Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Time to Trade: Eastern Conference

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Time to Trade: Eastern Conference

    http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=18298
    By Joel Bingham

    With the Orlando Magic having steamrolled the two best teams in the NBA over the course of the last week, we have a great example of what a big trade (or in Orlando's case, two big trades) can do for a franchise.

    Also, now that December 15th has come and gone and all the summer's free agent signings can be included in deals, it opens up a whole new realm of possibilities for all the potential trades hanging around out there in basketball purgatory.

    The trade deadline is less than two months away, and teams are far enough into their seasons to know what their weaknesses are and who they'd be willing to move. It's trading time, ladies and gentlemen, and over the next couple of days, Lang Greene and I will be looking at every team in the league in terms of what they can move, as well as what they'd like to get back in return.

    We'll start today with the Eastern Conference, with the West coming tomorrow.

    Atlanta Hawks – Just like they've done the last few years, the Hawks are quietly one of the better teams in the Eastern Conference, posting a 19-12 record, good for what would be the fourth seed in the playoffs. They're going to be a playoff team with a reasonable seeding, so getting their roster right before the deadline is important, especially as they decide what to do with Jamal Crawford and his expiring contract.

    Assets: Jamal Crawford, SG (1 year, $10.1 million), Maurice Evans, SG (1 year, $2.5 million), Mike Bibby, PG (2 years, $11.8 million). Crawford could very easily walk at the end of the season if not offered a proper extension, so the team may look to move him to avoid losing him for nothing. He'll be the guy most coveted by other teams. Hawks' backup point guard Jeff Teague has shown flashes of promise this season, perhaps making Bibby a player that could be moved if the returning player were good enough. Evans has a great salary for what he brings to the table, and the fact that it's an expiring deal makes him worthwhile, too. Atlanta has a few other inexpensive expiring guys (Jason Collins, Etan Thomas, Josh Powel, Pape Sy) that could be added to deals as well.

    What They're Looking For: More than anything, they could use a real center so Al Horford can actually play some power forward. Not that there are a lot of marquee centers being dangled around out there, but the Hawks need some size down low.

    Boston Celtics – It's hard to complain if you're a Celtics fan. The team has gone 23-5 through the 2010 portion of the season, and they've done it all without their starting center, Kendrick Perkins, and only 19 games from Shaquille O'Neal. Even with Rajon Rondo a little shaky, they've still been dominant. What trade could get them to do any better?

    Assets: Not a whole lot, honestly, unless someone is interested in Marquis Daniels's $2.5 million expiring contract.

    What They're Looking For: Just to keep the guys they've got healthy. They're dangerous enough as it is.

    Charlotte Bobcats – Things are sort of coming unraveled in North Carolina, what with Larry Brown having recently stepped down from the head coaching position amidst a disappointing 9-19 start to the season. The team made the postseason for the first time last year and were supposed to build on that momentum. Instead things are looking a little rough and some sort of trade from Michael Jordan's organization seems inevitable.

    Assets: Looking at the lineup it's hard to believe that anybody is untouchable, but some of the contracts would be more difficult to move than others. Stephen Jackson is safe, both because of his production and his money remaining (3 years, $28.8 million), and Tyrus Thomas just signed a pricy and lengthy extension through 2015. Also, DeSagana Diop's albatross contract (2 years, $13.5 million, plus a $7.3 million player option for a third year) is pretty rough, but that hasn't stopped him from being included in rumors. Beyond that, nobody is officially on the books beyond 2012, with Gerald Wallace being the most desirable asset of the batch. If the Bobcats are really looking to make a splash, he'd be the player to dangle out there.

    What They're Looking For: A marquee point guard. Losing Ray Felton has proven to be more costly than Charlotte imagined, and while D.J. Augustin has played fairly well as the new full-time starter, an upgrade is necessary for the team have much of a shot at getting back to the playoffs—if not this season, then next. Baron Davis has been in the news as a possibility here, and he makes a lot of sense for the Bobcats.

    Chicago Bulls – I think we all know how much better these Bulls are compared to every single other Bulls season since Jordan retired, but the right trade could be the difference between Chicago taking a big step in the right direction this season, or legitimately having a shot at the NBA Finals, which is less absurd than it sounds.

    Assets: Taj Gibson, PF (2 years, $2.3 million, not including options at end of rookie deal), James Johnson (2 years, $3.5 million, not including options at end of rookie deal), SF, Ronnie Brewer, SG (3 years, $13.9 million), C.J. Watson, PG/SG (2 years, $6.5 million, with a team option for a third year at $3.7 million), Keith Bogans, SG (2 years, $3.3 million), Omer Asik, C (2 years, $3.6 million). Gibson will be the hottest commodity, but Johnson and Asik should hold some value as well—short, inexpensive deals for players with high upsides. Also, if the Bulls do make a deal for a shooting guard, Bogans or Brewer will likely have to be included to avoid a glut at that position. Kyle Korver could be included instead, but I get the sense he's the one two guard the team is least inclined to move due to his ability to hit threes and spread the floor.

    What They're Looking For: Not a single one of Chicago's three shooting guards is good enough to be an NBA starter. All are affable backups, but with Keith Bogans starting (or Kyle Korver or Ronnie Brewer, should Bogans ever lose his spot), the Bulls just don't look like a championship team. More than anything else, the Bulls need to find the right two-guard, and Jamal Crawford (mentioned above) could potentially have a great second stint in the Windy City. Other ideas that have been thrown around include Richard Hamilton (who probably is too expensive long-term) and O.J. Mayo. Finding a back-up center less raw than Omer Asik and less old than Kurt Thomas would help a lot, too, especially with Joakim Noah likely out until after the All-Star Break. And as hot as C.J. Watson can get shooting the ball, the team really has no true point guard to run the team should Derrick Rose end up hurt.

    Cleveland Cavaliers – It's time to blow this thing up. At 8-22, they're the fourth-worst team in the league right now, and there's absolutely nothing keeping that from getting worse as the teams behind them (Washington, Minnesota, and Sacramento) all have plenty of room for improvement. With LeBron gone, it's time to rebuild, and in order to do that properly, the team will need to make a few moves to wipe the slate.

    Assets: Antawn Jamison, SF (2 years, $28.4 million), Mo Williams, PG/SG (1 year, $9.3 million, with a player option for $8.5 million the following year), Anderson Varejao, C (4 years, $35.2 million, with a team option for a fifth year at $9.8 million), Jamario Moon, SF (1 year, $2.97 million, with a team option for a second year $3.2 million), Anthony Parker, SG (1 year, $2.9 million). While Varejao has got himself a rather lengthy contract, he's the player other teams seem to be most interested in. He's young enough to include in the rebuilding process, but for the right returns, moving him may be what's best for the future of the organization. Cashing out Jamison and Williams, however, should be the team's first priority.

    What They're Looking For: Draft picks, cap space, and young assets. That's the holy triumvirate of the rebuilding process, and it's the route Cleveland should be taking at this deadline if at all possible.

    Detroit Pistons – We've been saying it all year; the Pistons are stuck between a burgeoning youth movement and the remnants of their championship past. There's no need to keep all those veteran contracts on the payroll when the team clearly isn't in a position to be competitive any time soon, so moving a few of the team's bigger names, though painful, is what should be in the cards for Detroit. It probably won't be, knowing Joe Dumars's loyalty to his veteran guys, but it should be.

    Assets: Tayshaun Prince, SF (1 years, $11.1 million), Rip Hamilton, SG (3 years, $38 million), Ben Wallace, C (2 years, $4.3 million). Prince will be the easiest to move, but that doesn't mean there isn't a market for Hamilton, as well. Both players still have some gas in the tank, but their talents are being wasted on a team that doesn't appear to be going anywhere.

    Indiana Pacers – Indy has hovered right around .500 all year, which in the East is probably good enough for a playoff spot should that trend continue. If they want to actually win a series, though—and that hasn't happened for quite a while—they'll need to make some moves. Luckily for them, they've got an asset or two to work with.

    Assets: Mike Dunleavy, SG (1 year, $10.6 million), Jeff Foster, C (1 year, $6.7 million), T.J. Ford, PG (1 year, $8.5 million), James Posey (2 years, $13.4 million). While Larry Bird and David Morway have said that they're looking forward to having the cap flexibility this summer that Dunleavy, Ford, and Foster will provide, there's no reason they shouldn't explore using those assets to make a few upgrades.

    What They're Looking For: Power forward is by far the weakest position the Pacers have, and if they can find a team with a starting-quality four they'd be willing to move for cap space, Indiana could be a perfect trading partner.


    Miami HEAT – All that stuff about the HEAT looking awful, about them not living up to the hype—it's time to forget all that. After starting the season 9-8, the HEAT have gone 14-1, even with some scattered injuries to Dwyane Wade. While it never hurts to spruce up a roster, the HEAT are going to be fine as long as the Super Friends are intact. And since they are (intact), they will be (fine).

    Assets: Not a lot. The Big Three aren't going anywhere, Udonis Haslem is too injured to move, and we haven't seen enough of Mike Miller to warrant moving him already; the organization still thinks he's a great fit for this team, and he probably is. All that leaves is a bunch of veteran minimum deals, and there isn't a whole lot they can expect to in return for those.

    What They're Looking For: The same thing we knew they'd be looking for once we got a sense of what their final roster would look like—a point guard, and a center. But again, they don't really have the assets to bring one of those in.

    Milwaukee Bucks – More than a few really smart NBA people thought that the Bucks would win the Central Division. It doesn't look like that's going to happen, especially now that Brandon Jennings is going to miss some extended time with a broken foot. It's not too late for them to gain some ground in the Eastern Conference playoff picture, and making a trade is one way that they could potentially do that.

    Assets: Michael Redd, SG (1 year, $18.3 million), Chris Douglas-Roberts, SG (1 year, $850,000, with a $1.1 million qualifying offer on deck after the season), Ersan Ilyasova (2 years, $4.9 million). Redd doesn't hold a lot of value as a player anymore, but his is one of the hugest expiring deals in the league, and that's what makes him so valuable. Beyond him and the other two guys listed above, the players on this roster are either keepers or on long-term deals that could make them hard to move.

    What They're Looking For: To be honest, this is a team with a ton of talent already. What they really need is to figure out a way to start winning some more ball games. As far as personnel is concerned, Milwaukee really isn't in all that bad of shape.

    New Jersey Nets – Well, things aren't as bad as they were a year ago, but a 9-21 start to the season isn't necessarily something we'd call marked improvement. There's some reasonable talent on this roster, as well as an owner who's willing to spend, so it seems like only a matter of time before they do something splashy.

    Assets: Devin Harris, PG (3 years, $26.8 million), Troy Murphy, PF (1 year, $12 million), Derrick Favors (in the first year of his rookie deal, which starts at $4.1 million and increases every year), Kris Humphries, SF (1 year, $3.2 million). The guys listed above are players the Nets are most likely to throw out in trade discussions, but New Jersey will give up anything they have to short of Brook Lopez in order to get their ideal target…

    What They're Looking For: Carmelo Anthony. They'll cast out a wide net once they really start getting into trade season full force, but nobody will get more attention from them than Anthony. He's their Holy Grail.

    New York Knicks – Perhaps the most surprising team of the season so far, New York's insurgence led by Amar'e Stoudemire, Ray Felton, and Danilo Gallinari has been nothing short of heartwarming. That doesn't mean that aren't interested in making a few changes, however, and you can count on them being a team involved in more than a few rumors over the course of the next several weeks.

    Assets: Eddy Curry, C (1 year, $11.3 million), Kelenna Azubuike, SG (1 year, $3.4 million), Wilson Chandler, (1 year, $2.1 million, with a qualifying offer of $3.1 million on deck for this summer). As with the New Jersey Nets, the Knicks are interested in Carmelo Anthony, and they'll trade almost anybody they've got to make that happen.

    What They're Looking For: Other than Anthony, they'd like to bring in some more size to keep Stoudemire from having to deal with all the centers in the league. Otherwise, it's hard to see them doing anything too crazy unless it's a sure-thing move. Why mess with a good thing that's just getting started, right?

    Orlando Magic – I'm not sure there's a whole lot else the Magic can do. After two huge trades recently, they don't' really have a whole lot of guys on the roster that they want to trade. That said, there's a logjam at the guard spots that could be loosened with a move, and now that Marcin Gortat is gone, Dwight Howard really needs a backup.

    Assets: J.J. Redick, SG (3 years, $21 million), Brandon Bass, PF (2 years, $8 million, with a third-year option for $4 million), Chris Duhon, PG (4 years, $14.3 million), Jason Williams (1 year, $1.4 million). Redick is a big contract to take on compared to his output, but in the right situation, he could be a big producer. As for Duhon and Williams—moving them would help relieve that glut at the guard positions.

    What They're Looking For: A back-up center and any other upgrades Otis Smith might feel are best for the team. We've heard it suggested that he isn't done yet, and he very well may not be.

    Philadelphia 76ers – As the season has progressed, the 76ers have looked more and more like a real NBA team thanks to the coaching talent of Doug Collins and a lot of eager young players trying to make their marks on the league. However, were the team able to cash out Elton Brand for almost anything, the Philly fandom would be elated. Not that Brand's been horrible or hurt this year, because he hasn't. It's just that he's not as much in the long term plans of this organization as they thought he'd be when they signed him to that monster contract a couple years ago.

    Assets: Elton Brand (3 years, $51.2 million), Andre Iguodala (3 years, $40.6 million, with a fourth-year player option for $15.9 million), Jason Kapono (1 year, $6.6 million), Darius Songaila (1 year, $4.8 million). Moving Brand is most likely a pipe dream, but if it's going to happen they'll have to package him with youth, draft picks, and cap space. Philly has a little bit of all of that, but finding a taker is still going to be tough. Finding a taker for Iguodala would be quite a bit easier, but they aren't letting him go unless they're getting a superstar in return. Iggy's value is high right now, so the Sixers are going to try and maximize it.

    What They're Looking For: Upgrades pretty much everywhere except point guard and small forward. The team is happy with Jrue Holiday and Iguodala, but nobody else on the roster has been so great that they couldn't be improved upon.

    Toronto Raptors – This is a very, very young team, and the real conundrum about where to go with this team moving forward is whether to ship off what little veteran influence there is left on this team in favor of a complete youth movement, or to bring in a couple more vets and see if those young players can transform into solid role guys for a more experienced team.

    Assets: Peja Stojakovic, SF (1 years, $15.3 million), Jose Calderon (3 years, $29.3 million). Jerryd Bayless is the point guard the franchise wants to move forward with, which means that even after moving Jarrett Jack, Calderon is still on the block. Leandro Barbosa is tradable too, as are a number of the younger guys on the roster, but if something is going to be done, it's more likely to involve a veteran than a youngster.

    What They're Looking For: Star power. It's easy to point out the team's need for a veteran big man ever since a certain someone left a Chris Bosh-sized hole in the Toronto starting lineup, but the truth is that they just need someone who's going to come with not only years under his belt, but also an air of confidence that can rub off on a young group that doesn't necessarily believe in itself.

    Washington Wizards – Dumping Gilbert Arenas for Rashard Lewis was a great start for Washington this trading season, but even with a Rookie of the Year candidate and quite a bit of talent on the roster, this is still the worst team record-wise in the Eastern Conference. They need to keep exploring their options and see what else they can get done.

    Assets: Josh Howard, SF (1 year, $3 million), JaVale McGee (2 years, $4 million, with a $3.5 million qualifying offer on deck for the summer of 2012), Al Thornton (1 year, $2,8 million, with a $3.9 million team option for next season). There's not a whole lot left here that other teams would be knocking down the door to get at, but McGee has been disappointing this season and just hasn't clicked with Wizards head coach Flip Saunders. There's no question he's got promise, and at that money he could be worth taking a gamble on.

    What They're Looking For: Another veteran who takes the game as seriously as Lewis and Kirk Hinrich. Those two, along with John Wall, are the kind of players Washington should be building their team around. If they can turn some of their less mature younger players into vets that know how to prepare and get through a full NBA season, they'll be in much better shape.
    Sittin on top of the world!

  • #2
    Re: Time to Trade: Eastern Conference

    James Posey a trade asset LOL

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Time to Trade: Eastern Conference

      Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
      James Posey a trade asset LOL
      I think he is, I could see him on a bunch of teams as a small minutes sniper, defender off the bench.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Time to Trade: Eastern Conference

        The only way a trade will make us better is if we get a four who can fit into JOBs idea of a Power Forward (ie Antoine Walker, Troy Murphy). We need a Channing Frye type player, one that has a good mid and long range game, and can decently defend in the post, bringing in a block or two per game and 6-10 boards per night. Problem is, not many players meet his requirements, and there are even less available. If you look at his successful teams, you see that his basketball philosophy, and style are ones that can both work, and succeed at the NBA level, but like all unique styles (fast break, triangle etc.) of play, certain players are needed to work. As of now our team doesn't match the coach. This doesn't mean JOB is a bad coach, not at all. It just means we need to decide if we wanna build our team around his style. In 2001-2002 the Celts lead the league in 3pa, and 3pm. And even went to the ECF with JOB's system, but when you look at the roster, that is where his success lies. That team, like the successful UK Wild Cat teams that Pitino coached, where all deep rooted in three point shooting. The Celts team thrived on the scoring of sf Pierce and pf Walker, and was supported by the scoring of several sporadic scoring threats; Rodney Rodgers, Eric Williams, Erick Strickland, Tony Delk, Joe Johnson, and Walter McCarty. The big guys on that team? Antoine Walker (if you can call him a big man), Vitaly Potapenko, Tony Battie, McCarty and Mark Blount. And that team made it to the ECF. So dont blame the guy to much, he is just trying to play his basketball, with the guys he has been given. I really dont care for it, but it is proven, just under different circumstances. It seems like Bird is drafting particular players, with a certain idea for each in mind, and up until this season, we have been extremely feed up with this team (at least most of us). I dont think JOB is a bad coach, just not the coach our team needs, the Suns squad would be great, or Toronto could be decent also.
        "Did we learn anything?"-Jonathan Ames

        "No, but thats okay, It's a good thing to stay in the dark about things - it keeps life more interesting."- George Christopher

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Time to Trade: Eastern Conference

          Groundbreaking stuff here

          Comment

          Working...
          X