Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Sean Williams

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sean Williams

    I was thinking the other day about David Harrison and Josh Boone as to where they are. I read Sean Williams played in the NBADL last season for Nancy Lieberman, and did quite well. She stated she enjoyed coaching him.

    I wonder if Sean Williams has learned enough to take a flyer on him as a Big like Walsh did with Shawe Williams? What do you remember about his game? His game only PLEASE.

    Harrison had the body and footwork to be a decent Center. Last I heard he played in China.

    Boone, IIRC, played in China. All I remember is that he and Williams played for the Nets. I don't recall him being a scorer, so was he any good with "D" and rebounding? I don't remember any personal problems with him.

    Just thinking "maybe" there might be a former NBA player who could be a 4th or 5th Big. Can anyone else thing of another player of any interest?

  • #2
    Re: Sean Williams

    Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post

    I wonder if Sean Williams has learned enough to take a flyer on him as a Big like Walsh did with Shawe Williams? What do you remember about his game? His game only PLEASE.
    This is like bringing up Ron Artest and telling everyone to only talk about his game. You're stacking the argument.

    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Sean Williams

      I personally would give him a camp invite. As bad as we need a shot blocking rebounding PF, heck I would look at Roy Tarpley
      Sittin on top of the world!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Sean Williams

        Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
        Harrison had the body and footwork to be a decent Center. Last I heard he played in China.
        I'm not sure Harrison had the body. I remember when we drafted him. The commentators said he had "short arms". From then on my friends and I always referred to him as "short arms". I'd picture him in my mind playing center with little t-rex like arms.

        But that's not what you asked, is it.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Sean Williams

          All I remember about his game is that he was/is an excellent shot-blocker. I'm pretty sure his offense was nothing but dunks and lay-up. I'm not sure about his rebounding...actually I'm not 100% sure on anything I just said here.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Sean Williams

            The question isn't whether he has the skills and hops....the question is whether he has matured or not.
            Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Sean Williams

              Hulk did not have the defensive footwork. He was 10 times worse than Hibbert in his rookie year. Harrison did not improve at all while he was here.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Sean Williams

                Here's an article on Sean Williams posted just yesterday at AZCentral.com...

                Sean Williams looking for a 2nd chance in NBA

                Originally posted by Paul Coro, The Arizona Republic
                It is fitting that Sean Williams' road back to the NBA traveled through the desert Wednesday.

                Once nicknamed "Mirage," Williams always has been an illusory talent who can't help but demand a second glance.

                The Suns gave him one this week, when they included him, 13 other NBA hopefuls and first-round pick Markieff Morris in a two-day minicamp.

                With a checkered past, the New Jersey Nets' 2007 first-round pick is out to prove he is not the misfit whose immature and illegal behavior overshadowed his talent. After a year spent trying to restore his image with the D-League's Texas Legends, Williams received his first NBA evaluations since the Nets waived him last year with workouts for Memphis and Phoenix this week.

                "There are a lot of misperceptions about who I am because a lot of people don't know me," Williams, 24, said. "If you just read reports about some of my past, you might think I'm a horrible person. I'm trying to see people face to face and show them me. Everybody's trying to get to know me, see who I am and pick Sean Williams' brain.

                "Everybody knows I can play basketball. I've gotten this far through all the trouble I've been through in my life. It's just being the best person I can possibly be on and off the court. That's what is going to help me be a professional in this league."

                Williams' NBA stint nearly mirrored his troubled times at Boston College that dropped his draft stock to No. 17 in 2007. He was a risk then but New Jersey was blinded by the 6-foot-10 power forward's athleticism and defensive prowess.

                At Boston College, he had a marijuana arrest and was dismissed from the team for repeated rules violations.

                With New Jersey, he was arrested in 2009 on a Nets road trip when he threw a computer monitor in a cellphone store. He was waived in January 2010.

                Williams played 14 games in China and two in Puerto Rico before asking Dallas General Manager Donnie Nelson for a spot to play for his D-League affiliate near Williams' hometown of Arlington, Texas. He averaged 14.4 points, 9.4 rebounds and 2.9 blocks for a Texas team coached by Nancy Lieberman, a friend of Suns coach Alvin Gentry for 35 years.

                "She speaks highly of him," Gentry said. "He's real athletic and does some good things as far as shot-blocking.

                "She said he was easy for her to coach. That's all I can judge it by. He seems to be working hard out here and seems to be focused on what he's trying to do as far as getting back in the league."

                Suns scout Dan Panaggio recommended Williams after watching his D-League play, as he did for camp invitees Jerel McNeal and Tasmin Mitchell of the D-League.

                "Sean swallowed his pride to play in the D-League and his numbers were solid," Suns Director of Player Personnel John Treloar said.

                With limited free agency spending room, the Suns might be inclined to take a risk based on potential.

                Williams said he slowed down the hurried way he played in New Jersey but knows teams want to see his off-court performance even more.

                He defines his mistakes as "a young man growing up" but claims to have a renewed motivation.

                "The motivation's always been there, especially on the court," he said.

                "I just switched motivation and gave it a different direction, taking it more off the court the last two years."
                Production-wise, he's basically a slightly better version of Solo Jones who's still young enough (24) to have some perceived potential:



                I'd be ok with giving him a chance as a Solo replacement, bottom-of-the-bench big man.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Sean Williams

                  Anyone know anything about Josh Boone presently or what his game is?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Sean Williams

                    Originally posted by 90'sNBARocked View Post
                    I personally would give him a camp invite. As bad as we need a shot blocking rebounding PF, heck I would look at Roy Tarpley
                    Man what a waste.

                    I saw this guy play in person several times when he was young and this may be the one story of a player who made it to the NBA, had the skill set to have an all-star career & blew it all away on drugs. A lot of people have the skill set & lose it to drugs but there aren't many who make it all the way to the NBA.

                    Roy was legit. 7' tall with a wide body and a sweet shot, but was also able to bang in the post.


                    Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Sean Williams

                      I've always really liked Josh Boone's game.

                      I don't know what his contract is with China, but if he's a FA over there, I'd be happy to bring him here.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Sean Williams

                        Originally posted by Peck View Post
                        Man what a waste.

                        I saw this guy play in person several times when he was young and this may be the one story of a player who made it to the NBA, had the skill set to have an all-star career & blew it all away on drugs. A lot of people have the skill set & lose it to drugs but there aren't many who make it all the way to the NBA.

                        Roy was legit. 7' tall with a wide body and a sweet shot, but was also able to bang in the post.
                        Ya know my friend the funny/sad/ironic/ thing about the whole connection to drugs and the NBA. The players like Michael Ray Richardson and Roy Tarpley and William Bedford, and so on all had issues with cocaine that brought down their career and personal life

                        Since the late 90's and beyond I cant recall a player getting into trouble for cocaine as it seems marajuana is the drug of choixe

                        regardless of how you feel personally it seems that those that smoked were at least able to continue to lead productive lives , while cocaine destroyed theirs

                        "cocaine is a hell of a drug" - Rick James
                        Sittin on top of the world!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Sean Williams

                          Originally posted by GrangeRusHibbert View Post
                          I'd be ok with giving him a chance as a Solo replacement, bottom-of-the-bench big man.
                          I'd rather just resign Solomon Jones than his slightly better, arrest riddled, clone.
                          "I had to take her down like Chris Brown."

                          -Lance Stephenson

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Sean Williams

                            David Harrison is playing in Guangdong Foshan along with Fred Jones and Stephon Marbury lol Harrison is a 22ppg guy over there lol
                            http://www.niubball.com/2010/12/its-cba-media-day/

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Sean Williams

                              Originally posted by 90'sNBARocked View Post
                              Since the late 90's and beyond I cant recall a player getting into trouble for cocaine as it seems marajuana is the drug of choixe
                              Chris "Birdman" Andersen enjoyed the white stuff. And it cost him two seasons.
                              "I had to take her down like Chris Brown."

                              -Lance Stephenson

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X