Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

    Originally posted by Lou Bega View Post
    sweep of the Giants over the wknd.

    Very good.

    Gomes only trade @ deadline.

    I read Jayson Stark calling Cincy losers for not making any moves. I dont consider the Reds losers. There was no huge name worth giving up quliaty talent or prospects for. Cleveland gave up a lot for Jimenez. Mets pretty much paid for Beltran to leave. Lets see how Cozart /Heisey/Chapman/Frazier/Alonzo play when they get more bats. Give the young guys a chance to be in a pennant race and play some meaningful games. This will lead to better evaluation of these players and then the organization knows what it has talent wise. I really believe Rolen would have been moved if healthy. Shame his shoulder didnt hold up this season.
    We really needed to make a move. Alonso especially is ripe to move. Votto blocks his path to the majors and he is ready for the big leagues now. Obviously I wasn't privy to these conversations, but we have the assets and I am a little upset we didn't do anything. I agree though, Jimenez scares me and I'm glad it was the Indians who took that risk and not us.

    Comment


    • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

      The Reds have several quality pro ready players in their system. The problem is these guys are not all star worthy prospects. Yes, they may be everyday quality players in the show. ie Jeff Keppinger but nothing to net an impact player.

      The problem is not the pitching (IMO) The problem is the lack of moving runners in scoring position and scoring runs. What impact bats were available Beltran/Pence.

      Pirates were considered buyers and all they picked up were Ryan Ludwick & Derreck Lee. I would rather have Alonzo then trade him for either of those players for a short term fix. Ludwick is not going to beat the Phils.

      I read the cincy papers, follow 700 WLW, & The team is not in panic mode. They think they can still win the division as assembled. If not, then make moves. Let the Players play it out this season. They are the returning division champions. We did move Gomes to clear the way for Alonzo & Heisey. Cozart down Frazier steps up. Next man In much like the Colts!!!

      Comment


      • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

        The Pirates were extremely cautious buyers. They know damn good and well they shouldn't be doing as well as they are right now and that their time to strike is still a year or two away. They weren't going to give up anything good to land a real impact player like Beltran or Pence, so they made the deals for Ludwick and Lee that I'm not sure actually make them any better. It might appease their fanbase in thinking they were buyers, but those two aren't going to have much of an impact imo.

        As for the Reds, of course they aren't in panic mode. Why should they be? They are still in the playoff race and their core is still very good. No reason to panic at all. The team is disappointing this year and they still need a frontline, bonafide #1 starter. Cueto has played the role well this year, but the other members of the rotation have underwhelmed. The offense was full of timely hits last year and it seems as if they have run out of a bit of that magic this year. The sweep of the Giants was huge. They absolutely have to win this series in Houston that starts tonight. The Astros are ****ing awful and should be considered a Triple A team at this point. Honestly, we need to sweep them, hope the Brewers/Cardinals beat up on each other, and that Pittsburgh comes back down to earth a little, which they have started to do.

        Comment


        • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

          Jockety want to win the war. He is looking towards next season.

          Rasmus is gone from St Louis.

          Prince (Brew Crew) & Big Al (Louie) are FA's

          Cubs & Houston is are looking towards 2013 @ the earliest.

          The Reds are in good long term shape.

          Last night was another hearbreaker, ball pops out of Hannigans glove. Word is Edison has been pitching well in Louisville. Travis Wood is still having control issues.

          Comment


          • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

            Nick Massett frustrated me so much last night. I wanted Willis to get that W so bad.. Pitched some pretty good innings, then when Dusty left him out there to bat one more time, he hit a HR! He single handedly gave the team the lead as he was being sat down.. Then Massett couldn't do anything right and got 5 guys on base in a row..

            Reds are so close to getting things together, looked fine last night, Massett just was a huge weakness when he came in last night.

            EDIT: always seems to be just one thing that is missing. Last night it was just Massett, a lot of times lately its been lack of hits while we have runners on.. Just got to put everything together!
            Last edited by Ownagedood; 08-04-2011, 01:58 PM.

            Comment


            • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

              Massett was traded for Ken Griffey Jr. He has had a roller coaster year. Started out terrible, was the best pitcher in the rotation for a stretch, and now back down. They got him thinking he could be a potential closer. I'll give him another season before I judge him.

              Arthur Rhodes got cut in Tx and Also Jared Burton is throwing again. He is scheduled to pitch 2 innings next outing.

              It has been a frustrating season. Losing 2 of 3 to a team 40 games under .500 upsets me but I didnt have the hand/eye cordination, speed, power, or throwing arm to play for them Season.

              Comment


              • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

                Reds are done this season. We need to trade Ramon Hernandez via waivers and call up Mesoraco to get some big league experience.

                Comment


                • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

                  I'll be seeing Mesoraco and co. in person on the 13th. My girlfriend and I are taking a trip to Louisville to see the Riverbats take on the Indianapolis Indians. Pretty excited to see Mesoraco and Dave Sappelt in action.

                  Comment


                  • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

                    Originally posted by cdash View Post
                    Reds are done this season. We need to trade Ramon Hernandez via waivers and call up Mesoraco to get some big league experience.
                    I believe. I really like what these call ups are bringing. Cozart was on fire then injury. Frazier has been doing decent. D Willis is pitching well. We just need a bat in the middle of the order to get going. Votto was hitting against Houston.

                    Comment


                    • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

                      Originally posted by Lou Bega View Post
                      I believe. I really like what these call ups are bringing. Cozart was on fire then injury. Frazier has been doing decent. D Willis is pitching well. We just need a bat in the middle of the order to get going. Votto was hitting against Houston.
                      I believe in our future, but this season we have fallen too far behind the suddenly scorching hot Brewers. We have too many teams to leapfrog, too many injuries, and we just aren't playing that well.

                      Comment


                      • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

                        Sadly, I agree the Reds are done this year.

                        Just lost to the Cubs today. That about sums up the year, eh?

                        Sucks, a lot of wasted potential.
                        Super Bowl XLI Champions
                        2000 Eastern Conference Champions




                        Comment


                        • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

                          Gunna lose to the Cubs again today and like it!

                          Comment


                          • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

                            Sappelt looks good! That guy can swing the bat and that's just what they need. WTF happened to Jay Bruce? He is looking horrible lately. I used to love when he came to the plate.

                            Comment


                            • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

                              Originally posted by presto123 View Post
                              Sappelt looks good! That guy can swing the bat and that's just what they need. WTF happened to Jay Bruce? He is looking horrible lately. I used to love when he came to the plate.
                              How'd you like that 3-run shot in the 1st inning? I love Bruce-Bruce but his bat has been dead lately.

                              I really like Sappelt, and was looking forward to seeing him in Louisville this Saturday but the Reds obviously had other plans. If they call up Mesoraco before Saturday I'm gonna be pissed.

                              Comment


                              • Re: 2011 CINCINNATI REDS THREAD

                                Originally posted by SMosley21 View Post
                                How'd you like that 3-run shot in the 1st inning? I love Bruce-Bruce but his bat has been dead lately.

                                I really like Sappelt, and was looking forward to seeing him in Louisville this Saturday but the Reds obviously had other plans. If they call up Mesoraco before Saturday I'm gonna be pissed.
                                Well I hope they call him up right after you see him then.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X