I ranked DC 16-20, because while you can argue that Brandon Jennings is better, I can agrue that he isn't. It's that way for about 10 players on the list, Jennings, Nelson, Holiday, Ridnour, Caulderon, etc.
Who you prefer, really doesn't matter, because there isn't a spits worth of difference between them.
They all have their glaring flaws, and they're all so far out of the top tier, that it really doesn't matter.
The fact that you rank, EVERY SINGLE ONE of them higher than DC is more telling than anything.
I understand putting half above DC, I understand putting 3/4s above DC, but every single one of them?
That tells me more about you and your opinion of DC, more than it does about your opinions on the rest of the PGs in the league.
Okay, so let's pretend that we swap out DC for any one of the other questionable PGs. What does that do to the Pacers? Does it take them to a different level?
No. Any team with Jose Caulderon has their starting PG is going to have PG troubles, just like any team that starts Darren Collison.
People who don't like DC are more likely to rate him under all the question marks. People who like DC are more likely to rate him above all the question marks.
At the end of the day, it really doesn't matter, becaue which ever one they choose can't match up with the top tier PGs so you're screwed regardless.
I just feel sorry for people who are constantly negative. Must be a ****** life to lead, to be so critical on almost every freaking topic.