Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Good Kravitz column about Manning

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Good Kravitz column about Manning

    Kravitz sat down with Manning recently. Manning has always seemed to like Kravitz and is usually fairly candid with him. He sounds disappointed about the firings (not surprising) and says that he will sit down with Irsay and not Grigson when deciding his future (not surprising either). This is a pretty good piece.

    http://www.indystar.com/article/2012...t|IndyStar.com

    Sorry, Rob Lowe.

    Peyton Manning is not retiring, at least not any time soon.

    "I never thought 'Sodapop Curtis' would announce my retirement," Manning said, laughing, referring to Lowe’s character in the 1983 movie "The Outsiders." "I always thought I would be the one to announce it. I'm a huge fan of the movie, but that caught me way off guard. I can't explain it. I know he (Lowe) is a friend of Jim's (Irsay), and Jim sounded surprised."

    So no, Manning isn't on the cusp of retirement. In a wide-ranging, exclusive interview with The Star on Monday night, the Colts' future Hall of Fame quarterback addressed a number of pressing topics, including his health, his sadness over the firings of several coaches, his minimal relationship with new general manager Ryan Grigson and the future.

    For the record, Manning and Grigson finally met, briefly, last week when the two ran across each other in the facility.

    "One thing he (Grigson) kind-of, sort-of told me, without really wanting to tell me, was that Irsay will be the guy I'm going to sit down and talk with," Manning said. "That's going to happen at some point, but we haven't had that conversation yet because we really don't need to have that conversation yet."

    Aside from Eli Manning's victory in the NFC title game in San Francisco, where Peyton was present to celebrate with his brother, this has been a rough week for Peyton --- and for a lot of the people who've made this one of the most successful organizations in sports over the years. Change is never easy.

    "I'm not in a very good place for healing, let's say that," he said, referring to the practice facility. "It's not a real good environment down there right now, to say the least. Everybody's walking around on eggshells. I don't recognize our building right now. There's such complete and total change."

    Manning didn't express anger about the firing of Jim Caldwell and so many assistant coaches as much as he expressed sadness, wistfulness even.

    He was working out with strength and conditioning coach Jon Torine last week when word came down that Torine had been relieved of his duties. One day later, after Torine had cleaned out his office, he ran Manning one more time, for old time's sake.

    "It was tough," Manning said. "Very emotional."

    It's been difficult with all the coaches, many of whom have been with Manning since the beginning, or at least close to it. This franchise has been a model of stability and continuity; now it's all about change. When Manning hasn't been rehabilitating, he's been calling other franchises and offering recommendations on behalf of the departed coaches.

    "One of the things about football is, it's a relationship business," Manning said. "Sometimes guys get fired, it goes across the ticker, 'Jim Caldwell got fired' and that's that. But when it's every day in a relationship business ... with Bill (Polian), with Marvin (Harrison), Edge (James), guys who retire, get cut, traded or fired, it's just really hard. I don’t think I have an emotion for it.

    "The new (management) team doesn't have a relationship with these guys like I do, and I know a lot of players feel that way about them (the departing coaches), too."

    He continued:

    "I mean, it's 20 degrees, it's snowing, the building is absolutely empty except when you see coaches cleaning out their offices," he said. "I guess it's the reality of the football world, just not something I've had to deal with very often. But I'm in there every day, so I have to sit there and see it. Everybody's being evaluated and I'm no different. It's not the best environment.

    "I just want to pay tribute to all those guys. It's unfortunate because so many of them have been such a big part of so many big wins here, and this is so ... sudden. Their keys didn't work the next day. There's no other way to do it? I don’t know. That's hard to see, all these people leaving.

    "And I may be behind them. Who knows?"

    The question was posed: Given all the changes, the fact the Colts appear to be in a rebuilding mode, does Manning even want to come back to Indianapolis?

    "I don't want to get into some kind of fan campaign with the owner, but I think it's well documented that I want to play in the same place my whole career," Manning said. "It's been a privilege to play here. I love the fans, the city, the transformation of the fans, how our place has become the toughest stadium to play in, the fact our fans wear more jerseys to games than anybody else. It's been fun to be a part of that.

    "But I understand how it works. I understand tough decisions have to be made. There's personal and there's business and that's where we’ve got to separate the two. I've seen other guys leave places and it was personal. I've invested too much into this city for that to happen. We live here, we've given lots of time and money to the community and our church, and that's never going to change Nothing changes that.

    "Whatever happens, happens. I can't give you a prediction because Jim (Irsay) and I will sit down at some point and he'll get a feel for where I am and I’ll get a sense of what direction he wants to go. Right now, I have no idea."

    As for Manning’s health, he's not all the way back yet, but he's not going to put any kinds of percentages on his recovery, nor will he predict whether he'll be at full strength by early March, when the $28 million option bonus is due. At this point, he just doesn't know.

    "You've been around me: You know I don't like to say something like, 'There’s no way I can play Sunday,' then come out and play Sunday and everybody in the media is writing 'I can’t believe he’s playing,'" Manning said. "I'm not into the drama. And I'm not into saying, 'Well, this is it, I sure have enjoyed it.' I'm not into saying goodbye. All I know is I'm still under contract to the Colts. I'm still the quarterback of the Colts That's why I'm in the building every day trying to get healthy."

    Manning continues to work out daily and throw to his beloved and overworked equipment guys, but this past Sunday, he got out of the facility. After watching the first two Giants' playoff games from the workout room, Peyton decided to surprise Eli and show up Sunday in San Francisco.

    I asked if he told Eli it was his job to protect his Lucas Oil Stadium turf from the hated Patriots.

    He laughed.

    "Well, I've already gone to work for him, getting all my teammates, trying to get their two-ticket allotments," Manning said. "That's what he did for me two years ago and I did that for him four years ago. And I'm helping any way I can, getting him restaurant reservations around town for him and his teammates. Jim (Irsay) called after the game and offered any kind of help he could give, which was generous.

    “As far as helping him with the Patriots, really, he doesn't need to talk to me. He played them seven weeks ago. We'll talk about things they do when you face them a second time in the same year, but he knows them better than I do right now.

    "It was fun Sunday, we talked about third and long situations, the defense San Francisco likes to play. They’ve got (former Colts defensive coordinator) Vic Fangio, and we were saying, 'In this situation, they run this particular coverage, three rushing and eight in coverage, and there are only certain places you can throw it.' I didn't tell him to throw that post route on the touchdown, but that was the kind of defense he was seeing. So it's kind of fun to talk about that stuff.’"

    Now, then, Manning will try to enjoy the Super Bowl madness, will continue to work out at the facility (until the team is kicked out to make way for the, gag, Patriots) and wait to see what unfolds in the front office. If and when the Colts are ready to talk --- likely in February --- Manning will be easy to find.

    "I'm in the facility every day," he said. "I'm right there. They know where to find me."
    When it's time to make an announcement one way or the other, Manning hopes he can do it on his own terms.

    "Hopefully, Sodapop Curtis doesn't tweet it before I can say anything," he said.

  • #2
    Re: Good Kravitz column about Manning

    Good article, even though Peyton is a little upset and dissapointed that all of the people he had grown relationships with were fired, he still is working hard to try to get his health right for the March deadline and next season. He is a class act for not bashing the owner for all of the firings.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Good Kravitz column about Manning

      Peyton's a crazy smart strategic thinker. Shouldn't be surprising after seeing him play for 13 years.

      He's is setting himself up to leave Indy. He wants to be elsewhere. He's trying to do it as gracefully as possible, but he's doing it.

      I completely empathize with him and will root for him wherever he goes, but it's pretty sad to see it come to an end like this. Really, this should be good for both parties, the Colts because of Luck and Peyton because the rest of our team probably isn't good enough to win a Super Bowl right now. But seeing Peyton leave Indy with only 1 ring will always sting. Burn in hell, Hank Baskett.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Good Kravitz column about Manning

        I'm not sure he wants to leave.. As he said its well documented that he wants to play for one team his whole career... But i do think he is preparing like he will no longer be a Colt.. Which is indeed sad.. But a necessary evil.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Good Kravitz column about Manning

          Originally posted by CooperManning View Post
          Peyton's a crazy smart strategic thinker. Shouldn't be surprising after seeing him play for 13 years.

          He's is setting himself up to leave Indy. He wants to be elsewhere. He's trying to do it as gracefully as possible, but he's doing it.

          I completely empathize with him and will root for him wherever he goes, but it's pretty sad to see it come to an end like this. Really, this should be good for both parties, the Colts because of Luck and Peyton because the rest of our team probably isn't good enough to win a Super Bowl right now. But seeing Peyton leave Indy with only 1 ring will always sting. Burn in hell, Hank Baskett.
          Did we just read the same article?
          Last edited by CreekShow; 01-24-2012, 04:48 PM.
          I Bleed Blue

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Good Kravitz column about Manning

            well Kravitz just had an interview on ESPN about peytons interview...... It seems like peyton is done as a Colt....... just a matter or him pllaying for another team or retiring.... It will be very very very very sad to see Peyton go after watching him starting when i was 6 and thoughtout the 12 years i greatly appreciate all that peyton has done for the colts,organization and this city... will be a very sad day when he leaves

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Good Kravitz column about Manning

              I just hope we invite him back someday after he's retired to come back to Lucas Oil and get a HUGE ovation for all he's done.. He deserves at least that much.

              Like when Reggie left.. It will be very emotional. It will be extremely hard if Peyton plays for another team before he retires, but I also don't want to see him retire earlier than he wants just because the Colts decide to move on. #18 will always be special to us!

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Good Kravitz column about Manning

                Well, it WILL be a bummer if he goes, but it's purely a financial and business decision.

                4 years of Peyton ?? 36 (soon to be 37) year old QB, 3 neck surgeries recently, a year removed from the game with a monster contract that will handcuff the team until it expires ??

                Or a fresh, young, talented kid for the next 10+ years ??

                I'll take option B.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Good Kravitz column about Manning

                  Originally posted by PacerDude View Post
                  Well, it WILL be a bummer if he goes, but it's purely a financial and business decision.

                  4 years of Peyton ?? 36 (soon to be 37) year old QB, 3 neck surgeries recently, a year removed from the game with a monster contract that will handcuff the team until it expires ??

                  Or a fresh, young, talented kid for the next 10+ years ??

                  I'll take option B.

                  He's 35, soon to be 36.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Good Kravitz column about Manning

                    If asked today I'd say.........

                    I'll soon be 65....trade the 1st pick for everything you can get and build around a proven commodity even if it's only for 3-4 years. Win as many as possible before I'm too old to know what football is...who knows, I may not have time to wait on Luck to develop.
                    Ever notice how friendly folks are at a shootin' range??.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Good Kravitz column about Manning

                      Originally posted by indygeezer View Post
                      If asked today I'd say.........

                      I'll soon be 65....trade the 1st pick for everything you can get and build around a proven commodity even if it's only for 3-4 years. Win as many as possible before I'm too old to know what football is...who knows, I may not have time to wait on Luck to develop.

                      Geezer,
                      The problem is, how I see it, the lack of any guarantee that Peyton can return 100% from the neck surgery... or even anywhere near 100%.... if at all... Let alone play out his career without this rearing its head again.

                      I've yet to see a doctor who says that the symptoms can't return at any point. In fact, the symptoms returning at some point is a likely scenario. And that assumes they ever go away. And keep in mind the symptoms are manifesting as an inability to properly grip the football and lowered arm strength. Not good for a QB in his throwing arm.

                      And you're making this gamble that a re-occurrence that shortens Manning's competitive window won't happen (or happen anytime soon) with a player who will be 36 years old and is already close to that window closing thanks to father time.

                      Then factor in all the business and cap scenarios the team has to deal with. What a tough, gut wrenching position to be in. ...But when you separate emotion from it, barring a renegotiated contract, I don't see how the team has any choice at all. Manning health issues and his contract are simply a poison pill to huge to swallow. IMO...
                      Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                      ------

                      "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                      -John Wooden

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Good Kravitz column about Manning

                        Well, in my defense my comments were made predicated on the idea that PM would return as good as ever.

                        AND

                        I did say...."If asked today..." I tend to flip flop depending on how I'm feeling that day.
                        Ever notice how friendly folks are at a shootin' range??.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Good Kravitz column about Manning

                          Originally posted by indygeezer View Post
                          Well, in my defense my comments were made predicated on the idea that PM would return as good as ever.

                          AND

                          I did say...."If asked today..." I tend to flip flop depending on how I'm feeling that day.
                          I'm right there with you... If I thought the odds were high Manning could return and play out his career normally I'd be hard pressed not to want to load up for the next 3-4 years.

                          And I would've still fired the Polians and much of the coaching staff because they should've already been in the mode of giving Peyton a team that didn't require him carrying it on his shoulders.
                          Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                          ------

                          "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                          -John Wooden

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Good Kravitz column about Manning

                            I would follow any team peyton goes to. I think he deserves to go down as the GOAT but unfortunately he's been set up for failure by this franchise the last few years.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Good Kravitz column about Manning

                              Originally posted by righteouscool View Post
                              I would follow any team peyton goes to. I think he deserves to go down as the GOAT but unfortunately he's been set up for failure by this franchise the last few years.
                              I don't see that at all.
                              Ever notice how friendly folks are at a shootin' range??.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X