I just cannot get over the fact that we could have just signed Stephen Jackson, and used Al Harringotn in another trade. I know we have been told this is because of "financial reasons", but I really think we could have dropped some salary had we played our cards right. Erik Dampier wants to play for a winning team and wants money, I think he would have come here.
The Hawks wanted Al Harrington. We could have worked something with them in which they signed Dampier and we could have made a trade with them.
We could have traded Harrington, Foster, and Croshere for Dampier and another player if we wanted one, and dropped 4 million dollars salary. It would have basically just been Foster and Croshere for Dampier and another player, because we ended up trading Harrington for a player we could have signed.
I know some of you dont want to give Dampier a big contract, but if we could have gotten rid of Croshere's, it would have been worth it.
Instead of getting Jackson for Harrington, I really think we could have gotten Dampier, Jackson, and other player and dumped Harrington, Croshere and Foster.
Dampier, O'Neal, Artest, Jackson, Tinsley