Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Artest is still worth the trouble - post from 10/26/03

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Artest is still worth the trouble - post from 10/26/03

    I found this article I wrote a year ago, and still agree with it, so I thought I would re-post it.


    http://www.pacersdigest.com/articles...uck102603.html

    __________________________________________________



    Artest Is Worth The Trouble
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    October 26, 2003

    By Unclebuck
    Staff Writer


    When the Pacers acquired Ron Artest from the Chicago Bulls in February of 2002, many Pacers fans had no idea what they were getting. Most knew he was a good defender but beyond that most fans had no idea. Who knew he was as good an all around player as he is and who knew the troubles he would cause.

    Those troubles have led to a summer filled with rumors about Ron being traded. The common thought was that Bird and Carlisle would not be able to coexist with Ron Artest.

    Ron Artest is the most controversial player in the Pacers NBA history. His on-court problems have been well publicized. Many have asked why don't the Indiana Pacers just get rid of the guy. He is not worth the trouble. Surely they could get something for him.

    Lets check in and see just what Carlisle is saying about Ron right now as the Pacers get set to open the 2003-2004 NBA season. From the Indianapolis Star preview section Sunday October 26, 2003.

    Carlisle loves his energy and confidence."He's a unique person, and I mean that in a very good way," Carlisle said. "You don't run across guys like him every day in this league and it's fun being around him."Carlisle was witness to the uniqueness of Artest after practice the morning of the Pacers' preseason game with Minnesota on Oct. 17. Artest wanted to stay and continue working out. Carlisle told him to go home and save his energy for the game that night. Artest threw a fit, then went home and played on the court behind his house. He came back a few hours later to score 30 points against the Timberwolves."His energy never seems to waver and I find that remarkable," Carlisle said.

    Sounds as though the new coach is starting to like Ron Artest almost as much as former coach Isiah Thomas. Why is that? Why do his coaches like him so much. What do they know that most of the national media does not know. Two things, Ron is a fanatical worker and he is also a very talented NBA basketball player. Artest is simply too good to get rid of.

    What makes a player work as hard as Ron? Where does that desire come from? We have all heard the stories about his work ethic and how in March of 2002 while the Pacers team was in Detroit, Ron went to a local park after the game day shoot around just so he could continue to play basketball. One gets the sense that Ron wished the NBA season lasted 12 months a year and that they played a game every night and had a three hour hard practice each and every morning. Ron Artest has a desire to be a great basketball player.

    I don't know about other Pacers fans, but this Pacer fan wishes there were 11 other players on the Pacers roster just like Ron. If every player had his work ethic, his desire, his basketball ability the Pacers would not ever lose in the first round of the playoffs again.

    The sad thing is Ron Artest should be well known for his play on the court, for his talent, for his tenacious defense, but instead he is best known for his antics. This should upset Artest to no end. Hopefully he is determined to change his public persona. He should be the player the NBA markets as everything good in todays NBA. He should be an example for kids about the value of hard work and the ability to overcome adversity.

    The NBA would be a much better league if every player played as hard as Ron and if every player wanted to win as badly as Ron does.

    I'll never forget a scene from the Pacers - Dallas Mavs game last Thanksgiving at Conseco Fieldhouse. The Pacers were leading by 9 points with just over 2 minutes to play in the game. The Mavs had just scored five straight points so the Pacers called a timeout and in the huddle Ron Artest is screaming at his teammates. As his teammates tried to calm Ron down he just kept saying I want to kill them, kill them. kill them. The fans who were seated near the bench looked a little bit scared. I had a huge smile on my face, I wish all 12 players had the same attitude.

    What about Ron's troubles. His outbursts, his flagrant fouls , his distractions, afterall wasn't Ron the reason the Pacers ended the season 11-19 after starting the season 37-15. Perhaps he was a factor in the collapse, but what people don't want to admit is that Ron was a huge part of the Pacers 37-15 record. Without Ron the Pacers were 5-8 last season. With Ron their record was 43-26.

    Will Ron mature, will he learn to control his temper, I say yes, I say he is worth the trouble, worth the gamble. People seem to forget Ron Artest is still only 23 years old.

    The best way to control Artest is to give him more responsibility, more influence on the team, more leadership opportunities. Put more on his shoulders. Bring him into the inner circle of the team. Use him as an example of what Pacer basketball is all about.

    Could all this blow up, could Artest's temper ruin his career and the Pacers franchise. Yes it could, however he is too good a player, too good a person to give up on. There is not a false bone in Ron's body, he does not do anything to try an get publicity, he is in many ways the anti-Rodman. Ron wants to do the right thing, he wants to play by the rules but he loses his temper from time to time and can't help himself. Dennis Rodman was all about self promotion.

    Ron's offensive game has improved each and every summer. This year he is much quicker and a much better ball handler. In the preseason he was regularly beating his man off the dribble again and again, even Kevin Garnett had trouble defending Artest.

    Artest's greatest benefit to the Pacers is not his defense, not his offense, not his rebounding or any of that. It is the energy, the toughness both mentally and physically that he brings. Artest brings a swagger and a level of confidence that propels his teammates to do things they otherwise would not or could not do. Look at how much trouble most young players have excelling in the playoffs, Al Harrington and Jonathan Benders and young players throughout the whole NBA struggle in the playoffs, but not Ron. I get the sense that Ron feels most at home in the playoffs because that is the only time the other players are playing as hard as he is.

    Ron Artest is the Pacers best creator, he makes a greater number of good passes, he creates more offense for others than any other player on the team. When the shoot clock winds down the ball often is on Ron's hands and he often can make a play.

    The more you see Ron play the more you like him. Really the only way to truly appreciate his basketball playing ability is to see him in person, you cannot appreciate his overall game on TV. As Tom Tolbert said in the playoff series against the Celtics last season the more you see Ron the more you like him.

    Tommy Heinsoln says that no one does a better job of defending Paul Pierce one-on-one than Ron Artest.

    Like it or not, like Ron or not, but the Pacers will only go as far as Ron can take them.

    The Pacers need Ron Artest, he is the most important player on the team, maybe not the best or the most valuable, but he is the most important.

    Will he have a perfect season, not get any flagrant fouls, not get any technicals, not lose control and throw things, no of course not. But I do predict a much more in control player in every aspect of his game.

    Perhaps I am being selfish, I admit I love the way Ron plays, I love watching him play basketball. Next time you get a chance to see a Pacers game in person watch Ron for a part of the game exclusively and you'll see what I am talking about. He is fun to watch.

    No Ron Artest should not be traded he is the heart and soul of this team, and yes he is worth the trouble.


    [edit=24=1095255162][/edit]
    Last edited by Unclebuck; 03-01-2010, 09:30 AM.

  • #2
    Re: Artest is still worth the trouble

    OT: vapacersfan please check you PMs.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Artest is still worth the trouble

      Interesting morning. First Buck mentions the Artest/Anthony duel and then I stumble across this.
      The Most Common Cause of Stress is Dealing with Idiots

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Artest is still worth the trouble

        I'm adding something to the thread title. First because I can, second because I don't want anyone to think this is soemthing new I just wrote, it was from 2003 a full year before the brawl.

        Re-reading it now to see what I wrote back then
        Last edited by Unclebuck; 03-01-2010, 10:45 AM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Artest is still worth the trouble - post from 10/26/03

          Even after the brawl, up until Ron forced the trade with his selfish immaturity, my brother-in-law and I both still felt exactly the way you did when you posted that article. He was easily the most important, and in our opinions, most valuable player on the Pacers even above the 3rd place in the league MVP voting JO, and we did not feel it was close. Just our opinions, of course.

          My brother-in-law even had just received an Artest jersey that he had requested for Christmas immediately before (maybe even just a day or two before) Ron went to the media about wanting out of here. What a kick in the...I will say "teeth" when that happened after the continuing public support he still had received here despite everything due to his skills and the fact we wanted so much to believe he was maturing in front of our eyes.

          What might have been...

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Artest is still worth the trouble - post from 10/26/03

            Up until he requested the trade I was perfectly fine with him being on the team... even considering the brawl I thought he was an amazing player that was worth the trouble. Just think what the current team could do with a defender like him.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Artest is still worth the trouble - post from 10/26/03

              Didn't Ron say he changed his mind after he demanded a trade? Did he a Jermaine get along?

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Artest is still worth the trouble - post from 10/26/03

                Originally posted by Hitman02 View Post
                Didn't Ron say he changed his mind after he demanded a trade? Did he a Jermaine get along?
                Yes, but you can't go by anything ron says. No

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Artest is still worth the trouble - post from 10/26/03

                  I agree that he's very talented, I also agree that he's worth the trouble --- for someone else.
                  There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Artest is still worth the trouble - post from 10/26/03

                    Also loved and supported Ron right up till the "I want a trade" moment. In that moment I switched to an opinion that he was actually pretty selfish and just wanted to get to LA.

                    Surprise, surprise, look where he found his way to.


                    His behavior as a disruption is blown out of proportion based on how people talk about him. I even heard Morey talking him up despite the underwear stuff and things like that. He talked him up like this was just part of the quirkiness that was Ron, but that he wasn't a mean person or an unlikeable person.


                    But I do think he wanted to be a bigger star and saw scoring more and LA as the keys to that.


                    I did love rooting for him though. I hate how people have thrown the 61 win team under the bus. That was the most intimidating defensive team we've every fielded. They just ran into the Pistons. The two teams battled hard and IMO were clearly the top 2 teams that year. Had the Pistons not picked up Sheed for free I think Ron would be a big reason why we had an NBA title banner in Conseco.

                    One thing we lost with Ron and Jackson was serious fire. Right now I think you get most of that from Hibbert, with dashes by DJones and Danny. Otherwise it's pretty lifeless.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Artest is still worth the trouble - post from 10/26/03

                      I HATE it when people bump old threads.
                      “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” - Winston Churchill

                      “If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning.” - Catherine Aird

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Artest is still worth the trouble - post from 10/26/03

                        Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                        One thing we lost with Ron and Jackson was serious fire. Right now I think you get most of that from Hibbert, with dashes by DJones and Danny. Otherwise it's pretty lifeless.
                        Tyler and Jeff?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Artest is still worth the trouble - post from 10/26/03

                          Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                          Tyler and Jeff?
                          Tyler?
                          Jeff?

                          Bueller?
                          Bueller?
                          Bueller?
                          Bueller?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Artest is still worth the trouble - post from 10/26/03

                            He was never worth it.
                            And he's not been the same player since he decided that he wanted to be a scorer.
                            Good riddance.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Artest is still worth the trouble - post from 10/26/03

                              Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                              Tyler and Jeff?
                              Tyler will give that when he hopefully returns to health, and hopefully Jeff will again as well.

                              Hibbert gives a LOT of positive team spirit, but I am not sure about "fire". Might happen as he gains further confidence, though.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X