Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

    http://robertogato.com/2012/01/07/bobcats-fall-at-indy/

    Whew. Paul Silas is pissed. I mean he’s that “You lied to me and crashed the car and your 4 year old sister was in the back seat,” parent-style pissed. Disappointment coupled with incredulity and anger at the level of disappointment. The Indiana Pacers played a more physical style of ball that the Bobcats weren’t ready for and weren’t used to at Indianapolis tonight. The first half was good. I mean, it was as good a first half as you’ll see from a team who ends up losing by 22 points. The Charlotte Bobcats came back after halftime and it did not matter. It didn’t matter whatever happened, whatever the Bobcats wanted to do, what the defense was going to be, what lineups were in, it didn’t matter; the Pacers determined the outcome of the game.

    The Bobcats, literally and figuritively, got kicked in the nuts tonight. Excuse my vulgarities, pissed and kicked in the nuts all before the jump but these are the facts of the game and the post game presser from Coach Silas. To be up by 6 at the half but to have your score DOUBLED in the second half? That’s getting kicked square in the nuts. Tyrus Thomas was providing perimeter defense on Indy’s Dahntay Jones, when Jones went up for his shot and did that ridiculous Reggie Miller kick while he was in the air, he caught Thomas right in the mommy-daddy buttons.

    I can’t even describe the physicality that the Pacers exuded over the Bobcats that they, not only couldn’t answer, they couldn’t avoid and couldn’t oppose in some sort of counterpunch that made any sense. It was like the Roberto Duran fight, the Pacers were Sugar Ray Leonard and the Bobcats were Duran saying “No Mas…”

    The game started with an interesting starting line-up change for the Bobcats. With Corey Maggette out, against the Hawks, Paul Silas started Boris Diaw, D.J. White, D.J. Augustin, Gerald Henderson and Derrick Brown (Maggette’s replacement). I think the thought process was likely “Biggest dude in the league in Roy Hibbert, better put Diop out there!” So, take out Derrick Brown, he only had 17 minutes or something last night anyway; insert Tyrus Thomas. Move Boris Diaw to the other forward, leaving D.J. White out of the lineup in his college “home town” and Desagana Diop in at Center. Right? Makes sense. Get Tyrus going early, Diop on Hibbert… It worked, I guess.
    Diop is just so out of shape. 17 minutes, 4 points, thankfully no free throw attempts, so he wasn’t so much embarrassed in that way. Byron Mullens played a good bit, but as a back-up against back-ups so he was able to get his points (10), he even got a block and 11 rebounds, which is good to see from a seven-footer. Bismack Biyombo scored 4 points, 4 rebounds and a block. So, let’s see, that’s 18 points between the 3 guys that are considered centers on the Bobcats roster. But Roy Hibbert had 20…so there’s that.

    The most pissed I saw out of Paul Silas was when someone asked him some extensive, barely audible on the TV feed, question about Boris Diaw. Coach Silas just said “I’m done talking about him.” Wow. 2 points for Boris, in his “more natural” position. He had two of everything, assists, rebounds, blocks, but 3 turnovers and 6 fouls, which of course, the 6th of which came with ample time left in the game. Open jumpers aren’t his thing. I don’t get it, maybe Larry Brown scarred him but you know D’Antoni in Phoenix and Paul Silas are just about the most apt coaches at green-lighting shots, so it’s on Boris. Maybe we should check the French population in Indianapolis?

    The game was in their hands. It’s almost as if the Pacers were rope-a-doping the Bobcats, to make for my second boxing simile of the post. They let the Bobcats get their punches in all the first half, but then the second half, they just ended it. Gerald Henderson got a frustration technical. Diaw fouled out with almost 3 minutes left. The Bobcats attempted 10 more field goals than the Pacers but also missed 10 more than the Pacers. 32.6% to 50.6% in the FG% department.

    I’d be pissed too, if I expected more, which, if I had been home to see more of the first half, I would have. I was just here for the collapse and to me, it looks like a young team that didn’t care to get into all that “hard” playing. ”We’re little guys, we’re finesse players, all this beating and banging is beneath us somehow.” If that’s the way these guys want to play, especially when faced with such physicality out of an opposing team, they better do a lot of other things, like outside shooting or cuts and drawing fouls or taking charges, really, really well.
    Teams are going to start coming more prepared to our games, but I'm enjoying these kinds of reads over the weekend. The very definition of smash mouth.

  • #2
    Re: Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

    Yea, I'd be pissed to if I was forced into giving heavy minutes to Boris Diaw and Byren Mullins.

    Good job Michael Jordan
    Stop quoting people I have on ignore!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

      Originally posted by Psyren View Post
      Yea, I'd be pissed to if I was forced into giving heavy minutes to Boris Diaw and Byren Mullins.

      Good job Michael Jordan
      Mullens is producing 11-5 on 52% shooting in 18 minutes per game. He's playing his *** off. Don't throw him in that category.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

        Is it just me, or did Diaw eat a lot of cheeseburgers during the lockout?
        "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

        "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

          My God isn't there a thread somewhere where we can talk about stretching the floor, I mean I don't know how much I can take of all this PACERS ARE PHYSICAL TEAM stuff from other teams.

          Seriously I can't even get up a good angst about our team right now to even be critical of about anybody and you know that is killing me.

          We haven't seen this type of basketball in Indiana in over a decade.


          Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

            I like this trend. Doc Rivers seemed just exasperated and at a loss after we beat the Celtics.

            Just gotta bring it when we play the big boys, too. Beating Charlotte is great, and Boston is a good quality win, but I really want to read Spoelstra, Carlisle, VanGundy, D'Antoni, and Thibodeau saying things like this.
            It's a new day for Pacers Basketball.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

              Somewhere out there, Dale Davis is smiling.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

                Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
                Somewhere out there, Dale Davis is smiling.
                Liked your post simply because you said "Dale Davis".

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

                  Originally posted by Day-V View Post
                  Liked your post simply because you said "Dale Davis".
                  I liked your post because you liked the fact that he mentioned Dale Davis.


                  Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

                    Originally posted by Peck View Post
                    I liked your post because you liked the fact that he mentioned Dale Davis.
                    i'm so confused

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

                      Originally posted by crunk-juice View Post
                      i'm so confused
                      I liked your post because you're so confused.
                      You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

                        Originally posted by crunk-juice View Post
                        i'm so confused
                        Peck and myself are having a non-ending contest to see who loves Dale Davis more. As of right now, I'd say we're tied.


                        Anyway, back on topic. I'm loving the post-game reactions from these coaches lately. They just seem frustrated and in awe at the same time by how tough we are as a team.

                        I also love how Frank has handled the season so far. Last year in his post game interviews he was smiling and really acting more like a fan than a coach (Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough! NOBODY!). Which I loved, don't get me wrong. It was quite refreshing to see someone as excited about the ball club as us fans! But this year, he puts out a much more serious vibe in his interviews. Gives off that "Yes, we're good. But it's early, and we know we can be a whole lot better." It's awesome. He's evolving as a coach just as the guys are evolving as players. And it really seems like he's getting everyone to buy in. From the players, to the coaches, these guys are all focused on one goal.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

                          I'm also very encouraged by the reactions of the coaches in these last two games. I think I'm even more encouraged that they come after a 35 point loss to Miami in which we let the refs get in our head and become lackadaisical. We've responded by playing some of our most intense basketball (the first 2 quarters of the Charlotte game excluded) of the season.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

                            For those of you that were not around in the 90's Dale Davis is the original founding member of the smash mouth team.
                            "He wanted to get to that money time. Time when the hardware was on the table. That's when Roger was going to show up. So all we needed to do was stay close"
                            Darnell Hillman (Speaking of former teammate Roger Brown)

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Paul Silas (Bobcats HC) is pissed...

                              Originally posted by Peck View Post
                              I liked your post because you liked the fact that he mentioned Dale Davis.
                              I liked your post because... well I think you know why.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X