Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

    http://sports.espn.go.com/rpm/racing...ory?id=5509590

    Originally posted by A.P.
    INDIANAPOLIS -- The death of a 13-year-old motorcycle rider at Indianapolis Motor Speedway cast a shadow over Sunday's races at the historic track and prompted mourning competitors to defend the development system for the dangerous circuit.

    Peter Lenz of Vancouver, Wash., fell off his bike during the warmup lap for the day's first race at Indianapolis and was run over by another motorcycle, driven by a 12-year-old. Medical workers immediately placed Lenz in a neck brace, put him on a stretcher and began chest compressions while taking him to a hospital.

    Several hours later, he was pronounced dead.

    The Marion County coroner's office said Lenz died from blunt force trauma. More details could be released Monday following an autopsy on the youngest driver or rider ever killed at the 101-year-old speedway.

    "Peter passed away early this morning when he was apparently struck by another rider," read a posting on Lenz's Facebook page, which was signed "Dad."

    "He passed doing what he loved and had his go fast face on as he pulled onto the track," the posting said. "The world lost one of its brightest lights today. God Bless Peter and the other rider involved. 45 is on another road we can only hope to reach. Miss you kiddo."

    Lenz rode the No. 45 bike, and his father was at the track Sunday.

    It was the first death at the track since IndyCar driver Tony Renna was killed in testing in October 2003.

    Lenz had emerged as one of America's youngest rising stars.

    At age 11, he earned the "expert" license from the American Federation of Motorcyclists, and in March 2009, Lenz became the youngest rider ever to win an AFM race. This year, competing in the U.S. Grand Prix Racers Union series, Lenz had four wins, five podium finishes and was leading the MD250H classification in points.

    The grown-up resume just didn't match his appearance. Listed at 4-foot-11 and 81 pounds, the baby-faced Lenz described his profession as "kid."

    "Our hearts go out to the parents, family and friends of Peter Lenz," speedway CEO Jeff Belskus said in a statement. "Words cannot adequately express the sadness of our company and our employees about this tragic incident, and Peter is in our thoughts and prayers."

    It wasn't the first time Lenz was involved in a serious crash.

    A mechanical failure last season left Lenz with four broken bones and a severed radial nerve -- all of which required surgery. By November, Lenz was healthy again and by spring, he was back in Victory Lane.

    The fatal accident almost certainly will spark a debate about how young is too young for racers to be competing on one of the world's best-known tracks, whether it's inside a car or riding a motorcycle capable of exceeding 120 mph in a straightaway.

    The USGPRU sanctions races across the nation, billing itself as a development circuit for motorcycle racers from ages 12 to 18. The hope is these riders eventually will compete in a world-class series.

    Lenz seemed to be on his way to the top before the accident. He was struck by 12-year-old Xavier Zayat, of Flushing, N.Y., who escaped injury and did not race after the crash.

    "We are deeply saddened by this tragic loss, but know that Peter is racing even faster in the sky," the Lenz family said in a statement. "Our thoughts and prayers are now with the other racer and his family, who were also involved in this tragedy."

    Racers insist age has never been the issue.

    American Colin Edwards was running 250cc bikes at age 17, and Indy MotoGP runner-up Ben Spies was competing on the 125cc circuit at age 12.

    "That's not like a bike too big for him, you know, I mean this is our sport, we chose to do it," said American Nicky Hayden, the 2006 world champ who called the death "terrible."

    "I mean, sure, we know going in the consequences."

    But are new rules needed?

    Those in racing circles say no, comparing the sport to other potentially dangerous sports such as football and gymnastics. When asked about running at Indy, speedway officials pointed out that the series has stops at potentially more dangerous tracks.

    USGPRU officials said this was the first fatality in the series in nine years.

    Still, racing conditions were not ideal this weekend at Indy.

    Hot, dry weather turned the bumpy, 2.621-mile course into a slick track that tested the world's best riders.

    Reigning world champ Valentino Rossi fell four times, including a spill Sunday morning during a 20-minute warmup session. Sunday's Moto2 race was shortened after a big wreck on the first lap took out four drivers.

    "This was the most difficult race for everyone," MotoGP winner Dani Pedrosa said. "The conditions were very hard because of the heat and the asphalt was very greasy."

    After a brief delay to clear the track, the USGPRU race was restarted. Had they known the severity of the injuries, one official said they would have considered canceling the race. The three other races all started on time, though Lenz was never far from the racers' thoughts.

    "This is an ugly, terrible part of this sport," USGPRU chief steward Stewart Aitken-Cade said. "You do what you can to stop it from happening as best you can. That's really all that you can do."

    "Any time a racer is injured in this way and loses his life, it's tough, adult or child," Aitken-Cade added. "It just makes it especially difficult when it's a young guy like Peter."
    How young is too young?
    "I had to take her down like Chris Brown."

    -Lance Stephenson

  • #2
    Re: 13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

    He died chasing his dream.

    "Make no small plans for they have no power to stir the soul."-Machiavelli

    RIP Peter.


    Comment


    • #3
      Re: 13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

      As said above, he died doing what he loved to do.

      In my opinion, any age is too young for death. I can only imagine the heartbreak of his family, and certainly the family of the young man who collided with him as well.

      What a sad and unfortunate event. My heart goes out to all those involved.

      “Behind every exquisite thing that existed, there was something tragic.” - Oscar Wilde

      R.I.P Peter.
      Stop quoting people I have on ignore!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: 13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

        13 year olds should not be racing motor cycles.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: 13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

          Originally posted by Foul on Smits View Post
          13 year olds should not be racing motor cycles.
          Why not? The kid had been riding since he was 5.


          Comment


          • #6
            Re: 13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

            Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
            Why not? The kid had been riding since he was 5.
            5 year olds should not be riding motorcyles.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: 13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

              That still doesn't answer the question of why not...he's probably a more skilled rider than most of the jackasses that get on the road with them, and put themselves in just as much danger.

              It was an accident, a terrible one to be sure, and a reminder of the dangers of racing ANYTHING, AT ANY AGE, AT ANY LEVEL. He was one of the best racers in the 12-18 motorcycle racing league, in fact he was leading it in points. So if he's capable of out running 16-18 year olds, I see no reason he shouldn't be allowed to ride.

              A tragedy. Yes. An accident. Yes. But that kid probably wouldn't have wanted to do anything else that day, and for that his parents can take comfort that it was the right decision.


              Comment


              • #8
                Re: 13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

                Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                That still doesn't answer the question of why not...he's probably a more skilled rider than most of the jackasses that get on the road with them, and put themselves in just as much danger.

                It was an accident, a terrible one to be sure, and a reminder of the dangers of racing ANYTHING, AT ANY AGE, AT ANY LEVEL. He was one of the best racers in the 12-18 motorcycle racing league, in fact he was leading it in points. So if he's capable of out running 16-18 year olds, I see no reason he shouldn't be allowed to ride.

                A tragedy. Yes. An accident. Yes. But that kid probably wouldn't have wanted to do anything else that day, and for that his parents can take comfort that it was the right decision.
                Why not give a 13 year old a gun then. Heck, if he's a skilled shooter. Why not. Lets give them licenses.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: 13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

                  How do you think the drivers in NASCAR, Indy, and F1 become the best? It's because they've been racing since they were old enough to reach the go kart pedals. It's in their blood. Motorcycle racing is no different, and in fact, statistically at least, is quite a bit safer than racing the four wheelers. In fact, just for you, I looked up youth deaths in ALL sports. The most recent data I could find covered 1982-2002. Want to take a guess how many motorcycle racing deaths there were? Want to compare how many deaths there were in the other "safe" sports like basketball, baseball, cheerleading? Yes cheerleading. In fact, according to this data, a rider could die ever month for two years and not catch cheerleading. Boy, we should put a stop to that awful cheeleading we are letting our 13 year olds do.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: 13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

                    I think the question to be asked is not whether 13 year olds should be racing motorcycles but should they be doing it on tracks like Indy...

                    I don't have the answer to that question because I don't know what the bikes these kids are riding are capable of. I don't know the data involved or anything about the sanctioning organization. The only thing I know is I was absolutely STUNNED to know a 13 year old was killed on the IMS track because I had no idea a 13 year old would be allowed on the track by any series that would be racing there.
                    Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                    ------

                    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                    -John Wooden

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: 13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

                      BBall,

                      I guess that would be a legitimate question, but the fact is, this was a freak accident occurring before they were even up to speed on a warm up lap.

                      Racing is inherently dangerous. If you're going to ban it from 13 year olds you might as well just ban it altogether. If kids weren't allowed to train from such a young age, then once you stick them in something really dangerous (F1, Moto GP, etc.) I think you would see deaths sky rocket in those series. They need the training at these young ages to make those series safer IMO.


                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: 13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

                        Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                        BBall,

                        I guess that would be a legitimate question, but the fact is, this was a freak accident occurring before they were even up to speed on a warm up lap.

                        Racing is inherently dangerous. If you're going to ban it from 13 year olds you might as well just ban it altogether. If kids weren't allowed to train from such a young age, then once you stick them in something really dangerous (F1, Moto GP, etc.) I think you would see deaths sky rocket in those series. They need the training at these young ages to make those series safer IMO.
                        I wouldn't ban it from 13 year olds but I'm certainly curious about their bikes, the tracks they race on, and a 12-18 year old age group tossed in together.

                        With this being a freak accident, and without more info, it's a little hard (for me) to take a hard line stand overall. OTOH, if I was IMS there would be no 13 year olds racing on the oval or road course. If the sanctioning body didn't want to agree with that then not having that sanctioning body and their series is a viable alternative. The PR hit over something like this isn't worth it and it's hard to justify putting 13 year olds in life threatening situations. And if nobody believed it was life threatening then they certainly have evidence to the contrary now.

                        I'm just absolutely stunned a 13 year old would be allowed on this track though. And when the argument turns to he was more than capable of running this track then I have to ask what about those around him? Of course it's also true there are only those riders who have laid their bikes down and those that are going to so it's hard to blame him too much for losing control on a slick track but I do have to wonder how much experience (and inexperience) played a factor here in the entirety of the accident and especially the way other riders reacted initially leading up to him being hit.
                        Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                        ------

                        "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                        -John Wooden

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: 13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

                          Originally posted by Foul on Smits View Post
                          Why not give a 13 year old a gun then. Heck, if he's a skilled shooter. Why not. Lets give them licenses.
                          Flawed logic, my friend. The discussion is about motorcycles, not guns.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: 13 Year Old Dies in Motorcycle Race Crash at IMS

                            13Y is too young age to ride a bike parents are responsible for this type of incidents
                            “Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today.” James Dean quotes

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X