Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Pacer fans are spoiled

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

    Originally posted by indianapolismarkus View Post
    Ron does what us Pacer fans would have done if we were there. Find that guy and kick his tail.
    Nope. Never in a million years.

    Originally posted by indianapolismarkus
    What do Pacer fans think of my cheap, theatrical, self-serving, revision of history?
    I think you are wrong about it. (And there's nothing to be gained by taunting KStat.)


    Originally posted by KStat
    has any player ever done more damage to his own team than Ron Artest?
    Shoeless Joe Jackson, maybe? Or Gil Gamesh.
    Last edited by Putnam; 10-16-2010, 08:07 AM.
    And I won't be here to see the day
    It all dries up and blows away
    I'd hang around just to see
    But they never had much use for me
    In Levelland. (James McMurtry)

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

      Originally posted by indianapolismarkus
      Hey Kstat is Dave Bing your dad?
      You know, grow up. You just started posting here. Nothing wrong with healthy debate but there is no need to talk about who people's parents are.
      "Sometimes, when you look Andy in the eyes, you get a feeling somebody else is driving." -- David Letterman

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

        Overall nice article. I don't agree with the basic premise though. I don't think most Pacer fans at this stage are spoiled.

        I do agree that those who lived through the Reggie years were spoiled by the team. However, I think that has worn off for the most part. IMO, most people have adjusted their expectations. I know I would just like to see the team improve even if they don't make the playoffs and stop doing silly off court stuff. Is that asking too much?

        Anyway, the Pacers have lost a lot of fans over the last decade. The people who have stuck with this team through the trials deserve more credit than being called spoiled.

        By the way, I don't hear that much criticism of Bird. I think he's done a good job with some exceptions.

        As for JOb, I think people have a legitimate argument for criticizing some of things he's said and done especially last year. Yes, the criticism has been way over the top. But some of his decisions have been very questionable, starting with Dahntay Jones playing PF over the irrelevant Josh McRoberts. If the team is attempting to rebuild, tell me why a) that happened and b) he is now all of the sudden so awesome?

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

          Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
          Overall nice article. I don't agree with the basic premise though. I don't think most Pacer fans at this stage are spoiled.

          I do agree that those who lived through the Reggie years were spoiled by the team. However, I think that has worn off for the most part. IMO, most people have adjusted their expectations. I know I would just like to see the team improve even if they don't make the playoffs and stop doing silly off court stuff. Is that asking too much?

          Anyway, the Pacers have lost a lot of fans over the last decade. The people who have stuck with this team through the trials deserve more credit than being called spoiled.

          By the way, I don't hear that much criticism of Bird. I think he's done a good job with some exceptions.

          As for JOb, I think people have a legitimate argument for criticizing some of things he's said and done especially last year. Yes, the criticism has been way over the top. But some of his decisions have been very questionable, starting with Dahntay Jones playing PF over the irrelevant Josh McRoberts. If the team is attempting to rebuild, tell me why a) that happened and b) he is now all of the sudden so awesome?
          Great job Blue and Gold!

          Finally someone has called me out on such an inflamatory name of an article. Sadly, people are more likely to read something negative than positive. It's much easier to talk trash than to talk rationally.

          You're right on so many points: Pacer fans are not spoiled at this stage. Most people have adjusted their expectations. Pacers need to stop doing silly off court stuff. The people that have stuck with this team deserve credit. Bird has done a good job. People have a legitimate argument for criticizing O'Brien for things he had said and done.

          I enjoy talking to other like minded individuals that love and know the Pacers. I'm sure most of you do also. Pacer Digest is the best place ever invented to talk Indiana professional basketball and has the best Pacer fans. I really look forward to this season and discussing with my peers the in's and out's of Pacer basketball.

          Area 55 is ready for the home opener. Go Pacers!

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

            The pacers haven't done anything since reaching the ECF in 2004. Don't understand how pacer fans are spoiled. I like how the pacers are turning the corner though. Otherwise, I love the article!
            Larry Bird and Ryan Grigson- wasting the talents of Paul George and Andrew Luck

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

              Originally posted by duke dynamite View Post
              Don't make me make you sit next to me again.
              This came across .... slightly creepy.

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

                Originally posted by Mr_Smith View Post
                The pacers haven't done anything since reaching the ECF in 2004. Don't understand how pacer fans are spoiled. I like how the pacers are turning the corner though. Otherwise, I love the article!
                The Pacers have done a lot since reaching the 2004 ECF. They have changed the culture of the team. Indiana will not tolarate knuckle heads. The fans showed their displeasure and the francise responded. No other team have been through what we've been through. No other team could have handled it better than we've handled it.

                If I could edit the title I would put "Pacer fans were spoiled". Making the playoffs 16 out of 17 years was nice. That streak would have been bigger if it wasn't for unforseen circumstances. Contrast that with our early NBA days when we didn't make the playoffs 11 out of 13 years.

                You're right the Pacers are turning the corner. Go Pacers!

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

                  1. You can edit the title.

                  2. Not many people care a whole lot about making the playoffs a lot when there's no championship at the end of the rainbow. When there are more years since your last championship than there are teams in the NBA, you're not spoiled. The Pacers had a very long run of success, but they never reached their goal. There's nothing about that era that bought the Pacers a free pass for what's gone on since 2005.

                  3. All that's changed in the last 5 years is that management has crapped all over the franchise and the fanbase. They've changed the culture of the team from a winning one to a losing one. They're just now realizing how hard it is to stop the chain of misfortune they themselves set in motion. Stop trying to paint this as rosy when it isn't.

                  I give people a lot of credit for sticking it out through this, but I don't blame anybody that's been jaded by recent events. I also find it condescending to tell fans that have been out of the first round exactly twice in the last decade that they've had too much success.
                  Last edited by Kstat; 10-16-2010, 07:09 PM.

                  It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                  Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                  Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                  NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

                    Originally posted by Kstat View Post
                    1. You can edit the title.

                    2. Not many people care a whole lot about making the playoffs a lot when there's no championship at the end of the rainbow. When there are more years since your last championship than there are teams in the NBA, you're not spoiled. The Pacers had a very long run of success, but they never reached their goal. There's nothing about that era that bought the Pacers a free pass for what's gone on since 2005.

                    3. All that's changed in the last 5 years is that management has crapped all over the franchise and the fanbase. They've changed the culture of the team from a winning one to a losing one. They're just now realizing how hard it is to stop the chain of misfortune they themselves set in motion. Stop trying to paint this as rosy when it isn't.

                    I give people a lot of credit for sticking it out through this, but I don't blame anybody that's been jaded by recent events.
                    Lol. Resident Pistons fan is a little jealous that we have a decent future.

                    And for the record, DW crapped all over the franchise, not Bird, not Morway.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

                      Bird and Donnie both played parts. I realize that people will gravitate towards defending Bird's involvement because he's still here and Donnie isn't, but the truth is Bird has been here a while and we don't know how much involvement he had in the deals that were made when Donnie was still here.

                      Bird isn't exactly Matt Millen, though. He's made some quality moves, but he's also made some poor decisions. Hibbert was a great pick, and Collison was a great trade.

                      As for jealously, I'm not and won't be jealous. I wouldn't be here for this long if I were. It is what it is. The Pacers and Pistons are both cellar teams, albeit the Pacers are a slight favorite to finish 4th with a more well-balanced roster.
                      Last edited by Kstat; 10-16-2010, 07:16 PM.

                      It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                      Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                      Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                      NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

                        Originally posted by Kstat View Post
                        1. You can edit the title.

                        2. Not many people care a whole lot about making the playoffs a lot when there's no championship at the end of the rainbow. When there are more years since your last championship than there are teams in the NBA, you're not spoiled. The Pacers had a very long run of success, but they never reached their goal. There's nothing about that era that bought the Pacers a free pass for what's gone on since 2005.

                        3. All that's changed in the last 5 years is that management has crapped all over the franchise and the fanbase. They've changed the culture of the team from a winning one to a losing one. They're just now realizing how hard it is to stop the chain of misfortune they themselves set in motion. Stop trying to paint this as rosy when it isn't.

                        I give people a lot of credit for sticking it out through this, but I don't blame anybody that's been jaded by recent events. I also find it condescending to tell fans that have been out of the first round exactly twice in the last decade that they've had too much success.
                        (If someone could school me on how to change the thread title I'd appreciate it. Maybe a seven year PD vet can help a brother out.)

                        Many fans do care a whole lot about making the playoffs but you also need momentum so when you get there you can have hope of going farther. If you're only chasing championships at the end of the rainbow then you should take your talents to south beach.

                        In the last 30 years their have been only eight different champs. In the decade previous their were also eight different champs. The 70's saw the NBA almost fold. The Bird and Magic rivalry saved the league. MJ then took it to another level.

                        The NBA loves super teams. They make more money and draw more interest. Greed has hurt the league and will hopfully be set right in the next CBA.

                        The NBA is not a equal opportunity league. The Clippers should change their name and move to Seatle. If you measure spoiledness by championships won over a 30 year period then more than two thirds of the league have not tasted it. If you measure by how a team is run then one third.

                        Look at Utah they have been a relatively well run franchise. They got lucky and drafted two HOFers that played there a long time and never won it all. They bottomed out, got D.Will and are now making another playoff run. If your a Jazz fan then you can be proud of your team.

                        Whats gone on since 2005 have been a complete rebuild for the Pacers. What's going on in Cleveland since James left? A rebuild. Those fans may never see a championship. They finally lead the league in wins, get upset in the playoffs and that's it. Their native son leaves, total heartbreak!

                        Cav fans must be fealing similar to how we felt when one man's decision cost us our hoop dream.

                        Whats gone on in Chicago since 1998? A couple rebuilds. Jordan retires, the Bulls bottom out and they get the first pick in the draft to start building. They've had six years out, three years in, a bad year and then the number one overall pick AGAIN with a 33 win team.

                        Whats gone on in Milwaukee since Mr. Sky Hook told the city that they didn't have enough culture.

                        Whats gone on in Detroit since 2004? Sad leadership from all three major sports. Pistons, Tigers and Lions. Detroit is where a HOF running back in his prime retires to get away from that city. Detroit is where you draft Darko and trade Billups for AI.

                        All that changed in the last five years is that we have got out of our crap but you'll be in yours for awhile. We have changed our culture from ghetto to fine and upstanding. The Bad Boys like being ghetto and because the Lion & Tigers carry such a huge chain of misfortune they don't feel so bad.

                        You don't like when things are painted rosey? Sometimes condescention is hard to decipher.

                        Go Pacers!
                        Last edited by indianapolismarkus; 10-17-2010, 04:10 AM.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

                          Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
                          they will come back just wait till we start winning this city is a band wagon city.
                          Indiana fans will be back. They left because they are showing their displeasure over "the incident". They have a legitimate gripe of how the Pacers embarrassed the whole state of Indiana. In the distant past our fans showed displeasure because we were poorly run.

                          The band wagon city right now is Miami. You'll see by how many Heat fans show up at the Fieldhouse.

                          Me and my fellow Area 55ers are going to pump you up. Go Pacers!

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

                            Originally posted by indianapolismarkus View Post
                            Indiana fans will be back. They left because they are showing their displeasure over "the incident". They have a legitimate gripe of how the Pacers embarrassed the whole state of Indiana. In the distant past our fans showed displeasure because we were poorly run.

                            The band wagon city right now is Miami. You'll see by how many Heat fans show up at the Fieldhouse.

                            Me and my fellow Area 55ers are going to pump you up. Go Pacers!
                            ya i ll be right there with you cheerin on te pacers . But idk if they will be liked or hated. Lots of my friends who lied LeBron and Wade dont likem anymore.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

                              Originally posted by indianapolismarkus View Post

                              Whats gone on in Detroit since 2004? Sad leadership from all three major sports. Pistons, Tigers and Lions. Detroit is where a HOF running back in his prime retires to get away from that awful city. Detroit is where you draft Darko and trade Billups for AI. That's why some people move to NC.
                              Yeah, that's why I left Detroit, because we drafted Darko and it's an awful place. You are ridiculous.

                              Go sing some Ron Artest folk songs.

                              It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                              Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                              Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                              NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: Pacer fans are spoiled

                                Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
                                ya i ll be right there with you cheerin on te pacers . But idk if they will be liked or hated. Lots of my friends who lied LeBron and Wade dont likem anymore.
                                You go boy! You and your friends sound like true Indiana fans it makes me feel all good inside. You are a good example of the next generation of Pacer fan. Keep it up. It sounds like you already have made a commitment to the Pacers with your name and all. You're a gem, you remind me of myself when I was your age.

                                I love your story about Lance. See you at the game.

                                Area 55 where Pacer fans for life happens. Go Pacers!
                                Last edited by indianapolismarkus; 10-17-2010, 07:19 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X