Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Tbird 2012 draft analysis #4: Jeff Taylor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tbird 2012 draft analysis #4: Jeff Taylor

    22 days before NBA draft night on June 28, and we roll on today with the 4th breakdown of 2012, the strong wing from Vanderbilt, Jeff Taylor. Taylor is a mature, experienced player, who turned 23 years old just a couple of weeks ago. Taylor was a 4 year college player for the Commodores, anchoring a program nowturned around by veteran coach Kevin Stallings.

    Not that this matters, but Taylor’s background is interesting. He actually grew up in Sweden, where his father was playing professional basketball, and was born and raised primarily in Europe. His father, Jeffrey Sr, played a bit in the NBA before having more success across the pond. So being the son of a professional in Europe, Taylor has all the positives you’d expect from that type of upbringing: a maturity, fundamental idea of what is important, and a steadiness…..without having the same sense of entitlement and swagger that some young players of privilege get in the AAU culture of the United States.

    Taylor has ideal NBA size for a wing player, at 6’7 and approximately 225lbs. Interestingly though he has a very short wing span for a professional of that height, just at 6’6. And reportedly he has small hands as well, which I think is a factor in some of the weaknesses of his game that we will discuss below. But while his lack of reach does mean he may play a bit smaller than his listed height, he is still well within the normal confines of a typical NBA wing player, so nothing really to be concerned about from an athletic point of view in my judgment.


    ………………………………………… ………………………………………… ………………………………………… ……………………………
    Taylor has 2 major NBA skills, either of which would have given him a chance to make a roster and stick in the league. But since he ha sboth, he to me will clearly have a nice steady long career ahead of him.

    His best skill by far to me is his ability to play lock down perimeter defense.
    Taylor plays extremely low to the ground, with great flexibility and knee bend in his defensive slide. Taylor plays very very balanced, and rarely gets his feet crossed or lunges, thereby keeping his body in front of his man off the dribble very well. His balance is of elite quality in my opinion, and makes up for his lack of elite length. One of my pet coaching sayings I say to my own players often is that “balance and quickness beats size and strength”, and never has it been proven more than in watching Jeff Taylor defensive tape.

    Taylor is a nightmare for people to try and drive around with the ball in isolation situations, which in the NBA will cause many players who rely only on their skill off the bounce major problems. His superior balance and quickness means he can play further up on players and get in their chest, yet not get beaten often with a quick first step.

    When being screened, Taylor is athletic and smart enough to fight over the top of ball screens without losing his balance, and when screened away from the ball he slides through the traffic well, WITHOUT gettingout of his defensive stance. About 95% of defenders get out of their stance when screened, if only for an instant….Taylor though does what well taught savvy defenders do, which is get even lower, which gives the screener less body to screen number 1, and makes you stronger and quicker to blast through the screeners body and stay with your man….very impressive, and a skill and talent that not many players have.

    My only real nitpick with Taylor defensively is his tendency to not always raise a second hand when contesting jump shots. Now I realize that 95% of defenders only get one hand up on a shooter in the NBA, but stats consistently show that getting a second hand up on a contested jumper radically decreases a shooters accuracy .( If LeBron James would raise a second hand on a contest for example, maybe Paul Pierce doesn’t make that huge jumper in his face last night) This isn’t to say that Taylor doesn’t get his second hand up SOME of the time, I just think he could be a little better defender if he concentrated on getting it up ALL the time.

    As a help defender, Taylor is a smart player who is almost always in the right position. He plays like to me a guy who absorbs scouting reports well, and who studies his opponent well. He sprints to his help well,stays in a stance for entire possessions, and doesn’t take plays off. He closes out well to shooters after help as well, and does it consistently throughout an entire game (with again that slightly annoying to me trait of not alwaysgetting the second hand up). He gets in good position, “shows help early”, andtakes charges when it is called for.

    He has active hands, although probably his lack of elite length will hurt him at the next level in causing deflections. He will never bea shot blocker away from the ball, but on his own man I think his excellent balance will enable him to get in the air quickly and let him effect some shots taken right in front of him.
    I know I keep mentioning his great balance, but it really can never be said enough what a great thing that is for someone to have. If Paul George had Taylor’s balance with his considerable physical attributes,literally no one would ever score on him. But unfortunately Taylor lacks George’slength and size, so it equals out a bit.

    Even with his short wingspan, Taylor still projects to be an elite level wing defender, with the ability to guard 3 positions in the NBA. Ithink Taylor would be able to guard just about any NBA point guard and do nice job with him, along with being able to guard almost ever NBA wing man who didn’t just overwhelm him with size. I particularly like him guarding smaller point guards and catch and shoot type wings who go thru screens a lot, along with being able to guard people in isolation.
    ………………………………………… ………………………………………… ………………………………………… …………………………….>
    While I wouldn’t call it “elite”, I believe that Taylor has another NBA skill, which is the ability to hit the stand still set 3 point shot.

    This is impressive to me, because if you go back and research, Taylor at one time was a big time brick layer early in his college career. But apparently he was enough of a gym rat and hard worker, and was coachable enough, to solve that problem and be a solid set shooter from deep.

    I would not call his shooting form a thing of beauty, but he makes enough to be credible. I don’t think he has any real glaring shooting flaw, other than he doesn’t get his shot off very quickly…..it seems like it takes a while for him to get comfortable. And at times it seems like he doesn’tget his legs into his shot, so he shoots a bit stiff legged occasionally. But thankfully, he also does something else well, which is this: he tends to not take bad shots, he only shoots when he is basically open.

    It is fairly easy to project how you would use him offensively most of the time, which is as a spot up shooter, particularly for some of the smarter teams, from the deep corners.

    I do think from time to time he might help you offensively as well in the low post against a smaller defender. Taylor is strong, and again has really good balance when he posts up, so he doesn’t get moved around in there. And he has shown an ability to score with his back to the basket onoccasion earlier on his career. This is something that I believe whoever drafts him should continue to try and exploit and expand on, because I think if a team tried to defend him with a smaller player, that he needs to be able to post that guy and be able to score. Currently he has shown only a jump hook over his left shoulder with his right hand, and the standard drop step stuff to the baseline on either side. But I see untapped potential there, and I hope he goes to a coach with enough imagination to use it some.

    ………………………………………… ………………………………………… ………………………………………… …………………………..>
    If you want a wing player who can get his own shot and getto the front of the rim, Taylor isn’t your guy, not by a long shot. If he could dribble and break people down off the bounce, he’d be a top 10 pick, but that simply isn’t in his skill set, and I don’t think it ever will be.

    This is where I suspect his small hands come into play. He just doesn’t have that ball on a string ability that you see the top wingplayers or point guards have. His crossover isn’t very good, mainly because it isn’t “big” enough…the defender doesn’t have to shift his weight much to guardit in other words. Taylor really lacks any top level dribble move, and will be a liability as a ballhandler at the NBA level for sure at least initially and likely for his entire career.

    This especially bothers me in fast break situations, where you’d like to think that he could take a retreating defender off the dribble ifhe had to in a 3 on 2 or 2 on 1 situation, but really I am only comfortable throwing him the ball right near the rim for a finish. 1 or 2 dribbles max for Taylor at this point is about his limit before you start getting nervous. He is a really good leaper though, so lobs are in play for him. Again, I think it is more of a situation where he gets up in the air early and on balance more than him being a tremendous high flyer.

    Off a catch, Taylor is what I call a “right hand, left foot guy”, as he usually goes right, with his first step being a crossover step withhis left foot. Most of the time he has to keep heading right in this situation,as he lacks the skill of being able to crossover or spin somehow and change direction. In this exact aspect, he is very much like our own Danny Granger,though Granger has worked hard and sometimes can crossover once right into a shot…..right now Taylor can’t even do that. Granger’s problem is playing to upright though,and Taylor’s problem seems to be the inability to have even the most basic dribble moves down. It is aggravating to watch on film.


    But not as aggravating as watching him shoot free throws .For an NBA level player to shoot free throws as poorly as Taylor does is inexplicable. He made just 60% at the line at Vanderbilt this past season, a number that boggles my mind. This has to be a mental issue, and doing research it seems that Taylor has had some confidence issues in the past. Still, a talented wing player who is going to play for money has GOT to be better than 60% from the charity line,so whoever coaches him in the NBA will have to solve that issue, whatever the cause.
    ………………………………………… ………………………………………… ………………………………………… …………………………..>
    So, what do we have in Jeff Taylor?

    To me we have a near elite NBA wing defender who can be a major contributing factor to winning playoff games and championships if used correctly. He has the ability to be a lockdown defender in defending almost al lwings and most of the point guards in the league. I think he can be a spot up shooter offensively, with in my own view a chance to be an effective post up player if given the right matchup.

    But, he has to get on the right team to excel and thrive. He needs to play on a team with at least 2 much better ballhandlers on the floor with him at all times, as Taylor is extremely limited in that way currently. And as a wing guy he will never be an elite scorer, in fact I doubt he ever averages double figures.

    But as an off the bench or even starting NBA defensive stopper on the right team, I think he has really good talent. You can win and win big with guys like Jeff Taylor playing for you, assuming he works on his game and improves his ballhandling and free throw shooting some, and continues to solidify his outside stroke. Seemingly from afar, he has the intelligence,background, and pedigree to be able to do that. He seems like a 6-8 year pro to me, maybe even longer than that if he lands in the right spot and culture and system. The better the team, the more Taylor makes sense to draft, hence his status of being drafted near the end of the first round.
    ………………………………………… ………………………………………… ………………………………………… …………………………
    I like Taylor as a player, and I highly value players who excel defensively as a coach.

    However, for Indiana @ pick 26, I fail to see how he would be a great fit for our current roster and system.

    For example, we already play below average dribblers at almost every position, adding another player who has that as a major weakness doesn’t seem like a good fit for us or him. If he played as a substitute for us, he’d have to play with Danny Granger, Paul George, and Tyler Hansbrough, who are all poor ballhandlers for their position. Taylor probably will rate a notch or 2 below them as ballhandlers starting his career.

    Taylor would fit best next to a ball dominant wing player beside him, or perhaps with a team with an elite level ballhandler at the point guard. He would work in many spots in the league, just not for us as we are currently constructed.

    It is because of this bad fit with our current style of play and fit with our roster that I believe Indiana should pass on Jeffrey Taylor if available, and I believe we will.

    I do really like Taylor the player, just not for us at this time. Not at all.

    Taylor to me makes sense for the Heat at #27, the Thunder at#28, and possibly even the Timberwolves at #18. The Timberwolves would be a very nice fit, as they have a team defensively challenged, a superior point guard in Ricky Rubio, and a stud front court player in Kevin Love that can command defensive attention. If I were Minnesota to take him there makes perfect sense. He might even remind Coach Rick Adelman a little of a player he had in Houston, Shane Battier.

    But Minnesota rarely does the right thing, so I expect them to pass on Taylor as well. My guess is that Taylor is picked by another team he fits well with, the Cleveland Cavaliers at pick #24. Just a hunch.
    ………………………………………… ………………………………………… ………………………………………… …………………………

    Current NBA comparable: Thabo Sefalosha, who is a perfect fit playing next to Durant and Westbrook.


    Former NBA comparable: Quinton Ross, a player I begged for Indiana to go after a few years ago and that I always thought was undervalued around the NBA.

    Those examples are interesting I think. Sefalosha fell into the ideal spot, playing in Oklahoma City, with a team and roster perfectly arranged to get the most out of his ability.

    Ross however was stuck playing for the then clueless Clippers and Memphis Grizzlies, neither of which knew what they had or had the right kind of talent around him for him to properly fit in.

    Taylor I think will have a similar career potentially. I hope he falls into the right spot him….I just don’t think that spot should or will be Indiana.
    ………………………………………… ………………………………………… ……………………………………

    As always, the above was just my opinion.

    Tbird
    Last edited by thunderbird1245; 06-06-2012, 05:35 PM.

  • #2
    Re: Tbird 2012 draft analysis #4: Jeff Taylor

    You had me at Thabo Sefalosha.
    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Tbird 2012 draft analysis #4: Jeff Taylor

      Fantastic write up.

      I agree with your summation that he just wouldn't be a good fit on our roster. We need a guy that can dribble, drive and get his own shot. When will one come?
      First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Tbird 2012 draft analysis #4: Jeff Taylor

        I love your insights.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Tbird 2012 draft analysis #4: Jeff Taylor

          I agree that his weaknesses are definitely areas of concern, but I'd still have a very difficult time passing on him near the end of the 1st round. At #15, I'd go for another player, but at #26 he could be best available talent if he's still on the board. I do not expect him to be available, however.

          Comment

          Working...
          X