but spot of 3's all year long. He is Danny Granger lite right now, and Tayshaun Prince 2.0 in the future. I think Hayward's out look is much better. I think he has a legit shot at being a Genobli type player.
                  Your comparisons are way off for a number of things.

                  1. PG is already a better shooter and scorer than Prince has been within his career. Also, Prince wasn't athletic enough to guard quick 1's and 2's...on a CONSISTENT basis. Danny Granger and Prince play nothing alike, and neither are particularly explosive, quick, nor athletic which are all strengths of Paul...so how do they compare?

                  2. Hayward doesn't have Ginobili's herky-jerky type of ball handling skill. He's not as quick, nor as good of a ball-handler as Ginobili (which is part of what makes Manu so good)

                  As someone stated before, Paul averaged more points, in less minutes, on a much better team, as a lesser focal point within the offense. All this was WITH Heyward's lil "surge" at the end of the season (though 14 ppg isnt much of a surge when you should be the best wing scorer on your team). And then when you add in George's superior athleticism, rebounding, and defense...PG is better now and going forward. Lol I don't see how anyone could argue different.

                  But at this point your mind is made up. So the arguing is a moot point, no matter how many facts people may spew within this thread.

                  I'm not sure if it's a coincidence or not, but I've noticed that between Gordon and Heyward, you like home-grown, Indiana boys quite more than the average pacer fan. Not necessarily a bad thing, they're both good young players. But you're opinion of them is a lot higher than most.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: PAUL GEORGE???

                    Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
                    Your comparisons are way off for a number of things.

                    1. PG is already a better shooter and scorer than Prince has been within his career. Also, Prince wasn't athletic enough to guard quick 1's and 2's...on a CONSISTENT basis. Danny Granger and Prince play nothing alike, and neither are particularly explosive, quick, nor athletic which are all strengths of Paul...so how do they compare? Both Granger and Prince were pretty quick and athletic in their first couple years in the league. All of them are spot up shooters. None of the 3 have much of a handle. George can guard the smaller quicker players now because he is thin enough to do it at 215lbs. But once he gets up to 225-230 range the speed will start to elude him. George might have all the athletic ability in the world, but I don't think he will have the skills to utilize it to the level you all are predicting. Thus he will be Prince 2.0, great defender, great leaper, good shooter.

                    2. Hayward doesn't have Ginobili's herky-jerky type of ball handling skill. He's not as quick, nor as good of a ball-handler as Ginobili (which is part of what makes Manu so good) Well its a given he is not as quick as Manu, 6-5 vs 6-8. Hayward has a pretty good handle from what I seen, better than George's for sure. I guess when I mean Genobli like, I refer to play making abilities, a heady game, able to use alot of deception.


                    My opinions though, just what i observe, I hope both turn out to be all-stars.
                    You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: PAUL GEORGE???

                      I wish nothing but success to Hayward and PG. Personally, I'm so very happy the Pacers drafted PG. PGs offense will come, but damn the dude can play some serious D and hit those boards. Gotta love that.
                      First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Re: PAUL GEORGE???

                        It's a good thing that Paul can defend. It's even better that he is a really really good defender. Glad he can rebound. Glad he can block shots. Glad he is athletic. All of that stuff is good. But just listing out all the things he can do makes me feel like seth or MR explaining why McRoberts should be playing. It's stuff that's nice, but it not stuff that's Paul's job.

                        Paul can play in the league with the skill set he has now. A kind of young Bruce Bowen guy. Good guy to have on a team. Makes the team better. Versatile, doesn't need the ball, but basically Gerald Green on steroids. Makes the team good, but doesn't make the team great. or even very good.

                        The Pacers need Paul to be very good at least. They need him to be a guy you have to pay attention to when they are defending the B&G. Paul needs to become a 'Scoring' Guard. not just a defender/3-pt shooter. Paul needs to get a couple of moves that force teams to double against him or just give up points by not doing so.

                        and one more thing. to use an Isiah Thomasism, he need to stop playing just to play and start playing to win. So far, Paul has just showed up and played the game. That was great until things get serious, and suddenly Paul doesn't have a go to move. or can't feed the post when pressured. or can't post a guy that half a foot shorter than he is. He just doesn't have a purpose to what he is doing. That is the things he needs to work on. Find something that allows him to impose his will on the guy guarding him. Put a half *** defender on Danny and he'll go for 40. put the same guy on Paul and he goes for 15 or 20. Paul needs to find what he can do and start doing it until someone figures out a way to stop it.

                        hope that makes sense.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Re: PAUL GEORGE???

                          Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
                          Hayward plays in the West, tougher overall competition.

                          Define potential...
                          Thats not really all that accurate anymore, we had to play Miami 4 times last season and are in the same division as Derrick Rose. Sure the West have a couple more mediocre teams fighting for the eigth seed, however if you look at last years playoff teams records vs. seed they are pretty similiar.
                          Last edited by spazzxb; 08-09-2012, 04:55 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Re: PAUL GEORGE???

                            Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
                            Looking at the last 2 months of the season Hayward was playing out of his mind compared to George.

                            I like George, but I just like Hayward much better going forward. I'm just not sure how you all can be so sure on a guy who look nothing but spot of 3's all year long. He is Danny Granger lite right now, and Tayshaun Prince 2.0 in the future. I think Hayward's out look is much better. I think he has a legit shot at being a Genobli type player.
                            What does Hayward's last 2 months of the season have to do with anything? He shot 19% in the playoffs after those 2 months too. You keep pointing out throughout this thread when George struggled, and when Hayward did well, like the rest of the season didn't happen.

                            Also, when are you going to give up on this Tayshaun Prince thing? Have you ever looked at Tayshaun Prince's career? Paul George is already averaging what Tayshaun did in his prime. He was essentially Tayshaun Prince last season. I guess only Gordon Hayward can get better. Paul is doomed to never improve.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Re: PAUL GEORGE???

                              Originally posted by xBulletproof View Post
                              What does Hayward's last 2 months of the season have to do with anything? He shot 19% in the playoffs after those 2 months too. You keep pointing out throughout this thread when George struggled, and when Hayward did well, like the rest of the season didn't happen.

                              Also, when are you going to give up on this Tayshaun Prince thing? Have you ever looked at Tayshaun Prince's career? Paul George is already averaging what Tayshaun did in his prime. He was essentially Tayshaun Prince last season. I guess only Gordon Hayward can get better. Paul is doomed to never improve.
                              I didn't want to continue going back and forth, but I've NEVER understood the Prince comparisons. Tayshaun was slow, unathletic (vertically and foot speed) and was more of a post up/mid range scorer. PG is already a better deep shooter (took over 20 more 3's last year than Prince ever has in a season)

                              Also PG is already as good of a scorer, without havin a "go to" move.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Re: PAUL GEORGE???

                                Thanks for all the responses guys! I was away for awhile but enjoyed reading everyone's thoughts! I'm so excited for preseason to start... I wanna see the scrimmages, and see where everyone has improved!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X