Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

    Just read this fantastic column by Ron Glover at The Starting Five and I had to post it. Just an excellent perspective on some of our problems with the media's reporting on sports today.

    http://thestartingfive.net/2012/05/2...-the-back-row/

    Oops forgot to link it!!

    Quick note- Yes. This is about race. Pump the breaks a little. There's definitely a contingent whether small or large who will be angered by one more columnist pointing out problems we have in this country. If you understand that this isn't an assault on your character, but simply someone writing from a different perspective than yours than we can all probably learn something here. Try to understand. It will challenge you. I say that because this should be a fun and engaging discussion.

    I think ESPN, though honestly it is probably entirely unintentional, does a horrible job reporting on African American athletes in almost every single circumstance. A great example as I've pointed out before, is how LBJ, the nicest guy ever is a villain, and Kevin I stomp peoples faces Love is an "angel."



    Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

    African-American athletes make up for more than 66 percent of the players in the NFL and 82 percent of the players in the NBA. In 2006, a study conducted by the Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport showed 95 percent of sports editors, 87 percent of assistant sports editors, 90 percent of columnists and 87.5 percent of sports reporters were white. Of the 303 newspapers that participated in that study, only three African-American and four Latinos were sports editors. Among columnists only 19 were African-American, 3 Latino and 2 Asian. The numbers aren’t much higher for women – 5 percent editors, 13 percent assistant editors, 7 percent columnists and 10 percent reporters.

    Not exactly sure how much the needle has moved either way in the years since that study, but judging from my view there’s reason to shout.

    Anti- N*gger Machine

    I found very early in the sports journalism game that not having a formal education is not as big an obstacle as being African American for advancing in the field. I’m good enough and smart enough - I’m just not sure if the establishment wants too many of my race in heavy rotation.

    The majority of credentials issued to print media and “stand alone media”- which The Starting Five falls under – are white. Is this indicative of the population or more about perspective? More than enough media credentials exist to accommodate Philadelphia sports media for every game, every night. For reasons that have become obvious, writers at The Starting Five are asked to jump through special hoops. Hoops not existing for other affiliates - such as constantly following up with emails and phone calls just to make sure our requests didn’t slip through the cracks for that event. We have to be especially detailed in what we do because the slightest oversight could be a tripwire to being on the outside looking in. The lack of African-American journalists in locker rooms across the country denies writers like myself the ability to give the reader more than just what occurred in the game the previous night. When I’m sitting with a player minutes before he goes to work, I realize that he has a life. A life with real issues in the same real world that we all live in. An athlete having a bad day or not wanting to deal with a common media member can go from being unhappy with his contract to just being a jerk altogether. In the case of any African-American athlete, that speculation is tenfold.

    If a white dominated press has shaped America’s view of the African-American athlete in a negative way for decades, it would seem African-American journalists would seek to change that perception by giving the public more than what is just commonly written. Instead those same common writers fear stirring the pot, and are just as happy to piggyback a story instead of digging beneath the surface as they well should.

    And that is where many African-American sports writers in the position to make a difference have failed to give America an alternative view of the Black Athlete.
    A priority should be placed on developing young African-American writing talent outside of what is done here at The Starting Five. Can’t just play the game, African-Americans have to write the game as well.

    The credentialing power lies within the public relations structure of sports franchises - people who are in my opinion taught to adhere to a certain quota of non-white reporters regardless of the outlet. In my interaction with these individuals, their intentions are evident, “Put a lid on the pot before it boils over.” I’m sure that their pre-season briefings are hypothetically, “Remember, we can’t control who they put on the floor or in the stands, but our power lies in who we have talking to these guys (players) and the less that it looks like a North Philadelphia street corner, the better.”

    For the most part PR representatives are about their work and could care less about who’s covering what. Naturally, there are a few who use their false sense of authority to put their bigotry on display in the most subtle of tones. It can come in the form of accommodating TSF for games during the season – the majority being games vs. teams lacking a superstar or an approval for one playoff game in a seven game series. Try swallowing that pill when a writer – African-American or white - is credentialed for the season, doesn’t show up until the playoffs and is still accommodated. It’s only because TSF is trying to break through that we roll with the punches. To these public relations folk, walking around with a non-laminated 3×5 card around your neck with name and affiliation scribbled with a Sharpie, is a privilege and we’d better take it with a smile or get to steppin’!

    It becomes more frustrating when I’ve done my due diligence as a writer only to have to knock a little harder and longer the next time out. Working twice as hard as the next guy because I’m from a stand alone site focusing on the African-American athlete is a given, and that is the story of most of our African-American lives. I would like just as much attention paid to me for reasons to keep inviting me back as they have reasons for wanting to keep me out. Coverage of a game usually begins after leaving my 9 to 5. I’m usually one of the first from the media showing up at the arena, first in the visitor’s locker room and one of the first with an inquiry in the post game presser. I remember the first time I asked a question in a press conference and I noticed heads turning because it was someone other than who they would’ve expected asking a question and it wasn’t nothing slow pitch softball. That was a great feeling because the elephant in the room had just stood up. And while none of those writers felt threatened by my presence, I viewed each one of them as a measuring stick and a soon to be a notch on my belt each time their pens touched paper after I made an inquiry to a coach or player. That was my victory and validation that I was in the right place.

    One benefit I never paid much attention to was actually building a professional relationship with some of the players. Sometimes I’m greeted openly in the form some dap and a shoulder hug instead of eyes rolling skyward and a player dipping into the training room when I show up. Quite naturally, some white reporters give the scene that it must be a Black thing expression, while the PR representative wanting to keep me out is seething inside.

    “False media, we don’t need do we?“

    There’s no doubt African-American athletes would welcome more Black press into the locker rooms. Someone they relate to in ways that a white reporter would not understand (this is a Black thing). Could a white reporter relate to Allen Iverson about walking through sewage-filled floors before becoming a generational icon in the NBA? I doubt it. For the greater part of his career, the only thing reporters seemed to worry about was the number of practices Iverson brushed off in a week, or which Philly club he and his entourage…I mean posse occupied the night before. Should any writer worth his/her salt feel comfortable writing a story that they have trouble understanding on any level? Yes, they should. The Struggle is the calling card of today’s African-American athlete no matter how they’re viewed by the rest of the world. The majority of those covering them have no clue of any struggle and are not about that life. If reading ten stories about Iverson’s upbringing, nine will sound the same, while the one with the most passion and sensibility never makes it to print.

    Why did we find out nearly a year later that Terrelle Pryor signed Ohio State memorabilia for money to keep his mother and sister off the street? African-American and also white journalists lambasted Pryor for bringing down the Ohio State program. Pryor was also seen as costing Jim Tressel his job but it was Tressel who was oblivious to the actions of his star player and African-American journalists failed to dig deeper in getting to the root of Pryor’s dilemma. So what happens? A young man’s reputation is ruined and he’s left to pick up the pieces and continue on his own the best way he knows how – falling back on those same survival skills that cost him his collegiate career. Where white reporters see the cars, expensive clothes and jewelry and think Pryor is in it for himself, African-Americans who aren’t journalists have the instinct to look one layer beneath the surface and see that there is a 90 percent chance that this kid is sending money home. He is sending money home to keep a younger brother from falling victim to the streets or a baby sister from running with the wrong guy.

    The relationship between African-American athletes and white reporters is awkward at best and at the end of the day that player is reluctantly emptying his soul to someone whose color represents the root of his struggles. Hypothetically he may say to himself: “A white man fired my dad to hire another white man and because of that a white man cut our lights off. My white coach took me in only because I could dunk a ball like no one else and wants to cash in later. Now this white reporter wants me to give him a lily-white story of my struggles so he can make some green to feed his white family.” It’s hard to build any sense of real trust when every door that was closed in your life was at the end of a white hand.

    It’s equates being at Augusta National on Masters weekend, having five minutes with (name white golfer here) and that conversation last all of 15 seconds. Reason: there is no common ground between that golfer and myself. Color plays a role but it isn’t the sole reason. His first thought is hypothetically, “What does he know about golf?” I can’t relate to the that golfer being a child of privilege. Nowhere in our timelines can we ever relate to one another on a socio-economic plane, so in his conscience I’m already inferior to him and his way of life. Being on the grounds of Augusta where I’m welcomed reluctantly even as a journalist solidifies his feeling.

    If professional sports incorporates a plantation philosophy, then the American sports media is the last line of defense between the African-American athlete and the level playing field non-existent since our arrival on slave ships to America.

    The lack of diversity in the press rooms and locker rooms around the country is a simple game of divide and conquer. As long as there are people in the press seeking to reinforce stereotypes about African-American athletes as opposed to a respectable percentage that mirrors the African-American presence in sports, it only highlights the problem. Black athletes will continue to be conditioned to the white hand at the end of every microphone or recorder which becomes a whip of recorded words held against him if he/she chooses to get out of line.

    That playing field will be hard to come by as long as the majority of reports and columns read have the same opinion and bias. If there’s only one side to the story, how can an intelligent opinion develop? It’s almost conditioning the reader to not think for themselves or outside of the box they’ve become accustomed to. So, when it comes down to an opinion of an African-American athlete, he’s already stereotyped and placed in the all too familiar categories: pampered, selfish, childish and troubled with an attitude problem before the story hits the web or your newsstand.

    My goal as a writer is to continue to seek the good in every athlete (and scrutinize when needed), instead of mimicking the lazy and all too tired narrative seeking to disparage the African-American athlete first and ask the right questions later. The reputation and image of the African-American athlete is of the utmost importance because it has been misunderstood, misconstrued and mismanaged from Jack Johnson through LeBron James.
    Lastly, I'd like to give a quick example of how the white sports media really distorts our perspective on sports. On this board in particular, as I've been one of the leaders on the bring-Deron-to-Indy bandwagon, some may remember thread after thread where I had to preach about Deron Williams character. The media almost instantly painted Deron Williams as egotistical, self centered, uncoachable, and almost entirely money oriented. The problem was, there was no evidence to back up that sort of reasoning.

    The way the media reports on athletes today, whether intentional or not, does not give athletes a fair shake. (LBJ is probably the most blatant example).

    Anywho, hoped you enjoyed the read.
    Last edited by mattie; 05-21-2012, 02:46 PM.

  • #2
    Re: Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

    Absolutely agree about DWill and LeBron.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

      The relationship between African-American athletes and white reporters is awkward at best and at the end of the day that player is reluctantly emptying his soul to someone whose color represents the root of his struggles. Hypothetically he may say to himself: “A white man fired my dad to hire another white man and because of that a white man cut our lights off. My white coach took me in only because I could dunk a ball like no one else and wants to cash in later. Now this white reporter wants me to give him a lily-white story of my struggles so he can make some green to feed his white family.” It’s hard to build any sense of real trust when every door that was closed in your life was at the end of a white hand.

      If professional sports incorporates a plantation philosophy, then the American sports media is the last line of defense between the African-American athlete and the level playing field non-existent since our arrival on slave ships to America.

      Black athletes will continue to be conditioned to the white hand at the end of every microphone or recorder which becomes a whip of recorded words held against him if he/she chooses to get out of line


      Ok Mattie I'm challenged alright. So was the point White people are bad? Hate/bias is bad no matter where it comes from.
      Last edited by RWB; 05-21-2012, 01:15 PM.
      You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

        Something also very interesting from Mr. Glover.

        http://thestartingfive.net/2012/01/1...rd-iii-part-i/


        Ron Glover: Mr. Pollard, how are you today?

        Fritz Pollard III: I’m doing well.

        RG: What is your feeling about Tim Tebow and the extraordinary amount of press that he has received in relation to Black quarterbacks that have come along with the same skill set that have been vilified by the same media?
        You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

          Long ago we decided to not allow these kinds of discussions on PD because when it's open to the general public, you almost always, inevitably, have someone (or more than one) come in and start setting fires, and it spirals out of control. The kind of stuff I found not worth the trouble of policing on a board that was created to talk about basketball games.

          That having been said, that policy has been in place for a long time now, and maybe PD 2012 can handle it. We'll see. This gets closed if this gets heated. And if it does, there are tons of places online to talk about this other than PD, so have at it.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

            Also, is there a link to the source of this story? I'm not seeing one?

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

              Honestly it just seems out of all the things someone could be upset about media bias toward African American athletes would be the low rung on the ladder. Until Lebron did the decision thing he was the most beloved person in sports. Everyone wanted to be like Mike before that and Tiger Woods use to be on that same level until infidelity thing.

              I'm also confused as to where Kevin Love is getting this supposed free ride? Hell the guy was getting hammered by the press clear back in high school for being a jerk.
              Last edited by RWB; 05-21-2012, 01:35 PM.
              You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

                I'd be very interested to find out somehow how Mike Wells feels about this. He might be able to give a perspective that is separate from the obvious frustration this writer is feeling due to "stand alone media" not being considered as important as print or corporate media.
                BillS

                A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

                  Originally posted by RWB View Post
                  Something also very interesting from Mr. Glover.

                  http://thestartingfive.net/2012/01/1...rd-iii-part-i/


                  Ron Glover: Mr. Pollard, how are you today?

                  Fritz Pollard III: I’m doing well.

                  RG: What is your feeling about Tim Tebow and the extraordinary amount of press that he has received in relation to Black quarterbacks that have come along with the same skill set that have been vilified by the same media?
                  If you read that whole interview on the website, they actually get butt hurt over Luck being #1 over RG3, and how its the white man's media doing. Seriously? Really? Did we not just have a Black QB taken #1 just this last year? The interview is with the grand son of Fritz Pollard. Who?? Somebody who must have no real connection with sports as the writer's only attribution is the relation to his famous grand father. Notice how Glover frames the responses with his own opinion as the questions.
                  You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

                    Originally posted by RWB View Post
                    Something also very interesting from Mr. Glover.

                    http://thestartingfive.net/2012/01/1...rd-iii-part-i/


                    Ron Glover: Mr. Pollard, how are you today?

                    Fritz Pollard III: I’m doing well.

                    RG: What is your feeling about Tim Tebow and the extraordinary amount of press that he has received in relation to Black quarterbacks that have come along with the same skill set that have been vilified by the same media?
                    That's an ongoing discussion going on at #TSF generally inspired by Tebow's obsessed following despite his extremely poor play. Tebow oddly enough was given more opportunities than similar or superior skilled African Americans in his same position.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

                      Originally posted by mattie View Post
                      That's an ongoing discussion going on at #TSF generally inspired by Tebow's obsessed following despite his extremely poor play. Tebow oddly enough was given more opportunities than similar or superior skilled African Americans in his same position.
                      I couldn't disagree more, and I could care less about Tebow.

                      The fact is Tebow won 2 national titles. That buys you some clout in the NFL and the media. Thats how he got drafted in the 1st round. He became the starter for Denver this season basically through attrition.

                      Also the similarly skilled African American in the same position comment is ridiculous. Its freaking football. There is so much that goes into evaluating a player. It could never be clear cut and dry like Person A is a better accountant than Person B.

                      Just how many black QB's should be in the NFL? CFL? AFL? XFL? NFL Europe?

                      Was anyone mad that Gordon Hayward got picked before Paul George? Except me...
                      You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

                        Originally posted by mattie View Post
                        That's an ongoing discussion going on at #TSF generally inspired by Tebow's obsessed following despite his extremely poor play. Tebow oddly enough was given more opportunities than similar or superior skilled African Americans in his same position.
                        Would you not think that the significant religion angle as a fan attractor might play a significant part in Tebow's following? Certainly I'd think that would skew any purely racial view.
                        BillS

                        A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                        Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

                          I am sure that a writer's race does have an influence on how he/she reports things, at a level that he/she may not be aware of. But I feel that in general the athlete's ability and performance on the court or on the field, and his actual behavior on/off the field in some cases, are the major influence on people's opinions.

                          some questions:

                          a) would Reggie Miller have been more popular if he were white?
                          b) would Peyton Manning have been less popular if he were black?
                          c) The Pacers wanted to rid themselves of Jackson and Tinsley for off-court issues. Would the issue have been lessened if either had been white?
                          d) Would Ben Roethlissberger have been treated more harshly if he were black?
                          e) Would Michael Vick have been treated less harshly if he were white?
                          f) Would Tiger Woods have been more popular if he were white, or less vilified for adultery if he were white?
                          g) Would Michael Jordan have been more popular if he were white?
                          h) Would Larry Bird have been less popular if he were black?

                          My gut feeling to all of these is "no, certainly not to me or to anyone that I know, though I can imagine such a shift in perception might apply in the case of a few ignorant people"

                          I suppose I can see a CHANCE for h) being a "maybe" just because I think that perception was much worse for non-white athletes of 30 years ago, vs. today.

                          I think for the most part we have arrived at the point in sports where you are judged on how you play and what else you do. That's a good thing. I'm not saying racism or more specifically racially biased reporting doesn't exist or doesn't hinder advancement of people, including athletes, but I don't think it is anywhere near as important a factor as your own actions and abilities.


                          aside: the Tebow craze is a religion thing, not a race thing, it seems to me
                          Last edited by Slick Pinkham; 05-21-2012, 04:59 PM.
                          The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

                            Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
                            I couldn't disagree more, and I couldn't care less about Tebow.

                            The fact is Tebow won 2 national titles. That buys you some clout in the NFL and the media. Thats how he got drafted in the 1st round. He became the starter for Denver this season basically through attrition.

                            Also the similarly skilled African American in the same position comment is ridiculous. Its freaking football. There is so much that goes into evaluating a player. It could never be clear cut and dry like Person A is a better accountant than Person B.

                            Just how many black QB's should be in the NFL? CFL? AFL? XFL? NFL Europe?

                            Was anyone mad that Gordon Hayward got picked before Paul George? Except me...
                            Before we could even consider the numbers on black QB's in the NFL you have to realize that Tebow highlighted this issue in a big way by becoming the most popular athlete in the country, while simultaneously being horrible at football.

                            It'd be much easier and desirable for all of us to simply turn a blind eye to the issue and say, "oh well it's because he's religious" but at the very least we have to consider the implications right? With so many wanting to completely dismiss the issue as related in anyway to race it has to expose a major issue.

                            The truth is, though it is a very complicated issue that never has any cut and dry answers, Tebow is an example of the "great white hope" which was a concept our society was much more open with over a 100 years ago. In a much more overtly racist society years ago, white America was quite open about desiring it's various white athletes specifically to overcome their black counterparts.

                            I think we have quietly inherited that idea. I even think it's natural and human that people would want their own race to succeed. As I've said before, it's complicated and hard to get a firm grasp on how our society operates as a whole, especially since now more than ever people do not want to talk about racial issues. The quarterback position is mostly dominated by white athletes in the NFL and there is no doubt in my mind, at least secretly, white America does not want black athletes to succeed at that position. It is also important to note that white America clearly wants white athletes to at least succeed on some level as blacks in areas whites don't normally excel at. (for instance, white runningbacks, or basketball players who rely on athleticism, not jumpshots)

                            Tebow, as a highly athletic running QB is an example of that. We want him to do well, just like we wanted Chase Budinger to win the dunk contest. Or Brent Barry. It's also the reason why African Americans want Michael Vick to do well as a QB, or Cam Newton, or RG3. It's a position African Americans have not done well at in the NFL, and many think its because they don't have a fair opportunity. I happen to agree with them. There is a history of the NFL trying to control which positions its athletes can play at. There used to be a time when African Americans weren't "smart enough" to play cornerback. The same argument is being used today but in a far more sly way. (An analyst today would say, "well running quarterbacks just don't well" and black quarterbacks when they make it to the NFL constantly have their intelligence questioned.
                            Last edited by mattie; 05-21-2012, 05:20 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Diversity In Sports Media: Ron Glover’s View From The Back Row

                              Originally posted by BillS View Post
                              Would you not think that the significant religion angle as a fan attractor might play a significant part in Tebow's following? Certainly I'd think that would skew any purely racial view.
                              Had it been a complete anomaly for an athlete to openly express his religious beliefs sure, but considering it is very common, (Tebow is hardly the only Christian in the country) and the other glaring evidence suggesting why Tebow is beloved so much I think it all suggests a major reason for Tebows popularity.

                              Tebows religion definitely does play a part though. I'm not discounting that.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X