Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

    will i stay up at night and buy legue pass without Roy >> depends on what comes back, but in all likelyhood i will be down to reading about the team now and then, not gonna lose more sleep over a team that dont care
    So Long And Thanks For All The Fish.

    If you've done 6 impossible things today?
    Then why not have Breakfast at Milliways!

    Comment


    • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

      Originally posted by Strummer View Post
      Really? After one of our best seasons ever, you're looking for excuses to walk away from the team? The FO knew what they were doing when they built the team. The team greatly exceeded everyone's expectations last season. Why not trust that the front office knows what they are doing this off season?

      I think everyone has gotten spoiled by good stable ownership the past 3 decades. It hasn't always been this way for the Pacers. The Simon's have been wonderful for the Pacers franchise.
      I trusted Larry Bird, and I'm hopeful in the new regime. However, if financial constraints are imposed, there's only so much you can do to get this team to the next level of being a contender.

      Comment


      • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

        Originally posted by Hicks View Post
        It'll be another nail in the coffin that eventually seals and buries my ability to give a **** anymore. Probably not the final nail, but a nail.
        For me, its a pretty big frigging nail. I make reasonably good money, but it is not sufficient for me to blow good money to buy lower bowl seats in Washington, DC when the Pacers come to town to play the Wizards unless they are showing a similar commitment to me. Yeah, I know that's technically not supporting the franchise financially, but I am supporting it with my time. I take a couple of hours of annual leave from my job to grab something to eat and get to Verizon Center to watch the team warm up. That's leave I could be saving up to go on vacation, spend time with my family, whatever. But I spend it on the Pacers. I also have bought tons of Pacers merchandise over the years. All of that will cease if the Pacers do not show a commitment to winning. Yeah, I will check the box scores on ESPN and watch the second half of games when I get home from work and they're on TV, but that's it. And I won't even be that upset if the team ends up moving, in fact if they move to Seattle I will root for them wholeheartedly.

        I like sports but have many interests that take up my time. The Pacers should not think they have a comfortable monopoly on my time and money if they **** around like this.

        Comment


        • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

          How many games did you go to last season?

          Comment


          • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

            Really not understanding the idea that the ONLY way for the Pacers to contend is by giving max money to a 17th pick center who is probably not even an all-star if his competition in the East is healthy.

            Sure, he's a big [sic] piece. Sure, he's a fan favorite. Sure, he could get better. But I think there is a HECK of a lot of room to accept that a decision NOT to spend the money isn't necessarily a guarantee to the road to mediocrity.

            Now, not re-signing Roy and not doing anything else to fill the gap? I can accept that, as long as "anything else" isn't cherry-picked to only mean "sign a max FA or RFA beating out another team also offering the max" - the Pacers can offer and offer and offer but they can't FORCE anything to happen.
            BillS

            A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
            Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

            Comment


            • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

              I'd go so far to say, if they signed Kaman, they would hit the ground running. He's a smart player and does some things better than Roy. The problem is Kaman can't stay healthy and he is older. But ya, what Bill said, for sure. Worse part, if they don't match Roy is reading all the apocalyptic threads for the next 3 mos. It will take until Xmas when Portlands 5 games under .500 and the pacers are 8 over for anyone to stop, I'd guess.

              Comment


              • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

                Point taken but if we let Roy walk then we will certainly be mediocre.
                Until they do something to adjust the roster.

                See, this is the issue, people are treating it like a Roy vs Void deal, as though Roy just walks and they have Danny play center for the next 5 years. We just don't know what the new configuration would look like, and we don't know if they'd address it this year or next or at the trade deadline or as part of a multi-team deal yet this summer.

                What we do know is that the team would be financially able to fill in a 10-14m hole at some point, which could be a pretty big piece.

                Comment


                • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

                  I want Roy to return, I like rooting for him....but the cost. Croshere was a likeable enough player but people came to resent him because of his contract.

                  You pay Croshere 4-5m a year and he's a fan favorite, but at 8-9m he was "killing the team". Of course at the time of the deal he was coming off the great Finals play and few fans realized that was 100% due to his Horry matchup and not some sign over his overall play to come. Had he played all his games like the 2000 Finals he would have matched his contract, led the team to big victories and been a great resign....just like we now speculate with Roy.



                  And I sure as f*** don't want to see Roy go to Portland and fail just to prove some point. The kid is great and I can't imagine not rooting for him to succeed no matter what.
                  Last edited by Naptown_Seth; 07-09-2012, 12:41 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

                    Pacers: It’s time to match
                    It’s not often that I agree with my colleague Bob Kravitz when it comes to the Pacers.

                    I can’t believe I’m about to admit this, but I’m with Kravitz in saying the Pacers need to match Portland’s four-year, $58-million offer to Roy Hibbert. It’s still unknown if they’ll match. The league’s moratorium period ends Wednesday.

                    I didn’t feel that way last week.

                    I changed my mind over the weekend because there’s too much action going on around the NBA that doesn’t include the Pacers.

                    Boston, Miami, New York and Brooklyn have already agreed to deals with free agents or trades.

                    Unless the Pacers plan to get involved in all the wheeling and dealing that’s going on, they’ll have to use team continuity to try to close the gap on the Heat in the East.

                    The Pacers will have to hope that having their starting five back for a second straight season will help offset their lack of star power. They still have to fill some holes on the bench. They might want to hurry, though, before they start running out of options. ESPN.com reported over the weekend that the Celtics also have a lot of interest in Courtney Lee.

                    Things could get interesting with O.J. Mayo once New Orleans matches Phoenix’s offer to Eric Gordon. It wouldn’t be surprising if the Suns make a run at Mayo.

                    Gerald Green and Carlos Delfino are still an option for the Pacers.

                    Lou Williams is also available, but you have to wonder if his price tag will be too high for the blue and gold.
                    http://blogs.indystar.com/pacersinsi...time-to-match/

                    Comment


                    • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

                      Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                      I want Roy to return, I like rooting for him....but the cost. Croshere was a likeable enough player but people came to resent him because of his contract.

                      You pay Croshere 4-5m a year and he's a fan favorite, but at 8-9m he was "killing the team". Of course at the time of the deal he was coming off the great Finals play and few fans realized that was 100% due to his Horry matchup and not some sign over his overall play to come. Had he played all his games like the 2000 Finals he would have matched his contract, led the team to big victories and been a great resign....just like we now speculate with Roy.



                      And I sure as f*** don't want to see Roy go to Portland and fail just to prove some point. The kid is great and I can't imagine not rooting for him to succeed no matter what.
                      I don't think Roy is the new Croshere, that spot is reserved for Hill.
                      @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                      Comment


                      • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

                        Mike Wells: Restricted free agent Roy Hibbert is already in Portland where he'll sign his offer sheet (4 yrs $58 mill) w them at 9 pm PST tomorrow. 2 minutes ago

                        Read more: http://hoopshype.com/twitter/media.html#ixzz209EgxkEp

                        John Canzano: Wonder if the Blazers would make a show of Roy Hibbert at 1 pm presser. Indiana wouldn't like that. about 9 minutes ago

                        Read more: http://hoopshype.com/twitter/media.html#ixzz209En73ll


                        John Canzano: Blazers offer to Hibbert is "so front loaded with money" that all are taking this seriously, source said. Pacers can still match. about 10 minutes ago

                        Read more: http://hoopshype.com/twitter/media.html#ixzz209Eq2VSz


                        John Canzano: Free agent C Roy Hibbert is in Portland today, per #Blazers source. He's taking physicals and doing medical. about 12 minutes ago

                        Read more: http://hoopshype.com/twitter/media.html#ixzz209F3Ncm6

                        Comment


                        • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

                          Mike Wells ‏@MikeWellsNBA
                          The Pacers are matching Portland's 4-year, $58 million offer to Roy Hibbert, according to a source
                          Expand
                          Reply Retweeted Favorite

                          Comment


                          • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

                            Given the news that the contract is massively front-loaded, I don't think that the Pacers will or should match. If this is "just business" as the players tell us all the time, then we need to look at this unemotionally. Is Roy Hibbert really worth something like two front-loaded 19m years? I say no. You can say that he is because someone is willing to pay him that, but I don't think that he is worth that to us. And I mean all this as a basketball player. The fact that he seems to be a good guy and that we all like him should not enter the equation. We'll get over it. We need to stop getting attached to players.
                            Slug 'em Sabres!!!!!
                            http://youtube.com/watch?v=cj1SUF4wzu0

                            Comment


                            • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

                              Originally posted by PacerFan31 View Post
                              Mike Wells ‏@MikeWellsNBA
                              The Pacers are matching Portland's 4-year, $58 million offer to Roy Hibbert, according to a source
                              Expand
                              Reply Retweeted Favorite
                              Right after I write a post trying to convince myself that it will be all right when we don't match, Wells tweets this. The universe conspires to make me look like a fool yet again.
                              Slug 'em Sabres!!!!!
                              http://youtube.com/watch?v=cj1SUF4wzu0

                              Comment


                              • Re: Portland offers Roy max (via Sam Amick)

                                This thread can die rest if peace

                                Good to hear Roy is coming back

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X