var yuipath = 'clientscript/yui';
var yuicombopath = '';
var remoteyui = false;
else // Load Rest of YUI remotely (where possible)
var yuipath = 'http://yui.yahooapis.com/2.9.0/build';
var yuicombopath = 'http://yui.yahooapis.com/combo';
var remoteyui = true;
Not to burst your bubble but Dun at PG is hopefully something we'll never see, as is Granger regularly at PF where he would take a beating.
In spot duty, yeah, I'm actually fine with playing Danny some minutes at PF, and I'm sure it'll happen, but on a regular basis, no way. He'd be broken by the end of November.
And I'd ather not put the heavy weight of a starting spot on the new kid right away. Let's give him time.
yeah i know granger would get punished a bit but i believe this line up is pretty dangerous one, you have hibbert on the inside and then you have 4 players who can all hit the 3 atleast 5 times out of ten. so as long as hibbert can put that ball in the basket and if he continues to make the right decisions i don't see not having a prototypical point guard as being an issue.
Lance Stephenson is not going to be a starting point guard on an NBA team. That is just not going to happen, nor should it happen.
Indiana will need to acquire a PG. I'm personally hoping they do so using an expiring rather than with Rush, but it's obvious that many are eager to dump our best defender, highest percentage 3-pt shooter, the guy who played the most minutes for this team, and the only player we have who played all 82 games.
Ok, so hopefully you don't take what I am saying the wrong way... what I meant by my starting line up is considering the what we will lose in trades and the players that we will still have and JOB's schemes I could see this as a Roster by the end of the season... Do I think it will stick no, But I do feel that this will happen at the time the season comes to a end.
This is not taking into account us adding a PG through trade... I think we keep Rush and focus on a PG in the next draft which has potential to be loaded at the PG position.