Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

  1. #1
    Feed the big fella. Infinite MAN_force's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Broadripple
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,253

    Default Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    I was perusing 8points9seconds today and came across an interesting tidbit I thought I would share. Part of Tim Donahue's "By the Numbers" segment.

    http://www.eightpointsnineseconds.co...ough-33-games/

    -30.7 per 100

    From a Net +/- perspective, the George Hill/Paul George combination has been the worst backcourt the Pacers have put on the floor this season. They’ve played 97 minutes, and while that’s not enough to draw final conclusions, it is enough to be at least mildly concerned.

    And while it would be convenient to move further up the lineup, and blame this on the 61 minutes played with Dahntay Jones, that doesn’t clear things up. It’s true that they’ve been worse with Dahntay (-32.2/100), but they’ve been pretty terrible with Danny, too…posting a -27.8/100 in that 36 minutes, scoring only 69 points per 100.
    Just thought I'd put this out there, given some of Well's recent assertions that Vogel may be preparing to move George Hill into the starting lineup at the Point Guard spot. Sample size isn't great, but I think the idea that "Hill can't possibly be any worse than Collison at running the offense" may be more inaccurate than some realize.
    "As a bearded man, i was very disappointed in Love. I am gathering other bearded men to discuss the status of Kevin Love's beard. I am motioning that it must be shaved."

    - ilive4sports

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Infinite MAN_force For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    23,738

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    Good catch!

    At this point, I consider Hill to be solely a shooting guard, who can cover the PG spot in an emergency. But it wouldn't be until Collison and Price are out.
    Welcome to Pacers Digest! New around here? Here are three tips for making the forum a great place to talk about Pacers basketball.

    • Log in. Even if you want to read instead of post, it's helpful because it lets you:
    • Change your signature options. You can hide all signatures by choosing "Settings" (top right) then "General Settings" (middle left) and unchecking the box "Show Signatures" (in the "Thread Display Options" area).
    • Create an ignore list. I know it may seem unneighborly. But you're here to talk about the Pacers, not argue with someone who's just looking for an argument. Most of the regular users on here make use (at least occasionally) of the "Ignore" feature. Just go to "Settings" -> "Edit Ignore List" and add the names.

    Enjoy your time at PD!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Anthem For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Member ilive4sports's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    6,845

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    I said awhile back that it seemed like PG worked better with DC than he did with GH just from my observations in the games. I think part of the reason is that we are asking so much from GH so soon. The man is still learning to play with this team. I think he should focus on getting some chemistry with Tyler right now so that second unit can become what we expected it to be.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to ilive4sports For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    You Did It Joseph!!!! AesopRockOn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    honolulu
    Age
    26
    Posts
    7,877
    Mood

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    Though I think DC should remain as the starter and finisher, I do feel like Vogel could go for Hill over DC on final defensive possessions.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AesopRockOn For This Useful Post:


  9. #5
    Member spazzxb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    fort wayne In
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,816

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    Quote Originally Posted by Anthem View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Good catch!

    At this point, I consider Hill to be solely a shooting guard, who can cover the PG spot in an emergency. But it wouldn't be until Collison and Price are out.
    I hope he is better than that, considering the payday he's looking for and what we gave up to get him.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to spazzxb For This Useful Post:


  11. #6
    Feed the big fella. Infinite MAN_force's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Broadripple
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,253

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    Quote Originally Posted by spazzxb View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I hope he is better than that, considering the payday he's looking for and what we gave up to get him.
    I never really thought we were acquiring him to be a PG. Combo Guard who can play both positions off the bench. You see guys like this fill a combo guard type role off the bench all the time ie Jason Terry. Great 6th man material.

    However, I don't think anyone wants Jason Terry to be their starting PG, and the same goes for George Hill.
    "As a bearded man, i was very disappointed in Love. I am gathering other bearded men to discuss the status of Kevin Love's beard. I am motioning that it must be shaved."

    - ilive4sports

  12. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Infinite MAN_force For This Useful Post:


  13. #7

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    Quote Originally Posted by Infinite MAN_force View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I never really thought we were acquiring him to be a PG. Combo Guard who can play both positions off the bench. You see guys like this fill a combo guard type role off the bench all the time ie Jason Terry. Great 6th man material.

    However, I don't think anyone wants Jason Terry to be their starting PG, and the same goes for George Hill.
    So then you're okay with Hill getting 10 minutes a game in the playoffs? That's what will happen if he's not playing the point.

  14. #8

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    Quote Originally Posted by Infinite MAN_force View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I never really thought we were acquiring him to be a PG. Combo Guard who can play both positions off the bench. You see guys like this fill a combo guard type role off the bench all the time ie Jason Terry. Great 6th man material.

    However, I don't think anyone wants Jason Terry to be their starting PG, and the same goes for George Hill.
    Quote Originally Posted by CJ Jones View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So then you're okay with Hill getting 10 minutes a game in the playoffs? That's what will happen if he's not playing the point.
    thought these were both good points.

    the answer to the 2nd question is mostly yes, unless/until paul learns how to defend the 3.

  15. #9

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    Quote Originally Posted by xIndyFan View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    thought these were both good points.

    the answer to the 2nd question is mostly yes, unless/until paul learns how to defend the 3.
    Hill's too good to play fewer then 20 minutes. Dahntay or AJ's minutes are going to have to be cut down.

    And please... don't get me started on the Paul can't guard SFs MYTH.
    Last edited by CJ Jones; 02-29-2012 at 08:03 PM.

  16. #10

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    Quote Originally Posted by CJ Jones View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Hill's too good to play fewer than 20 minutes. Dahntay or AJ's minutes are going to have to be cut down.

    And please... don't get me started on the Paul can't guard SFs MYTH.
    if paul can defend the 3, then everything is solved. a wing rotation of danny, paul and hill will be fine playoff rotation.

    i hope you're right about the 'can't guard SFs myth.' i'd like to see more of that and more post work.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to xIndyFan For This Useful Post:


  18. #11
    Feed the big fella. Infinite MAN_force's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Broadripple
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,253

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    Quote Originally Posted by CJ Jones View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So then you're okay with Hill getting 10 minutes a game in the playoffs? That's what will happen if he's not playing the point.
    I don't have a problem with Hill playing some minutes at backup PG, I also think eventually Paul George should be getting pretty much all the minutes at the backup 3 spot.

    If Paul George plays 16 minutes at the two, and 16 minutes at the three thats 32 minutes. It leaves 32 minutes at the backup 2 for George Hill, and 32 mins for Granger starting at the 3... and there is flexibility with those minutes. There are plenty of minutes to go around.

    Thats a three man wing rotation I have zero problems with.
    "As a bearded man, i was very disappointed in Love. I am gathering other bearded men to discuss the status of Kevin Love's beard. I am motioning that it must be shaved."

    - ilive4sports

  19. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Infinite MAN_force For This Useful Post:


  20. #12

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    I guess the 3 man wing rotation could work. Although I don't like the idea of Hill playing more then 10-15 minuted at sg. Not a fan of an undersized back court.

    I'd rather Hill play point and then give Dahntay more minutes at backup sg/sf.

  21. #13
    Member spazzxb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    fort wayne In
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,816

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    Quote Originally Posted by Infinite MAN_force View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I never really thought we were acquiring him to be a PG. Combo Guard who can play both positions off the bench. You see guys like this fill a combo guard type role off the bench all the time ie Jason Terry. Great 6th man material.

    However, I don't think anyone wants Jason Terry to be their starting PG, and the same goes for George Hill.
    I thought he was going to be the guy who could guard players like Derrick Rose so Paul George wouldn't have to. I didn't watch much of him before he came here, but that's what I expected.

  22. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Indy
    Posts
    8,018

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    When it comes to Collision, Price, Hill, George, and Granger it should be dependent on who gives you the best chance to win. Against Rose and the Bulls I would expect to see Hill play more PG in order to take advantage of George's and Hill's defense. Also I think if the other SG isn't too tall Price would do fine guarding a SG. When we aren't facing the likes of Rose Hill will see almost all of his minutes at SG. We have a very flexibile backcourt that can adjust to any situation.

  23. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Eleazar For This Useful Post:


  24. #15
    thx4tehmRys Danny! daschysta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Geist, Indianapolis
    Posts
    1,952
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    Quote Originally Posted by spazzxb View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I thought he was going to be the guy who could guard players like Derrick Rose so Paul George wouldn't have to. I didn't watch much of him before he came here, but that's what I expected.
    PG is better than him at that. Hill can guard those kinds of guys but he doesn't have the same ability Paul has to frustrate them with unusual looks. Plus when PG has to do that, Hill can slide over and guard the SG so that DC doesn't have to.

  25. #16
    Member Dr. Awesome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wilmington, NC
    Posts
    4,246

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    Combo guards are awful. I hate that they are now a trend in the NBA.

  26. #17
    Intuition over Integers McKeyFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Free Lance!
    Posts
    8,080

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    I'll go with the sample size is too small.

    Point guard is the most difficult position on the floor, and Hill needs more time to find chemistry with the first unit. He's just getting comfortable with chemistry among the subs.

    And, if the sample size includes mostly Dahntay over Granger, it's just way beyond trying to reach a helpful conclusion.
    .

    .

    .

    .


    “People talk about how quiet he [McKey] is, but he’s really been helpful. He gives a lot of insight to players in how to guard certain teams and what their weaknesses are. The whole team listens to him, and it makes my job a lot easier. Having players like him is what pro basketball is all about for me.” —Larry Brown

  27. The Following User Says Thank You to McKeyFan For This Useful Post:


  28. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    nj
    Posts
    15
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    with all these trades going on, i have plan to get better at the sg position that will better everyteam.

    pacers trade:
    lou amundson
    2nd draft pick

    pacers get:
    Monta Ellis

    Gs trade:
    monta ellis
    2nd draft pick

    Gs Get:
    Chris Kaman

    NO trade:
    Chris Kaman

    NO Get:
    lou Amundson
    NO & IND 2nd draft picks
    Last edited by sapposnap; 03-01-2012 at 11:36 AM.

  29. #19
    Born ready? TheDavisBrothers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Davenport, IA
    Age
    24
    Posts
    1,478
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    Quote Originally Posted by sapposnap View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    with all these trades going on, i have plan to get better at the sg position that will better everyteam.

    pacers trade:
    lou amundson
    2nd draft pick

    pacers get:
    Monta Ellis

    Gs trade:
    monta ellis
    2nd draft pick

    Gs Get:
    Chris Kaman

    NO trade:
    Chris Kaman

    NO Get:
    lou Amundson
    NO & IND 2nd draft picks
    We get Ellis and all we have to give is Lou and a 2

  30. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    nj
    Posts
    15
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Another look at the starting point guard controversy.

    well from what i heard NO want to b under the cap, while still getting some draft or young players. GS want a good C, and we have cap space to acquire a big salary contract. if anything we give GS some money

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 38
    Last Post: 02-18-2011, 04:57 PM
  2. Why is everyone upset we don't have a Point Guard?
    By Psyren in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 06-26-2010, 12:54 AM
  3. Who is a starting Point Guard?
    By Ozwalt72 in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-17-2010, 02:58 PM
  4. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-22-2009, 09:42 AM
  5. The PD NBA Best Pick Left in the Draft
    By Hicks in forum Indiana Pacers
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-23-2008, 10:23 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •