Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers (in 2007)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers (in 2007)

    Wow, simply wow! Bet you David Stern does nothing about this.

    http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slu...cksdraft102610

    Sources: N.Y. scout led improper workouts
    By Adrian Wojnarowski

    For the past four years, the New York Knicks may have circumvented NBA draft rules by conducting secret workouts of collegiate players throughout gymnasiums in suburban Atlanta, Yahoo! Sports has found.

    Knicks director of East Coast scouting Rodney Heard coordinated and conducted the sessions, three players who were involved in some of the workouts told Yahoo! Sports – including one May 2007 session that resulted in a devastating knee injury to Kansas All-American Brandon Rush(notes). A tear of the anterior cruciate ligament in Rush’s right knee forced him to withdraw from the 2007 draft and required surgery plus six months of rehabilitation.

    In addition to the Rush session – which was an apparent violation of NBA bylaws forbidding teams from working out players before the annual predraft camp – Heard may have broken more rules by conducting predraft workouts with additional players during restricted time periods in 2007 and for excessive sessions in 2009 and 2010.
    More From Adrian Wojnarowski

    * NBA whistles while its players work Oct 14, 2010

    Rodney Heard, Knicks director of East Coast scouting
    (NBA.com)

    • League sources with knowledge of the workouts said Heard trained forward Wilson Chandler(notes) for multiple weeks before the 2007 predraft camp. The Knicks went on to draft Chandler with the 23rd overall pick that year.

    • DePaul’s Dar Tucker said Heard led two-a-day workouts for him and other players for multiple days before the 2009 draft. NBA rules limit teams to two total workouts spaced three days apart.

    • Heard also helped oversee multiple workouts in 2010 for a group of players including Baylor’s Ekpe Udoh(notes) and Notre Dame’s Tory Jackson(notes), said Jackson and a college coach who was present at the sessions. The workouts also are an apparent violation of NBA rules limiting the time teams may spend with players before each draft.

    “Rodney did most of the workouts,” Jackson said of the sessions in which he was involved. “He never really put anybody else in charge of his workouts. He wanted to run all the workouts himself, which was good.”

    The NBA has previously fined teams and suspended team officials involved in improper workouts. None of those incidents, however, covered multiple seasons or involved an injury to a player who could have been a potential lottery pick.

    Reached Monday, Heard denied being involved in any of the workouts. The NBA declined comment through a league spokesman.

    Rush, now a member of the Indiana Pacers, said he was injured during a workout with Heard at a gymnasium connected to the one-time home of former NBA player Shareef Abdur-Rahim(notes) in Marietta, Ga. Rush had previously maintained that he sustained the injury in a pick-up game in his hometown of Kansas City, Mo. Multiple NBA executives, who researched Rush for the following draft in 2008, and sources in college basketball, the sneaker industry and those close to Rush and Heard said they were aware the injury happened in a workout with the Knicks.

    “It was [during] drill work, doing a three-man weave,” Rush said in a recent interview. “I went up for a dunk, came down and that was it. It was a quick pop in my knee.”

    When asked by Yahoo! Sports whether Heard was running the workout, Rush replied: “Yeah.”

    In a memo to NBA front offices dated April 3, 2007, league attorneys warned: “Teams are prohibited from conducting or attending any workout of any draft-eligible players before the conclusion of the predraft camp.” Rush’s workout occurred before the 2007 predraft evaluation camp, which ran from May 29 to June 1 in Orlando, Fla.

    Rush said he planned to spend a week working out with the Knicks executive in suburban Atlanta prior to the camp. Rush wasn’t the only impermissible player in the gymnasium, he told Yahoo! Sports.

    “One guy I do remember was Joe Crawford(notes) from Kentucky,” he said.
    Pacers guard Brandon Rush said he injured his right knee during a workout overseen by Knicks scout Rodney Heard prior to the 2007 predraft camp.
    (NBAE/Getty Images)

    Crawford was a University of Kentucky junior and hadn’t declared for the 2007 draft. The NBA forbid team officials from having any contact with college underclassmen. When reached by Yahoo! Sports on Monday about the incident with Rush’s knee, Crawford asked, “Did Brandon tell you about this?”

    Crawford described how there was nothing awkward about the way Rush jumped or landed on his feet.

    “You don’t want to see that happen to anyone,” Crawford said. “I knew that he could be a top-five pick and I was just hoping and praying he was going to recover.”

    When asked how Heard reacted to the injury, Crawford hesitated and said: “Can I call you back in a few minutes, sir?”

    When Crawford called back several minutes later, he insisted the game was an open pick-up game and he didn’t remember seeing Heard there. Crawford and Heard have a relationship going back to their days in Detroit together.

    “There were so many people in and out of the gym there,” Crawford said.

    When reached on Monday, Heard denied he was present in suburban Atlanta when Rush suffered the knee injury.

    “That’s so far from the truth,” Heard said. “Someone called me and told me he got hurt. I was in Florida at our staff meetings.”

    When told that Rush said he was running the workout, Heard responded: “I wasn’t there. That’s a lie.”

    At the center of most of the apparent violations is Heard’s close relationship with player agent Chris Luchey, who represents Chandler, Udoh, Tucker and Jackson. Heard and Luchey founded and coached rival AAU basketball programs in Detroit, and both eventually relocated to the Atlanta area.

    Heard denied working out any Luchey clients during predraft processes in 2007, 2009 and 2010.

    “That’s not true,” Heard said.

    Luchey acknowledged that Heard had relationships with several of his clients from their shared Detroit days – including Chandler – but said, “No, Rodney never worked out Wilson before the draft. … What you’re asking … that Rodney works my players out? That’s not a true statement.”

    Former Knicks president Isiah Thomas hired Heard from the Atlanta Hawks in 2006 and still enjoys a close relationship with him. Through a school spokesman, Thomas, now the coach at Florida International University, declined to speak to Yahoo! Sports on Monday.

    Donnie Walsh, who succeeded Thomas as president of the Knicks, kept Heard and ultimately gave him a new contract. Walsh said he was unaware of Heard’s workouts under his watch in 2009 and ’10.

    “I don’t know anything about this,” Walsh said. “I didn’t know any of our scouts worked out people like this. They know they’re not supposed to.”

    By holding the workouts, Heard could gain valuable information on young prospects who may have had small samples of work on the college level. Teams can scout college games, practices and sanctioned predraft evaluation camps. Prior to 2009, team officials weren’t allowed to conduct or attend workouts before the annual predraft camp.

    The NBA altered that rule in 2009, allowing teams to run limited workouts with draft-eligible players prior to the combine. The league office reiterated in a April 6, 2010 memo: “Teams are prohibited from conducting more than two team visits per draft-eligible player prior to the draft. A ‘team visit’ includes any contact between a team representative and a draft-eligible player that is arranged for the purpose of recruiting or working out the draft-eligible player, including for the purpose of having the player tested, interviewed or otherwise evaluated by a team representative.”

    Walsh said he’s never sanctioned a formal workout with a player outside of the Knicks practice facility, and if he did, the workout would’ve included several members of the organization.

    Rival team officials said such workouts could give a team a competitive advantage.

    Past penalties

    The NBA has publicly fined teams and suspended team officials a handful of times for violating the league’s draft rules over the past decade.

    July 7, 2000: The NBA fined the Milwaukee Bucks and Dallas Mavericks $ 50,000 each for violating league rules concerning players entering the NBA draft. The rules prohibit teams from having more than four draft- eligible players competing on the court at the same time during workouts and from having those players compete against veteran NBA players.

    May 28, 2002: The NBA fined the Cleveland Cavaliers $150,000 and suspended coach John Lucas(notes) for the first two games of the 2003-04 season for including high school junior LeBron James(notes) and other draft-ineligible players in a Cavaliers team workout.

    Oct. 18, 2002: The NBA fined Dallas $150,000 and suspended Don Nelson and Donnie Nelson for the first two games of the 2002-03 season for contact with players who were ineligible for the NBA Draft. The Nelsons had attended private workouts in Yugoslavia in June of 2002.

    June 3, 2005: The NBA fined the Denver Nuggets $200,000 and suspended George Karl for three games for attending workouts at Marquette University in May 2005 that included his son Coby. The league has rules against contact between NBA teams and players not yet eligible for the NBA draft.

    “The more information that you can get on a player, the better off you are in this business,” one Western Conference executive said. “If we could bring in underclassmen for two weeks and get to know them even better, we would all do it.

    “Say we played Player ‘X’ from watching him play in college for a year. And then, we bring him in for a couple of weeks and he acts like a complete whack job – or he can’t do what we thought on the floor, or he’s late every day.

    “That tells you a lot.”

    When it comes to underclassmen who have a decision to make about staying in the draft or returning to school, one Eastern Conference executive said: “That kind of access can really influence a kid to stay in the draft, and it also gives the team an ability to hide him from the rest of us before the draft.”

    Prior to Rush’s injury in late May 2007, league executives, coaches, players and trainers with knowledge of the workouts said Heard used his relationship with Luchey to gain access to Chandler, a DePaul sophomore, who had been considered a likely second-round draft pick based on his inconsistency in college. The sources spoke anonymously because they were not authorized by their respective teams to comment publicly. When Chandler left DePaul to enter the ’07 daft, he signed with Luchey, his childhood AAU coach from Michigan, who had become an agent.

    Chandler trained for several weeks in May and June 2007 in suburban Atlanta with Heard, sources with direct knowledge of the workouts told Yahoo! Sports. They mostly used the gymnasium at the one-time home of Abdur-Rahim because of Heard’s close relationship with Abdur-Rahim and the privacy provided by the location. Luchey later canceled planned trips to several teams – including Chicago, Portland and San Antonio – who wanted to conduct permissible workouts in those cities.

    Luchey told the teams that Chandler had an ankle injury.

    “I’ve heard these accusations before,” Luchey told Yahoo! Sports. “It was a big deal when Wilson canceled all the workouts and people were asking, ‘Why would the Knicks take him?’ The truth is that me and Isiah [Thomas] sat down, talked about [Chandler], and he told me to sell him on Wilson. Two hours later, he said, ‘I think I’ll take him, but I’ll get back to you.’

    “When he was drafted, I heard this story 100 times. I’m surprised to hear this again now. Listen, Rodney and me are cool. We’re homeboys. I don’t actively hire Rodney to work out my guys, but I don’t step between his relationship with them. They’re all Michigan guys.

    “It’s probably a positive for me that we have a decent relationship,” Luchey said. “It doesn’t hurt me.”

    Chandler turned into one of the finds of the draft for the Knicks, and became a productive starter for them. He previously denied to Yahoo! Sports that the Knicks ran illegal workouts for him prior to the ’07 draft.

    DePaul’s Dar Tucker and Syracuse’s Eric Devendorf were two Luchey clients eligible for the ’09 draft, and Tucker told Yahoo! Sports that both worked extensively with Heard in suburban Atlanta during parts of May and June 2009. Teams aren’t allowed to have more than two such encounters with a player – with a gap of three days between them. Heard conducted the workouts on an almost daily basis, Tucker told Yahoo! Sports.

    “Twice a day,” Tucker said. “Once in the morning and once in the afternoon. … [Heard’s] tough when you work out with him. It’s kind of like the army. It helps you because he’s there already. It gives you the upper hand. He’s the one that [the Knicks] send looking at guys. To have him give you pointers on what you need to do was real helpful for me and the other guys.”

    Besides Devendorf and another Luchey client, Anthony Roberson(notes), who played with the Knicks in 2008, Tucker said there were some “small college players” in the workouts that “I didn’t know.” NBA bylaws would have prohibited Roberson, as a current pro player, from joining draft-eligible players in such workout sessions. Walsh signed Roberson to a two-year free-agent contract in the summer of 2008, and he played 23 games with New York before the team traded him to Chicago in February of ’09.

    Tucker worked out for several NBA teams, including Milwaukee and Golden State, but went undrafted in 2009. He played the 2009-10 season for the Los Angeles Defenders of the NBA Developmental League.

    In the spring of 2010, Bill Firnbach, assistant basketball coach and associate athletics director at Life University in Marietta, Ga., received a phone call from CGL Sports, the Atlanta-based agency owned and operated by Luchey. Luchey wanted to use the gym to work out several draft prospects, including Udoh, a Baylor University standout who would be picked sixth overall by the Golden State Warriors.

    “They came to us and said, ‘Well, we’re going to have someone with the Knicks training some of our players,’ ” Firnbach told Yahoo! Sports in his campus office recently. “And [I thought], ‘Well, that’s always good to have exposure when NBA teams are involved in your school.’ ”

    The promise of a Knicks official running the workouts became the primary reason that Firnbach suggested to Luchey that the agent allow several of Life University’s graduating senior players to participate in the workouts.

    Firnbach said he first met Heard and Luchey when they arrived on his campus in mid-May to begin workouts. Firnbach said he typically opened the gymnasium for the workouts in the morning, and occasionally checked on how his Life University players were conducting themselves in the sessions. The workouts stretched, he said, “from mid-May to mid-June.”

    Tory Jackson, a three-year starter for Notre Dame, signed Luchey as his agent and took part in the workouts in Marietta this past spring. He knew Heard from the Detroit AAU scene and had a long-standing relationship with Udoh. Jackson told Yahoo! Sports that Heard spent several weeks running the workouts with the players, another apparent violation of NBA rules which limit the number of workouts conducted by teams to two.
    The Knicks took forward Wilson Chandler with the No. 23 pick in the 2007 draft.
    (NBAE/Getty Images)

    “He did everything himself,” Jackson said of Heard. “He knew it was his line of work. Everything was run his way. He never really put anybody [else] there. I think that really helped Ekpe and myself … it showed at the next level what they expect, what they want, the little things that matter the most.

    “We did a two-a-days most of the time. We’d do conditioning in the morning, and we’d come back and play in the afternoon, do individual stuff. We’d mix it up sometimes. We’d work out hard in the morning and then shoot in the afternoon. It worked out well for us.”

    Jackson wasn’t selected in the June draft but did earn an invite to the Milwaukee Bucks training camp. Jackson didn’t make the team but expects to play in the NBA Developmental League this season. He credits the work that Heard did with him at Life University as instrumental in his pro development.

    “He taught me a lot,” Jackson said. “I think the things that he taught me were the things that helped me get through tough times. He taught me a lot of ways to score and get easy baskets at my size. Knocking down a jump shot is very important; he preaches that as a guard.

    “He was hands-on to teach us everything to help us get through it. He knew what we had to do. Like him with any other trainer out there, he’s not going to half-step anything. He’s going to do it hard.”

    Asked if Heard had been in the gym to work out or evaluate Udoh and the rest of the players more than twice, Firnbach said: “That would be accurate. More than twice, but I don’t think I saw him more than five times during the month.”

    Heard and Luchey maintain that the Knicks executive was never in the gymnasium.

    The Knicks had already traded their 2010 first-round pick, and the top prospect in the workouts, Udoh, was considered certain to be among the first players drafted. As one Atlanta-based source who has witnessed Heard’s workouts of college underclassmen at Abdur-Rahim’s house said: “Rodney’s a gym rat. He works out a lot of guys with no shot at the league. I don’t think there’s always intent when he does it.”

    It would be unusual for NBA organizations to do formal workouts and evaluations in the predraft process without their ultimate decision-makers present. And in almost all cases, teams will fly the draft prospects into their practice facility. As an exception, the Portland Trail Blazers held a legal workout in the Los Angeles area for 2010 prospect Eliot Williams of Memphis. The Blazers sent a general manager, assistant GMs, coaches, trainers and a video crew to beam the session back to owner Paul Allen on his private yacht.

    For more than two years, the story of Rush’s workout injury percolated within league front offices. After Rush helped Kansas win an NCAA title in his junior year, he re-entered the draft in ’08 and told at least two teams a different version of his public stance that the injury occurred in a pickup game in Kansas City. Rush says no one with the Knicks, including Heard, encouraged him to cover up the story.

    “He told us Atlanta,” one front-office executive said. “We knew it was with the Knicks and Heard, but we didn’t push the issue with him. We were just more concerned with how the knee was.”

    Rush was vague when asked about why he originally said the injury had happened in Kansas City, as well as the circumstances around his traveling to Atlanta to work out for Heard at Abdur-Rahim’s house. Before the trip to Atlanta, Rush said he had been in North Carolina to play at his old prep school, Mount Zion Academy.

    “I heard some guys were down there [in Atlanta] working out, and I thought it would be best for me to go down and try some stuff out,” Rush said.

    “I went down to Atlanta and I was supposed to be there for a week,” he added. “It happened the first day … in the first 15 minutes.”

    Heard had the players start the workout with a traditional three-man weave drill, Rush said before describing himself going up for a dunk and feeling the pop in his right knee.

    “I went down, but then I got back up and was running down the court,” he told Yahoo! Sports. “And I couldn’t get stable on it. It was really wobbly. I went to the hospital and they said they didn’t know what to do. They couldn’t run an MRI on me. Then I had to fly back to Kansas City the next day.

    “The seat they had [on the plane] was too small, so [the knee] was getting real cramped and it started blowing up real fat,” he said.

    Rush flew home to Kansas City, he said, informed Kansas coach Bill Self of the injury and underwent surgery on June 5, 2007.

    When reached on Monday night, Self told Yahoo! Sports: “Brandon initially told us he hurt his knee in Kansas City,” Self said. “And later, he told us that was inaccurate and that it happened the day prior, while he was in North Carolina. We heard about the workouts in Atlanta, and we asked Brandon if he had worked out there and he said, ‘No,’ that he was injured when he got there.”

    Rush told Yahoo! Sports that the Knicks never asked him to change his story about the injury happening in Atlanta with Heard, but multiple sources said his family and advisers worried about his college eligibility and believed he needed to keep the story quiet until he left Kansas for the NBA.

    The NCAA’s rules extend to a player’s predraft workouts, but sources said any issue with Rush’s eligibility upon his return to Kansas would likely center around whether an agent paid for his travel to Atlanta. The NCAA declined comment on Monday.

    Rush withdrew his name from the 2007 draft and started an arduous six-month rehabilitation process. After Kansas won the national title, Rush was chosen with the 13th pick in the 2008 draft by the Portland Trail Blazers. The Blazers then traded his rights on draft night to the Pacers. Rush has been inconsistent in his first two seasons with Indiana, averaging 8.8 points. He is suspended for the first five games of the 2010-11 season for violating the league’s substance-abuse policy.

    “After that injury, he was never the same player,” said one Western Conference executive.
    You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

  • #2
    Re: Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers

    The thing that interests me the most is why Rush changed his story and said he injured it during a pick up game. He had no reason to protect the Knicks Trainer. Most likely he didn't want to look like damage goods who couldn't survive 15 minutes of an NBA workout. Sounds worse than I injured it playing a pick up game at my local gym.
    You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers

      Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
      The thing that interests me the most is why Rush changed his story and said he injured it during a pick up game. He had no reason to protect the Knicks Trainer. Most likely he didn't want to look like damage goods who couldn't survive 15 minutes of an NBA workout. Sounds worse than I injured it playing a pick up game at my local gym.
      I imagine he was worried about losing eligibility.
      Passion. Pride. Patience. Pacers

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers

        You may want to change the title of the thread to have (2007) somewhere so that no one panics by reading the title.

        Otherwise yeah this is an unusual story.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers

          Originally posted by USF View Post
          I imagine he was worried about losing eligibility.
          Good point. It was before the draft decision deadline.
          You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers

            Originally posted by duke dynamite View Post
            You may want to change the title of the thread to have (2007) somewhere so that no one panics by reading the title.

            Otherwise yeah this is an unusual story.
            i will do no such thing, because i'm unable to. It won't let me change the title.
            You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers

              Maybe Brandon fears tearing his ACL again and so it has messed with his head and prevented him from showing his full potential? I know some people who suffer devastating injuries are afraid to play as aggressive as they used to.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers

                Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
                i will do no such thing, because i'm unable to. It won't let me change the title.
                Really? That's odd. I just double-click the empty space next to the title on the thread view screen.

                Oh well...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers (in 2007)

                  Well, this shows that Rush is willing and able to try to circumvent rules.

                  And smokes pot.

                  Wth has happened to this guy?
                  There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers (in 2007)

                    Originally posted by Kid Minneapolis View Post
                    Well, this shows that Rush is willing and able to try to circumvent rules.

                    And smokes pot.

                    Wth has happened to this guy?
                    Not sure it was Brandon Rush who circumvented the work out rules. He's just trying to increase his chances at getting drafted. The blame on that lies with the Knicks. If a pro team calls you up for a work out, you probably aren't going to say no.
                    You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers (in 2007)

                      Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
                      Not sure it was Brandon Rush who circumvented the work out rules. He's just trying to increase his chances at getting drafted. The blame on that lies with the Knicks. If a pro team calls you up for a work out, you probably aren't going to say no.
                      I agree, I have a hard time putting any blame on Rush for this. Chances are he, and most of the players who took part didn't even know it was against he rules to do so.

                      Personally I think something like this should be enough to take away a future 1st round pick from the Knicks.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers (in 2007)

                        Awesome article. Yahoo sports is really getting the scoop on ESPN these days.

                        While yes, this probably will fall under the umbrella of the New York Knicks, one doesn't know how much this scout was operating within the framework of the Knicks vs. he himself trying to get a better analysis on the players to report back to his bosses. Scouts seem like pretty independent entities outside of the fact that they enjoy paychecks from these NBA teams.

                        I cannot see management of an NBA team taking such a foolish risk as this.
                        "Sometimes, when you look Andy in the eyes, you get a feeling somebody else is driving." -- David Letterman

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers (in 2007)

                          I remember that despite his general incompetence, Isiah usually seemed to draft surprisingly well. Was this during the Isiah period, and could illegal workouts explain why the Knicks seemed to have above average drafts despite being so below average at everything else?
                          2010 IKL Fantasy Basketball Champion Baltimore Bulldogs

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers (in 2007)

                            Why is it that everything bad that is associated with the Knicks in recent years starts and ends with Zeke?
                            Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Brandon Rush injury conspiracy with New York Knicks trainers (in 2007)

                              Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
                              Not sure it was Brandon Rush who circumvented the work out rules. He's just trying to increase his chances at getting drafted. The blame on that lies with the Knicks. If a pro team calls you up for a work out, you probably aren't going to say no.
                              Dude, think about it. It's already been pointed out in this thread --- He lied about the event to protect his draft status. All NBA hopefuls know about the draft rules. Especially a guy who has a brother who has *gone* through the draft process. He knew what he was doing.
                              Last edited by Kid Minneapolis; 10-26-2010, 04:30 PM.
                              There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X