Results 1 to 25 of 320

Thread: 5/2/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #3: Pacers Vs. Magic

Threaded View

  1. #1
    streets ahead
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    DC
    Age
    30
    Posts
    5,768

    Default 5/2/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #3: Pacers Vs. Magic


    DESTROY THE DISNEYS!
    Not a Redickulous Thought...


    -VS-



    Game Time Start: 7:30 PM EST
    Where: Amway Center, Orlando, FL
    Officials: D. Crawford, B. Adams, B. Spooner, M. Lindsay

    Media Notes: Indiana Notes, Orlando Notes
    Television: NBATV, FSI
    Local Radio: WIBC 93.1 FM
    NBA Feeds:

    REMINDER: Per PD policy, please do not share a link to, describe how to search for, request a link to, or request a PM about streaming video of a NBA game that is not coming directly through the NBA. Not even in a "wink-wink, nudge-nudge, know-what-I-mean" round-about sort of way. Thank you


    Series & Season Records:
    1
    43-25
    Away: 19-14
    1
    38-30
    Home: 21-12
    Upcoming Games:
    May 5
    May 8
    May 11
    May 13
    at
    vs
    NBATV
    at
    vs
    2:00 pm
    7:30 pm
    If Necessary
    If Necessary


    Projected Starting Lineup:
    C
    PF
    SF
    SG
    PG
    HIBBERT
    WEST
    GRANGER
    GEORGE
    HILL
    Projected Starting Lineup:
    C
    PF
    SF
    SG
    PG
    DAVIS
    ANDERSON
    TURKOGLU
    RICHARDSON
    NELSON


    Pacers
    Leandro Barbosa, sprained ankle, probable
    Darren Collison, sore groin, probable

    Magic
    Glen Davis, sprained ankle, probable
    Dwight Howard, herniated disc, out


    Eight Points, Nine Seconds Preview Review:
    Jared Wade: Countermoves, Chin Checks and the Lessons of Chessboxing

    The onslaught reached force in the third quarter, when — for the first time — this series
    felt like the mismatch that most experts had predicted. The Pacers did jump out on the
    Magic early as well in game two last night, busing out the gates to quickly build a 20-10
    lead, but like in Game One, that early scoring flurry was soon erased, and Indiana once
    again looked like a team that was going to allow Orlando to dictate the tempo.

    Way more troubling than that initial recovery, however, was the fact that their opponent,
    led by the vertically challenged Glen Davis, was punishing the Pacers front court. It
    became Big Baby’s game; Indiana was just along for the ride.

    In the NBA, much is made about energy levels, aggressiveness and imposing physicality.
    Sometimes this is just cliched rubbish spun by hack writers who spent more of the game
    feverishly writing a post-game report pre-buzzer than truly paying attention. After all, it
    is really easy to just throw out overarching generalities (“TMac was never great; he
    couldn’t make it to the second round”) and be accurate without being correct.

    But in this case, it’s the only way to explain what actually happened. The Magic, in the
    second quarter, wanted it more.

    After falling down early, the Magic simply decided to be tougher than the Pacers. It led
    to them being able to do whatever they wanted. Jameer Nelson dribbled around freely,
    Davis was the largest presence on the court. Even NBA nobodies Chris Duhon and Earl
    Clark were making Indiana’s look like the ones who are fringe pros at best. And it
    wasn’t even so much that Orlando was running any great sets or converting buckets
    at an impressive rate. But they were able to get enough second-chance points to
    supersede the fact that the offensive execution was subpar. It was clear why: the
    Pacers were intimidated and became indecisive, passive and reactionary. Every Pacer
    fan watching must have been thinking the same thing: “Indiana isn’t making the
    second round.” It was that one-sided from an aggression standpoint.

    Then a funny thing happened...CONTINUE READING AT 8p9s




    Magic Basketball
    Orlando searching for answers on offense

    By now you’ve heard. The third quarter of last night’s game between the Pacers and
    Magic seems to have been the series turning point for Indiana. Down a bucket at the
    half, the Pacers came out in the third and cold-cocked the Magic to the tune of a 30-13
    quarter that provided the final margin of victory.

    The question going forward is exactly what to make of that run. Was it an outlier or a
    harbinger? Was it a case of regression - the Pacers just starting to perform how we
    figured they always would - or was it a case of the Pacers playing exceptionally?

    To my eye, there were four reasons the Pacers came alive in the third: 1.) they
    mauled the Magic on the glass, 2.) they converted at the line, 3.) they snuffed out
    most of Orlando’s initial actions on pick-and-rolls, and 4.) George Hill began once
    more to resemble a professional basketball player. Of these, we’ll ignore Hill’s
    resurfacing, for the simple reason that I have no idea whether he will again net 16
    points on 8 shots, as he had at the end of last night’s third quarter.

    I’ll focus first on the fouls and the rebounding, because they’re really two sides of
    the same coin. I hate to point this out, but the Pacers only shot 28 free throws last
    night, which is a totally reasonable figure for a team playing with the sort of
    interior advantage the Pacers have. Even though, at times, during the third quarter
    it seemed there was a whistle on every play, the Magic really can’t argue with a
    28-19 free throw disparity in favor of Indiana given the stylistic and personnel
    differences. The rebounding? Stay with me, because this is where things get grim.

    Look, the Pacers are going to outrebound the Magic. Even in Game 1, Indiana was
    +5 on the boards. The Pacers are a strong rebounding outfit no matter how you
    slice it — a top-five team in raw per-game rebounding and in offensive rebound
    percentage. However, they simply bludgeoned Orlando on the offensive glass last
    night, corralling 37.5 percent of their own misses. While this seems like a shocking
    figure, nearly 8 percentage points above Indiana’s season average, when you
    consider the fact that Indiana’s offensive rebound percentage in the Magic’s Game
    1 win was 30.6 percent, it’s hard to come to the conclusion the Magic will remedy
    this situation...CONTINUE READING AT MAGIC BASKETBALL


    140 Characters of (Non-PD) Coverage
    Pacers
    Mike Wells @MikeWellsNBA
    Jared Wade @8pts9secs
    Tim Donahue @TimDonahue8p9s
    Tom Lewis @indycornrows
    Ian Levy @HickoryHigh
    Magic
    Orlando Sentinel @joshuabrobbins
    Magic Basketball @erivera7
    Orlando Pinstripe Post @BQRMagic

    Last edited by avoidingtheclowns; 05-02-2012 at 07:45 PM.
    This is the darkest timeline.

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to avoidingtheclowns For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Odd Thoughts: Round 1 game 2 2012 playoffs
    By Peck in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 05-02-2012, 10:44 PM
  2. 4/30/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #2: Pacers Vs. Magic
    By avoidingtheclowns in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 686
    Last Post: 04-30-2012, 10:11 PM
  3. Odd Thoughts: Round 1 Game 1 2012 playoffs
    By Peck in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 87
    Last Post: 04-30-2012, 06:00 PM
  4. 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Magic
    By avoidingtheclowns in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 841
    Last Post: 04-28-2012, 09:59 PM
  5. 05/04/2006 Playoffs EC 1st Round Game Thread: Pacers vs Nets (Game 6)
    By BostonConnection in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 586
    Last Post: 05-04-2006, 10:23 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •