Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Understanding Brandon Rush

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Understanding Brandon Rush

    Let me get started with saying that Brandon is not a star player. He will not bust out for 30 points on any given night. But in this league you have players that are winners and you have players that are not winners. Players such as Monta Ellis, Gilbert Arenas, Jermaine O'Neal, Antoine Walker, or even Allen Iverson are not going to accept shots being taken away for the good of the team. That was the reason that the Karl Malone, Gary Payton, Shaq, and Kobe Lakers ultimately couldn't win it all. However there are other players that are huge in sacrificing stats for their team and being unselfish to help their team win. Players such as Derek Fisher, Scottie Pippen, Tayshaun Prince, Bruce Bowen, and so on and so forth win alot of games and championships for a reason. Each championship team needs a guy or two like this to spread the "love" to their teammates and lead them in the right direction.

    You saw Ray Allen scold Nate Robinson and Big Baby for being obnoxious and getting overhyped. You always saw Bruce leading teams to victory and giving pointers to younger players in the NBA. You guys saw it with Mark Jackson.

    My point is, alot of you guys see Brandon as a player who doesn't care and shows no emotion, and is a zombie on the court because of his personality. I have a personality alot like his, and when I used to play in High School, I used to be like that whether I made a big play or did something very unintelligent. He doesn't like showing out when he does something good because he feels like he should be doing it all the time. He also doesn't think that showing out is smart. If a team like San Antonio or Boston picked him up, he'd be one of their most valuable pieces right away because while good shooting guards are a dime a dozen, winning players are not easy to come by. When he tweeted "Yeah someones getting shipped" what else is he lead to believe? Some people responded that he is an arrogant tool and thinks that he's the absolute ****, but he's not like that, if you read his tweets you'd know that he's just a man of few words, and that he gets toyed around with by his friends in Kansas. He just wants to win, and stats obviously don't matter to him.

    Now we have Paul George. If he turns out good, he'll take the starting spot over him. Brandon wouldn't be upset about that, because it is all about winning. What is wrong with having a low cost winning role player to back up your super shooting guard Paul George? He does what he does, and he just helps teams. He leads without using many words, just like Ray Allen, Michael Finley, and heck Earl Watson do.

    So, discuss. How expendable is he? How much are you open to dealing him?

    And I ask that I not be too criticized because this is my first post.

  • #2
    Re: Understanding Brandon Rush

    Actually I bet Rush would get angry over getting benched in favor of George, you just wouldn't notice it. If you are a competitor, then it eats you alive to see somebody take your spot.

    I understand not faulting the guy for his personalty, but this is a team who had one of the most loud mouthed, rudest, trash talking SGs in the league for 18 years, so we have some preconceived notion as to what a great SG is. Right or Wrong thats just the way it is in Indiana.

    Now you talk about him being the type of player who sacrifices stats for winning, that doesn't hold water when the team is asking him to shoot more and have more of an impact on the game. So if that's the case then he isn't giving the team what the team needs right now.
    You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Understanding Brandon Rush

      I'm caught with Brandon

      Either he doesn't know how to play with Ford (which stats suggest)
      Or he is simply not aggressive.

      Brandon plays great defense. And he can shoot the three.

      But offensively, he struggles to create his own shot. Perhaps, the difference in Rush was simply Jack/Watson/Price looked for him on the wing, more so than Ford did.

      I think working on a midrange game, and learning how to create his own shots (and FINISH) would do a lot in helping him.

      I don't think his personality is why "sometimes he shows up and sometimes he doesn't." He consistently plays good defense. When he gets good shots, he shoots them...when he doesn't he passes. It's not about "not being aggressive." He simply depends on other players to get him his shot. It's not a personality thing so much as a skillset thing.

      His personality is fine. God forbid a guy act classy and professional. he's just laid back and quiet. If he does his job well, that shouldn't be a problem.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Understanding Brandon Rush

        I am over Brandon. I can't for the life of me understand why someone with all the talent he has can't be more effective on a nightly basis. He just doesn't seem to have the fire inside. If he does he covers it up well. I don't think but on a hand full of times, have I seen him show any emotion at all. I like to see a little fire out of a player, show me you want it.

        All that being said, he is a good defender and can only get better there. I like his shot, I just can't figure out why he doesn't knock down more of them. I saw him put the ball on the floor and go to the rim a few more times this past season, but not enough.

        We need more scoring from him and he doesn't seem to be able to consistently do it. I know he has improved and I don't want it to sound like he sucks, but he needs to produce more offensively, period. His D has come a long way, I will give him that. But on the offensive side he needs to show a lot more.

        I think he is as good as gone, I think TPTB might have already decided it. They are just waiting for the right deal. I think he has had more than enough time to show us what he's got and for me, so far, it is not enough.
        Avatar photo credit: Bahram Mark Sobhani - AP

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Understanding Brandon Rush

          Seems a bit premature to use the argument that he's a winning player, when he's yet to play on a winning team.

          Whoever wants to cite NCAA to me now can just go ahead and recall this is the NBA, and that couldn't matter less.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Understanding Brandon Rush

            On the offensive side of the ball he is kind of the anti-Daniels. Daniels was the master of creating his own shot, but couldn't hit an outside jumper if his life depended on it. While Rush can hit three's all day, but has trouble creating an outside shot.

            As far as personality goes I don't give a **** about it, and neither should anyone else. As well I highly doubt Reggie's personality has anything to do with people's perception of Rush and his personality. Really I think people see it as the reason he is inconsistent, so they want to blame it when in reality his inconsistency has more to do with his confidence than personality. When he shows his confidence he is just as good Granger, but when he isn't confident he has trouble on the offensive end. The only reason his personality would be a problem is for leadership, he wouldn't be good as a vocal leader, but more of a lead by example kind of guy which doesn't always translate well to others.

            I do think Rush would be mad if George started over him, it would probably push him to be better, but I think Rush would eventually accept it once he either realizes that George is just better than him or it is better for the team.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Understanding Brandon Rush

              Brandon was suppose to have his break out season last year after he had a great spring last year. Then this year came and he was back to the same old Rush. He show a ton of potential on some nights and then on other nights he looks like he is afraid to shoot or even touch the ball. His nights when he doesn't show up out weigh his nights when he does show up.
              I don't see him getting much better here. If he improves and becomes a solid starter for another team I will not be mad. In fact I will be happy for him. His time is up here. We need to trade him before he has no value at all.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Understanding Brandon Rush

                I said this on another thread, but the Brandon Rush you see is the Brandon Rush you get IMO. He will be 25 before the start of next season. There are a few guys who have gone on to make drastic strides and become better after the age of 25 (David West, Manu Ginobli, Steve Nash). That said, the majority of players, whether good, average bad etc. are who they are by the age of 25.

                Brandon, as well as others, could improve on aspects such as court awareness, positioning, etc. But as with most players, at age 25 you are what you are. I highly doubt Rush will ever make big strides and become a remarkably better player. His defense will keep him in the league for some years, but his offensive ability is a liability most of the time.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Understanding Brandon Rush

                  Originally posted by joew8302 View Post
                  I said this on another thread, but the Brandon Rush you see is the Brandon Rush you get IMO. He will be 25 before the start of next season. There are a few guys who have gone on to make drastic strides and become better after the age of 25 (David West, Manu Ginobli, Steve Nash). That said, the majority of players, whether good, average bad etc. are who they are by the age of 25.

                  Brandon, as well as others, could improve on aspects such as court awareness, positioning, etc. But as with most players, at age 25 you are what you are. I highly doubt Rush will ever make big strides and become a remarkably better player. His defense will keep him in the league for some years, but his offensive ability is a liability most of the time.
                  Skill wise I agree, but that isn't Rush's biggest problem. He has the skills to be a good starter, he just doesn't have the confidence. Confidence is something that can change.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Understanding Brandon Rush

                    Originally posted by joew8302 View Post
                    I said this on another thread, but the Brandon Rush you see is the Brandon Rush you get IMO. He will be 25 before the start of next season. There are a few guys who have gone on to make drastic strides and become better after the age of 25 (David West, Manu Ginobli, Steve Nash). That said, the majority of players, whether good, average bad etc. are who they are by the age of 25.

                    Brandon, as well as others, could improve on aspects such as court awareness, positioning, etc. But as with most players, at age 25 you are what you are. I highly doubt Rush will ever make big strides and become a remarkably better player. His defense will keep him in the league for some years, but his offensive ability is a liability most of the time.
                    I don't think Brandon has to improve or make drastic strides, he just needs to fit into the system a little better. He doesn't have to become a lot better, I don't expect him to be the next jordon. Everyone wants to trade him and say he no good, we all complain about this team's poor defense and for some reason everyone wants to trade who i think is our best defense player. I just don't understand.
                    Good is the enemy of Great


                    We're changing the identity of our basketball team -- dramatically. We're a power post team -- a blood-and-guts, old-school, smash-mouth team that plays with size, strength, speed and athleticism. We attack the basket. . . . This is the new identity of our team. It was a great effort. I'm very proud of our guys."
                    -- Frank Vogel.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Understanding Brandon Rush

                      Brandon was a good starter.
                      He played good Defense (on the opposing team's best player..and on a team that lacks defense)

                      And makes his shots when he's open.

                      You going to tell me that Bruce Bowen wasn't a good starter?

                      What he hasn't been is a star. A Robin to Granger's batman. It really should say enough that Pop is interested in him. And heck, if Pop gets a hold of him, we'll all be kicking ourselves.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Understanding Brandon Rush

                        Again, for the Rush apologists he will be 25. If he isn't "confident" or hasn't "got it" by now when will he? People don't make these revelations in their careers on the down side of 25. It just doesn't ever happen.

                        And by the way, the Bowen comparison isn't good. Bowen was much smarter player and a ton better on defense than Rush is. I like Rush's defense, but he is not in Bowen's league.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Understanding Brandon Rush

                          Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
                          Actually I bet Rush would get angry over getting benched in favor of George, you just wouldn't notice it. If you are a competitor, then it eats you alive to see somebody take your spot.

                          I understand not faulting the guy for his personalty, but this is a team who had one of the most loud mouthed, rudest, trash talking SGs in the league for 18 years, so we have some preconceived notion as to what a great SG is. Right or Wrong thats just the way it is in Indiana.

                          Now you talk about him being the type of player who sacrifices stats for winning, that doesn't hold water when the team is asking him to shoot more and have more of an impact on the game. So if that's the case then he isn't giving the team what the team needs right now.
                          love the Reggie Miller reference. BOOM BABY!! I may be in ther minority, but i think trading rush will be a mistake.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Understanding Brandon Rush

                            Originally posted by joew8302 View Post
                            Again, for the Rush apologists he will be 25. If he isn't "confident" or hasn't "got it" by now when will he? People don't make these revelations in their careers on the down side of 25. It just doesn't ever happen.

                            And by the way, the Bowen comparison isn't good. Bowen was much smarter player and a ton better on defense than Rush is. I like Rush's defense, but he is not in Bowen's league.
                            Bowen also wasn't drafted and didn't crack the NBA until he was 25.

                            I think he improved drastically from that point on.

                            Bowen wasn't born good. In fact, he didn't "get it" until he was around 30.

                            /shrug

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Understanding Brandon Rush

                              Originally posted by flox View Post
                              Bowen also wasn't drafted and didn't crack the NBA until he was 25.

                              I think he improved drastically from that point on.

                              Bowen wasn't born good. In fact, he didn't "get it" until he was around 30.

                              /shrug
                              True, but for every Bruce Bowen there are probably thousands of players who had similar skill sets at around age 25 and never improved. He is definitely an unusual case.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X