Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Pacers/Utah postgame thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

    People are thinking too much into attendance and our lack of attention.

    Indianapolis just hosted one of the biggest events in America last Sunday.

    All eyes were on that. With roads closed, decorations up, and all that hype, that had Indy's attention.

    Even towards the end of the NFL regular season, radio shows began to praise the Pacers, more people called in and such.

    I didn't think too highly of last night's crowd. It was a SB hangover. It's expected that attendance will shoot up very soon. Saturday is looking good.

    IF Saturday night's crowd is anything smaller than 90% or so filled, I really hope someone publically comes out and says something. Whether it's Danny, Frank, Bird, Simon.

    Someone needs to make a point because this is basketball world and the Pacers have had some terrific crowds in the past years of winning.

    We're playing up to the way people wanted.

    BLF will be packed very soon.... Take it easy!
    In 49 states it's just basketball, but this is Indiana!

    Comment


    • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

      Really need to take care of Atlanta tonight, they've lost 3 in a row and all of them at home. I don't want them to beat us, that would drop our conference record to 12-7.


      Comment


      • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

        Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
        they've lost 3 in a row and all of them at home.
        That makes it even more dangerous for us IMO.
        Never forget

        Comment


        • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

          Yeah, I hate how it seems like every team seems to get up for playing against us. We really can't catch a break really I won't breathe a sigh of relief until after our first back-to-back-to-back and hopefully we're still on a roll going into the All-Star break. How amazing would it be if we were the second or third best team in the league going into the all-star break.

          Comment


          • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

            Danny will be on the Jim Rome show today.

            Comment


            • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

              What time?
              "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

              Comment


              • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

                Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
                What time?
                The show runs from 12-3. I don't know which segment he'll be on.

                Comment


                • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

                  Originally posted by Major Cold View Post

                  I wish we could get Earl Watson as our backup.
                  NO THANKS!

                  Neither he, Jarrett Jack, nor Diener are coming back no matter how much some would like to see it. Hopefully, after this season I can put Price in the same category as Diener... what ever happened to him.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

                    Originally posted by Sookie View Post
                    What bad shot did he take tonight? I personally don't think shooting when the shot clock is winding down is a bad shot, but if others disagree, so be it.

                    He's going to make mistakes. It happens. Are turnovers truly a problem for Price? I don't think so. Yea, he turned it over twice in a row tonight, but it's typically not a problem.

                    It's not that I don't think he's playing poorly, it's that I think people go way overboard with the criticism, whereas other players are seemingly above it.

                    Tyler Hansbrough played straight awful for weeks, and it was rarely talked about. David West was TERRIBLE tonight, never mentioned. Lance Stephenson can play terrible for game after game, and people will pick out the one good play he had and suggest he was awesome.
                    Paul George has a habit of getting himself in foul trouble early in games, when has that been noted...and only Seth has pointed out his apparent occasional ADD. George Hill really struggled from the field in the beginning of the season, there was a whole lot of patience with that. Why no patience with AJ?

                    DC and Danny seem to be the only other players that get this wrath. At least they're starters, and playing major minutes.

                    So, you know what, it is his fault when he turns the ball over and when he misses shots. But for ten minutes tonight, he played well. And because of his two mistakes it became this hyperbolic reaction where it seems as if - and this started last season - one mistake and AJ sucked. A few missed shots, AJ sucks. How is that reasonable? I think the way people reacted to him in the playoffs is the perfect example of this.

                    AJ's a young guy, and he hasn't had the easiest time in Indiana, if there's a kid on this team that deserves slack, it's Price. Why people expect him to be flawless, especially when it's clear that he's struggling with confidence and such at this time, is beyond me.

                    And regardless, as a fan of his, I think he just needs to be in a different situation. Mentally, he's just not the same player. And it's clear he's not part of the Pacer's future plans, and IMO, as much as he tries to act like a team guy..he knows it. It would just be better for him to be somewhere else. Even though it's a shame because the Pacers are in a good place now.
                    Just food for thought here. I actually thought AJ played well, all things considered. I also think DC is only effective when looking for his own shot and it is falling. He can do the pick and pop well, but he doesn tget everyone involved. In my opinion AJ does that the best on the team. I dont think he took bad shoots last night, but it is so difficult for him to be successful in this on and off again thing

                    The only thought I have , is that you made a comment on how "AJ gets blasted" on the board yet "Lance can have bad game after bad game and gets nothing"

                    Therein lies the issue. I feel everytime you defend AJ, its at the expense of taking a shot at Lance. I dont agree with your opinion on him, and felt like he played extreemly well last night. I think this is the problem sove have with you in your feelings towards AJ and Lance

                    Just my opinion and I like you stick up for the player you like, just dont think it should be at the expense of another player

                    again just a thought here, right or wrong
                    Sittin on top of the world!

                    Comment


                    • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

                      Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
                      Hopefully, after this season I can put Price in the same category as Diener... what ever happened to him.
                      Travis plays in the Italian Serie A for Dinamo Sassari. He averages 13.3 PPG, 5.1 APG and 3.3 RPG. His team is pretty much a middle of the pack team in Italy that is en route of going to the playoffs as one of the last seeds.
                      Originally posted by IrishPacer
                      Empty vessels make the most noise.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

                        Each team has only got one b2b2b in their schedule or more?
                        Never forget

                        Comment


                        • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

                          Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
                          What time?
                          He said in the next hour, so sometime after 1 o'clock.

                          Comment


                          • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

                            Originally posted by Hicks View Post

                            What an attitude.

                            I pointed out what I saw in the game that I felt hurt the Pacers in the game. Maybe I should have said we won even though these things occurred in the game. There is no such thing as a perfect game in BB. There are always things that can be improved upon, and pointing them out doesn't mean one has a bad attitude.

                            Oh btw, I changed my mood to TINGLY last week, so I believe "my attitude" is just fine.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

                              Originally posted by 90'sNBARocked View Post
                              Just food for thought here. I actually thought AJ played well, all things considered. I also think DC is only effective when looking for his own shot and it is falling. He can do the pick and pop well, but he doesn tget everyone involved. In my opinion AJ does that the best on the team. I dont think he took bad shoots last night, but it is so difficult for him to be successful in this on and off again thing

                              The only thought I have , is that you made a comment on how "AJ gets blasted" on the board yet "Lance can have bad game after bad game and gets nothing"

                              Therein lies the issue. I feel everytime you defend AJ, its at the expense of taking a shot at Lance. I dont agree with your opinion on him, and felt like he played extreemly well last night. I think this is the problem sove have with you in your feelings towards AJ and Lance

                              Just my opinion and I like you stick up for the player you like, just dont think it should be at the expense of another player

                              again just a thought here, right or wrong
                              I wasn't taking a shot at Lance. I was merely pointing out that a majority of Lance's games (and he's not the only one, this applies to Tyler and Lou and half the time West - Who I've said deserves plenty of slack- as well) have been pretty bad. And yet we don't see anyone posting about how they can't wait to get rid of them. (Okay, maybe Lou gets it a bit..)

                              I made the point in saying that everyone gets a pass, except DC, Danny, and AJ. And that was my problem. And sometimes, when mistakes happen, that aren't completely their fault (or aren't at all, it just appears that way) they still get blamed.

                              Like last night, when DC was getting "bashed" for not passing. When PG went to the bench with foul trouble, Lance isn't the type of player you pass to for a bucket (he needs to create it himself to score) and besides Hibbert, everyone else was that DC played with was missing. So he was extra aggressive with his scoring. He made a majority of his shots, and we get blown out if he decides to be "pass first."

                              Comment


                              • Re: Pacers/Utah postgame thread

                                This game showed me that we still don't know how to close teams out, but that we are learning how to survive an opponent's late surge. The former is something they need to work on, the latter is a good sign. The latter should've never happened though, had they worked on the former. That's about it. Giving up a huge lead like that is frustrating, but at least they won. Utah had no business being in this game late.
                                There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X