Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

    Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...#ixzz1yvmrHf6D


    Finch is really, really busy these days. He works late, gets up early, and sleeps very little in between. This is the most stressful week of Finch's year, but it's also the most exciting. All that traveling, all that work, all that analyzing will finally come to fruition on Thursday night. When it's over, Finch will exhale. Then he'll get up early Friday morning and get right back to work.
    Finch is an NBA scout -- sort of. He's actually an amalgam of six NBA scouts, coaches and executives that I spoke with over the last two weeks to get their thoughts on the current crop of draftable collegians. I have culled together all their quotes into one smooth paragraph uttered by a character named "Finch," a nom de plume coined by my colleague Alex Wolff many years ago to describe an anonymous scout who was the subject of an SI story. (Alex chose the name "Finch" because it was Scout's surname in To Kill A Mockingbird. And NBA scouts like to remain anonymous so they can say what they really think.)
    It wasn't always to derive a consensus on the prospects, because not all six of my guys felt the same about each one. But the paragraphs below are the closest you will find outlining the general feeling about 52 college players hoping to hear their names called at the NBA draft Thursday night. That will be a big moment for these players, but when David Stern hands each of them their hats, I suggest the players tip them in Finch's direction. He's the one who put in all those hours, flew all those miles, and stayed in all those crummy hotels to help make their dreams come true.
    Draft night would be Finch's dream come true if he ever went to sleep. This week, all he can do is daydream. Here's what Finch had to say about ...

    Quincy Acy, 6-7 forward, Baylor: "He's an undersized Kenneth Faried type. High character kid, not a great offensive player, but he's an energy guy off the bench."

    Harrison Barnes, 6-8 forward, North Carolina: "I can't figure him out. I want him to be better than he is, yet what he is is pretty good. His biggest problem is he doesn't have enough toughness. This is a man's league and I don't know for sure if he's the type of guy who will step on you when you're down."

    Will Barton, 6-6 forward, Memphis: "I'm a fan. Tough kid, high energy, he can dribble and pass, and he can rebound well for a little guy. I think he likes to win. He cares. His skinny body worries me a little bit, but he just figures out a way to compete out there."

    Bradley Beal, 6-5 guard, Florida: "Phenomenal body, good shooter, not an over-the-top athlete but he's good enough. He's also a great kid, almost presidential. He's got a great stroke. Reminds you of Ray Allen, and he can really rebound. Strong kid."

    J'Covan Brown, 6-2 guard, Texas: "He hurt himself as much as anybody [at the predraft combine] in Chicago. He came in heavy and slow. He makes baskets, but I don't know what he is. He's a non-athlete. He did a good job for Rick Barnes this year with all those freshmen, so I give him credit for that."

    William Buford, 6-5 guard, Ohio State: "He looked a little heavy at the combine, didn't shoot it real well, so he probably hurt himself. I wouldn't draft him. I don't think he likes to play. I don't think he has enough toughness."

    Jae Crowder, 6-6 guard, Marquette: "Size is an issue because he measured small in Chicago, but he just does enough things well. High motor, high energy, rebounds. For a mid-second-round guy, he's not bad. I don't know quite what his NBA skill is other than he plays hard."

    Anthony Davis, 6-10 forward, Kentucky: "I have zero red flags. People say strength, but he's no weaker than Kevin Durant was. Whatever 'it' is, this kid's got it. He has a little bit of Duncan and a little bit of a Durant. The sky's the limit."

    Andre Drummond, 7-foot center, UConn: "Physically, he's off the charts. I personally don't like him, but it scares me to death to not like him. He's so big, agile and athletic, and by all accounts he's a great, great guy. I don't think he's immature, he's just underdeveloped. The question is whether he loves to play and how hard will he work. People forget he made his decision to go to UConn late and he had some NCAA issues, so he didn't get a normal preseason."

    Kim English, 6-6 guard, Missouri: "He's a one-dimensional player, but it's the right dimension. The guy can really shoot it. I could see someone pulling the trigger on him."

    Festus Ezeli, 6-11 center, Vanderbilt: "I've watched that guy a lot. I don't know what he's doing sometimes, but he's got a great body. He's a big, big man. Thick and strong, and he uses his size. If you're picking at number 26, and you're looking for a big backup center, he's a good pick."

    Drew Gordon, 6-9 forward, New Mexico: "Someone will take him in the second round. He can rebound and that's a skill that translates. Maybe a little undersized, but he could be a backup four somewhere."

    Draymond Green, 6-7 forward, Michigan State: "I'm not feeling [him]. I think he's an average athlete. He has a high I.Q. and he's coachable, so he'll survive for a while. He has versatility, can really handle the ball, and his shot's not broken."

    Moe Harkless, 6-9 forward, St. John's: "We interviewed him. Talk about a sharp kid. He was raised well. He still has to develop his skill set, but I think he goes in the middle of the first round. He doesn't dribble, but he has a soft touch and shoots it decently. Two years from now, we might be saying, 'Wow, that guy was picked 20th?'"

    John Henson, 6-10 forward, North Carolina: "His body has gotten better, although he still needs to work on it. He's a solid rotation player. His shot is greatly improved from his freshman year. He's not Ray Allen or anything, but he's not Reggie Evans anymore, either. I worry about kids who have high centers of gravity, because that usually means they have poor balance."

    Tu Holloway, 6-foot guard, Xavier: "He probably goes undrafted, maybe the end of the second round. I just don't know what he does."

    Robbie Hummel, 6-8 forward, Purdue: "I like Robbie. I think he's finally getting healthy. He's the kind of guy you want to have. He's a better athlete than you think. His knees don't seem to be an issue."

    John Jenkins, 6-4 guard, Vanderbilt: "Probably a late first-rounder because he has that elite skill as a shooter. But he's a little undersized. Strictly a catch-and-shoot guy. Kind of like the Jodie Meeks of the draft. He measured well in Chicago. What he did at Vanderbilt speaks for itself. He has really improved his body and his strength since the season ended."

    Orlando Johnson, 6-5 guard UC Santa Barbara: "He's a fifth-year senior, so he's more mature than these other guys. Strong body, can shoot it pretty well, surprisingly vertical athlete. He can really shoot at the college line, but he's still adjusting to the NBA line."

    Kris Joseph, 6-7 forward, Syracuse: "He tested pretty well in Chicago and shot it decent. He had a good body of work at Syracuse, but the sum of his parts is more than the whole. He has ability, but you're just waiting for him to do more."

    Darius Johnson-Odom, 6-3 guard, Marquette: "He's a killer. I like him. He's going to will himself into our league. He can score, he can guard, and he'll make your practices better."

    Perry Jones, 6-11 forward, Baylor: "He's such a neat kid and you root for him, but how do you have that skill set and be that inconsistent? Over 82 games, there will be 30 where you're going to wonder if he's even on your team. He is who he is. He makes plays that take your breath away, and then he disappears for a while. You see him get his *** kicked by Kevin Jones or Thomas Robinson or Jeff Withey and you wonder when things are going to click."

    Terrence Jones, 6-9 forward, Kentucky: "I'm not as high on him as a lot of people are. I don't view him as a strong athlete, and yet I don't view him as a strong bull, either. He's kind of in between. He wants to be a three, but he's a four who can dribble. He'll make just enough shots that you have to go get him. Whoever drafts him is going to have to keep a thumb on him, because he's not a self-starter. That's a problem at this level."

    Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, 6-7 forward, Kentucky: "Your first reaction is how hard he plays. He's not crazy long, but he's long enough. He's not a great shooter, but when guys work that hard, they tend to get better. He's as athletic as Gerald Wallace, but he's a better shooter. He needs to work on his shooting and his ballhandling is just average."

    Doron Lamb, 6-5 guard, Kentucky: "Very solid basketball player. Can shoot it, defend. He'd be a good combo guard coming off the bench."


    Jeremy Lamb, 6-5 guard, UConn: "That kid can really play. His facial appearance and body language makes it appear that he doesn't care, but he does. His body is no worse than Rip Hamilton's was. When he played for the under-19 team in Lithuania, it was a tough final game, and he was the best player on the floor. It wasn't even close. He had a tough year at UConn, but it's not his fault."

    Meyers Leonard, 7-1 center, Illinois: "Physically, he's Tyson Chandler. He has probably helped himself as much as anyone since the season ended. He's 255 pounds, but he can probably play at 265. He's intriguing, but he's very emotional. He's not a bad kid, not malicious at all, not a party guy. People don't want another Darko, but I think he likes the game more than Darko did."

    Damian Lillard, 6-3 guard, Weber State: "He's the most unselfish scoring point guard I have ever seen. He's a great kid -- a great kid. He played more like a two in college, but he played on a team where if he didn't score 24 points, they wouldn't have won a game. Who was he supposed to pass to? He has a little bit of a chip on his shoulder, like he's out to prove people wrong."

    Scott Machado, 6-2 guard, Iona: "He's a second-round pick. The system he played in at Iona made him look pretty good."

    Kendall Marshall, 6-4 guard, North Carolina: "I don't think he's going to make a poor team a lot better, but if you put him on a team like Oklahoma City or Philadelphia, where he's surrounded by a bunch of athletes, then he can really make them better. He's not a bad shooter. If someone leaves him open, he can knock down a few jumpers. My concern about him is the other side of the ball. Will he be capable of defending quick point guards? He doesn't have great speed, but he knows how to play fast."

    Fab Melo, 7-foot center, Syracuse: "His body did not look good in Chicago. I worry about how committed he is. He's a backup somewhere. I give him credit for losing some weight, but he's got limits. I have a hard time with bigs who can't catch. His hands are average. He tries hard, but the game does not come easy to him."

    Darius Miller, 6-7 forward, Kentucky: "I like this guy. He'll figure out a way. I could see him being a good rotation player, like a Danny Green or a James Jones. He'll know how to play his role."

    Quincy Miller, 6-10 forward, Baylor: "He's intriguing but he's scary, and not in a good way. He still has a knee issue, and he's easily distracted. I haven't been a huge fan. I don't know what position he is. I guess he's a three, but he's really thin. He should have stayed in school. I don't think he's ready at all."

    Arnett Moultrie, 6-11 forward, Mississippi State: "He's the same type of player as Taj Gibson, who's doing well. I don't know that he has a ton of improvement ahead of him, but he has a complete game and will rebound. He's a little slight. You think he's 250 and he's really 230. He doesn't have a motor, which is a problem."

    Andrew Nicholson, 6-9 forward, St. Bonaventure: "He puts up decent numbers, but he's not a terrific athlete. Somebody is going to be really pleased with this kid. He's got a 7-3 wingspan. He just has a knack for putting the ball in the basket, and that's hard to teach. Reminds me of Paul Millsap."

    Kyle O'Quinn, 6-10 forward, Norfolk State: "He has gotten a lot of buzz. He played really well at Portsmouth, and he did well at the big team workouts in New Jersey and Minnesota. He's a poor man's Kurt Thomas. He can play the four or the five and rebound a little bit, make a shot once in a while. He'll give you a nice presence."

    Miles Plumlee, 7-foot center, Duke: "He's turned out to be a way better athlete than anybody knew. Duke is so guard-oriented, but he really helped himself in workouts in Minnesota and Chicago. I've never been a fan, but he's a physical freak. I would have said halfway through the season that he wouldn't even get drafted, but he has helped himself. His biggest problem is he thinks on the court too much."

    Austin Rivers, 6-3 guard, Duke: "My biggest concern with him is size. He's never going to be a pure point because it's not in his personality. He's a capable passer, but he hasn't been a willing passer. He's hard to play with, frankly, because he dominates the ball. It depends on who the coach is. I did not like what I saw at Duke. I thought he was spoiled and selfish. He's a streaky outside shooter, not a great one."

    Terrence Ross, 6-7 forward, Washington: "Maybe the biggest sleeper in the draft. He's athletic, he shoots it, he's competitive. His basketball I.Q. is a question, but that wouldn't concern me. One of the best shooters I've seen. He can really stroke it. He's far away physically, but he can put on strength. I like that he gets in his stance and tries to guard."

    Thomas Robinson, 6-9 forward, Kansas: "Size was always a big deal with him, but he measured fine in Chicago. Playing away from the basket is a concern, but he works so hard, I don't see a risk with him. I don't know if he's an all-star, but he has some upside because his shot continues to improve."

    Mike Scott, 6-9 forward, Virginia: "He's a little undersized, but he never misses. He doesn't have NBA three-point range, he doesn't even have college three-point range, but he never misses from 17 feet and in. Tony Bennett can really coach, so you know the kid knows rotations and how to hedge."

    John Shurna, 6-9 forward, Northwestern: "He's a really, really, really good shooter, and he can really run. He'll duck it in on you, and he's a really good north-south runner. Plus, he's got legit size. If you play him with a good post player, you've got to guard him."

    Renardo Sidney, 6-9 forward, Mississippi State: "He can't play more than three or four minutes at a time. No one will touch him. He has no chance. I'll let somebody else take that project on."

    Henry Sims, 6-10 center, Georgetown: "He had a pretty good last season, but where was he the first three? I don't know if he likes to play or not. I don't think he gets drafted. I don't know how much of that body of work I can trust."

    Jared Sullinger, 6-9 forward, Ohio State: "He's as good a basketball player as there is in the draft. The bottom line is he can score. Weight will always be an issue with him, and heavy guys historically end up having problems. I know he failed the NBA doctors' physicals, but our doctors did not fail him. You have to take all of that into account, but I still think he's talented."

    Jeff Taylor, 6-7 forward, Vanderbilt: "He doesn't do anything off-the-charts well, but he does everything really well. He's a terrific athlete. He can almost guard four positions because he's so damn strong. His shot isn't great, but it's better than it was."

    Tyshawn Taylor, 6-4 guard, Kansas: "Second-round pick. Gotta prove he can be consistent taking care of the ball, but he's very talented. His size and athleticism at that position is pretty good."

    Marquis Teague, 6-2 guard, Kentucky: "The biggest thing with him is he got better as a point guard, but he should have gone back to school. He's not going to be playing against Mississippi State and Auburn up here. He's fast but he's not quick with the dribble. He doesn't get in the paint and create. He's an average ballhandler. One thing he does have going for him is he's a high-character kid."

    Dion Waiters, 6-4 guard, Syracuse: "I'm a big fan. He's Dwyane Wade-ish. I don't know if he's pure enough to be a two, but he's just a baller. And he definitely has a little toughness in him. The only drawback is he's a little small, but he's thick, and he's a surly guy. He'll be an East Coast version of Rodney Stuckey. I would take him over Jeremy Lamb five times a day."

    Royce White, 6-8 forward, Iowa State: "He's another guy I'd be scared to take and scared not to take. He has uncommon ballhandling skills for a guy with that body type. He's a poor free throw shooter, which is a huge concern. Huge, great hands. He holds the ball like it's a grapefruit. I know he has an issue with flying, but from what I hear that isn't that big a deal. He's making it to all his workouts."

    Tony Wroten, 6-5 guard, Washington: "That shot is scary. I mean, he just does not make shots, and he's really turnover prone. Some of his turnovers are because he has a flair for the dramatic. But he measured 6-5 with length."

    Tyler Zeller, 7-foot center, North Carolina: "Beast. I personally have him in the top seven. He's a 13- to 14-year NBA center. He can shoot, he's strong, he runs. Everybody complains they can never find a center. Well, here he is. There's absolutely no scenario where he's not going to succeed."


    Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...#ixzz1yvniDqqK

    I agree with a ton of what the scout says. I really agree with Lillard's take I was saying that months ago same with Barton. I dont agree with a few though Dion Watiers I don't get the hype on this kid I must say. I think O'Quinn is better IMO then he gives him credit for. Also think Jenkins is better than he gets credit for in this article. Jenkins doesnt have a high celining but I think he has a better game than Meeks. Also disagree with Machado he played in a system just like Marshall did a run and gun college spread type offense where the ball was in his hands to get the ball to teammates. I think running and gunning is a strength but holding his offense he played in against him?? I just dont agree he is solid in the half court as well and running but many teams in the NBA play uptempo ala Miami OKC and DEN the list goes on. I think if he gets a good fit he will be better than this scout thinks. Best pure pg in the draft.

    I agree with the Terrence Ross take get him with a real PG who can get him the ball he will be a lot better Wroten Jr really killed Ross IMO. Also I agree on Quincy Miller I just dont know where you play him and he isnt really NBA ready yet at all. Quincy Acy I have always been high on Reggie Evans 2.0. Miles Plumlee we both aren't fans of at all.

    the Renardo Sidney is so sad but it's so true me and really debated him and I pretty much stated the same thing this scout says LOL.


    This is always a great read year in and year out thought I would post it.

    I like Fes and the blurb on him is lol. He has a lot of Kendrick Perkins in his game.
    Last edited by pacer4ever; 06-26-2012, 05:04 PM.
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

    Festus Ezeli, 6-11 center, Vanderbilt: "I've watched that guy a lot. I don't know what he's doing sometimes, but he's got a great body. He's a big, big man. Thick and strong, and he uses his size. If you're picking at number 26, and you're looking for a big backup center, he's a good pick."

    Hmmmmmmmm...

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

      Fran Fraschilla ‏@franfraschilla
      If more people paid attention during the college basketball season, there would be fewer "sleepers" the week before the NBA draft.



      Fran Fraschilla ‏@franfraschilla
      Combines, workouts, interviews with teams & media all nice but real resume for potential draft picks is how they PLAYED during their career.




      I couldn't agree more with Fran


      I think a guy we are working out tomorrow could be the pick. Darius Johnson-Odom has the intangibles and the game Bird looks for great shooter great scorer and defends seems like a Bird type guy as well a leader and really mature for his age.

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

        I'd like to hear more from that scout on Machado. What was it in the Iona system that made him look so good? Machado just played well and put up numbers. I don't know what the system was I guess.

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

          i don't care who gets picked, i just want talent. more than just a player that fits a need, more than just the BPA, I want the pacers to draft a high upside guy. the #26th pick equivalent of what Perry Jones or Andre Drummond or Harrison Barnes is to the 2nd pick. I want the most talented, athletic guy available.
          Last edited by xIndyFan; 06-26-2012, 05:27 PM.

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

            Bird won't be drafting right?

            But on another note two of the guys I think he is off on are Teague and Rivers.

            All the stuff he said about Teague can be fixed, not too worried, and I think he is a better ball handler than he is getting credit for, not a fancy ball handler but a good one.

            Austin Rivers if put with the right team will be a force to be reckoned with, I am not sure why he listed him at 6'3" when he measured 6'5" at the draft combine. Duke was a bad system for him to be in the first place, if he had been on a team like Florida he would have shown a lot better. I do not think he is as selfish as many believe, this is coming from the games that I watched at Duke this year, he actually often led them in assist many games, but he is high on his abilities and has tons of confidence in himself. He has the drive to be great and I think he will be in time, if he goes to the right system.
            Why so SERIOUS

            Comment

            • #7
              Re: Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

              Originally posted by PacersHomer View Post
              I'd like to hear more from that scout on Machado. What was it in the Iona system that made him look so good? Machado just played well and put up numbers. I don't know what the system was I guess.
              Lots of passing, penetrate zones and kick it out, their passing really helped open up lanes, and they also ran a lot.

              As a team the put up the most points per game and most assist per game in the country, assist in large part to Machado though, but he was the primary ball handler as well, that should go without saying.

              Atleast that is my take, but I definitely did not watch as much as P4E though, he probably knows more...
              Why so SERIOUS

              Comment

              • #8
                Re: Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

                Originally posted by Really? View Post
                Lots of passing, penetrate zones and kick it out, their passing really helped open up lanes, and they also ran a lot.

                As a team the put up the most points per game and most assist per game in the country, assist in large part to Machado though, but he was the primary ball handler as well, that should go without saying.

                Atleast that is my take, but I definitely did not watch as much as P4E though, he probably knows more...

                Ya basically a lot of high PnR dribble hand off game some motion but not a lot. Actually a ton like the NBA game actually lol. They had 2 guys Momo Jones and Machado who could get to the rim at will Machado would penetrate and dish better than any guard in the nation. But Machado did everything a pro pg has too he feed the post very well. He penetrated and passed people open he sees plays before anyone else does which is why I think he is special. He made Mike Glover into a terrific big man the guy averaged 18-9 on almost all easy looks due to Machado.

                Watching him at IONA was like watching a PHX Suns game (same style offensively) and he being Nash the offense is very simple just just PnR and get his teammates the ball where they are best with it.

                They IMO were very good at finding the extra man and that was the key to that team togetherness.


                I swear at least 2 to 3 times a game he would make a play that no one in the arena even saw his vision is in a league of it's own along with Marshall. But both he and Marshall play in control and make the simple play they rarely try to be heros even though sometimes the passes they make seems like they are. They make hard plays look simple is a better way to put it I guess.


                The only thng I didnt like about was how they played zone offense they had Machado play middle and it was just awkward. But Machado is a guy who shooters like Granger and Hill and Dwest will instantly get much better looks. I think Granger would benefit the most along with Hibbert. Machado would become the only true post feeder on the team if we draft him.


                I like how he defends too he is limited but he is fundamentally sound and is pretty good for his size he really gets after it. I doubt he is a good defender at the NBA much like DC was good in college but not that great in the NBA. The rules make it really hard to defend the pg in the NBA.

                If you have ESPN3 on xbox they have about 10 games of his you can check out/


                EDIT: was looking for a video of highlights but the ones I could find the other team was playing zone so it really didnt show their real offense.





                This video shows a bit the few passes he makes early on this video he makes on a nightly basic and they are nothing special for him. (pass at .20 and 1:30

                his passing ability is truly elite up there with the best I scouted I would rank Rubio 1 Machado 2 and Marshall 3 in terms of best pure passers and floor generals I have scouted.


                Like Kerr and special K says on the tape my favorite attribute is how in control of the game he is. He is normally in control and his head is on a swivel looked his game in the 15 or so tapes I watched of him.

                His only real weakness that could really hurt him is favoring his left hand. He struggles when you force him right and I dont get it because the kid is right handed lol. It's corretable IMO that's why im not to down on him. But the only problem is his size speed combo he is probably just average athletically and in the NBA that is below average. But IMO the size isnt an issue he plays like he is 6'3 not 6ft long winspan I think bigger than Marshall's. But there have many many all star pgs who are just average athletically so I think he makes up for it in other areas plus he isnt a terrible athlete he just isnt that elite athlete like a lot of the scoring guards are today. But what Machado is he is very quick and that can make up for the speed. I always say I want a guy quicker than fast(think John Stockton quick as hell with the hands and moving just slow compared to other pgs) and Machado is just that doesnt have tons of speed but he is quick.


                In so many ways he reminds me a lot of a young Jamal Tinsley with a jump shot.
                Last edited by pacer4ever; 06-26-2012, 06:27 PM.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Re: Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

                  Originally posted by xIndyFan View Post
                  i don't care who gets picked, i just want talent. more than just a player that fits a need, more than just the BPA, I want the pacers to draft a high upside guy. the #26th pick equivalent of what Perry Jones or Andre Drummond or Harrison Barnes is to the 2nd pick. I want the most talented, athletic guy available.

                  Tyler Zeller, 7-foot center, North Carolina: "Beast. I personally have him in the top seven. He's a 13- to 14-year NBA center. He can shoot, he's strong, he runs. Everybody complains they can never find a center. Well, here he is. There's absolutely no scenario where he's not going to succeed."

                  Someone else agrees about Zeller with Bird. That is who I would get if they could get to ten. I think these guys know what they are talking about.
                  {o,o}
                  |)__)
                  -"-"-

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Re: Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

                    I still haven't figured out the mancrush some scouts seem to have on Waiters. Seems like a very solid player, but he's never struck me as the class of the draft. I'd rather have Beal, J. Lamb, Ross, or Rivers at SG. Yet some seem to think he's going to be the best SG in the draft. I don't get it.

                    This guy seems to think the world of Zeller. I'm not a huge fan, but I will admit that I do like how quick he is for his size. And most seem to think he can play PF and C, which would be very nice. I could see him helping this team even if he's not my top choice personally.

                    If there's a way to sneak up and grab Lillard for a fair price, I think we should. I'd keep on the phones with teams that might want to trade out of the draft.

                    Is there any evidence of Royce White's anxiety causing significant problems for his team in the past? It really doesn't seem like it's that big of a deal to me. He seems to be open about it and said that he receives treatment. If they find troubling personality/ characterological traits with a psych evaluation, then you pass, but I'd still strongly consider him based on the information I've seen about his fear of flying.

                    Nothing seems to have significantly shaken my interest in nabbing Jeffrey Taylor if he is available at #26. Seems like a steal that low, but many project him to fall around there or possibly a bit lower. Orlando Johnson would be a nice consolation prize if Taylor was gone. Anyone who has read my posts would know I'm tend to highly value defense and athleticism. I don't see how anyone can take a look at Miami and think we wouldn't benefit from having another guy who can effectively guard the wing position. You can't have enough of these type of guys in the Playoffs. I obviously can't have my favorite defensive wing of the draft, Kidd-Gilchrist, but Taylor or Johnson are real possibilities, and I want one of them to wear a Pacers jersey if we pick at #26 unless someone really fantastic unexpectedly free falls to us a la Granger.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Re: Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

                      For the combine results: Bench press results is an 185 weight bench press, right?

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Re: Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

                        Originally posted by TinManJoshua View Post
                        Festus Ezeli, 6-11 center, Vanderbilt: "I've watched that guy a lot. I don't know what he's doing sometimes, but he's got a great body. He's a big, big man. Thick and strong, and he uses his size. If you're picking at number 26, and you're looking for a big backup center, he's a good pick."

                        Hmmmmmmmm...
                        I noticed that too....but he hasn't been invited for any work outs. I understand not inviting and working out Players that will likely be in the early to mid-Teens....but Ezeli isn't slotted or expected to be gone until the 20s..if not right where we pick.....so why isn't he invited to audition?

                        My guess is that Bird thinks that he's not ready to contribute on the level that Bird thinks he would have to contribute in order to consider him as a draft pick at 26.
                        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Re: Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

                          Originally posted by IndyPacer View Post
                          Nothing seems to have significantly shaken my interest in nabbing Jeffrey Taylor if he is available at #26. Seems like a steal that low, but many project him to fall around there or possibly a bit lower. Orlando Johnson would be a nice consolation prize if Taylor was gone. Anyone who has read my posts would know I'm tend to highly value defense and athleticism. I don't see how anyone can take a look at Miami and think we wouldn't benefit from having another guy who can effectively guard the wing position. You can't have enough of these type of guys in the Playoffs. I obviously can't have my favorite defensive wing of the draft, Kidd-Gilchrist, but Taylor or Johnson are real possibilities, and I want one of them to wear a Pacers jersey if we pick at #26 unless someone really fantastic unexpectedly free falls to us a la Granger.
                          Every time I read something about Jeff Taylor, I immediately think that he'd be similar to Dorell Wright....a solid 3pt shooting and hard nosed defender at the SF spot that would be better suited to play in an uptempo offense. Taylor seems like a "safe bet" that would fit Bird's preference to draft someone that is ready to contribute off the bench.....much like what one can think of when it comes to Green.....they just bring different things to the table.
                          Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Re: Days before NBA draft, scouts size speak on most players

                            There are an unusual number of probable second rounders that I think can still be playing in the league 5 years from now: Hummel, Shurna, Machado, Plumlee, Jenkins, Ezeli...
                            The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).

                            Comment

                            Previous template Next
                            Working...
                            X