Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

    Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors
    Written by Peck

    Link

    For those of you that did not stay up late or better yet have access to NBA league pass and watch the Pacers play the Kings I’ll just end the suspense now for you if you didn’t already know.

    The Indiana Pacers won.

    There are lots of people doing reviews of the game so I am not going to rehash that. There is also going to be lots of talk about Danny Grangers fantastic game and if you didn’t see it he was just absolutely fabulous. There will also be lots of talk about the teams new found religious conversion to the doctrine of defense and by all means that does need to be talked about & then probably talked about some more after that.

    But what I want to do is focus on a couple of reasons why all of a sudden we are a force & my God it is hard for me to type that without literally wanting to stand up and thrust my fist in the air & let out a primal Viking like scream. But I am going to say we are a force right now and the reasons are many fold.

    But one thing and one person who may be being overlooked here is someone who was often maligned early in the season.

    Solomon Jones was benched for two games versus the Clippers and the Magic but since his return to the regular rotation he has provided the Pacers with solid relief for Roy for when he is on the floor.

    Since returning to the lineup Solomon has averaged 7 points and 5 rebounds per outing and while this next statistic can be debated in value and how it should be used it is certainly worth noting that Solomon has had the following +/- in each game.

    Versus Miami his +/- was + 21

    Versus Cleveland his +/- was + 1

    Versus Oklahoma City his +/- was + 11

    Versus Los Angeles his +/- was – 3

    Versus Sacramento his +/- was + 4

    Again you can argue the value of that particular statistic but if you watch the games you can see that when Roy has gone to the bench we have not had the dramatic drop off in talent level that we had been experiencing earlier in the season.

    Solomon has joined in with every other member of the Pacers and taken real pride in defending the paint and has been far more physical both on defense and in going after rebounds than we have seen previously in his time with the club.

    Obviously not the most glamorous of players and I’m not trying to over state his value to the current winning ways but I do believe his contributions to the club are very real and at this time very beneficial. I still shudder when I think about Roy rolling an ankle or getting in foul trouble early in a game but for the minutes he has played recently Solomon has given the Pacers good relief for Roy’s down time.

    Moving on.

    Something that I did not foresee coming this year & if you said you did you are either a liar or well no there is nothing else you are a liar, is that the Indiana Pacers have become Road Warriors. We are 6-2 away from the fieldhouse with our losses coming on the second half of a home and home series with Philadelphia and the other loss coming to the 15-2 San Antonio Spurs.

    You don’t go into other people’s houses and routinely walk away with victories unless you are playing solid defense night in and night out. Sure you can have a punchers chance of hitting a lot of long distance shots but that is not going to happen more often than it fails. The only way to have a winning record on the road is to be a defensive machine. Which as of right now you have to say that the team is a defensive machine.

    A machine that works so much better when Josh McRoberts plays on the floor for an extended period of time. Statistically Josh is not having a great season, but we are not the same team when he goes to the bench. He provides a level of toughness, rebounding and frankly panache that nobody else on the team does right now.

    If you saw the game or if you saw highlights of the game you will see a one handed throw down that he did on the fly with T.J. Ford. That was breathtakingly spectacular but it wasn’t his best play of the night. In one of the first possessions of the game he grabbed a rebound with one hand and in one fluid motion turned and whipped it length of the court to a breaking Danny Granger for an easy layup. Visions of Payton Manning to Marvin Harrison should come to mind when thinking of this if you didn’t see it. However it could be argued that equally as impressive was his block of a Jason Thompson dunk towards the end of the game. He just absolutely smothered him on that block. Also it should be noted that Josh had 7 points but only 2 of those came from the field, he was 5 of 6 from the free throw line.

    Other quick notes from the game.

    In yet further proof that this is not your Fathers Pacers (or last season for that matter) the team is now routinely coming out and getting on teams in the 3rd quarter where last year that seemed to be our waterloo. The Kings and Pacers went into the half tied at 52 but the Pacers came out swinging and outscored the Kings 28-17 in the third. This is becoming somewhat of a common event this season. While teams are always making a run to get caught up often times our lead is just enough for us to overcome their run. Tonight was no different as the Kings outscored the Pacers 29-27 in the 4th but by then it was too little to late. This is in stark contrast to last season when our team would routinely be crushed in the 3rd with no hope of overcoming the massive deficit by the end of the game.

    While it has been nice to do several Odd Thoughts without having to deal with many negatives I do have one tonight that I have to kind of point out. Really it’s almost more of a question than an observation.

    Why has Tyler Hansbrough regressed so badly this season? He looks totally lost and out of place whenever he is on the floor. I mean he is battling on the inside and attempting to rebound but on offense he doesn’t appear to have a clue and often times on defense he is missing assignments as well. I understand that he is essentially a rookie this year but he seems worse now than when he was a real rookie last year.

    Also while this isn’t so much a negative or a question but more of an observation but dang talk about cold. Jim O’Brien has left Paul George in street clothes for his only trip home for the year. I understand that Brandon certainly has earned the right to pass him by in minutes played on the floor but dang talk about timing. Now the question is has Paul regressed to the point of now not only being out of the rotation to the point of being non playable? Odd that Foster is dressed but they seem to have zero desire to use him in the games. Honestly at this point I wonder if maybe suiting up A.J. or Paul would be a better choice. But with the recent play and record it is really hard to criticize him for personnel decisions.

    Which brings me to the last point of this thread and this should be a doozey. Today’s question comes courtesy of Diamond Dave.

    What will you think if Jim O’Brien wins Coach of the Year?

    Yes I know I nearly had an airway obstruction after having a seizure just thinking about this but after further review as odd as this sounds coming from me, at the current winning pace and if the team makes the playoffs this is not out of the realm of possibilities. Nor, dare I say it, is it something that would not be earned.

    Oh what a rush!



    *beeps*

  • #2
    Re: Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

    Originally posted by RoboHicks View Post
    Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors
    Written by Peck

    We are 5-2 away from the fieldhouse with our losses coming on the second half of a home and home series with Philadelphia and the other loss coming to the 15-2 San Antonio Spurs.
    fixed

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

      If O'Brien is coach of the year (it will probably take 50 wins for that to happen) I will just laugh, and laugh and laugh and laugh as I read what seems to be the currently common refain of well yeah they are winning because Jim O'Brien is finally doing all the things we fans have wanted him to do for 3 years. Not sure that argument will carry the whole season though - but we'll see.

      More likely it will be yes the team won 51 games, but Jim O'Brien lost the team 10 games so really Jim's plus/minus is -10 so he isn't that good anyway

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

        I was thinking about Solo's recent good play and watching him closely last night. One thing I noticed is that the offense changes quite a bit with him on the floor now. At the beginning of the season when Solo came in we pretty much ran the offense just like he was Roy. He'd get the ball at the elbow, get asked to make a lot of passes and set a lot of screens. He clearly wasn't comfortable with the ball in his hands that much. Last night - and I'm going to assume this was at least partially true for the last few games even though I wasn't watching as closely - we weren't really asking Solo to handle the ball at all. He was really only given the ball when there was a quick and obvious decision that was already made for him (shoot, dribble hand-off, etc.). He looked much more comfortable and had a nice game offensively. I think this is something O'Brien should probably be given a bit of credit for.

        One other thing about this game is that the Pacers were very assertive in pushing the pace. It looked like something O'Brien emphasized before the game.

        As for the Kings, Tyreke Evans is a beast. He's added a lot of muscle since college. He killed us in the first quarter when we tried to guard him with Collison. Rush and Granger did a decent job, but he's a tough cover for anyone. However, he completely disappeared in the 3rd quarter when the Kings really needed him to step up. When you're the guy who's clearly the focal point of your offense and can score pretty much at will you can't let Luther Head make the only two shots for your team during a 6 minute stretch when you're on the floor. That would worry me a bit if I was a Kings fan.

        Cousins is good. If he and Evans mature and buy in to playing defense and playing consistently hard, the Kings will be really good in a couple of seasons.

        Also, Collison very much looked like the starter this game and TJ very much looked like the back-up. I like games like that.
        "A man with no belly has no appetite for life."

        - Salman Rushdie

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

          Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
          If O'Brien is coach of the year (it will probably take 50 wins for that to happen) I will just laugh, and laugh and laugh and laugh as I read what seems to be the currently common refain of well yeah they are winning because Jim O'Brien is finally doing all the things we fans have wanted him to do for 3 years. Not sure that argument will carry the whole season though - but we'll see.

          More likely it will be yes the team won 51 games, but Jim O'Brien lost the team 10 games so really Jim's plus/minus is -10 so he isn't that good anyway
          Well, Jim was trying really hard to lose that game last night, luckily for us Danny was on attack mode and Collison did a good job at closing the game.
          @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

            Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
            Well, Jim was trying really hard to lose that game last night, luckily for us Danny was on attack mode and Collison did a good job at closing the game.
            Really? so now Jim is trying to lose games?

            OK, I know that is not what you mean. But that is what you posted.

            If you heard Granger on the post game radio interview, you heard him give O'Brien some credit for the teams really good third quarter.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

              Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
              Really? so now Jim is trying to lose games?

              OK, I know that is not what you mean. But that is what you posted.

              If you heard Granger on the post game radio interview, you heard him give O'Brien some credit for the teams really good third quarter.
              The Pacers had an 18 points lead at one time and of course Jim brought his all star team of TJ,Posey,Solo,Dun and that lead when all the way to 9 or 8 I can't remember, that in my book is trying to lose, not only that but again he was letting DC and TJ guard a bigger guy in TE and as expected he was killing them and for some reason he was letting Cousins to get on fire and never call a play downlow to see if Demarcus " the foul magnet" could get a foul and be send to the bench.

              Regarding Danny's comments about Jim, what else do you expect him to say? He didn't trash him in three horrible years, he is not going to do it now.
              @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

                Re Jeff Foster:

                He was the first player off the bench against the Lakers. He got up, did some walking around and stretching, then went back to the bench.

                You couldn't see it on TV, but it looked like our intent was to play Jeff on Sunday but he couldn't go.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

                  Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                  The Pacers had an 18 points lead at one time and of course Jim brought his all star team of TJ,Posey,Solo,Dun and that lead when all the way to 9 or 8 I can't remember, that in my book is trying to lose, not only that but again he was letting DC and TJ guard a bigger guy in TE and as expected he was killing them and for some reason he was letting Cousins to get on fire and never call a play downlow to see if Demarcus " the foul magnet" could get a foul and be send to the bench.

                  Regarding Danny's comments about Jim, what else do you expect him to say? He didn't trash him in three horrible years, he is not going to do it now.
                  OK.

                  But Mark Boyle asked Danny why the good third quarter and Danny said coach really got into us at halftime. (he was not asked about the coach, Danny offered that up). danny could have easily said we just started playing really good defense, got out and ran.......he didn't have to mention the coach
                  Last edited by Unclebuck; 12-01-2010, 10:12 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

                    If JOB wins coach of the year, LB/Morway should win the GM of the year for getting Troy Murphy out of JOB's hands.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

                      Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                      OK.

                      But Mark Boyle asked Danny why the good third quarter and Danny said coach really got into us at halftime. (he was not asked about the coach, Danny offered that up). danny could have easily said we just started playing really good defense, got out and ran.......he didn't have to mention the coach
                      Ok this got me thinking now, are they trying to do some type of damage control in case they give Jim an extention? You are right Danny has never say anything like that before and what a better person to show that supports the coach than Danny?
                      @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

                        Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                        Well, Jim was trying really hard to lose that game last night
                        What did he do? Please enlighten me. Which decisions did he make that were poor?


                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

                          Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                          What did he do? Please enlighten me. Which decisions did he make that were poor?
                          For the first time in his tenure i thoght he coached pretty well last night. Never thoght i'd be saying im glad he left solo in at the end lol. But he let DC close the game and DC really helped us win that down the stretch. Hope he lets Dc coutuine closing.
                          Last edited by pacer4ever; 12-01-2010, 11:28 AM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

                            Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
                            For the first time in his tenure i thoght he coached pretty well last night. Never thoght i'd be saying im glad he left solo in at the end lol. But he let DC close the game and DC really helped us win that down the stretch.
                            The reason DC was at the end of the game was not because Jim had some kind of change of heart, TJ was just too horrible to stay on the game.I'll give some points to Jim for noticing this(when the lead got close to 9 points)
                            @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Odd Thoughts: Road Warriors [The Front Page]

                              Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
                              For the first time in his tenure i thoght he coached pretty well last night.
                              For the first time in my adult lifetime, I'm really proud of my franchise , and not just because JOB has done well, but because I think people are hungry for wins.
                              PSN: MRat731 XBL: MRat0731

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X