Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

    Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time







    Nobody would argue that the idea of Michael J. Fox playing basketball is sort of hilarious. The man's barely four feet tall and needs a footstool to get into bed every night. But while Fox might be a laughable player, Fox as Teen Wolf sinks 75-foot hook shots and dunks like Dominique Wilkins' highlight reel.

    Even Michael Jordan, widely believed to be the greatest basketball player of all time, plays better ball in the movies. Name us one time in Jordan's NBA career, for instance, where he got launched into outer space to compete against basketball-playing aliens, then jumped 200 feet in the air to sink a textbook layup from Porky Pig. (Maybe twice.)

    If movies have taught us anything, it's that actors and basketball players alike can pretend to do things far better than actual people can in real life. So, in honor of the upcoming NBA draft-a night filled with hilarious interviews, ridiculous suits and old white men talking lustily about the flawless condition of young black men's bodies-we turn to the real, but routinely ignored, stars of the NBA: the completely made-up ones



    #1 Teen Wolf (Teen Wolf)



    NBA Equivalent: Dr. J in a Chewbacca costume

    Upside: Calling this guy a freak of nature is not just pundit hyperbole: the Wolf's athletic ability is absolutely off the charts. His jumper's a little spotty, but with his ability to drive the lane, any mid-range game is almost an afterthought. Has been known to drive the rim and make Lebron-esque, two-hand dunks in a half-court set, which is incredibly impressive, even if some of these dunks appear to be the exact same ones.

    Weaknesses: The Wolf is a star and he knows it. Has been known to steal the ball from his own teammates and play with sunglasses on. Doesn't go anywhere without his agent, Stiles, who seems more interested in apparel deals than wins, and could be a major locker room distraction. Is also half-human/half-wolf, meaning he possibly eats babies.



    #2 Neon Budreau (Blue Chips)




    NBA Equivalent: Plays uncannily like Shaquille O'Neal

    Upside: Extraordinary athleticism for his size. Polite young man who is extremely coachable, which is saying something, since his college coach seemed to think "coaching" meant yelling at the referees and telling people to "dunk it," then celebrating when they did.

    Weaknesses: Background playing in a factory in the middle of a Louisiana swamp that requires a boat trip to get to means that he's still pretty raw. Also, questions surrounding his recruitment to play at Pacific University might raise a few Chris Webber-like red flags. Reports from a Pacific booster named Happy that Neon was given a nuclear surfboard in exchange for his matriculation raise questions-both about character and radiation exposure.




    #3 Saleh (The Air Up There)




    NBA Equivalent: A more athletic, less sexually forthright Dikembe "Who Wants to Sex" Mutumbo

    Upside: This slender center from the Dark Continent has tremendous leaping ability and overall athleticism. In a game against a mining company in which the winner would take control of the land Saleh's tribe had inhabited for centuries, he was the best player on both ends of the court and hit the game-winning shot, wisely ignoring a wide open Donyell Marshall in the corner.

    Weaknesses: Like all foreign prospects, there are questions about the level of competition in his home country. For instance, in the mining game, the second-best player on the court was Kevin Bacon, who is currently being dominated by an aging, bloated Michael Jordan in creepy Hanes commercials. If Bacon can stay with Saleh, the newcomer may not be prepared for the level of competition he'll face in the league. On the bright side, he will be the closest thing in the league to a younger Michael Jordan, at least in terms of Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon.



    #4 Jesus Shuttlesworth (He Got Game)




    NBA Equivalent: A less charismatic, more idiotically named Ray Allen

    Upside: Sweet jumper, great movement without the ball. His ability to juke defenders playing in blank jerseys makes for a pretty unbelievable highlight reel. Hails from basketball hotbed Coney Island, home to such current NBA players as Stephon Marbury and Sebastian Telfair.

    Weaknesses: Hails from Coney Island, home to such current NBA players as Stephon Marbury and Sebastian Telfair. Not surprising, then, that there have been character issues raised concerning contact with an agent during high school. His decision to play at State University also raises some questions, such as: which state?



    #5 Jimmy Chitwood (Hoosiers)




    NBA Equivalent: A whiter Jeff Hornacek, if that's possible

    Upside: This, the whitest man on the planet, was put on the earth to shoot a basketball, and his stroke is as sweet as a tender ear of Indiana corn. Despite not being a vocal leader, his teammates rally behind him because they know, just as well as he does, that he'll make the shot.

    Weaknesses: He is a bit spacey at times, but that's just Jimmy being Jimmy. Is liable to wait until the middle of the season to join the team if the mood suits him; and if coach goes, well, he goes too. Also faces considerable trash talking and locker room tension due to the length of his shorts.



    #6 Earl "The Goat" Manigault (Rebound: The Story of Earl "The Goat" Manigault)




    NBA Equivalent: Since Rebound is based on a (vastly exaggerated) true story, we're going to go with the Goat here. Hey, he got a tryout"�

    Upside: As a high school phenom, the Goat's vertical leaping ability was the stuff of playground legends. Thanks to training with ankle weights, Manigault could snatch a dollar bill off the top of the backboard and make change before coming back down. Also, as far as nicknames that double as acronyms go, The Goat (The Greatest of All Time) is pretty slick.

    Weaknesses: A few years of sleeping in pools of his own vomit, giving 50-cent stroke jobs in the men's room of the Port Authority Bus Terminal, and a daily, ravenous appetite for heroin, has slowed the Goat a step or two. Has also been dead for the better part of a decade, so he's definitely a project. Don't expect him to contribute right away.



    #7 Jim Carroll (The Basketball Diaries)




    NBA Equivalent: If Bill Walton were a guard, and shot smack instead of smoking pot, he would be Jim Carroll

    Upside: This New York product is a combo guard who is more of a scorer than a pure shooter. His passion and tough attitude make up for his slight frame, obvious blond highlights and sissy love of rambling, nonsensical poetry.

    Weaknesses: Has a bit of a mean streak that is sometimes construed as being uncoachable. Carroll fans argue that he just needs a tough, fair coach who won't try to fondle him in the post-game shower. Similar to The Goat, Carroll loves his heroin, like, a whole lot. Could be an issue down the line.



    #8 Billy Hoyle (White Men Can't Jump)




    NBA Equivalent: Post-debilitating injury Larry Bird

    Upside: Prospective defenders are actually so dismissive of Hoyle's cutoff hemp shorts and mesh poncho jersey that it usually takes four or five uncontested three-pointers before someone will actually guard the guy. Which is good for you if you draft him because, despite the fact that his mechanics couldn't be any uglier, Hoyle was blessed with a jumper truer than Jimmy Chitwood's.

    Weaknesses: Unfortunately, he was also blessed with the athleticism of Chunk from The Goonies. It's infuriating, really. This journeyman doesn't appear to be able to jump over a basketball, let alone dunk one. Also, Hoyle's substantial debts to the Stookie Brothers make him a perpetual point-shaving threat.



    #9 Shephard (Above the Rim)




    NBA Equivalent: Robert Parish, except not such a cut-up

    Upside: Is so dedicated to the game that he's been known to practice without a basketball. When he does get his hands on the leather, he is a force, combining Ben Wallace's defense with Kendall Gill's touch and ridiculous haircut. Appears to have a tremendous work ethic, a good head on his shoulders and a disproportionately awesome soundtrack.

    Weaknesses: We're not sure who he's trying to fool, but all of his games were very clearly played on eight-foot rims, so it'd be wise to see how he performs in workouts before any deals are made. Emotionally, it's unclear if he's ever fully recovered from the death of his best friend, who fell off the roof of a high rise while he and Shep were playing one-on-one. Friends say that Shep partially blames himself for the tragic fall, which, when you think about it, is sort of inevitable, since playing basketball on the roof of a high rise is among the stupidest things anyone can do.


    #10 Calvin Cambridge (Like Mike)





    NBA Equivalent: Kobe Bryant

    Upside: NBA GMs are the Humbert Humbert's of the sports world: When it comes to evaluating talent, the younger the better. And this kid certainly has the total package, with the uncanny ability to dunk from half court, a Kobe Bryant like drive to be like Mike and the hunger that comes from growing up in an orphanage run by an evil Crispin Glover (again, like Kobe). Also, as far as NBA entourages are concerned, they don't come much cuter than Jonathan Lipnicki. When I saw Jerry Maguire I wanted to take him home and make him hamburgers, the little rascal.

    Weaknesses: Because of the recently imposed age limit, teams are going to have to take a chance on him now and then wait for his 18th birthday. Also, his athletic ability stems from getting electrocuted while touching Michael Jordan's shoes. So every time he gets a new pair of shoes you're going to have to electrocute him, which sounds like it could be hard on such a little guy's heart. So, you know, a bit of an injury risk.



    #11 Air Bud (Air Bud)




    NBA Equivalent: You know the play where the kid gets down on his hands and knees and barks like a dog to distract the other team? Like that except for the entire game.

    Upside: He may be the only player in this entire draft that has the athleticism to at least stay in front of Teen Wolf. Bud's endurance and stamina are awe-inspiring. Opponents are often left despondent and morally defeated after watching Bud go baseline to baseline for the full 48 minutes without even breaking a sweat. (It should be noted that it's biologically impossible for him to sweat.)

    Weaknesses: Lacks opposable thumbs and many other anatomical features of a standard NBA point guard. His ball-handling, shooting and passing are dreadful and his propensity to hump the mascot has a tendency to interrupt the flow of the game (though we suppose the same could have been said for Shawn Kemp, and he had a solid career).



    .
    .
    .
    .
    .


    Likely to Go Un-Drafted: Chubby (Teen Wolf)




    NBA Equivalent: Charles Barkley with skin made out of not-quite-dry Elmer's Glue

    Upside: Chub sets a mean pick, grabs boards like the ball is deep-fried and fills out a pair of short shorts like nobody's business.

    Weaknesses: This round mound is your classic "tweener," as he lacks the height to play the four or five, but is too morbidly obese to be a traditional shooting guard.



    Read more: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time | Cracked.com http://www.cracked.com/article_15201...#ixzz1p3zTl7qp
    "Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

  • #2
    Re: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

    Bill Murray in Space Jam should have been #1!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

      Wheres jackie moon?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

        I just found this on http://www.cracked.com and thought it was funny enough to share, being it basketball related...

        I agree wholeheartedly on Jackie Moon lmao
        "Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

          That was spectacular.. Thanks for sharing my man
          Reggie Miller is a God. Period.

          Passion. Pride. Pacers.

          It's ALWAYS Miller Time.
          #31 & Only

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

            Jordan is even the best in the movies...

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

              I can't believe Moses Guthrie (Dr. J.) from The Fish That Saved Pittsburgh isn't at least in the top 5.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time



                Not only is he the best talent on this team, but he makes the players around him better too.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

                  How about Chip Douglas?

                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g16IV1ZyRC4

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

                    The sleeper of this draft that no one is talking about is Hustler from Fast Break.

                    I also have to question the level of competition Teen Wolf has played against as well as his ability to go left...

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

                      How is Jimmy not #1? Best basketball player to ever come out of the state of Indiana in the last 40 years.

                      And where is Lewis Scott???


                      @Pacers24Colts12

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

                        I didn't know Kevin Durant was Kevin Bacons co-star.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

                          Originally posted by PacersCenter View Post

                          And where is Lewis Scott???
                          Yes! I mean the guy was kidnapped and still won an NBA championship. That deserves a top 11 spot.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

                            OK , I got major beef with this list

                            Where's "Above the rim"

                            Where's "Love and basketball"

                            and how can you leave out the classic "Fish that saved Pittsburgh"



                            Edit: Scratch above the rim (saw it) but the player was the dude playing PG for Georgetown, not the old dude that was a janitor(pictured)
                            Last edited by 90'sNBARocked; 03-14-2012, 12:28 PM.
                            Sittin on top of the world!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Mock Draft: The Top 11 Movie Basketball Players of All Time

                              I nominate Snake Plissken (Kurt Russell) in Escape from LA, in what was probably the stupidest scene/scenario ever in a movie.

                              Enjoy:
                              Last edited by The Sleeze; 03-14-2012, 01:38 PM.
                              I know "Sleeze" is spelled incorrectly. I spell it this way because it's based on a name.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X