Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: NBA.COM Indiana Pacers Season Preview

  1. #1
    All is full of Orange! Mourning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Bilthoven, The Netherlands

    Default NBA.COM Indiana Pacers Season Preview


    New 91 Is One Volatile Catalyst

    If Ron Artest were a stock, you wouldn't want to invest your life savings. In SAT terms, Ron Artest is to volatility as Jennifer Garner is to bootylicious.
    This offseason, Artest told Slam Magazine he should have been the MVP because he was the best player on the best team. Confidence is a powerful tool, but assuming those words got in front of Jermaine O'Neal, Artest ran the risk of creating a little more tension in the locker room.

    That tension surely exists already. It was reported after the playoff loss to Detroit that prior to Game 6 Artest missed a practice, a team flight, and the game-day shootaround. Not a good way to endear yourself to teammates.

    Perhaps it's fitting that Artest has apparently decided to wear number 91 a number last worn in the NBA by Dennis Rodman. Like Rodman, Artest changes games defensively when he's not undermining his team with his words or antics.

    With his mental health in check, Artest is in fact one of the league's most valuable players. If his behavior, not his play, becomes the story, the Pacers will be better off without him.


    There is no evidence to suggest that the Pacers, 61-21 a year ago, would take a precipitous drop in the standings, but it's hard to imagine them again boasting the league's best record.
    The Pacers were a Tayshaun Prince fingertip away from hosting Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Finals last year. The team returns intact, minus Al Harrington, who was traded to Atlanta for Stephen Jackson.

    Jackson excelled as a role player on the Spurs championship team, and was a prolific scorer last year in Atlanta, where somebody had to score. He will be a nice addition if he defends and can accept being the third option on offense.

    Options one and two, clearly, are Jermaine O'Neal and Ron Artest. After the Shaq/Kobe divorce, O'Neal and Artest might be the best 1-2 punch in the NBA. O'Neal, third in MVP voting, enters his ninth NBA season at the ripe old age of 26. Artest, 24, had a breakout year offensively and earned his first Defensive Player of the Year award.

    The rest of Indiana's talent is good, not great. With a nod to the lifetime achievements of Reggie Miller, he's no longer a go-to guy at age 39. In May, though, he's still worth buying a ticket to see.

    The two positions coaches typically deem the most critical are manned by committees. Jamaal Tinsley and Anthony Johnson play the point. Jeff Foster and Scot Pollard man the middle.

    Austin Croshere and Jonathan Bender continue to gather dust, flashing just enough intermittent brilliance to suggest they could shine if ever given an extended opportunity.

    O'Neal and Artest are good enough to put the Pacers in the playoffs with three players from the Indianapolis 'Y', so Indiana's questions won't be answered until May, when we see if a minor roster tweak is enough to propel them past Detroit and Miami.

    Jonathan Bender: With Al gone, could be first forward off the bench
    Stephen Jackson: Won't duplicate numbers with Hawks


    I think they're a team in turmoil, but no one ever talks about it Ron Artest is a huge factor. I don't know how long that honeymoon is going to last, considering some of the issues they had during the playoffs last season. To me, the Pacers are very talented, but there's commotion going on They have too much talent to completely flop, but they're vulnerable this year Jermaine O'Neal takes a beating like no one else in the East. If they lose him for any length of time, they're just an average team in the East I like Stephen Jackson as a player, but he also adds fuel to the fire Their luck may run out this year."
    --Eastern Conference scout

    PG Jamaal Tinsley 8.3 2.6 5.8
    SG Reggie Miller 10.0 2.4 3.1
    SF Ron Artest 18.3 5.3 3.7
    PF Jermaine O'Neal 20.1 10.0 2.1
    C Jeff Foster 6.1 7.4 0.8

    F Jonathan Bender 7.0 1.9 0.4
    F Austin Croshere 5.0 3.2 0.7
    G-F Stephen Jackson 18.1 4.6 3.1
    G Anthony Johnson 6.2 1.8 2.8
    G Fred Jones 4.9 1.6 2.1

    C David Harrison Draft
    G Rashad Wright Draft
    C John Edwards Free agent
    G Eddie Gill Free agent
    G Anthony Johnson Re-signed
    G-F Stephen Jackson Trade

    G Kenny Anderson Free agent
    G Jamison Brewer Free agent
    F Al Harrington Trade
    C Primoz Brezec Expansion

    PPG Jermaine O'Neal 20.1
    RPG Jermaine O'Neal 10.0
    APG Jamaal Tinsley 5.8
    SPG Ron Artest 2.08
    BPG Jermaine O'Neal 2.55

    Points Scored 91.4 (20th)
    Points Allowed 85.6 (3rd)
    Field-Goal Percentage .435 (19th)
    Opponents' FG% .432 (9th)
    Rebounding Diff. +1.55 (8th)"

    Your thoughts please, ladies and gentlemen. I personally feel the scouting report to be very negative of our team. Judging from this article I would say we would be just another little above average team, certainly if you then read the "previews" of say Miami and Houston .


    2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion,

    2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion,

    2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up,

  2. #2
    Fat, Drunk and Stupid Lord Helmet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Richmond, IN

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA.COM Indiana Pacers Season Preview

    Yea will people get off Artest!He changed his number to honor D.Rod not do what he did off the court.The media is dumb most of the time.Don't listen to them.I hope they keep saying bad things like "Miami is better than Indy" or "Indy can't beat the Pistons" Because that is locker wall material so we can always be motivated and play hard.
    Super Bowl XLI Champions
    2000 Eastern Conference Champions

  3. #3
    Member Ultimate Frisbee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Pasadena, CA

    Default Re: NBA.COM Indiana Pacers Season Preview

    Boooo... I don't like that preview.. Way too cynical... give the Pacers a chance to show any indication of failure before predicting that they will self destruct...

    I think we'll get the last laugh on this one though. Pacers are good and not only because of O'Neal and Artest.... that is a naive assumption that has become the common view of people who don't pay attention to basketball.
    Here, everyone have a : on me

  4. #4
    Member Ultimate Frisbee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Pasadena, CA

    Default Re: NBA.COM Indiana Pacers Season Preview

    sorry, double post
    Here, everyone have a : on me

  5. #5
    flexible and robust SoupIsGood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Lappy Go Hucky

    Default Re: NBA.COM Indiana Pacers Season Preview

    Yeah the same could be said for every team, that they will self-destruct and turmoil erupt in the locker room. What a pansy scouting report. Instead of actually focusing on basketball, they focus on personalities they know little about.

    "I think they're a team in turmoil, but know one ever talks about it...."

    Maybe there's a reason people don't talk about it?
    You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

  6. #6
    Administrator/ The Real Jay Jay@Section12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: NBA.COM Indiana Pacers Season Preview

    For the record:

    I did not write that article.

    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

  7. #7
    Administrator Unclebuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004

    Default Re: NBA.COM Indiana Pacers Season Preview

    I wonder who that eastern conference scout is. he seems a little reactionary to me as is the whole article. They make it sound lijke the pacers might fall off and win 35 games.

    Only decent analitical part of the article was the part about if the pacers lose J.O they are in trouble.

    With the loss of Al Harington, J.O is worth 20-25 games this season.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts